Skip to content

Chance Eau Splendide by Chanel

Women 2025

Brand
Chanel
Perfumer
Olivier Polge

Description

Chance Eau Splendide by Chanel is a floral fruity fragrance from the olfactive family, created for women. This new scent, launched in 2025, was composed by Olivier Polge. Its opening reveals a vibrant blend of red fruits, raspberry, rose, violet, and peach. The heart of the composition is sustained with the elegance of iris and scented geranium, while the base…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 6.8%
  • Spring 43%
  • Summer 40%
  • Autumn 11%
  • Day 83%
  • Night 17%

Key notes

Community

1,881 votes

  • Positive 68%
  • Negative 13%
  • Neutral 20%
positive reviews 1.9 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentSpring CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

5,457 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

1,778 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

850 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Chance Eau Splendide

Main accord fruity Year 2025 Gender Women Perfumer Olivier Polge

Chance Eau Splendide by Chanel is a floral fruity fragrance from the olfactive family, created for women. This new scent, launched in 2025, was composed by Olivier Polge. Its opening reveals a vibrant blend of red fruits, raspberry, rose, violet, and peach. The heart of the composition is sustained with the elegance of iris and scented geranium, while the base leaves a soft trail of white musk and cedar.

Fruits, vegetables and nuts Flowers Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

844 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

803 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

870 votes

Value perception

Leading answer A little expensive

802 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. AlineTan_val

    Luckily I bought a decant. It’s not a bad perfume, but it smells very similar to the Idols, probably because of the rose and iris notes; I never detected the fruits (huge letdown). I wouldn’t buy it.

    Reply
  2. cursedhazakura

    It’s not bad, but it doesn’t stand out. I think it’s a waste of money. It’s floral and clean, but that’s about it.

    Reply
  3. It looks good, that opening is super fresh, sweet and citrusy. The iris and violet are noticeable, and I feel like I just took a shower. But the longevity is poor, the trail lasts nothing, and by the end of the day it turned way too woody to the point that I didn’t like that drydown. The violet is noticeable, but for a Chanel costing up to 4,000 pesos that lasts 2 to 4 hours on my skin, it’s an insult. I wouldn’t buy the full bottle.

    Reply
  4. Floral perfume with lots of rose. It reminds me of Boss Ma Vie L’Eau by Hugo Boss for the rose, and Miss Dior Blooming Bouquet by Dior for the peony. Chance Eau Splendide by Chanel is a timeless classic.

    Reply
  5. They sent me a sample when I bought another Chanel. It seemed like a fresh, youthful scent with a pleasant, fruity sweetness that reminds me of shampoo or just out of the shower. Undoubtedly the stars are the red fruits and violet, joining the musk and cedar from the Chance line. In that sense, Eau Splendide is juicier and sparklier than Eau Tendre, though I agree it smells very generic and is an uninteresting launch. What both share is their terrible fixation, longevity, and projection, considering the high cost. It smells nice and could be a good daily perfume, but I think its notes are too basic and it lacked the elegance to be Chanel. I honestly think it’s not worth the price, just like Tendre, and of course, there are better options with musk, cedar, and red fruits. Finally, between Tendre and Splendide, I stick with the original Chance xD

    Reply
  6. They gave it to me for my birthday with all the love, but at first, it seemed like a total bore. Now I’m giving it another shot, and honestly, I enjoy it a lot, even as a daily or all-rounder. It’s youthful, fresh, and super luminous. The opening is an acidic, effervescent raspberry, accompanied by a musky cloud of light, almost aquatic flowers. In summer and spring, it has to be its prime. I’m surprised it lasts more than a full workday; on my skin, it’s very long-lasting.

    Reply
  7. Kari Castro

    Beautiful scent, calming. It’s sweet, citrusy, and fresh, doesn’t remind me of anything I’ve smelled before. Very feminine and clean.

    Reply
  8. Truly beautiful 💜 I just bought it and loved it; it’s so fresh and super youthful without being disgustingly sweet. Plus, its trail, projection, and longevity are very wide. I completely disagree with those who say it smells like nothing, lasts nothing, or adds nothing new; it’s true, it didn’t reinvent the wheel, but it’s quite well formulated. I’d recommend it to people between 20 and 28, I think it’s more than perfect for work, it smells clean. Wish Chanel would make more of these perfumes targeting the Asian market; I’m tired of Arab perfumes that even the dog brings home.

    Reply
  9. I bought Zara Majestic Lilas a while ago; this new Chanel version is the refined older sibling I was looking for in that fragrance. It’s a delicate, talcum-powdered, feminine scent that evokes the classic melancholic color of violet, with that softness of lilacs and a well-selected iris. It’s very pleasant for any lady, so if you’re looking for a unique scent, this isn’t for you. Long-lasting, especially on clothes, or medium on skin, medium trail, and it keeps the price of the other high-selling versions.

    Reply
  10. La Clochard

    Smells fruity and mainly like roses, with hints of sweet red fruits, the typical peach, and roses. It smells good, yes, but honestly, I expected more. It smells quite generic, to be honest. I think it’s a perfume you could easily give to a teenager who would like it. I agree with a review that this perfume might be targeting the Asian market, which is a huge money market. This perfume could have a wide audience; it’s easy to like, but it’s not original. Another one for the Chance list to sell.

    Reply
  11. EdithLAguirre

    Tender and lovely scent, very similar to Dior’s Addict To Life.

    Reply
  12. anndrea12

    Super citrusy opening—those berry notes are citrusy, not sweet. Dries down to violet, musk, and cedar; the dry-down feels a bit odd to me, is it the Chanel DNA or something else? Reminded me a bit of Gabrielle from the same brand. Personally, I’m sticking with Chance Eau Tendre EDT; I like it more.

    Reply
  13. Nuripecor

    Just finished my bottle of Chanel Chance Eau Tendre EDP and tried this new one to see if I’d switch. I didn’t have high expectations, and honestly, that’s exactly what happened. My first thought was: ‘nothing new under the sun.’ It smells good, yes, but I need something more to justify the price, especially since it’s not just about the Chanel name. I tested it on my sister, who is more casual about perfumes, and she loved it; she said she’d never smelled anything like it. For people less ‘in the know,’ this could be a great find. I see it as a sparkling, cheerful, and feminine fruity scent, perfect for summer. I’m sticking with Eau Tendre.

    Reply
  14. In its dry-down, it reminds me of Givenchy’s Hot Couture Collection No. 1 from 2000, which is no longer available.

    Reply
  15. oriana_chile

    I went to a store in Chile, tried a tester, and was amazed, but I waited to see how it felt after hours. The next day I bought it online because they send samples and details, which the store doesn’t do. I loved it: it smells like violets and roses, like sweetened lavender, with cheerful notes that linger on skin and clothes even in the cold. It’s one of my favorites.

    Reply
  16. I really liked it. I’m not sure if the store tester was mellowed, because the longevity was more than acceptable. Very enjoyable. Definitely, you have to try it yourself and not get swept away by reviews; you need to test it on your own skin.

    Reply
  17. Maryferie

    I wanted to try it because of the hype—the video and song are addictive. I tested it on skin and blotter: the sparkling opening was my favorite part, more so than the dry down where it transforms into intense violets and roses. It’s not intrusive, smells clean with a subtle talciness; even though I don’t usually like florals, I wasn’t bothered wearing it. Lasts 6 to 9 hours.

    Reply
  18. oriana_chile

    I went to a store in Chile, grabbed a tester, and applied a little; I was amazed. But based on experience, I wanted to wait and see how it felt after hours. The next day, I bought it online from Chanel because they send extra details and samples (something physical stores no longer do). I absolutely loved it; you can feel that purple aroma, very similar to sweetened lavender. The violets and roses are the stars, with cheerful notes that linger on skin and clothes even in chilly autumn weather. It’s one of my favorite fragrances.

    Reply
  19. Ma Cristina

    Fresh and bubbly. I’m the only one who noticed the resemblance to Guerlain’s Granita de Pera.

    Reply
  20. Maryferie

    I wanted to try it because the ads were everywhere; the video is cute and the song is very addictive. I got curious, went in, and tested it on skin and paper. The opening is sparkling; I liked it more than the dry-down. It transformed into a violet scent, very intense. Yes, it smells quite like roses and violets. It’s not invasive, smells clean, and has a subtle talc-like quality. Even though I’m not a fan of florals, it didn’t bother me to wear it. Longevity is 6 to 9 hours.

    Reply
  21. Chanel is back with a signature that replicates a Lancôme O’Zur EDT, discontinued three years ago. They told me they dropped it to bet on more expansive scents, but it was my favorite clean scent: rose, violet, and a slightly plum-like note that I adored. Now this scent is back, but yes, for four times the price. Roses, violets… Good for Chanel for rescuing this subtle masterpiece, but at that price, it really needs to speak to you.

    Reply
  22. Virlopezlopez

    It reminds me of one my mom used to wear, maybe Dior Addict 2. Rich and fresh, but it doesn’t last long. I’m not sure if it’s worth the investment.

    Reply
  23. Ximena25

    I think the goal of this perfume was to cause the same stir in girls that Eau Tendre did fifteen years ago. It’s charming, sweet, and easy to wear. Although fragrances shouldn’t have an age (I’d hate for them to smell ‘old lady’), it will fascinate many young women just starting out in the perfume world. For collectors like me, it’s disappointing, as others say. It reminded me of Moschino Toy 2 Bubble Gum, Marc Jacobs Daisy Dream, and YSL Mon Paris, all of which are more interesting. At this price point, there are better or cheaper options; Chanel has more sophisticated things. It lasted about seven hours on my skin, acceptable for an eau de parfum, though not as long as Chance eau de toilette, which lasts twelve. A pretty perfume that I hope serves as a gateway to the fascinating world of Chance, which has more interesting options within its great tradition.

    Reply
  24. Virlopezlopez

    Reminds me of an Iguak my mom used to wear, maybe it’s Dior Addict 2. Smells rich and fresh, but it fades quickly; I’m not sure if it’s worth the price.

    Reply
  25. IrasemaMC

    It seems Chanel and Dior are leaning more toward the Asian market than the Western one; here we are flooded with Arab-inspired scents and a few originals. To me, Splendide smells like those typical Asian girls from K-dramas or J-dramas: pretty, delicate, and neat, tender yet with a sparkling and bold side. It’s totally for spring and summer; it opens with very refreshing, almost bubbly red berries, neither sweet nor acidic, perfectly balanced. Then come the flowers, highlighting rose and geranium with a slightly bitter citrus touch that helps balance so the fruits don’t get too sweet. It closes with an acidic, fresh, clean, and slightly powdery floral, very neat thanks to Chanel’s musk. While it’s not the eighth wonder, it’s a very good option if you like clean scents that don’t overwhelm the senses. It doesn’t seem like Bright Crystal; don’t trust others’ noses, test on skin. Nothing in common between paper and skin; the musk does magic on skin, just like in Chance Tendre. I agree it fits the Dior Addict 2 line, only Splendide is denser, with a stronger opening and better longevity. Despite its lack of maturity, it lasts 6 hours on skin. If you like this line, it’s totally worth it: there’s scent and quality.

    Reply
  26. Azul Reyes

    I tried it in the store and loved that fresh, youthful scent. Suddenly, I thought it reminded me of Guerlain Insolence, but no. The scent changed until it became so insignificant that it went unnoticed. I like powerful scents with good sillage. Maybe I’d buy it for my 15-year-old daughter.

    Reply
  27. Mona Mour

    What a pleasant surprise! The girl at Sephora told me to try it, and I wasn’t even paying attention… when I tried it, I fell in love instantly and bought it! It’s a super cute scent, maybe nothing new, but it’s quite pleasant, feminine, and very flattering. It’s a mix of lovely flowers, none stand out more, but those red berries give it a juicy, refreshing, and sparkling touch. It could easily be my signature scent; I’m totally hooked. It lasts about eight hours on me, and people always ask what I’m wearing.

    Reply
  28. Isabeau Lafontaine

    Chanel perfumes usually have a particular DNA, but this new flanker has lost everything, neither from the Chance line nor from the house. If they had let me smell it blind, I wouldn’t have guessed it was Chanel. It’s a standard floral with an acidic red berry opening that, on my skin, hides the rest of the notes (the iris I love so much isn’t there). After a while, it softens, but it remains linear. I’ve compared it to Baby Doll and disagree: YSL’s still a beautiful, balanced floral. This Eau Splendide reminds me more of the Delinas from Parfums de Marly, which isn’t a compliment. The longevity is minimal; at three hours, only a fruity trace remains at the skin level. The INCI is clean, but it has four unnecessary synthetic colorants. It seems like an attempt by Chanel to do something 100% commercial for a young woman (though I don’t know who would let themselves be convinced). It seems like a blunder, especially coming from Chanel.

    Reply
  29. Azul Reyes

    I tried it in-store and liked the fresh, youthful scent. I thought it might be Guerlain Insolence, but no; it evolved until it became unremarkable. I like potent scents with a strong trail. Maybe I’d buy it for my 15-year-old daughter.

    Reply
  30. Disappointing for a Chanel. On my skin, violet dominates, very watery, reminding me of Marly Palatine Parfums, which I also didn’t like. Similar alternatives: Cheirosa ’59 by Sol de Janeiro or with more punch, Dolce Violet by Dolce&Gabbana.

    Reply