Men
Lady Million Lucky
Acordes principales
Descripción
Lady Million Lucky by Rabanne is a fruity floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2018, this composition features raspberry as the top note, a heart of hazelnut, rose, and jasmine, and a base blending honey, cashmere wood, sandalwood, and cedar.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
781 votos
- Positivo 67%
- Negativo 22%
- Neutral 10%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Lady Million Lucky y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en AmazoneBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBayCaracterísticas
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
27 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:





I’m wearing it and I love it. It’s very pleasant to the nose. It feels different from the original: I detect lots of hazelnut and raspberry at the start, giving it a creamy, sweet, slightly milky touch (I thought it had lactonic notes). Then comes the raspberry and jasmine. I don’t notice the woods or almost any honey, which I’m happy about since I don’t like that note in perfumes. The dry down is a soft floral-fruity scent with a hazelnut base. Although it reminds me of the original, it’s softer but has good sillage. I think it’s more casual and less elegant; I’d use it more often because it doesn’t overwhelm me. The original Lady Million overwhelms me a bit with its florals and feels a bit old-fashioned. Lady Million Lucky, without being gourmand, has a special edible-floral touch. It’s a pity they made the raspberry similar to other new ones, but it has the advantage of floral elegance that others lack. I’d buy it and use it with pleasure.
I’m wearing it and I like it. It’s very pleasant to the nose. It feels different from the original: I detect lots of hazelnut and raspberry at the start, giving it a creamy, sweet, slightly milky touch (I thought it had lactonic notes). Then comes the raspberry and jasmine. I don’t notice the woods or almost any honey, which I’m happy about since I don’t like that note in perfumes. The dry down is a soft floral-fruity scent with a hazelnut base. Although it reminds me of the original, it’s softer but has good sillage. I think it’s more casual and less elegant; I’d use it more often because it doesn’t overwhelm me. The original Lady Million overwhelms me a bit with its florals and feels a bit old-fashioned. Lady Million Lucky, without being gourmand, has a special edible-floral touch. It’s a pity they made the raspberry similar to other new ones, but it has the advantage of floral elegance that others lack. I’d buy it and use it with pleasure.
Lady Million Gold, Bronze, and now Silver: more of the same. We get the same bottle, change the cap and paint, the name, and a few notes, and we’re done. If you like Lady Million, you’ll like this one too. I detect lots of almond and honey, with barely any fruit. After an hour, it smells like coffee and chocolate; I don’t dislike it, it’s rich, but that’s all.
I tried it on my skin today. It’s a fragrance following the red fruit trend (in this case, raspberry), adorned with very obvious synthetic gourmand notes. The raspberry stands out—it’s a synthetic one that personally reminds me of old-fashioned syrups: thick, sticky, and sweet pink syrups I used to take when I had the flu. A sweet fragrance with medicinal chemical undertones. Don’t buy it blindly! Better to test it first. The original Lady Million is much better.
I tried it today and it’s a trendy red fruit fragrance, specifically raspberry, with very prominent synthetic gourmand notes. The synthetic raspberry reminds me of thick, sticky, sweet pink syrups I used to take as a child when I had the flu. It’s sweet with medicinal chemical undertones. Don’t buy it blindly; better to test it first. The original Lady Million is much better.
August 2018: a slightly more ‘adult’ or formal version of the original Lady Million, but more linear and a bit boring. It’s less sweet. It has a classic approach with a floral heart of rose and jasmine, accompanied by flashes of raspberry and a shy hint of honey. I wish I’d perceived the hazelnut with more intensity, like in the men’s version, but no; the hazelnut disappears. What I clearly noticed is the wood combo of sandalwood and cedar in the base. As an olfactory proposal, it adds nothing new, just smells good without more. It reminded me of Emporio Armani Because It’s You, though the latter seems more interesting to me. I prefer the glam and opulence of the original Lady Million, as I feel it’s richer in nuances and intensity. Longevity and trail on my skin were moderate. It’s pleasant but… it doesn’t stand out. Cheers.
It’s a simple scent, smells good but it’s not innovative at all—very commercial and very similar to the previous Lady Millions, though I think this is the one I like the most of the three.
It’s a simple scent that smells nice, but honestly, it’s not innovative at all—very commercial and very similar to the previous Lady Million bottles, though I think I like this one the best of the three.
I absolutely love it. I like perfumes with raspberry; it’s sweet but not overpowering, very feminine. It has good longevity and I think it can be worn in any season and at any time of day.
I tested it on blotter the day before yesterday alongside the Prive. Both differ enough from the original to warrant their own identities, haha. I didn’t test Lucky on skin (I did test the other one). On paper, it stayed linear, a scent that reminded me of stationery. Soft floral, barely creamy, quite clean, with a round sweet base like sandalwood bathed in diluted honey. It smells good but feels synthetic. I found it more pleasant than the original. I should test it on skin to see how body heat changes it…
I only detect nuts, like if I’d smeared a walnut on my wrist with a woody touch; once it dries, that nut smells damp and musty. I have samples I won’t even use—I wouldn’t buy it because it’s not special to me and I don’t enjoy the scent. The trail is moderate for the first hour, then it’s just skin-scent, lasting about 5–6 hours total.
Honestly, I didn’t like it. It’s too strong and reminds me of old-lady perfumes. After hours, it smells like talcum powder… I would never buy it again. Absolutely terrible.
It’s not bad, but not great either. I got it as a gift with Pure XS, which is why I have it. I can smell the raspberry, almond, and honey, but it doesn’t do anything for me. It’s just another bottle on the shelf, maybe for sleeping in. I should try it in full summer to get a different take.
It’s not bad, but it’s not great either. I got it as a gift when I bought the Pure XS, which is why I have it. The raspberry, almond, and honey notes are very prominent, but it just doesn’t speak to me. It’s another perfume gathering dust on my shelf that I might possibly use for sleeping. I should try it in the middle of summer to get a second opinion.
It’s a standard perfume. In Rabanne, rose and sandalwood dominate—almost mandatory—which makes it akin to those trendy amber florals and strays from the traditional LM style.
I tested this perfume before buying it and found it pleasant; after a few hours, the woods and hazelnut notes become more pronounced. It reminds me a lot of the smell of loose powder makeup; it doesn’t have good sillage or last long, at least on me. For the price, there are several Paco Rabanne options with better performance.
I tried it before buying and liked it, but after hours, the woods and hazelnut become overpowering. It smells like heavy makeup powder to me, has no good sillage, and doesn’t last on my skin. For the price, there are better Paco Rabanne options out there.
Wait, I thought it would be like Cavalier—sweet and rich—but it disappointed me. Maybe that’s why, or because it doesn’t stand out. It smells sweet but doesn’t last. After a few hours, all that’s left is caramel; I don’t detect the hazelnut, and I never noticed the raspberry, just a fruity note right when I applied it.
The only LM I like, and I can’t believe they’ve released more flankers this late into 2024. Reading the previous reviews, I’m amazed at how one scent can evoke different sensations in each person. That speaks well of it, doesn’t it? I’m not a huge fan of strong raspberry, and luckily I barely notice it here, but on my skin, the woods sweetened with nuts and roses really stand out. A 5-hour longevity, moderate sillage, and a creamy development that makes it somewhat elegant without being too mature. It’s not a memorable perfume, but at least it stands out from the classic.
It’s the only LM I like, and it’s mind-blowing that they’ve released more flankers this late in 2024. Reading previous reviews, I’m amazed at how one scent can evoke different feelings in each person. That speaks volumes about it, doesn’t it? I’m not a huge fan of prominent raspberry, and luckily, it’s barely noticeable here, but on my skin, the sweetened woods with nutty and rose notes really stand out. It lasts 5 hours, has moderate projection, and a creamy development that makes it elegant without being too mature. It’s not a memorable perfume, but at least it distinguishes itself from the classic.
I had the Millanel version (Lady Lucky Millanel 236), which is no longer in production and is a shame because it was my favorite—I couldn’t find anything else like it. The scent is gorgeous, and the era I wore it is forever marked by it. When I smell the bottle I still have, those memories flood back. I used it for going out at night in the fall, which is why it felt ideal for that. Plus, that almond, sweet fruit, and wood aroma directly evokes the season. I suppose the Millanel doesn’t even come close to Paco Rabanne, but it was so good that if I ever save up the money, I’d definitely consider getting the original version someday.
I had the Millanel version (Lady Lucky Millanel 236), which is no longer produced, and it’s a shame because it was my favorite; I haven’t found anything that compares. The scent is beautiful, and the era I used it is forever marked by it. Whenever I smell the bottle I still have, I’m transported back to those moments. I wore it for night outings in autumn, which made it seem ideal for the season. Plus, its almond, sweet fruit, and wood notes evoke autumn perfectly. I suppose Millanel doesn’t even come close to Paco Rabanne, but it was so good that if I ever save up the money, I’d definitely consider getting the original version.
It’s a pretty perfume, but it didn’t meet my expectations. I don’t detect the hazelnut note; instead, it smells more fruity, sweet, and slightly acidic, like those colorful pastel round candies that used to come in tubes from my childhood. Hehe. The drydown is very pleasant, though it’s not potent in terms of projection or longevity. Nothing lasts long on me, but this one enjoys about 3-4 hours of delicate, personal wear.
A pretty perfume, but I expected much more. I don’t detect any hazelnut at all; it’s fruity, sweet, and slightly acidic, like those childhood candies that came in tubes (little round pastel-colored drops), haha. It dries down very pleasantly but isn’t strong, neither in sillage nor longevity. Although longevity isn’t my strong suit, it’s enjoyable for about 3-4 hours in a delicate, personal way.
Please excuse me, but what a terrible perfume. All I can perceive is a kind of aged whiskey with liquefied raspberry and old wood. The opening is powerful (though there are no traces left after a few hours) and intrusive. If you want to add a few more years to your life, this is the perfume for you.
Sorry, but what a terrible perfume. It just smells like rum with liquefied raspberries and old wood. The opening is strong (and after a few hours, there’s nothing left), and it’s annoying. If you like aging, this is for you.
This perfume is so polarizing that it disappoints some, enchants others, and makes others hate it, but for me, it’s a staple. It’s woody, sweet, and delicate; on my skin, it feels light, which is incredible considering I live on the Ecuadorian coast where the sun and humidity chase you from birth. I have sensory processing issues, and almost every perfume gives me nausea or migraines, so I thought this would be a direct hit, but it wasn’t! I love the honey note that gives it that perfect sweetness, I detect hazelnuts and roses, and those woody notes that in others are too heavy and usually paired with patchouli (which I hate, lucky this flanker doesn’t have it). It doesn’t project much, and I know many people don’t like a perfume that doesn’t announce itself down the block, but for me, it’s ideal because it doesn’t distract, overwhelm, clog my senses, or make me want to pull my hair out in pain from a headache. I fall asleep wearing it, and the next day it still smells sweet on my skin as if it were natural. It hurts so much that they discontinued it, and I hope Rabanne relaunches it someday, even as a limited edition.