Angel Eau de Parfum Rechargeable Edition 2015 by Mugler
Women 2015
Description
Mugler's Angel Eau de Parfum Rechargeable Edition 2015 is an oriental vanilla fragrance for women. Launched in 2015, this composition was created by Olivier Cresp and Yves de Chiris. Its olfactory pyramid unfolds with a top note of bergamot, a heart of red berries, and a base of patchouli and vanilla.
Show moreQuick summary
When to wear it (votes)
Key notes
-
Top
bergamot
-
Heart
red berries
-
Base
patchouli
Community
184 votes
- Positive 88%
- Negative 10%
- Neutral 2.2%
The olfactory pyramid
A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.
The community speaks
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
In the collection
Leading answer I own it
646 votes
What do you think?
Leading answer Love it
184 votes
Season
Choose severalLeading answer Winter
173 votes
Time of day
Choose severalLeading answer Night
111 votes
Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.
Fragrance profile
About Angel Eau de Parfum Rechargeable Edition 2015
Mugler’s Angel Eau de Parfum Rechargeable Edition 2015 is an oriental vanilla fragrance for women. Launched in 2015, this composition was created by Olivier Cresp and Yves de Chiris. Its olfactory pyramid unfolds with a top note of bergamot, a heart of red berries, and a base of patchouli and vanilla.
Fruits, vegetables and nuts Woods and mosses Spices
It may remind you of
Ranked by what the community voted.
More from Mugler
Related editions
More from Olivier Cresp
How it wears
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
Longevity
Leading answer Very long-lasting
95 votes
Sillage
Leading answer Strong
131 votes
Character
Leading answer Traditionally feminine
48 votes
Value perception
Leading answer Fair price
33 votes
Featured review The most detailed of the latest reviews.
Have you worn Angel Eau de Parfum Rechargeable Edition 2015?
Tell us how it opens, how it settles on your skin, how long it lasts and when you wear it.
Sort by
Verrouski
With three versions of Angel: this 2015 Gravity, Thierry Mugler’s 2013 Star Edition, and the current one, I have to say there’s very little difference between this and the new reformulation. The Gravity’s opening is more patchouli-like, and I notice the red fences a bit more, but once it dries down, there’s barely any difference. There’s only a very subtle nuance in the dry-down of this edition. That tiny bit is what makes the difference and makes me prefer it over the reformulated Angel. I think if you already own one, it’s not worth having both just for the scent. What’s clear is that it doesn’t just contain those four notes.
Verrouski
I own all three versions of Angel: the 2015 Gravity, Mugler’s 2013 Star Edition, and the current one. Comparing this to the latest reformulation, the difference is minimal. The Gravity’s opening smells more like patchouli, and the red fences are slightly more noticeable, but once it dries down, there’s barely any distinction. The only real difference is a faint nuance in the dry-down of this edition, which is why I prefer it over the reformulated Angel. If you already own one, I don’t think it’s worth buying both just for the scent. The truth is, it’s not just those four notes.
Maureen Carmichael
I think the listed notes here are wrong because I own this fragrance, and it’s very similar to the original—the difference is almost imperceptible. This version also has excellent longevity and a powerful sillage.
geo
I haven’t been lucky enough to try the original 1992 Angel, but I have the new reformulation and now this Gravity Star by Thierry Mugler. I can say that for me, there’s no difference between these two versions. I love it just as much as the reformulated Angel; I get the same ripe, almost overripe fruits with lots of honey. I believe it’s the same thing, and the notes listed here are incorrect.
geo
I haven’t had the fortune of trying the original 1992 Angel version, but I have the new reformulation and now this Gravity Star by Thierry Mugler. I can say that for me, I don’t see any difference between these two versions. I love it just as much as the reformulated Angel; I get the same ripe, almost damaged fruits with lots of honey. I believe it’s the same thing, and the notes listed here are wrong.
Lilmonroe
The new jewel on my vanity. Starting with the packaging: the box is large and unusual, featuring a star aesthetic with embossing. Upon opening, the bottle is amazing: thick glass with its artisanal imperfections, metallic details on the cap and sprayer; it’s truly outstanding. The scent has a light hint of Angel when you open the box, that familiar touch you know. Once applied, it’s a bit softer than the traditional version, but longevity is above average: comfortable for about 6 hours on skin and lasting days on clothes. Its sillage is softer, lacking that intrusive potency we know. If you have the opportunity, buy it. That star can last you years; you can refill it until you get tired of it, or if you thought Angel was good but too invasive, this slightly mellowed version might please you more.
gbriel
Much softer and more wearable than the classic 1992 Angel.