Men
Lola
Acordes principales
Descripción
Lola by Marc Jacobs is a fruity floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2009, this composition was created by Yann Vasnier and Calice Becker. The top notes unfold with pink pepper, pear, and tangerine; the heart reveals a harmony of rose, peony, and geranium; while the base notes land with vanilla, musk, and tonka bean.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
pink pepper
-
Corazón
rose
-
Base
vanilla
Comunidad
3,629 votos
- Positivo 63%
- Negativo 34%
- Neutral 2.8%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Lola y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
33 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I liked it on paper, but on my skin the pepper explodes too much, so it doesn’t fully convince me.
What the previous reviewer said is true: the pepper really stands out. Besides that, it’s very feminine, “very pink” due to the rose and geranium notes, spicy and pleasant. I consider it quite youthful.
Lola is super spicy. To me, it seems sexy and bold, though I wouldn’t call it elegant. It has a very particular scent that not everyone will like. I agree it’s a floral-fruity blend with a perfect balance. What stands out most is the pink pepper, that spicy note that can sometimes be too much. The bottle isn’t practical, but it’s gorgeous and looks great decorating the vanity.
I tried it at a friend’s house, and to be honest, I think it’s more suited for women aged 30 or 35 and up. The rose is so dominant that it reminds me of that age profile.
“Lola, Lolitaaaa!” I loved it. Perfect for girls aged 18 to 26: college, first job, nights out with friends. It’s soft, feminine, and has an elegant touch. I can picture a pretty, extroverted girl surrounded by people. I wouldn’t buy it myself, but I like it. I agree with Arantxa about everything except the bottle, which isn’t my style. My mother, who is over 55, wears it well, so it’s a mix: youthful yet mature. On my skin, I notice the pepper, but my nose detects more rose, geranium, tart pear (from the grapefruit), and tonka bean. It’s a youthful, playful scent for everyday wear.
I wear it for late afternoon and evening outings. It’s floral-fruity, sexy, feminine, and cheerful, with a cosmopolitan and unusual touch. I don’t imagine wearing it during the day at work due to its intensity, nor for anyone under 25. It lasts a long time on my skin, and the pepper note isn’t bothersome because the roses and geranium take precedence.
Lola and I are a love-hate relationship. I love Marc Jacobs as a designer, but he hasn’t impressed me with perfumes yet. With the name “Lola,” I expected something coquettish and playful. On my skin, it smells like pepper, a bit of carnation, and at the end, like salad (?). It’s not unpleasant, but it’s weird. Later it becomes floral and fruity, but that doesn’t convince me to buy it. If it doesn’t work on my skin, it’s not worth it for the final scent. The bottle is confusing: I hate the flower colors, but I like the idea of the flower-topped cap and the purple. Its sillage and longevity are very good. It suits all ages and is easy to wear. I won’t buy it, mainly due to the price, when there are other Marc Jacobs options. I hope others try it; I think it’s worth it. My chemistry with perfumes is always confusing.
Lola and I have a love/hate relationship. I adore Marc Jacobs as a fashion designer, but perfumes don’t impress me. I thought I’d love this perfume out of curiosity and the name ‘Lola,’ expecting something coquettish and bold. On my skin, it smells like pepper, a bit of carnation, and in the end, with the other notes, it smells like a salad (maybe?). It’s not unpleasant, but it’s strange. Later, it takes on a more pleasant, floral, and fruity scent, but that doesn’t convince me to buy it. If it doesn’t work well on my skin, it’s not worth it just for the dry-down. The bottle is confusing: I hate the flower colors, but I like the idea of the floral cap and the purple. Its sillage and longevity are excellent. It suits all ages and is easy to wear. I conclude I won’t buy it, especially considering Marc Jacobs’ price and that they have other perfumes. I hope others try it; I think it’s worth it. This isn’t the first or last time my chemistry with a perfume has been confusing.
I love it, super coquettish and sexy, but it annoys me sometimes. I let it rest, and then I love it again.
I bought Lola by Marc Jacobs (100ml) a few days ago. It’s sweet, spicy, and long-lasting, but it didn’t match my skin chemistry. If anyone wants to swap and lives in Peru, message me at the email in my profile. Cheers, girls!
I loved it. A different, uncommon scent—not too sweet or fresh. Magical. I don’t smell the pepper on me, just the roses and pear. It works great on my skin.
I bought the 100ml Lola a few days ago. It’s a sweet, spicy, and long-lasting perfume, but it just didn’t work with my skin chemistry. If anyone wants to swap it and lives in Peru, feel free to message me; my email is in my profile. Cheers, girls!
I love it, but the pepper is noticeable. A guy told me it smelled like ‘chicken broth,’ something salty. The bottle is beautiful, and I like it a lot. I should try it again.
Deliciously floral, playful, and spicy. I imagine it on a young, coquettish, and lively woman. Exquisite!
Horrible! I didn’t like the pepper; it smells like an old lady. I also found that ‘chicken broth’ scent.
Horrible! I didn’t like the pepper note at all. It smells like an old lady, and on top of that, it has a chicken broth scent.
In one word: flowers. I bought it to step out of my vanilla comfort zone and have something for everything (school, gym, night). The first spray is a floral explosion! But there’s something that tickles your nose—it’s the pepper. The alcohol is strong, and the pepper gives it a salty effect. It’s for girls aged 15 to 20, but the pepper adds maturity for the 40s too. It loses points because it’s boring, smelling only like chicken broth. Soft sillage, moderate longevity. I wouldn’t buy it again: it’s expensive, and Marc Jacobs doesn’t stand out for perfume quality. The bottle is gorgeous, but the flower smells like plastic or petroleum, lol.
Soft, floral rose scent with that clean soap note I love. At times, it reminds me of Tito Bluni’s DUE.
I’ve never been sold on Marc Jacobs fragrances; they always seem to prioritize the visual and conceptual over actual scent quality. Lola is the perfect example: a fruity-floral blend so ‘girly’ it feels like it was made for a Disney short. It smells like freshly seasoned salad with a heavy dose of pink pepper and an acidic rose note that reminds me of vinegar. While some see it as mature, I find it ultra-childish. It’s not elegant, but it is fun. If you’re looking for something similar but better executed, try Nina Ricci’s Mademoiselle Ricci. The sillage and longevity are moderate; in summer, it’s barely noticeable unless you drench yourself in it, which affects the value for money. Nothing new from the brand, though Decadence might promise more.
I’ve never fully been convinced by Marc Jacobs fragrances; I’ve always had the impression they release higher quality products in other lines. Although they shine in fashion, in perfumery they don’t seem to abandon their innocent and ‘fruity’ slogans, smeared with names of female characters from old Disney shorts, with outrageous containers that remind me of children’s garden ornaments. Lola is particular, reflecting exactly what disgusts me about the brand: I’ve never been one to assign gender to fragrances, but I warn you the following statement is relative to a character concept. Lola has to be the most ‘girly’ fragrance ever created (enough to be recommended by Yuya… without offending). It has strong fruity notes from the pear, which when mixed with pink pepper and geranium, produces a ‘freshly seasoned salad’ aftertaste, very spicy. The rose is acidic, like vinegar, although it momentarily lingers on a clean sweetness I deduce from the peony. Although some see it as mature, I see it as ‘ultra-childish’. The flowers on the cap could well be re-interpreted with EVA foam. I don’t see it as elegant, although it is fun and carefree. If I recommend something of the same style, I’d lean toward Mademoiselle Ricci by Nina Ricci, much better executed, more mature philosophically, although it changes the fruits for acrobatic extortion of roses. Sillage and longevity are moderate; unless it’s summer, I don’t think it’s perceptible unless you bathe in it (requires several applications, so the bottle lasts less and loses quality-price balance, which in my opinion is already unbalanced). Anyway, nothing new in the Marc Jacobs list, although personally I think Decadence could be promising.
To my surprise, Lola really caught my attention. I consider the Marc Jacobs line not necessarily the best or most innovative, however, Lola fits perfectly with me. I like its pepper-with-rose scent, pear, tonka bean, and vanilla, the notes that feel most on my skin. That mix gives it a slight sweetness. It seems comforting, warm, coquettish, and slightly sensual. I recommend it for autumn and afternoons, ideal for going out with friends or informal gatherings. Longevity and sillage are moderate. Rating 7/10.
Lola surprised me by catching my attention. The Marc Jacobs line isn’t always the best, but Lola is perfect for me. I love its blend of pepper, roses, pear, tonka bean, and vanilla; on my skin, it has a slight sweetness. It seems comforting, warm, coquettish, and sensual. I recommend it for autumn and evenings, ideal for going out with friends or informal gatherings. Longevity and sillage are moderate. 7/10.
Definitely for me, the rose scent dominates; it’s soft, floral, feminine, and youthful. A perfect fragrance for everyday wear.
One day I found out my sister had taken an expired gelocap and decided to buy it for herself. It must have been the only time I begged someone in my house to leave and not come back for three hours. Lola looks like a Caribbean perfume; if you judge the bottle without smelling it, you imagine gardenia, orchid, passion fruit, guava, or lychee, something for a blanket and fireplace. You figure it’s messy. But my goodness what it hides. It’s undoubtedly one of the most unbearable perfumes I’ve ever smelled. As if for years you had macerated rose petals, geranium, and peony in a mortar, extracting all the acidic grease until you had a solid, reddish, hysterical plaster, and you add pepper to give and give more, plus an acidic, frosty pear from the bottom of the fridge, dead with laughter, with hints of belly sweat, finishing with the slaughterhouse and butcher shop tone that sometimes the grapefruit brings out. My sister ended up giving it away after using it twice, acting cool while defending that she loved it; she confessed she couldn’t stand it and it caused her anguish and a desire to vomit, I think she even offered fifty euros as a gift to get rid of it. The image it forms in my mind, mind you, has nothing to do with potency, since there are nuclear perfumes I adore; it’s that of a stranded starfish on the sand, a living being in a state of decomposition to which oily floral air freshener effluvia mixed with canary seed and boiled sunflower oil have fallen. It smells like an iguana and a reptile terrarium. I get goosebumps just thinking about it.
I bought it on promotion, the 100ml bottle full of hope. I used it only once. In my life, I’d never smelled anything so strong and cloying. I gave it to my aunt and forbade her from using it when she came to visit; on her, it looked spectacular. A bad experience for me.
I bought it on sale with full enthusiasm. I used it only once because it smelled so strong and cloying that I couldn’t stand it. I gave it to my aunt and told her not to wear it when she visits, even though it looked spectacular on her. A terrible experience for me.
I was organizing my house and suddenly, looking up, there she was, Lola, on my fragrance shelf. A bottle that, being so vulgar and childish with that poorly made flower on the cap, ends up being cute. It smiled at me as I remembered it was a gift from my ex-boyfriend (now husband) back in 2010. Getting close, I saw the last few drops dying. I honored them with the four remaining sprays. The scent was exactly as I remembered: very musky rose petals, a ripe pear, and a bit synthetic. Compared to today, the pink pepper usage is very timid, barely showing. It’s a floral-sweet scent without being cloying; the geranium gives it a touch of darkness that makes it more mature, which is why I enjoy it more now than 11 years ago. I lost it for about 7 hours with moderate sillage. I consider Lola a good attempt that didn’t quite deliver. Although discontinued, you can still find some. Lola: we lived lovely moments and this brief reunion was beautiful, but ours is now a closed chapter.
It was a perfume I loved to have, and it hurts that it’s no longer in production. It’s rare, captivating, heavy, mysterious, and super feminine all at once.
It was a perfume I loved to wear, and I’m so sad it’s no longer made. It’s one of those rare but captivating ones, heavy, mysterious, yet super feminine.
The best perfume I’ve ever smelled in my life. I don’t understand why they stopped producing it; it was the only one people stopped me every day to ask what I was wearing. Lola by Marc Jacobs… simply unbeatable.
The best perfume I’ve ever smelled. I don’t understand why they stopped producing it; it was the only one where people stopped me every day to ask what I was wearing. Marc Jacobs Lola… Unbeatable.
I remember it with fondness, it felt so good on my skin. It’s a pure floral, full of opulent flowers that later settle into a musky, sweet base. After Gucci Bloom, one of my youth favorites that I had set aside. Yes, the flower on the cap was plastic and had a childish vibe, but the fragrance stood out from other designer scents, just like with Marc Jacobs Dot, whose packaging sold more than the scent itself.
Powerful and bold scent, for women who know what they want and don’t beat around the bush. While people say it has vanilla and tonka bean, on the skin they’re almost imperceptible; what dominates is that herbal red rose with lots of geranium. The trail is wide and the presence is impactful.