Men
Gucci Guilty Cologne Pour Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Gucci Guilty Cologne Pour Homme by Gucci is a woody musky floral fragrance for men. Launched in 2019, the nose behind this composition is Alberto Morillas. The top notes are juniper berries, rosemary, and Calabrian bergamot; the heart notes are cypress, violet, and heliotrope; and the base notes are white musk, cedar, and patchouli leaves.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Juniper Berries
-
Corazón
Cypress
-
Base
white musk
Comunidad
909 votos
- Positivo 67%
- Negativo 24%
- Neutral 9.4%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Gucci Guilty Cologne Pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
27 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Wow, this looks like the real deal: violet, cedar, musk, rosemary, patchouli, bergamot, cypress… all cold, dark, and soapy notes.
It’s finally available. As a creative piece, it’s great; performance is regular. It’s a potent cologne at first, but I think it will appeal based on age and those seeking perfumes with character and temperature. It’s not ethereal or sensual; it feels like an old formula with new techniques. For me, Morillas shines more with the Absolute; here, he follows that citrus and wood path. It’s punchy with few poetic concessions. It could be the man who treats a woman with a velvet glove and an iron fist. Basically a classic, dry masculine cologne that didn’t particularly impress me and has discreet longevity.
I tested it a week ago and already own it: a blessed creation, I haven’t heard anything like it; it’s original. For those seeking the return of fresh, classic herbal and soapy fragrances, here they are. The scent is fantastic. Performance isn’t as bad as the rest of Gucci (Made to Measure, Pour Homme, or Guilty); it’s discreet like a cologne should be. It fulfills its purpose without being a powerhouse. Morillas’ work at Gucci is admirable.
I tried it again this week. The first time it reminded me of Kenzo Power, and the second time, it felt like the woman who wore it without enthusiasm before. For her, it was more of a feminine than a masculine fragrance. It’s floral, powdery, and woody but soft and short-lived (disappears in a couple of hours). To my taste, it’s unisex, leaning feminine, in the vein of One or Paco—those dry, clean 90s unisex colognes.
I’ve worn it for a week; it’s rich and intense, but smells like wet baby wipes. It’s different, but not because it’s original—it copies old colognes no one uses anymore. It’s unisex and floral. I grew up with scents like this and find it rich; it’s not new, but if you want something distinct, it’s an option. Longevity is poor, typical of Gucci; with luck and good pH, it lasts an hour.
I’ve been wearing it for a week; it’s rich and somewhat intense; it reminded me totally, and I say this without offense, of baby wipes used to clean a baby’s bottom. Definitely different, but not because it’s original (it’s not, as it’s a cheap copy of old-school colognes, exactly). Those seventies cologne aromas aren’t used these days, so it can feel different, and those who lived in the 70s will agree. It’s very unisex, in fact floral. Personally, I grew up smelling all kinds of colognes and frankly, it’s rich; it’s not something new, but if you want to smell something different, it’s an option. Its longevity is poor like all Gucci perfumes; if you’re lucky and your pH is good, it lasts an hour.
Gucci Guilty Cologne Pour Homme is floral, aromatic, and woody—a common scent but not boring. It starts with green notes of juniper and cypress with a powdery iris touch, similar to Prada L’Homme. Over time, green notes like rosemary rise, ending in a classic soap finish. Like the Absolute, it has nothing to do with the rest of the line. Regular longevity of 5 to 6 hours. Don’t buy blindly, but it’s worth trying to form your own conclusion.
I expected to love it based on the notes, but the test was the opposite: unpleasant.
I only like the opening: fresh, citrusy, and green. Then it shifts to a floral that smells like baby shampoo or cologne, nothing for me.
It has an opening with ‘medicinal’ vibes. I found both its projection and longevity quite weak.
Opens with a medicinal vibe, but the projection and longevity fall short.
Another Gucci scam: a terrible mistake on my part for having high expectations with this cologne version. The only tiny positives I found: it feels citrusy, fresh, and to some extent comfortable. That’s it—no further advantages. To my misfortune, this cologne, like the vast majority of Gucci men’s fragrances, has quite poor longevity (at most 1 to 2 hours maximum) and a pathetic trail, very unnoticeable. Oh, but yes, the selling price is way too high and outrageous for such a miserable product (in my city, it sells for an average of $100). A true pity.
I tested it today; they applied it to the back of my hand an hour ago, and I only smell it close to the skin. Zero projection. I know it’s a cologne, but a Dior Homme Cologne, which also has that concentration and lasts little, surpasses it by a wide margin. All I smell is a generic citrus aroma and a faint hint of violet. A much better option is YSL Y, despite all the criticism it has received.
I tried it today; they applied it to the back of my hand an hour ago, and I only feel it close to the skin. Zero projection. I know it’s a cologne, but a Dior Homme Cologne, which also has that concentration and lasts little, beats it hands down. A generic citrus scent and a faint violet hint is all I smell. Much better option: YSL Y, with all the criticism it has received.
The opening of this fragrance is very bold; to me, it smells like gasoline. It’s an unconventional fragrance; I don’t know how to categorize it by age; I’d say it’s rebellious, non-conformist, and not for everyone, but for very distinct personalities. It’s one of those fragrances you wear for personal pleasure, not to please others. Moderate sillage and cologne-level longevity. I see it for a spring motorcycle ride or a summer night, despite its moderate sillage.
The opening of this fragrance is very groundbreaking; to me, it smells like gasoline. It’s an unconventional fragrance; I wouldn’t know how to categorize it by age. I see it as rebellious and non-conformist, not for everyone but for very distinct personalities. It’s one of those fragrances you wear for personal pleasure, not to please others. Moderate trail and cologne-level longevity. I see it for going out on a motorcycle in spring or for a summer night, despite its moderate trail.
Guilty Cologne starts with a citrus accord accompanied by a grape or grape seed nuance, and a violet in the deep background. In tests, that violet had a certain powdery nuance, probably due to the combination with cypress, which is also in the accords. However, on my skin, it never had that powdery nuance, resulting in a violet more faithful to the flower. The dry-down moves toward a soapy violet accompanied by patchouli (especially) and the typical musk of colognes to give longevity, which usually overwhelms me too much, as it does here. The dry-down conveys a certain old-school air. Its performance is discreet: the scent stays very close to the skin after an hour and is hard to perceive by oneself after two hours. The denomination ‘cologne’ can be misleading, as it’s not a remarkably fresh fragrance, perhaps only at the start, so it can be used in any season. Not in vain, its concentration is EDT, so the term ‘cologne’ probably refers to the structure. To my taste, and only according to my taste, the scent feels too classic, perhaps due to the combination of violet and patchouli in the dry-down. In any case, just for its originality within the world of colognes, I think this creation by Morillas deserves a try.
It’s the only Gucci I own, a gift from a saleswoman friend I buy from often. I haven’t tried Guilty Absolute, but I did try the EDT. This cologne surprises: it’s fresh for summer as promised, but with a stronger, mentholated, herbal, and green twist. The cypress gives it an interesting green note (I love that graveyard tree vibe), and the violet might add a faint powdery tint (I don’t notice it much, but maybe 5-10%). Many complain about longevity, but it’s a cologne, as the box and bottle state: it won’t last like others. If you want potency, try Mancera Red Tobacco or, without spending much, Ted Lapidus Pour Homme. Sillage and longevity are moderate: it projects for two hours, then leaves a trail for a while. It lasts quite a bit close to the skin. Don’t buy blindly. The scent is very good, but I don’t think everyone will like it.
It’s the only Gucci I own because a saleswoman friend gave it to me—I buy her a lot of perfumes. I haven’t heard of the famous Gucci Guilty Absolute (yet), but I know the EDT. This cologne is surprising: although it’s made to be fresh and summery (and it delivers), it has a more challenging, strong, mentholated, herbal, and green aroma. The cypress gives it an interesting green touch (I really like that graveyard tree note), and the violet might add a slight powdery tone (I don’t feel it much, but a 5-10% chance exists). There’s a long line of complainers before me ranting about the longevity. This is a cologne, so we’re warned from the box and bottle: it won’t last as long as other perfumes. If you want power, go for Red Tobacco by Mancera; if you don’t want to spend that much, try Ted Lapidus Pour Homme. The trail and longevity are moderate: it projects for two hours and then leaves a trail for a while. Close to the skin, it lasts quite a bit. Not for blind buying. The scent is very good, but I don’t think it will please everyone.
Almost unisex, leaning feminine, smells like baby butt oil, poor performance, little longevity, and very expensive for what it offers.
Unisex, almost feminine, smells like baby butt oil, terrible performance, poor longevity, and way too expensive for what it offers.
I don’t understand why so many people dislike it; while it’s not the typical aroma that everyone loves, I find it hard to believe anyone who smells it won’t like it. Sure, it doesn’t have the best performance for the price, but it’s not that bad either: I get 5 to 6 hours on skin, which is understandable for the type of notes it has. Many love to complain that it’s just another one of the crowd; yes, it’s not spectacular, but I doubt it resembles many others on the market. It doesn’t align with all the sweet or spicy perfumes used by newer generations.
I don’t understand why so many people dislike it. While it’s not the typical scent that everyone loves, I find it hard to believe anyone wouldn’t like it. Sure, it doesn’t have the best performance for the price, but it’s not that bad: I get 5 to 6 hours on skin, which is understandable for this type of notes. Many people love ‘mama’ (a very generic scent); yes, it’s not spectacular, but I doubt it resembles as many others on the market. It doesn’t align with all the sweet or spicy perfumes newer generations are using.
Terrible, very terrible… nothing new. It reminded me 90% of the new XS version by Paco Rabanne, and between the two, I’d stick with the latter, which isn’t great either. For the price, you’re just paying for the brand. I can’t believe Alberto Morillas is behind this.
It’s the only Gucci I own; a perfumer gave it to me as a gift for a purchase. I’m a woman, and I find it fresh, mentholated, and spicy—quite different and original. The weird thing is that, with my perfume collection, this one has gotten me more compliments than many others. On my skin, it lasts a long time, but if I apply too much, it becomes overwhelming due to its projection.
I found it at a perfume store in my country with a huge discount since it was discontinued; I didn’t hesitate for a second to grab it. It’s fresh, bright, with that typical cologne vibe, a clean energizing scent from the rosemary accords and floral base, with a slight sweet touch that makes it modern and eye-catching. I see it as well-suited for men, elegant. Magnificent for cool or hot days, though I tested it at night and it worked wonderfully. To my surprise, it has great performance: the projection is brutal and longevity on skin and clothes exceeds the average. Wearing it in the air has a masculine, clean, elegant aura that leaves a good impression, whether for formal or casual occasions. Overall, I give it an 8.5/10: magnificent.
I grabbed it on sale in my country when they pulled it from the catalog, and I didn’t hesitate for a second. It’s fresh, bright, and has that clean, energizing cologne vibe from the rosemary, mixed with a sweet floral base that makes it modern and eye-catching. It feels well-suited for men—elegant and versatile for cool or hot days, though I tested it at night and it worked brilliantly. I was surprised by the performance: the projection is brutal and lasts way longer than normal on skin and clothes. It smells like a clean, elegant masculine aura, leaving a great impression for any occasion. In short, I give Guilty Cologne an 8.5/10—magnificent.