Skip to content

Gentleman (2017) by Givenchy

Men 2017

Brand
Givenchy
Perfumer
Olivier Cresp

Description

Gentleman (2017) by Givenchy is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2017, this composition was created by Olivier Cresp and Nathalie Lorson. The top notes unfold with pear, cardamom, and pineapple; the heart reveals iris, lavender, and geranium; while the base notes land in leather, black vanilla bean, and patchouli.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 18%
  • Spring 32%
  • Summer 19%
  • Autumn 31%
  • Day 57%
  • Night 43%

Key notes

Community

3,059 votes

  • Positive 74%
  • Negative 15%
  • Neutral 11%
positive reviews 3.1 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentSpring CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

8,284 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

4,141 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

2,246 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Gentleman (2017)

Main accord iris Year 2017 Gender Men Perfumer Nathalie Lorson · Olivier Cresp

Gentleman (2017) by Givenchy is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2017, this composition was created by Olivier Cresp and Nathalie Lorson. The top notes unfold with pear, cardamom, and pineapple; the heart reveals iris, lavender, and geranium; while the base notes land in leather, black vanilla bean, and patchouli.

Fruits, vegetables and nuts Spices Flowers Musk, amber and animalic Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

1,703 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

1,855 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

1,363 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

1,230 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Lautyreyes64

    An aroma that breaks the mold. The EDT from Gentlechy by Givenchy opens with freshly cut pear and evolves into a marked iris with a hint of lavender that fits perfectly. It’s a fragrance few talk about, but the scent is excellent, and in my opinion, it’s one of the best in the entire Gentleman line.

    Reply
  2. Severely underrated; I don’t understand why others don’t like it. Plus, it does last. Maybe they have a bad pH, which is why they feel it lacks longevity. It’s delicious for daytime and heat, ideal for enclosed spaces like the office.

    Reply
  3. I loved it, but it didn’t last long. It’s exquisite for daytime. Perhaps there are better options if performance is your priority.

    Reply
  4. A modern, classy scent that reminds you of walking into a luxury store. It’s the most underrated, and for me, along with the EDP, it’s one of the best. If I’d listened to YouTube reviewers, I never would have bought it; thank God I tested it and was pleasantly surprised. It’s the best Gentleman for daily wear, alongside Gentleman Only.

    Reply
  5. Adriamataguzman

    I apologize for saying it this way, but I don’t understand some reviews. I think the bare minimum before sharing an opinion is to inform yourself, even if you’ve tested the perfume and even if it seems like everyone here is an expert. I like it quite a bit. Perfumes with iris or violet usually appeal to me, and this one has both notes, especially the iris. I don’t find it as cloying as other Prada or Dior scents; I sense it’s fresher, probably due to citrus, lavender, or geranium notes. As it dries down, vanilla becomes slightly more noticeable, though not too sweet, which I also enjoy. It performs very well for me—I have skin that doesn’t hold fragrance well, and it lasts about 5-6 solid hours, then a bit longer closer to the skin, totaling around 8 hours. It doesn’t have much projection, but people nearby can still detect it without issue. Overall, the Gentleman collection is one of the ones worth it for me. I recommend Boisée and Reserve Privée.

    Reply
  6. Nothing like its sister, Givenchy Gentleman Only EDT. This one is just another blue, ambroxan-heavy, vanilla bomb designed to slap you in the face; Gentleman Only actually has the name to back it up. I see it as ideal for young guys who like Invictus or Versace Dylan Blue—it plays in that league. Honestly, it doesn’t add anything for me.

    Reply
  7. Love at first sniff. That’s exactly what I felt when I tried it for the first time in a department store; I said I needed that scent, that it was my personality bottled up, but everything fell apart when I realized the show is a one-act wonder. Disappointed, I looked at its sisters who also made me fall in love, but none gave me what this one did, even if just for a moment, so I decided to stick with this ephemeral poem. Setting aside the poems that get recycled here, it opens with pear, pineapple, iris, and leather, where the first two are fleeting and the rest is what will accompany you for 90% of the fragrance’s life. In short, none of its sisters resemble it too much except for that iris note, which you’ll find here in a much subtler way. It’s clear this comes closer to the style of its cousin Gentleman Only because it’s the first, and with the rest of the flankers, they decided to go down a different path with way more iris. Personally, I’ve loved it despite its short lifespan, but I wouldn’t recommend it to the masses since it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. My ratings: Scent 9.5, Longevity 6, Projection 3, Quality 10.

    Reply
  8. darlinessenza

    Let me start with the obvious: Givenchy Gentleman (2017) is a fragrance that doesn’t go unnoticed. It’s intense, spicy, and decidedly masculine. Its scent is, in effect, a true iris bomb complemented by strong fruits and spices. It’s like the bad boy, sexy side of Prada L’Homme.

    Reply
  9. Jadelifschitz

    I’m surprised how identical it is to YSL L’Homme Libre, which didn’t come back at least in Argentina. I bought it blind; it’s nothing crazy, but I absolutely love it. The powdery feel makes it seem like it has bergamot and basil with pink pepper (even if they aren’t listed in the notes); that aroma reminds me so much of the white part of dry deodorants. Recently, I’ve had the Gentleman line in my lens often and started buying them blind. So far I have this one, Intense, and Privé—all very different but sharing the same heart. All surprised me; I expected something different from each, just going by the packaging. This one is fresh and dry, Intense is almost unisex and smells like vanilla, while Privé smells like whiskey with amber and wood, with a certain similarity to Polo Red Extreme. Worth trying, 8/10.

    Reply
  10. Cegacharles27

    The iris is noticeable from the very first spray and dominates the entire life of the fragrance. It smells fresh and clean, perfect for hot days or going to the gym. It lasts about 4 to 5 hours on the skin, and its trail doesn’t go beyond an outstretched arm. If you like iris, you’ll find plenty here.

    Reply
  11. campeones22

    I was about to buy it, so I applied a drop to one arm and the EDT Intense on the other. Intense wins by a landslide in both longevity and scent. I couldn’t enjoy the smell of the 2017 version; I just don’t get it.

    Reply
  12. Perfumiris

    My boyfriend wore it today, and I didn’t recognize it (something I love to do, though with so many perfumes it’s getting complicated). It seemed strong, especially the leather note, at 30 degrees. The touch of pineapple and pear adds juiciness, but from the start, you can tell there’s lavender and leather; it’s not a light citrus EDT as the color suggests—the iris is more earthy. I think it’s masculine; it’s not easygoing cleanliness but rather for a white shirt, especially in spring and autumn for informal events or the office. The dry down is woody and dry, without sweetness, featuring that fruity leather that makes it interesting. It lasts 1-2 hours with a trail and another 2 hours on the skin. It’s not my favorite in the Gentleman line, but try it if the others don’t suit you, as it steps away from the olfactory profile.

    Reply
  13. HarrisonTomFord

    I used to hate this fragrance in favor of its derivatives. I remember that when I bought it, it grated on me; something didn’t add up. Over time, I realized it was the iris base; I was expecting an extreme addition like in Reserve Privé, but once I knew I shouldn’t expect more, I let it macerate and wore it in the heat. My impressions changed very favorably. I think it deserves a re-evaluation if you have it. Very pleasant.

    Reply
  14. Yung Life Bby

    Let’s start. I would define Gentleman as a clean fragrance. Its fruity top notes stand out and make the perfume pleasant from the start, enjoyable without being cloying. As it progresses, the iris stands out, and in my opinion, I sense the leather but not as dominant as others say. It has a special charm on mild autumn and spring days, where the weather isn’t extreme; it’s in these scenarios that it loses its spark, as the ambient smell can mask it since it’s not very potent compared to other derivatives like the EDT Intense or my favorite, the EDP. It’s pleasant, smells clean, perfect for the office because it doesn’t invade or overwhelm, although I agree with those who denounce its low longevity; nothing a decant can’t solve. I recommend it for those who want to smell clean and like soft iris. I’m more than satisfied with the purchase for the versatility it brings to the Gentleman collection.

    Reply
  15. Delicious fruity opening accompanied by that iris reminiscent of the Gentleman line. Powdery, clean, and with that leather base, making it super masculine. Great perfume for warm seasons (without abusing on extremely hot days). Versatile beyond measure. Romantic date, formal event, or everyday wear; it always looks good. If you want compliments, this one delivers them. Highly recommended. If there’s anything to criticize, it’s a bit more projection (longevity is perfect). Rating: 8.8/10.

    Reply
  16. Barras_fragancias

    Okay… the opening is delicious, super fresh, a pear scent mixed with an iris that slightly reminds me of Prada L’Homme and a barely perceptible acidic pineapple, plus a hint of vanilla that adds sweetness. If the perfume smelled like the opening the whole time, it would be a 10/10… however, that’s not the case at all. After 30 minutes, it starts to smell like leather, but not a pleasant one; a bitter, petroleum-like leather, almost burnt leather. It goes from that unique, fresh, and rich aroma to something that’s nothing special. Moreover, its longevity and projection are very poor; maybe it doesn’t react well on my skin, but I feel there are better iris options on the market. I felt this perfume wanted to be Prada L’Homme or the Gentleman EDP Intense version without reaching the heels of either. At first, I didn’t want to sell it because I loved its opening, but that burnt leather aroma repulsed me so much that I sold it. It’s worth noting that I personally hate perfumes with leather; I prefer sweet, citrus, or unisex scents. So if you like leather, this is perfect for you… but even in that case, perfumes like Montblanc Explorer have a much more pleasant fresh leather; I don’t recommend this Gentleman at all.

    Reply
  17. If you want a fragrance that gives a sense of cleanliness, this is a great option. With 5-6 sprays, it flooded the space with scent and has a good trail for the first 2 hours. It’s not a beast mode perfume by any means; don’t get confused. It’s a soft scent, with an iris that feels quite what we already know from this Givenchy line. It’s very versatile, but I see it as ideal for spring and daytime. I consider its worst time to be on cold days. I don’t see it for formal events, as it doesn’t impose and would lose against heavier, more masculine trails. That said, it would be a differentiator.

    Reply
  18. This was one of my first designer perfumes, and I really loved it. I wore it to a special event that I have very fond memories of. One of the things I like most is the pear note, which doesn’t dissipate over time and stays continuous. In my opinion, it’s an excellent option to start exploring iris fragrances.

    Reply
  19. I’ve only tried it, but it’s a good alternative. It’s one of those perfumes that stands out quite a bit, yet it’s soft and rich, very fresh, and a perfect signature. I think it’s a great scent to be recognized. 8.5/10. Longevity: ?, projection 9/10, blind buy 9/10, price 8.3/10, current final note 8.7, still testing.

    Reply
  20. You can really tell how the scent evolves over time. I love the opening and heart, but the dry down leaves a powerful leather note that, while not bad, doesn’t quite win me over. When I smell my clothes, I only detect that leather, with no pear or iris left. It’s a great fragrance overall, but this shift from fruity to strong leather is its weak point for me.

    Reply
  21. SantoGrial

    I bought a bottle based on the good reviews and I’m satisfied. That fruity halo at the beginning, with that dusty touch, gives off a delicious aura. It’s true it doesn’t last long, maybe three hours of projection, but it’s worth it. It’s a cheerful scent, perfect for any occasion, and you’ll always smell good. If I categorize perfumes into smelling good, smelling rich, or smelling delicious, this falls into the ‘rich’ category.

    Reply
  22. Mr. Baskerville

    They say all the past is better, but not always. At a certain age, I see people emphasizing that to the point of making it their life, just like their parents, yet curiously, that same crowd hates being called ‘old’ or ‘sir’. Plus, they practice permanent complaining: the music is bad, the patio is crowded, the grass isn’t green… Gentleman 2017 is Givenchy’s vision of how a gentleman would wear it today. It’s not a bad fragrance. Although the sweet opening of cardamom, pear, and pineapple isn’t my thing, the blend of iris and lavender gives the leather a subtle, elegant body, adding that masculine touch. Does it compare to the 1974? No, it’s a different kind of gentleman: younger and adapted to current elegance. I don’t fully share that impression, but I understand it. Longevity and projection are acceptable. I advise trying both versions.

    Reply
  23. After being a fan of Dior Homme in several versions, almost by accident, smelling this to see if it resembled Givenchy Gentleman Cologne, I sprayed it three times and automatically called the salesperson to buy a bottle. It’s a masculine, soft scent that generates well-being and security. I see it as ideal for a signature scent, very much in the vibe of Dior or Prada.

    Reply
  24. AugustoDoc

    Here we have something safe and inoffensive, like ‘record and play’. I bought it for my collection; the Gentleman line is one of my favorites and I own several, but this EDT is my least preferred. What I like most is the opening, which rounds out a delicious fruity leather that quickly settles and softens the slightly sweet iris and patchouli thanks to the vanilla. Everything is in homeopathic doses, very soft, except for the scarce minutes of the opening. The trail and longevity are low; you’ll have to apply a lot. I insist, the longevity rating on Fragrantica groups bad perfumes with regular performers. Three hours isn’t the same as five. This EDT sticks very close to the skin after three hours, and I can’t say its longevity is moderate. It’s rich, safe, and versatile; you can use it almost for any weather or occasion, but I’m not sure if I should have bought it.

    Reply
  25. I bought and reviewed it years ago, almost when it came out. It never seemed like much to me beyond the beautiful opening and the lavender with soft iris. It remains weak; it’s good that it’s an EDT, but alongside the fresh leather, there are woods! How can it not have them? And patchouli, what is that? A glorious wood alongside vetiver and sandalwood. They look like shrubs, but the aroma is woody. I bought it again yesterday because it was a gift. It sits there among others in my wardrobe, like the Intense, which is extremely sweet and potent, and I think to make it stand out you have to apply it more than once. Dry, dusty, rough, fresh, white fruity, leather, woody. For daytime and evening.

    Reply
  26. Wow! What a beautiful scent. It’s not aggressive, nothing delicate but with that masculine touch. Like a retro aroma but it’s a true gentleman, as its name indicates. That pear and that pineapple give it a unique touch, and that leather makes it masculine. I think it’s a scent for personal taste, a delight for the senses. The pear is felt throughout the journey, but its dry down is glorious.

    Reply
  27. JavierSantana

    I heard comments from reviewers like Israel Moreno and Primal Scent and I want to clarify a few things. First: iris is its most accentuated note. Whoever says it’s not an iris perfume or that it’s not present is wrong. Second: IT DOES NOT HAVE WOODS. For the love of God, it seems unreal that someone with so many followers can’t discern that it has a leather base, not woods or woody notes. I’m not saying this because the house declares it; even analyzed by my ‘dog nose’, it’s a perfume with quite refined leather; underneath it has resinous and amber nuances, but it doesn’t possess woody notes as such. Third: if you want this DNA for daily wear but that still pulls in dates, go for this. In my opinion, much better than the EDP Reserve Privée. Gentleman EDT doesn’t even cloy in heat, it’s very well constructed and balanced.

    Reply
  28. I must say this perfume was a disappointment at first, but then it wasn’t. I went to a retail store (first mistake) asking for perfumes with a leather accord and they sold me this Gentleman. I tried it and, not knowing the accord well and having more desire than knowledge, I bought it (second mistake). There was the disappointment: it’s not a perfume with leather as the protagonist or noticeable. Rather, the leather note gives it body and is accompanied by vanilla. I started to like it when I stopped seeing it as the leather fragrance (which I knew later was what I was looking for) and began to appreciate its other facets: the ripe, sweet, and watery pear, along with the pineapple, form the opening that sweetens the lavender and that dusty touch of iris. Finally, the sweet and lavender trails fall into the vanilla-leather I mentioned. A whole journey. Despite the density, its longevity goes somewhat against the grain, being scarce.

    Reply
  29. Gentil vagabond

    Givenchy is an excellent brand with very original perfumes from the beginning, and this is no exception. A great elegant and balanced scent, although the longevity is a bit poor.

    Reply