Men
Chance Eau Splendide
Acordes principales
Descripción
Chance Eau Splendide by Chanel is a floral fruity fragrance from the olfactive family, created for women. This new scent, launched in 2025, was composed by Olivier Polge. Its opening reveals a vibrant blend of red fruits, raspberry, rose, violet, and peach. The heart of the composition is sustained with the elegance of iris and scented geranium, while the base leaves a soft trail of white musk and cedar.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Red Fruits
-
Corazón
iris
-
Base
white musk
Comunidad
1,881 votos
- Positivo 68%
- Neutral 20%
- Negativo 13%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Chance Eau Splendide y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I tried it in-store today: it’s fresh, feminine, and elegant. Sparkling citrus-fruity opening that then settles into an elegant musky floral. I’d buy it if I had the money, but Chanel isn’t accessible to the average person.
I tried it a few days ago. I liked it, but it’s not groundbreaking. Typical red berry aroma with a floral and musk base. Pretty? Yes. Innovative? No. Would I buy it? No. If someone gave it to me as a gift? Absolutely.
This perfume comes out fresh and sweet from the red berries, but when it dries down, it’s clean, musky, and powdery, with no trace of sweetness. It smells good, although personally I haven’t liked it. It smells like a Yves Rocher perfume my mom used to wear a long time ago, of lilacs; there’s violet here, but it reminds me of that softer scent. After an hour, the dry down reminds me of baby wipe scent. I think Chanel jumped on the musky and powdery perfume train and didn’t fail; it smells good, but there’s no Chance DNA. It could have been a perfectly new perfume.
I had high hopes for this perfume… it’s not bad, it’s sweet and fruity, but it lacks the Chance signature. It reminded me of Versace Bright Crystal when it dried down, which smells much better. I don’t think it’s a suitable launch for 2025, but it’s not terrible.
Chanel perfumes usually have a particular DNA, but this new flanker lost it; it doesn’t even feel like Chanel. If they had let me blind test it, I wouldn’t have recognized it. It’s a standard floral with an acidic red berry opening that masks the other notes; I don’t feel the iris I love. It softens after a while but remains linear. They compare it to YSL Baby Doll, but I disagree: that one is lovely and well-balanced. This reminds me more of Marly Delinas, which isn’t a compliment. The longevity is poor; after 3 hours, only a fruity trace remains. The INCI is clean but has unnecessary synthetic colorants. Seems like a commercial attempt for young women, though I’m not sure who can afford it. A blunder coming from Chanel.
The new Chanel flanker has a restrained charm. When I saw the ad, I was excited about the iris in the pyramid, but it’s so softened that it’s hard to recognize; its powdery touch is eclipsed by a fruity blend dominated by very sweet and synthetic red berries. The floral heart is diffuse, and the musky base adds cleanliness without harshness. Nothing clashes, but I miss the soul, that adult and characterful touch that other creations from the house have. It’s balanced, versatile, with moderate longevity and a delicate sillage: ideal for daily wear. Faithful to the spirit of the line, although Chance Eau Tendre EDP remains my favorite for its youthful bouquet. In Eau Splendide, I recognize the will to please and the orientation toward a young audience looking for something pretty and easy. It’s okay, but for those who expect more from Chanel than mere correctness, it leaves a commercial déjà vu feeling. It’s designed to please, but it stays halfway between charm and risk.
I wait for every Chanel launch like Christmas… so as soon as it hit my city, I ran to my trusted store to try it. What a surprise! It smells so generic of raspberry and roses that it reminded me of dozens of more or less affordable perfumes with the same combination. The Chance line used to share citrus bases: lemons, grapefruits, oranges, or quinces. This bottle just holds a sweet, fruity floral red scent. It’s okay and 100% wearable, but it’s not elegant. It reminded me of Lanvin Couture or a flanker of Lancome Tresor before LVEB, even a light drugstore cologne. It could have rescued Chanel’s identity in that soft, enveloping sensation of notes dancing around the raspberry, but it still doesn’t smell like what it costs.
Smells rich. The longevity is about two hours, nothing in best mode. It sounds like something I’ve smelled before, but I can’t identify what it is. It’s like a little doll, feminine and subtle.
I tried it a few days ago. I liked it, but it’s nothing new. Typical red berry aroma with a floral and musky base. Pretty? Yes. Innovative? No. Would I buy it? No. If someone gave it to me, would I use it? Absolutely.
I tried it in-store and it’s fresh, feminine, and elegant. On my skin, it starts with a sparkling citrus and fruity top note, then settles into a very elegant musky floral. I’d buy it if I had the money, but Chanel isn’t accessible to the average person.
Disappointing for a Chanel. On my skin, violet dominates, very watery, reminding me of Marly Palatine Parfums, which I also didn’t like. Similar alternatives: Cheirosa ’59 by Sol de Janeiro or with more punch, Dolce Violet by Dolce&Gabbana.
I tried it in-store and liked the fresh, youthful scent. I thought it might be Guerlain Insolence, but no; it evolved until it became unremarkable. I like potent scents with a strong trail. Maybe I’d buy it for my 15-year-old daughter.
Chanel perfumes usually have a particular DNA, but this new flanker has lost everything, neither from the Chance line nor from the house. If they had let me smell it blind, I wouldn’t have guessed it was Chanel. It’s a standard floral with an acidic red berry opening that, on my skin, hides the rest of the notes (the iris I love so much isn’t there). After a while, it softens, but it remains linear. I’ve compared it to Baby Doll and disagree: YSL’s still a beautiful, balanced floral. This Eau Splendide reminds me more of the Delinas from Parfums de Marly, which isn’t a compliment. The longevity is minimal; at three hours, only a fruity trace remains at the skin level. The INCI is clean, but it has four unnecessary synthetic colorants. It seems like an attempt by Chanel to do something 100% commercial for a young woman (though I don’t know who would let themselves be convinced). It seems like a blunder, especially coming from Chanel.
What a pleasant surprise! The girl at Sephora told me to try it, and I wasn’t even paying attention… when I tried it, I fell in love instantly and bought it! It’s a super cute scent, maybe nothing new, but it’s quite pleasant, feminine, and very flattering. It’s a mix of lovely flowers, none stand out more, but those red berries give it a juicy, refreshing, and sparkling touch. It could easily be my signature scent; I’m totally hooked. It lasts about eight hours on me, and people always ask what I’m wearing.
I tried it in the store and loved that fresh, youthful scent. Suddenly, I thought it reminded me of Guerlain Insolence, but no. The scent changed until it became so insignificant that it went unnoticed. I like powerful scents with good sillage. Maybe I’d buy it for my 15-year-old daughter.
It seems Chanel and Dior are leaning more toward the Asian market than the Western one; here we are flooded with Arab-inspired scents and a few originals. To me, Splendide smells like those typical Asian girls from K-dramas or J-dramas: pretty, delicate, and neat, tender yet with a sparkling and bold side. It’s totally for spring and summer; it opens with very refreshing, almost bubbly red berries, neither sweet nor acidic, perfectly balanced. Then come the flowers, highlighting rose and geranium with a slightly bitter citrus touch that helps balance so the fruits don’t get too sweet. It closes with an acidic, fresh, clean, and slightly powdery floral, very neat thanks to Chanel’s musk. While it’s not the eighth wonder, it’s a very good option if you like clean scents that don’t overwhelm the senses. It doesn’t seem like Bright Crystal; don’t trust others’ noses, test on skin. Nothing in common between paper and skin; the musk does magic on skin, just like in Chance Tendre. I agree it fits the Dior Addict 2 line, only Splendide is denser, with a stronger opening and better longevity. Despite its lack of maturity, it lasts 6 hours on skin. If you like this line, it’s totally worth it: there’s scent and quality.
Reminds me of an Iguak my mom used to wear, maybe it’s Dior Addict 2. Smells rich and fresh, but it fades quickly; I’m not sure if it’s worth the price.
I think the goal of this perfume was to cause the same stir in girls that Eau Tendre did fifteen years ago. It’s charming, sweet, and easy to wear. Although fragrances shouldn’t have an age (I’d hate for them to smell ‘old lady’), it will fascinate many young women just starting out in the perfume world. For collectors like me, it’s disappointing, as others say. It reminded me of Moschino Toy 2 Bubble Gum, Marc Jacobs Daisy Dream, and YSL Mon Paris, all of which are more interesting. At this price point, there are better or cheaper options; Chanel has more sophisticated things. It lasted about seven hours on my skin, acceptable for an eau de parfum, though not as long as Chance eau de toilette, which lasts twelve. A pretty perfume that I hope serves as a gateway to the fascinating world of Chance, which has more interesting options within its great tradition.
It reminds me of one my mom used to wear, maybe Dior Addict 2. Rich and fresh, but it doesn’t last long. I’m not sure if it’s worth the investment.
Chanel is back with a signature that replicates a Lancôme O’Zur EDT, discontinued three years ago. They told me they dropped it to bet on more expansive scents, but it was my favorite clean scent: rose, violet, and a slightly plum-like note that I adored. Now this scent is back, but yes, for four times the price. Roses, violets… Good for Chanel for rescuing this subtle masterpiece, but at that price, it really needs to speak to you.
I wanted to try it because the ads were everywhere; the video is cute and the song is very addictive. I got curious, went in, and tested it on skin and paper. The opening is sparkling; I liked it more than the dry-down. It transformed into a violet scent, very intense. Yes, it smells quite like roses and violets. It’s not invasive, smells clean, and has a subtle talc-like quality. Even though I’m not a fan of florals, it didn’t bother me to wear it. Longevity is 6 to 9 hours.
Fresh and bubbly. I’m the only one who noticed the resemblance to Guerlain’s Granita de Pera.
I went to a store in Chile, grabbed a tester, and applied a little; I was amazed. But based on experience, I wanted to wait and see how it felt after hours. The next day, I bought it online from Chanel because they send extra details and samples (something physical stores no longer do). I absolutely loved it; you can feel that purple aroma, very similar to sweetened lavender. The violets and roses are the stars, with cheerful notes that linger on skin and clothes even in chilly autumn weather. It’s one of my favorite fragrances.
I wanted to try it because of the hype—the video and song are addictive. I tested it on skin and blotter: the sparkling opening was my favorite part, more so than the dry down where it transforms into intense violets and roses. It’s not intrusive, smells clean with a subtle talciness; even though I don’t usually like florals, I wasn’t bothered wearing it. Lasts 6 to 9 hours.
I really liked it. I’m not sure if the store tester was mellowed, because the longevity was more than acceptable. Very enjoyable. Definitely, you have to try it yourself and not get swept away by reviews; you need to test it on your own skin.
I went to a store in Chile, tried a tester, and was amazed, but I waited to see how it felt after hours. The next day I bought it online because they send samples and details, which the store doesn’t do. I loved it: it smells like violets and roses, like sweetened lavender, with cheerful notes that linger on skin and clothes even in the cold. It’s one of my favorites.
In its dry-down, it reminds me of Givenchy’s Hot Couture Collection No. 1 from 2000, which is no longer available.
Just finished my bottle of Chanel Chance Eau Tendre EDP and tried this new one to see if I’d switch. I didn’t have high expectations, and honestly, that’s exactly what happened. My first thought was: ‘nothing new under the sun.’ It smells good, yes, but I need something more to justify the price, especially since it’s not just about the Chanel name. I tested it on my sister, who is more casual about perfumes, and she loved it; she said she’d never smelled anything like it. For people less ‘in the know,’ this could be a great find. I see it as a sparkling, cheerful, and feminine fruity scent, perfect for summer. I’m sticking with Eau Tendre.
Super citrusy opening—those berry notes are citrusy, not sweet. Dries down to violet, musk, and cedar; the dry-down feels a bit odd to me, is it the Chanel DNA or something else? Reminded me a bit of Gabrielle from the same brand. Personally, I’m sticking with Chance Eau Tendre EDT; I like it more.
Tender and lovely scent, very similar to Dior’s Addict To Life.
Smells fruity and mainly like roses, with hints of sweet red fruits, the typical peach, and roses. It smells good, yes, but honestly, I expected more. It smells quite generic, to be honest. I think it’s a perfume you could easily give to a teenager who would like it. I agree with a review that this perfume might be targeting the Asian market, which is a huge money market. This perfume could have a wide audience; it’s easy to like, but it’s not original. Another one for the Chance list to sell.
I bought Zara Majestic Lilas a while ago; this new Chanel version is the refined older sibling I was looking for in that fragrance. It’s a delicate, talcum-powdered, feminine scent that evokes the classic melancholic color of violet, with that softness of lilacs and a well-selected iris. It’s very pleasant for any lady, so if you’re looking for a unique scent, this isn’t for you. Long-lasting, especially on clothes, or medium on skin, medium trail, and it keeps the price of the other high-selling versions.
Truly beautiful 💜 I just bought it and loved it; it’s so fresh and super youthful without being disgustingly sweet. Plus, its trail, projection, and longevity are very wide. I completely disagree with those who say it smells like nothing, lasts nothing, or adds nothing new; it’s true, it didn’t reinvent the wheel, but it’s quite well formulated. I’d recommend it to people between 20 and 28, I think it’s more than perfect for work, it smells clean. Wish Chanel would make more of these perfumes targeting the Asian market; I’m tired of Arab perfumes that even the dog brings home.
Beautiful scent, calming. It’s sweet, citrusy, and fresh, doesn’t remind me of anything I’ve smelled before. Very feminine and clean.
They gave it to me for my birthday with all the love, but at first, it seemed like a total bore. Now I’m giving it another shot, and honestly, I enjoy it a lot, even as a daily or all-rounder. It’s youthful, fresh, and super luminous. The opening is an acidic, effervescent raspberry, accompanied by a musky cloud of light, almost aquatic flowers. In summer and spring, it has to be its prime. I’m surprised it lasts more than a full workday; on my skin, it’s very long-lasting.
They sent me a sample when I bought another Chanel. It seemed like a fresh, youthful scent with a pleasant, fruity sweetness that reminds me of shampoo or just out of the shower. Undoubtedly the stars are the red fruits and violet, joining the musk and cedar from the Chance line. In that sense, Eau Splendide is juicier and sparklier than Eau Tendre, though I agree it smells very generic and is an uninteresting launch. What both share is their terrible fixation, longevity, and projection, considering the high cost. It smells nice and could be a good daily perfume, but I think its notes are too basic and it lacked the elegance to be Chanel. I honestly think it’s not worth the price, just like Tendre, and of course, there are better options with musk, cedar, and red fruits. Finally, between Tendre and Splendide, I stick with the original Chance xD
Floral perfume with lots of rose. It reminds me of Boss Ma Vie L’Eau by Hugo Boss for the rose, and Miss Dior Blooming Bouquet by Dior for the peony. Chance Eau Splendide by Chanel is a timeless classic.
It looks good, that opening is super fresh, sweet and citrusy. The iris and violet are noticeable, and I feel like I just took a shower. But the longevity is poor, the trail lasts nothing, and by the end of the day it turned way too woody to the point that I didn’t like that drydown. The violet is noticeable, but for a Chanel costing up to 4,000 pesos that lasts 2 to 4 hours on my skin, it’s an insult. I wouldn’t buy the full bottle.
It’s not bad, but it doesn’t stand out. I think it’s a waste of money. It’s floral and clean, but that’s about it.
Luckily I bought a decant. It’s not a bad perfume, but it smells very similar to the Idols, probably because of the rose and iris notes; I never detected the fruits (huge letdown). I wouldn’t buy it.