Men

Loewe Solo Mercurio

Marca
Loewe
3.97 de 5
368 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Loewe Solo Mercurio by Loewe is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 2020, this composition features fig leaves, lavender, and geranium as top notes; orange blossom and mandarin in the heart; and honey, tobacco, licorice, amber, cardamom, and musk in the base. The creation is signed by the perfumer who designed it.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 15%
  • Primavera 32%
  • Verano 24%
  • Otoño 29%
  • Día 60%
  • Noche 40%

Notas clave

Comunidad

368 votos

  • Positivo 73%
  • Negativo 14%
  • Neutral 13%

Pirámide olfativa

Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.

Salida 3 notas
Corazón 2 notas

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Loewe Solo Mercurio y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

38 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • Vicgarcia1990

    I tried a sample. In the dry down, it’s very similar to Armani Code. I can’t say more; I’ve only been wearing it for a few hours.

  • I received a sample and wore it a couple of times. It smells sweet but with an acidic touch that doesn’t suit me. This flanker reminds me of the Matrix, but sweeter; it also evokes Armani Code, though it lacks magic. In the dry down, it gets closer to Pure XS, which to me smells like stale spice. It’s not bad, but these notes don’t work with my skin and I don’t feel comfortable wearing them. The citrus opening is the best part, but it doesn’t innovate and there are better options in its range. Cheers, fragrance lovers.

  • It’s the classic Loewe Solo, but with less emphasis on the traditional and more on that ‘bluish’ tone. It keeps its versatility and that dusty base, which is more noticeable here, alongside fresh, sweet, or fruity nuances. It has more punch than the original without being a beast. I absolutely loved it. Highly recommended.

  • I tried it at a shopping mall, and despite people who were hopeful being disappointed after hearing bad reviews, I have to say that personally, I liked it quite a bit. It reminded me of the original Solo but with more body, better longevity, and a richer aroma.

  • I tried it at a mall, and although many people with high hopes were disappointed after reading bad reviews, I personally liked it quite a bit. It reminded me of the original Loewe Solo, but with more body, better longevity, and a richer scent.

  • Not bad at all; I don’t understand the criticism. It’s a flanker of the classic, with sweet touches that modernize it and excellent performance. I’m writing this while ordering a 100ml bottle. EDIT: I’ve been wearing it for 6 months in various situations. It’s not spectacular, but it has earned me several compliments. I’m a fan of ADP scents and have never received compliments with any of them. This Mercurio takes the crown, just above Prada Homme and Cebrat Boise. I suppose it depends on the social environment. You notice when I wear it, unlike the others. Although it’s not the best scent or reaches the soles of others in my collection, it delivers.

  • It’s not bad at all; I don’t understand the criticism. It’s a flanker of the classic, with sweet touches that modernize it and excellent performance. I’m writing this while ordering a 100ml bottle. EDIT: I’ve been wearing it for 6 months in various situations. It’s not spectacular, but it has earned me several compliments. I’m an ADP fan and never received praise from them. This Mercurio takes the crown, just above Prada Homme and Cebrat Boise. I suppose it depends on the social setting, but it stands out when I wear it compared to the others. That’s the difference, even if it’s not the best scent or reaches the soles of others in my collection, it performs.

  • It reminds me a lot of the Armani Code line; despite not having vanilla or leather, I don’t like either the Mercurio or any Armani Code, they are very sweet and give me diabetes.

  • It reminds me a lot of the Armani Code line, despite not having vanilla or leather. I don’t like this one or any Armani Code; they are too sweet and give me diabetes.

  • Boinaverde2009

    The metallic orange! That’s what I perceive. It would probably be the perfume for Mr. Alex DeLarge, with his refined speech and brutal behavior. What madness? It’s one of the most bipolar scents I’ve tried. It’s fresh but no, sweet but no, cozy… but no. According to Loewe, it’s a fougère that starts as an eternal fresh citrus, almost entirely orange (mandarin) with a sharp fig leaf. It gives a sensation of metallic orange and sweetness that should NOT be used in heat, especially in summer. The power, trail, and longevity are beastly. If you don’t believe me, ask my wife the first time I tried it with over 30 degrees. Don’t be fooled by “fresh citrus”; although it’s energizing and alive, it has nothing to do with fresh. That sensation is eternal, and after 2 or 3 hours comes the second phase: musky floral mandarin, which sometimes reminds me of Dior Eau for Men but without iris and livelier. Let’s call it the calm phase, since the initial one is too incisive. At the end, I perceive the tobacco/honey: creamy, pleasant tobacco that with honey gives a sweet, woody, and dark very relaxing sensation. All together with that metallic orange but more muted in the background. Is it good? Yes! Totally, it’s a beast of a perfume different from any citrus. Blind buy? Definitely not, it took me several days to test it in different climates to understand it. Recommended if you are a fan of the Solo saga and like novel and surprising perfumes (10-12h on my skin, very perceptible, brutal projection with just 3 sprays).

  • Solo Mercurio is woody, ambered, and musky. It resembles the mother, Solo, maintaining the typical fruity amber notes of the line, before settling into wood and musk that sometimes smells like a sawmill. It’s not fresh nor too warm. I don’t see much difference from the original, so the launch doesn’t make much sense. It’s for intermediate seasons like spring or autumn because it’s heavy in summer. Performance is great, good fixative, lasts over 12 hours with regular projection. Among the Solo derivatives, the one I liked most was Platinum; the others are very similar to the original.

  • Exquisite! What a beast of a perfume. I don’t understand why it’s not talked about more and why it has such low ratings. I’ve been collecting for a short time, and this is the first one that truly evolves in every stage. So rich and well-made, it demonstrates a quality that linear perfumes lack. I own Dior, Chanel, etc., but I never appreciated evolution until I added this. It smells incredibly rich, apart from everything else.

  • Excellent. I already owned the complete Solo line but felt it was a bit classic, with derivatives that were very similar. Until this flanker arrived, which is my favorite of the line and the entire collection. It keeps the original DNA but is modernized and rejuvenated; it’s the one that deviates most from the classic. It’s original, has personality, and distinct phases, unlike the original which is linear. It features a potent citrus opening with sweet herbs and an exquisite fig leaf with a metallic touch. Then, after an hour, it balances with floral and musk notes, finishing with tobacco, licorice, amber, and honey. It’s spicy, woody, and sweet. Not for extreme heat; better for spring or autumn. Longevity and projection are above average; it’s an underrated gem that is finally getting its due.

  • Excellent perfume. I own the complete SOLO line, which I liked, but lost interest when it felt classic, mature, and with very similar flankers. Until this came out, which has become my favorite of the line and one of my favorites in the collection. Although it keeps the original DNA, it’s modernized and rejuvenated; I feel it’s the one that strays furthest from the classic. It’s original, has personality, and surprises with its nuances and distinct phases, unlike the original which is more linear. Cataloged as a fougère, it’s much more complex: it starts with a potent citrus opening, sweet herbal notes (without being cloying), and an exquisite fig leaf with a metallic touch, fresh but not just that. After an hour or two, the blend balances with floral touches and a pleasant talcum-like dry down, but then tobacco, licorice, amber, and honey emerge, creating a spicy, woody, and sweet, exquisite fragrance. I don’t recommend it for extreme heat or cold; it’s ideal for spring and autumn. It has longevity and projection above average, inexplicably undervalued, although lately the community is doing it justice.

  • Almost identical to Invictus Victory but of much higher quality and less synthetic. You can tell they tried to imitate it, but this one is superior in every way. I have ten 2ml samples and I enjoy them a lot. It’s very seductive; women love it. The performance is brutal, with excellent longevity and projection. The value for money is unbeatable.

  • jerry drake

    It’s not a classic fougère, nor does it closely resemble Victory, though the drydown has a similar vibe. Rabanne is warmer; this one is rougher and herbaceous. The opening is a mix of citrus and synthetic wood that smells like a dead-end alley with tough guys watching. But then it changes, thanks to the licorice, although the tobacco and honey notes don’t appear. It’s spicy, herbaceous, and synthetic. Later, it becomes light and sweet, like a fine men’s fragrance you don’t smell every day. Perfect for late summer or autumn, even if the start is unpleasant.

  • BassoProfumo

    Hey, this smells absolutely incredible. It has an elegant sharpness that really hooks you. It reminds me of the original but feels more refined and balanced. The longevity is top-notch, at least on my skin. I don’t know why I always judge Loewe so harshly, but with this Mercurio, I was wrong. It’s like finding a treasure while looking for something else.

  • BassoProfumo

    It really smells, but VERY well. It has an elegant and addictive ‘acidity’. It reminds me of the original Essential and Solo Cedro, but more refined, better balanced, and sophisticated. Plus, it has good longevity, at least in my experience. I don’t know why, but I tend to prejudge Loewe negatively; I stumbled upon this Mercurio and I must correct myself. This fragrance gave me that feeling of ‘finding something while looking for something else’.

  • Another example that when they want to, Loewe does things right. This perfume was supposed to be a big risk because Emilio Valero, the house’s flagship Spanish perfumer for many years, was no longer behind it; now Nuria Cruelles faces the difficult task of not losing the thread, and although it changes a bit, it maintains a certain link with other ‘Solos’ in the line. It’s one of those perfumes that may not please everyone, and that’s because if the opening is somewhat complicated due to the roughness of its aroma; its dry-down is herbaceous and raspy, the fig leaf is very well done, and I say this firsthand because I know them really well. Then lavender and bergamot soften that initial roughness and transition the aroma into a sweet, creamy, and full-bodied dry-down. It’s not a sweet aroma in the usual sense, not an Armani Code as some compare it, not that sweet or plastic, nor gourmand. It’s very pretty and worth trying because it’s one of those perfumes with notable evolution, an evolution that, saving distances, reminds me of Le Male: fresh and herbal opening and powdery-sweet dry-down; in this Mercurio, the opening is certainly strong, herbal, and even acidic, turning into a creamy sweetness with a slightly musky base that gives the sensation of a barbershop aroma. In my case, like @Ulito, I see a slight similarity in the dry-down to Pure XS, even reminiscences of Le Male’s dry-down, but this composition is more modern than the last and easier to wear than the first, also more mature. Versatile aroma, works equally well for a torn shirt or a wrinkled suit, though better in intermediate and fresh seasons; for summer, it can be a bit suffocating on extremely hot days. Not terrible in performance but very satisfactory, above what we’ve recently gotten used to. In short, a good aroma that I don’t see redundant in Loewe, I think it’s a better perfume than Essential and has more personality, especially at the start; the dry-down is pretty but not surprising. It wasn’t bad to be the first from the new perfumer.

  • I bought it blind today just for the name, Solo Mercurio. The salesperson told me it was for women; I said it was for men, but she showed me a legend labeled by the store saying women, and what I told the salesperson was real: it’s for men, perhaps slightly unisex but mostly for men. It smells good, herbaceous, fresh, slightly sweet (subtle). You can detect the lavender. With a single spray, I realize it’s a perfume made to last, with great sillage, and the price is regular. A good men’s perfume, I recommend it for all climates, day or night, and people like its scent.

  • I had high expectations with Loewe’s Solo line. Mercurio, Platinum, and the original seemed simple, undefined. I feel them lacking personality, even though Loewe has beautiful compositions like the cylindrical 7, 001, Essence, PH, Él, etc.

  • Miguel Gil

    One of the best in my collection, I love it. It starts with a light freshness but turns sweet in the dry-down; the tobacco is felt throughout its life and it’s spectacular. The quality seems very good. Longevity over 8 hours and projection is more than decent. Very rich, one of my favorites. And compliments never fail, 10/10.

  • Aldo-12345

    I bought it recently. I love its different, almost niche aroma. Good longevity and sillage.

  • fleur parfumée

    Exquisite… For those who like Vie Est Belle, you could say they’ll like this; on my nose, I feel it as their male version. Softer, nothing aggressive. I’d buy it for myself, I think it passes as unisex.

  • I bought it blind, a 2021 batch. I already have 7 Anonimo Cilindrico and it’s amazing, just like Cedro. I hope I didn’t make a mistake.

  • Carlos Cardozo

    Solo Mercurio is a fruity, herbal, and spicy fragrance. It reminded me a bit of the vibe of Foconero by Tiziana Terenzi mixed with some of the Fierce AB body wash, but they head in very different directions. The grass here stays sharp, surrounded by citrus and lavender; Loewe’s guys did a great job because the evaporation is slow and the citrus lasts until the end. I don’t detect tobacco or honey; instead, I sense amber and spicy touches (cardamom) that give it that sweetness. In its dry-down, I perceive some cedar and oakmoss woods, notes not declared. Great longevity, projection well above average. Spectacular and quite versatile.

  • I’ve been wearing this fragrance for a few days and think it’s very underrated. It has amazing performance, smells delicious, everyone likes it, and you can get it at a good price, at least in Spain. The scent is sweet-herbaceous-fruity, something that doesn’t remind me of anything previous; you have to try it on skin because it changes quite a bit when smelled on a blotter. Maybe the only “bad” thing is that it leans formal/adult; I don’t see anyone under 25/30 smelling like this, nor for very sporty activities; it’s more elegant/semi-formal. As for the climate, I’d use it practically all year round except extreme heat; very versatile in that sense.

  • Herbal, fruity, and spicy aroma with a suede-like leather base (even though it’s not listed). It’s very close to niche perfumes. The bottle design should be updated; right now it’s an elongated yellow, but the fragrance still maintains all its power and scent profile.

  • Ander 333

    Loewe Solo Mercurio: I’ve been testing it for months and finally got a bottle. Fantastic, a familiar scent I can’t quite identify, very balanced and addictive. It comes out fresh and herbal, a bit rough with the fig leaf scraping a bit until it sweetens and aromas, with lavender, sweet mandarin, and an amber base that create a fabulous scent. It evolves from herbaceous/spiced accords to fruity/amber ones; in its heart notes, there’s a little bit of sweetness well-mixed with lavender without being cloying. I’ve tried the new one (orange bottle) and the old one (the one I have, on sale), and I can only distinguish them by the opening: the original comes out a bit fresher, sparkling, and dense; otherwise, they are identical. Longevity is good, 6-7 or 8 hours, with moderate projection and sillage. Leaning masculine, maybe due to the lavender. Very versatile, works well in any climate except heat; spring and fall are its star seasons. It’s not particularly mature or youthful; I struggle to define an age for this specific one. I see it as the perfect signature for whoever wants that, admitting both formal and semi-formal occasions, although I see it as quite casual. Highly recommended, available at a reasonable price for what it gives.

  • Good morning, everyone. As a young person, I want to focus my reviews on people my age (15-25). To start, it’s my favorite fragrance in my entire collection, though I’ll try to be as objective as possible. Ideally, it’s for fresh or mild weather; if it’s very hot (27°C+), the sweet touch can get cloying, although its projection isn’t beastly, it has pleasant sillage and diffusion. It opens with acceptable quality citrus and dries down to a very appealing sweet base, nothing cloying, just soft and charming, with a touch of tobacco in the background and some leather that’s hard to identify at 100%. Sincerely, it’s a serious fragrance of high quality, almost niche, that has left me amazed. It reminds me of intimate moments because of that sweetness that goes down the throat, almost evoking that sensation, which is why I also consider it sexy to a certain extent. Longevity is 6-7 hours with 1-2 hours of projection. I use it as a signature or for casual outings, though also for more formal events. For this age group, it’s totally suitable if you’re looking for a high-quality signature scent with a unique smell, as it doesn’t smell like anything I’ve tried before, and it’s even more recommended for older people. It’s my first review, I hope I did it well and that you enjoy this wonderful aroma.

  • It’s herbal, warm, and sweet, hard to define. Love and hate: I loved it at first, but once I got to know it properly, I stopped liking it.

  • I’ve been wearing this perfume for six months, and it’s simple yet characterful. Very cheerful, and everyone smells good on it. Although it’s sweet, it weighs nothing; the honey gives that sweet touch that contrasts wonderfully with the oranges and mandarins—that’s the key. Don’t forget the tobacco and musk that give it maturity. It’s better suited for younger people, but for daytime or casual events, it makes a huge impression. It’s quite strawberry-like despite the sweetness, and in winter or extreme cold, it might not stand out as much.

  • Victortor

    I like it, but it feels a bit youthful. It has that Loewe signature: aromatic fig, sweet mandarin, a touch of floral, and that aquatic sensation reminiscent of coconut. I also detect spices, cardamomo in the dry down. It’s good, easy to wear, but that youthfulness marks it. It feels like it’s between two worlds without a clear profile. Performance is decent, versatile, ideal for summer and spring-fall. Good price, although there are things within the brand I love more. I’ll use it more, but the performance has left me on a tightrope; the projection is very just on my skin.

  • I tried Mercurio out of curiosity because of the name, and upon testing it, I confirm it’s not a typical scent. Upon application, you get a fresh, herbaceous blend: lavender, fig leaves, and geranium that smell clean and modern, not earthy. Then it evolves into citrus and florals like mandarin and orange blossom, adding warmth without losing that green, urban vibe. The base is the best part: honey and tobacco, softly sweetened with amber, cardamom, and musk, giving it body. It’s not cloying, but elegant and spiced. It’s not a classic or tied to a specific season; it’s elegant, urban, and mysterious—not a light floral nor an exaggerated gourmand. Projection is moderate, noticeable without being overwhelming, and lasts several hours, though it doesn’t project heavily all day. Ideal if you’re looking for something modern with character, versatile for day or night. The best part is that it’s unpredictable, fresh yet deep. The downside is that it can seem synthetic or undefined at first and isn’t for those who want something that explodes around you.

  • I bought a decant and will be as objective as possible: if you like unique scents, you might think this is a hit, but for my unrefined nose, this is a perfume I would never wear, and don’t expect compliments.

  • Obsessed! This is one of my favorite perfumes. It’s a real shame Loewe discontinued it; it was a best-seller here in America. It’s versatile, fresh at the start, and I absolutely love the heart and base notes. The lingering trail of warm tobacco and honey is delicious—perfect for me on casual days or outdoors. It stays fresh and mysterious at the end. I had to buy two more bottles just because they stopped making it.