Skip to content

Virtuous Oud by Zara

Men 2023

Brand
Zara

Description

Virtuous Oud by Zara is a men's fragrance from the olfactive family. Launched in 2023, this composition was created by perfumer Alberto Morillas. The opening features bergamot, lemon, and calone, delivering a fresh and citrusy start. The heart reveals a warm, woody blend of oud wood, ambroxan, white musk, floral notes, and lavender. The dry down settles on vetiver, patchouli,…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 9.8%
  • Spring 32%
  • Summer 32%
  • Autumn 27%
  • Day 72%
  • Night 28%

Key notes

Community

101 votes

  • Positive 80%
  • Negative 8.9%
  • Neutral 11%
positive reviews 101 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

336 votes

Season

Choose several

Tied for the lead Spring / Summer

174 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

82 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Virtuous Oud

Main accord citrus Year 2023 Gender Men Perfumer Alberto Morillas

Virtuous Oud by Zara is a men’s fragrance from the olfactive family. Launched in 2023, this composition was created by perfumer Alberto Morillas. The opening features bergamot, lemon, and calone, delivering a fresh and citrusy start. The heart reveals a warm, woody blend of oud wood, ambroxan, white musk, floral notes, and lavender. The dry down settles on vetiver, patchouli, and sandalwood, offering a deep and enveloping base.

Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic Flowers

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

68 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

65 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

75 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

75 votes

Community reviews

5 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Tomorrowsdust

    If you ask me which is Zara’s most ignored gem, it’s definitely Virtuous Oud. It was a fragrance that got ahead of its time, and people just didn’t appreciate it. Its downfall was Carlos Rubio, that YouTuber who basically lives at Zara, who in a video claimed it smelled like fish or cuttlefish. He later retracted it, saying the tester was broken, but the damage was done. Plus, Virtuous got eclipsed by Elevated Oud, which stole all the spotlight. They also slapped the Acqua Di Gio label on it just because Morillas created it, just like they did with Elevated and Gucci Guilty Absolute, despite there being no real connection. It’s an accessible oud perfect for beginners, with zero risk of smelling like a chemical factory. Although people compared it to Acqua Di Gio’s DNA, to me it leans more toward Oud Wood by Tom Ford, but much more citrusy at first. It could be the perfect hybrid between the two. Its profile is a winter citrus that gives you energy and makes you feel good even in the cold, without being too heavy or too fresh. It’s like a white oud, a true all-rounder that goes anywhere. If this had come out under a niche brand for $100, it would have had way more hype. But it launched at Zara at an accessible price and passed without a trace. I think if they relaunch it, it will finally put this gem in its place, one we couldn’t enjoy.

    Reply
  2. The only good thing is that it’s named after Alberto Morillas, because the scent is a disaster. It starts with a very synthetic citrus, like a cleaning product, and then the calone kicks in, which doesn’t smell like fish but something rotten. Then the woody notes appear, but they’re very faint because they get mixed with that critical note and the calone. I can’t find any similarity to Acqua Di Gio or other Morillas fragrances, which are usually pleasant and delicious. This one, on the other hand, just seems like cheap cleaner. Do not recommend buying it blind.

    Reply
  3. I’ve read several reviews saying it smells like fish. Today I tried it at Zara, and honestly, on my skin, I don’t find that smell. It’s a citrus, aquatic, and woody fragrance. Very similar to an Acqua di Gio, though a bit darker. At first, it’s quite different, but after 10 minutes, it shares a lot of similarities. For 12 euros on sale, it’s not a bad buy, although I’m not buying it myself because I already have plenty of similar Acqua di Gio scents.

    Reply
  4. Calone overload. The performance is average, and the overall feeling is pretty mediocre.

    Reply
  5. I couldn’t go to Zara to try out this collection, and being an impulse shopper, I bought this Virtuous Oud blind based on its notes. It arrived yesterday, and today I watched Carlos Rubio’s video where he says it smells like cuttlefish. So, terrified, I applied this fragrance this morning thinking I’d smell like a chocolate meatball for the rest of the day. And I didn’t (fortunately). Virtuous Oud is a citrus fragrance with a very natural and pleasant opening, fresh and suitable for this summer. Supposedly it has easy-to-detect notes (calone and ambroxan), but I don’t notice them as much, except for the calone in the first fifteen minutes. That’s the only thing noticeable: fifteen minutes. After that, it drops to skin-level and lasts about 4 hours as a citrus with a faint woody sandalwood base. And that’s it. The same thing happened to me with Morillas’ previous collection for Zara, where I got ripped off by Morning Sunray in Seville. I can understand that the result might be limited by the budget Zara asks Morillas for, but it doesn’t justify it, because Zara has great perfumes with even lower costs. What did you do, Carlos, to make it smell like cuttlefish to you? (:P)

    Reply