Men
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Paco Rabanne Pour Homme by Rabanne is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 1973, the nose behind this creation is Jean Martel. The top notes are rosemary, helichrysum, and Brazilian rosewood; the heart notes, lavender, geranium, and tonka bean; and the base notes, oakmoss, honey, musk, amber, and tobacco.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Paco Rabanne Pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
What a marvel. A proper fougere, absolute cleanliness. To me, it smells like pure soap with magnificent green nuances. For those used to sweet scents like Invictus or Le Male, it might seem like an old man’s scent, but it smells like a MAN: a mature, transparent guy who knows what he wants. Thank you, Mr. Rabanne. I bought it to honor his memory. KEEP AWAY KIDS.
Paco Rabanne passed away a few days ago, and many people remembered this perfume (amidst the trash of Invictus and One Million). That speaks to its relevance. It was the first green scent to break the mold in the 70s, cutting through the previous cypress dominance. Even though it’s been reformulated, it respects its past. Without a doubt, a historical jewel worth trying.
What a delight, these were actually good. Now they release generic stuff that sounds like Invictus: masculine, classic, barbershop aroma. This one is soapy, elegant, and has good longevity despite the reformulations. These were actually good commercial perfumes.
I admit I’m not a huge fan of Paco, especially the hype around One Million or Invictus. I remember this masculine fougere scent well, with personality, relevance, and the longevity of its era. An excellent perfume that, as its name suggests, pays homage to its creator.
I love it, it’s a delight; all the notes blend magically to form a masterpiece that lasts. Cheers.
The definitive perfume for old men; if you’re over 50, it hits you like a slap.
What magic and originality. Total beauty; I’m not usually a fan of this family, but that talc in HD is perfection. The green notes get dirty with moss, creating a leather sensation. It’s a masterpiece, a solid 10/10, something you’d take to a deserted island. Old bottle, amber and dense liquid. I doubt the current version smells this way, I hope not.
It was my youth fragrance (ages 21-25) thanks to its herbal and well-cared-for scent. I never thought I was too old to wear it until marketing and this website convinced me otherwise. I wore it until before the pandemic; when I got locked down and tested positive, the smell gave me nausea and headaches. Now I remember it as a beautiful green classic, but I’d never wear it again for the life of me.
Incredible, it smells delicious, elegant, and imposing. It would be madness if it had better performance.
Before Polo, this was the quintessential scent of my hometown, synonymous with good taste. But like everything mass-produced, the lack of personality got old; everyone smelled the same. Now it’s my cold-weather office signature: it lasts 8 hours on skin and feels eternal on shirts. It adds formality, so I keep it for work, not for going out. The scent is linear with no notable evolution, and while it sounds like a 70s movie, it’s a classic that deserves its place. A curious contrast with its current siblings.
I had good memories of this fragrance but now it repulses me. It smells clean but it gets to a point where it becomes overwhelming. To me it doesn’t smell old rather the fragrance has aged poorly; even unpleasant notes are noticeable. It seems that out of necessity to reformulate they overdid it with the rosemary and synthetic notes. Very regretful of this purchase; I do not recommend Paco Rabanne Pour Homme.
It reminded me of the colognes my grandfather used to wear years ago. A very strong scent not for everyone.
Hi everyone! I just picked up a bottle of Paco Rabanne Pour Homme with a 2023 batch code, but it says ‘Made in France.’ I’m wondering if I should subtract 10 years, making it from 2013? Does anyone know when production moved to Barcelona? I want to know if this is the current version or not. Thanks in advance!
Even though reformulations have treated it poorly it’s worth saying that if a fragrance has been with us for 50 years it’s for a reason. Its scent remains unique. Paco Rabanne Pour Homme is elegance and distinction in a bottle. It doesn’t matter your age to wear it; it just asks that you have enough personality. It works for day and night. Ideal for spring fall and winter. I wouldn’t rule out wearing it on mild summer evenings either. Totally timeless; for me it’s a work of art living history of perfumery. One of the three or four jewels of all time luckily still around.
Green, masculine, and packed with lavender. I used to wear this when I was clean-shaven and wanted to turn heads. It’s a classic I still hold dear and respect. The performance is decent and it’s quite versatile. In the end, this is for a mature man… but if you love the scent, go for it. Rating: 7.0/10.
Very masculine scent reminiscent of Yves Saint Laurent’s Kouros, but much more wearable. The performance is moderate, around 4 to 5 hours, but it’s a clean, pleasant aroma. It reflects elegance and maturity. Maybe it’s not everyone’s cup of tea these days, but this classic deserves respect.
That aromatic fougère that stole my heart and more than a few sighs. Why do I speak in the past tense? Because it still does. I grew up surrounded by these scents: my uncle in Old Spice, my grandfather in these classics with cypress, and me putting on a few drops after a haircut or a visit to his office. With my grandfather’s image in mind, these smells have always meant what a man should smell like: someone who knows how to handle himself, a true GENTLEMAN from head to toe. I didn’t wear perfume for years due to budget, but at 25, I decided to invest in something. They showed me sweet stuff, but I wasn’t into it; I wanted those childhood aromas and to smell like a gentleman. Fresh, herbal, aromatic, packed with lavender and oakmoss. What a beauty. Since I bought it, my collection has grown, but I’ll never let a bottle of this exquisite quality go missing. I don’t wear it as much these days because it reminds me of an ex I spent a lot on. I hope time and memory soften the blow so I can start wearing it regularly again and enjoy it. If you’ve read this far, thanks for your time and patience in hearing my story. A hug to you, fellow aromatic fougère lover.
Top-tier fragrance.
Perfect for the AC office. Period.
100% masculine, with those moss and wood notes that drove 70s and 80s men crazy for their wild, natural vibe. Right out of the bottle, the rosemary and fern hit you hard—like Mike Tyson in his prime. Then, once you settle in, the heavy lavender and tarragon keep you alert with that anise touch that smells like the old-school gym. Oak and amber close it out with understated sophistication and last forever. If you wear it indoors, crack a window.
A perfume for an older gentleman. It has very good performance. With very marked moss notes, very cloying. Do not buy blindly. For my taste, it’s not interesting 👎🏻
Before 2010, did rosewood have such preponderance in its composition? Because I don’t remember that intensity in a bottle my father had, which I now notice is present and extremely uncomfortable in a fragrance that once seemed so masculine to me. 1/1/25 I’m happy to inform you that that scent of freshly showered woman’s skin has vanished; I’ll never know if it was due to the rosewood or the musk. But now it doesn’t matter! I had left the bottle in its box unused for about five months until I decided to give it another chance, and now it truly smells like the masculine scent of that bottle my father had in his collection. I’m delighted to perceive that aromatic idea of a man in a striped Italian suit enjoying a tiramisu at some traditional restaurant.
Good scent, good performance, but it smells like an old man.
It’s been a good while since I first smelled it. It was summer and early autumn of 2020, the world was wrapped in a deadly virus threatening everyone, and I was there, smelling things I shouldn’t be smelling. I used it a lot during the pandemic; I’d lift the bottom of my face mask to catch that projective scent of aromatic herbs, lavender, oakmoss, and honey. Now I can break it down as I’ve gained experience formulating my own fragrances. I still hold that Paco Pour Homme is one of the best commercial perfumes in history, up there with Egoiste, Bel Ami, and the 90s Salvador. At first, I detect (Medium Formula) rosemary and helichryse well-marked. The rosewood is perceptible, very powdery, like smelling shavings or dry sawdust. As it develops, you sense the slight sweetness of the honey, which depending on the formulation will feel more fruity/animalic (Natural) or more artificial, flat, and slightly sweet and liquor-like. That is a virtue only old-school perfumes possessed, using natural and even primitive resources to achieve nuances that today would be achieved first through aroma chemicals, like this Paco or the Givenchy Gentleman, which had liquor and fruit notes thanks to the natural honey they contained, or Polo, which used chamomile to get fruity nuances without aroma chemicals, a talent that, in my opinion, has been lost. Anyway: You also feel the geranium in the middle, leading to its generous base: Coumarin acting as a slight dry tobacco nuance, like leaves or an unlit habano, a slight amber to soften it, white musk (Regardless of the formulation, slightly animalic with a fresh-shaved man skin tone), honey slightly alcoholic, and oakmoss. I also highlight a spice note of cloves in the heart and a natural moss even in its most recent formulas. (Declared as Extract of Evernia Prunastri on the box). Like the old perfumes of that time, it goes excellent with era-inspired clothing (Flannel/jeans/boots or a classic three-piece suit with a wide peak lapel), and its scent isn’t ruined but greatly improved by the beautiful influence of tobacco smoke. As a final line: This perfume was conceived in a historical period totally alien to the current one, by a nose with formidable taste and substantial knowledge of the art, something few noses today could boast. In this virtual madness, as the Jamiroquai song says, we’ve become blind to purely human senses. Technique has blinded noses to their own humanity and naturalness. Now it’s about the number of ingredients, the obscene variety of nuances, and how it can be sold. Its humanity has been relegated to a secondary place. As a soundtrack: Roberto Carlos, recordings from the 70s and early 80s, like “Yo te recuerdo”. The Love’s Theme from Barry White’s LUO, the Eagles’ Hotel California album, Stevie Wonder’s Talking Book like Superstition, or Innervisions, like Higher Ground. The Bee Gees (Although they’re better for Polo and Azzaro) and the master Rocío Dúrcal interpreting Juan Gabriel, like in the beautiful “Fue un placer conocerte”. Blessings to all and everyone!
A very masculine fragrance; it has undergone some reformulations that have distanced it a bit from the original composition, but it remains a fougère in every rule. Paco Rabanne Pour Homme isn’t for everyone; if you want to smell like a true gentleman, hate the traditional, or simply want to take a trip to the past, then yes, I recommend it to you.
To me, Paco Rabanne Pour Homme is the undisputed king of characterful barbershop fougères. Its scent evokes those neighborhood barbershops from the 80s, a freshly shaved man in a white shirt with a masculine presence. It’s a classic, robust fragrance that smells like Mediterranean herb gardens and transports us on an aromatic journey into the past. Those of us with a certain age will inevitably feel a wave of memories, because in the 80s and early 90s, it was one of the four or five essential fragrances for any man, alongside Loewe Clásica, Cacharel Pour L’Homme, and the iconic Fahrenheit by Dior. Later came perfumes like Jean Paul Gaultier’s Le Male or the first Acqua di Giò, marking a shift toward sweeter notes. Since then, men’s perfumery has evolved toward unisex, with many fragrances that could be worn perfectly by women today. Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, however, remains a markedly masculine fragrance, one that “wears you by the feet.” And while some might find it outdated, saying this perfume is “for old people” is not understanding its essence. With all due respect, perhaps those who criticize it prefer much softer or androgynous scents, which is also valid, but that doesn’t mean you should belittle a classic jewel like this one.
Well, where do I start? This fragrance was a gift from my dad, who is already 80 years old. I’m 35, and while I really value the gesture, the truth is I only used it once: specifically to visit him. The scent simply isn’t for me. That distinct oakmoss profile, so typical of classic 70s perfumes, just doesn’t fit my personal tastes or the style of fragrances I usually wear. I can’t imagine an occasion where I’d really feel comfortable wearing it. That said, I recognize it has its elegance: it’s fresh, masculine, and definitely classic. For a man over 60, it seems totally appropriate and even nostalgic. But for my daily life or even formal events, I can’t see myself reaching for it. In short, it’s the only one in my collection I probably won’t use again, which is a bit sad because I don’t like having unused fragrances. But at the end of the day, the gift is appreciated and the sentimental value it carries. My final rating is 5.1/10.
I’m absolutely floored that Tom Ford grabbed this idea, slapped a cool name like ‘Beau de Jour’ on it, and sold it for seven times the price. The Tom Ford description calls it a monolith, elegant, and a true fougère. Here, they say it smells like an old man, outdated, prehistoric. In a few years, they’ll say the same about Santal 33 because if smelling lavender is for old people, you can’t even imagine smelling like an antique shop or a hotel lobby. To sum it up: it smells like lavender, clean (it’s the same DNA as classic cleaning and toiletry products), like the La Toja shaving foam from your youth, the ‘Moss’ soap bar you had as a kid, like a long time ago and not so long ago. I wish I could walk into a salon or any store now and smell like this; nowadays everything smells like berry air freshener or that ‘clean clothes’ spray from the supermarket. It’s not an outdated scent; it’s a traditional one reflecting cleanliness and simplicity, which all the advertising for this fragrance has tried to convey throughout history. As the positive reviews say, it’s a simple, clean white shirt. I don’t know if it smells like an old man, but I wish the subway during rush hour smelled like this instead of the end of the world.
The government of Panama just canceled the sanitary registration and sale of this fragrance in the country due to a prohibited ingredient by the EU. Resolution No. 147 of June 24, 2025. The European Union alerts about the presence of the compound 2-(4-tert-butylbenzyl) propionaldehyde (BMHCA) in the formulation. This substance is banned in cosmetics as it’s classified as a possible carcinogen, mutagen, or toxic for reproduction. According to the European Commission, pure BMHCA is an irritant to the skin and eyes of rabbits. I’m sharing this info without intending to alarm anyone. I’m a fragrance seller in my beautiful Panama, and we’ve already been notified. This fragrance came out in 1973, and now they’ve finally noticed that… how curious. Greetings and blessings to the beautiful aroma community.
Indeed, Borbúa’s Parfum: I broke out in a rash when I sprayed it on my skin a few times. That’s why I only use it on jackets or vests. As a room freshener, it lasts two hours, maybe more. Despite that, it’s a masculine and elegant aroma that doesn’t overwhelm in summer. Cheers!
PERFUMACO!!
I had it and it smells very rich. The opening felt a bit old, but it fades quickly and the dry down is elegant and masculine. It was my first renowned perfume. I remember it with fondness; it cost me a lot of money back then. Now that I have a collection and a taste for both classics and moderns, I’d happily use it again.
Well-marked vintage aroma, aromatic, fresh, and soapy, with that classic firm masculinity vibe. From the start, it conveys cleanliness, structure, and sobriety, with that green touch of traditional fougères. It’s green and clean, but today it’s not for everyone. Its style is hard for those not used to classics or the barbershop cut. That’s why I recommend trying it first, as it doesn’t seek to please everyone, but to maintain its timeless essence. Still, it’s a worthy fragrance that maintains presence over the years. Personally, I like it, though for now I wouldn’t wear it. A classic that deserves respect.
I was already ‘OLD FASHION’ in my teens and was new. It seems incredible, but that fragrance was the target of mockery among guys who didn’t wear perfume. I was privileged with Monsieur Balmain, without lavender. They called Paco Rabanne the ‘chauffeur’. I’m 64 and still haven’t made peace with it. I only perceive a strange rosemary, lavender I never stood, and moss, not oakmoss or of good quality. However, it has a hidden charm, you have to look for it. I rate it as HARSH. It wasn’t cheap, but it was very popular and mass-produced in the 70s, without today’s prosperity. Paco Rabanne made a lot of money, especially in Latin America. Try before buying.
I don’t want to add more to so many accurate reviews. I always refused to use it because I associated it with people I loved. Today, November 7, 2025, I bought the 100ml bottle. It all starts in the autumn of ’78, in a Napoleonic shop with Umberto Tozzi’s ‘Tu’ playing. I owe a lot to that person. So many memories that I thought it wasn’t for me, that I didn’t reach that role. Now I do, it’s never too late. I relive memories and enjoy the wonder of this perfume. The original vintage ones are living history, made differently in better years. I’m happy. And yes, it can be worn at night.
It’s the quintessential barber soap. Compact lavender, mosses, and musks. It’s the most standard and balanced, ideal for testing clean vintage styles. For my age, I don’t see the decline it might have had. Today it feels a bit lost compared to cheaper options like Lapidus Pour Homme or Puig Quorum, and less so than the legendary Kouros. If you’re not a fan of the masculine powerhouse but want something clean and retro for your collection, this is the most standard option and will save you hours watching tutorials to understand this world.
Pure classic barber shop scent that I keep alongside my Kouros and Boss Number One. If you like perfumery and were born before the 90s, you must have it. It transports you to very good times.
Love at first sniff, what a great job done. Unfortunately, it gave me an allergy and I had to sell it full, but it’s one of the best scents. Elegant, rustic, soapy, clean, and natural. Everything that’s right. If it weren’t for the allergy, I’d wear it regularly; I can’t give up and will try again. I see it more for ages 30 or 35, it’s vintage and leaves a brutal trail. The best I’ve smelled in that balanced vein. Quality-price and aroma 10/10, setting aside the allergy.
Bought it in 2025 for about 26€ for 100ml. It’s a classic masculine scent, perhaps difficult for some, but it still holds appeal. Clear notes of oakmoss, lavender, amber, and rosemary. It’s not as harsh as YSL’s Kouros. I recommend it for men over 40 or for dressing up, not for casual wear. On my dry skin, it lasts 7 hours, on clothes almost two days. It’s elegant and doesn’t overwhelm, though it’s noticeable at first. Ideal for those who enjoy classics without the fuss. Try it before buying blindly.
Smells like luxury soap, clean, and green with class. I wear it with a suit and pocket square; people always turn around to ask who’s wearing it. It’s pure elegance and sobriety. Hard to find these days, but I celebrate that it still exists. A real knockout for distinguished gentlemen.