Skip to content

Phantom Elixir by Rabanne

Men 2025

Brand
Rabanne
Perfumer
Anne Flipo
Perfumer
Paul Guerlain

Description

Phantom Elixir by Rabanne is a woody aquatic fragrance for men. Launched in 2025, this creation was designed by Anne Flipo, Juliette Karagueuzoglou, and Paul Guerlain. Its olfactory pyramid unfolds with marine top notes, a heart blending mineral notes and oud wood, and a base of vanilla bean.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 29%
  • Spring 27%
  • Summer 17%
  • Autumn 27%
  • Day 48%
  • Night 52%

Key notes

Community

495 votes

  • Positive 58%
  • Negative 19%
  • Neutral 23%
positive reviews 495 community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageModerate Best momentWinter CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

1,263 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Winter

742 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

404 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Phantom Elixir

Main accord vanilla Year 2025 Gender Men Perfumer Anne Flipo · Juliette Karagueuzoglou · Paul Guerlain

Phantom Elixir by Rabanne is a woody aquatic fragrance for men. Launched in 2025, this creation was designed by Anne Flipo, Juliette Karagueuzoglou, and Paul Guerlain. Its olfactory pyramid unfolds with marine top notes, a heart blending mineral notes and oud wood, and a base of vanilla bean.

Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

246 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

245 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

259 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

229 votes

Community reviews

59 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Nico.benjoin

    I can’t be the only one who thinks this so I’m posting it here: Is there anyone else here who thinks this smells like Monster? I’m not sure which version (I guess the classic one) or if it’s some other energy drink, but both the opening and the drydown totally reminded me of that, it’s like smelling the inside of a finished Monster can with a few little bits of wood dropped at the bottom, that’s from the supposed Oud listed which ends up being nothing more than harmless little woods: I guess my nose, smelling that whole bizarre combination of notes, associated the sweetness of the vanilla and the marine side with the energy drink smell and the mineral notes giving it a certain metallic touch. For that same reason I found it a super interesting and fun fragrance, but I get that not everyone wants to smell like this.

    Reply
  2. pablo_osmanthus

    Seeing the other reviews I decided to buy it, I saw a deal where the 150 ml version was cheaper than the 100 ml one for some reason… Nothing could be further from the truth, what a letdown, to my taste it’s disgusting, it has a vanilla at the end that saves it, but I wouldn’t wear it even if it were the only one I owned.

    Reply
  3. Enzo.osmanthus

    Honestly I don’t know why it gets so much hate, I don’t consider myself an expert, the marine notes opening they describe I smell as a Play-Doh scent but it’s not annoying at all, throughout the day that scent transitions with the vanilla, until at night only the vanilla scent is left, but it’s not a cloying vanilla at all… The longevity amazes me, also its versatility, about projection I’d say it’s not much though, it feels like a very intimate scent to me, close to the skin…

    Reply
  4. My favorite from the line, I hate the others. It leans a bit toward niche salty vanillas, like Sel Vanille by Maison Tahité but mixed with the typical Rabanne DNA.

    Reply
  5. Haha while total newbies think it’s bad, those of us who are more niche think it’s the best of the Phantom line precisely for its originality for being an ultra mainstream brand aimed at pleasing the masses, it’s the most mature version of these robots, it has an ozonic part that lasts very little and then shifts to the DNA of the regular Phantom, I don’t think it’s that summery, maybe for a mild night, neither too hot nor too cold, good longevity and projection as usual with Rabanne

    Reply
  6. VeraLabdanum

    Since I tried it in a store, it smells like mineral vanilla with oud and marine notes, at first I didn’t like it thinking it was more synthetic, but now I do recognize the scent, it’s long-lasting, intense and summery, this perfume works for any type of weather. Nowadays I have the Invictus Elixir with the same scent as the Phantom Elixir.

    Reply
  7. A perfume that doesn’t know what it wants to be, salty vanilla oud with something horribly metallic in the background, with something that hints at seaweed in the background, as if you took some muffins and tried to make sushi out of them but it also smells like unpleasant sharp metal. I think the best way to describe it is as if someone ran an entire marathon without deodorant and put on a vanilla perfume with oud to hide their smell. Unpleasant and confusing

    Reply
  8. Good fragrance, I thought it was going to be the classic sweet one but no, I can perceive all the notes but it’s true that the oud is very toned down and I think that’s excellent. I find it very wearable in all seasons and it can easily be a signature scent if you control the sprays…

    Reply
  9. Bruno.labdanum

    When I read the notes that make up this new Phantom, I said “Oud wood? That’s going to smell very strange”… and I wasn’t wrong, but it has oud only in name! The opening is very salty, it feels like sea salt being thrown in your face, very synthetic smell, strong, heavy, not pleasant. Afterwards it’s just synthetic vanilla… like the smell of those instant vanilla puddings. For an “elixir,” I expected something better

    Reply
  10. I try to like it but I just can’t, it’s sweet, salty and mineral at the same time, very hard to explain, I tried wearing it several times but it didn’t convey anything to me.

    Reply
  11. On the opening the Phantom EDT is very present for about 5 minutes, you can even notice the earthy notes so characteristic of the aforementioned one, then it evolves into a “synthetic” aroma in the good sense of the word (the Phantom line itself stands out for taking the synthetic down a modern path, they play very well with that) metallic, with a nice creamy vanilla in the background and an oud very far in the back, present in a friendly way but adding a very distinctive, creamy and dark weight… Honestly it’s the most different thing I’ve smelled in the designer sector, or at least one of the most different (Boss Bottled Absolu leads in originality) and more than marine, the note or accord it has I associate a lot with the “blue” touch of Dylan Blue… But the marine side is very very faint, nowhere to be found. Once settled the fragrance stays somewhat linear (quite linear I’d say) with that metallic note and background vanilla (and the almost nonexistent oud) with that “blue” note… it’s not a perfume that evolves much honestly, but if you’re one of those who when wearing a perfume want it to stay unchanged, no doubt this is for you, since it smells the same from an hour after spraying. The folks at Rabanne honestly didn’t complicate their lives 🥱 I wouldn’t call it “elixir” so much for longevity, because on skin, despite lasting about 7h quite present (by the eighth it drops abruptly to skin level!) please don’t overdo the sprays! It’s too explosive, it projects consistently for 4-5 hours, and on clothes? Pfff, all holy day and more! If you don’t wash it doesn’t come out. Scent: 7/10 (different, boring, nice) Longevity: 7h (cloying, overwhelming, excellent sillage) Projection: 7/10 (strong the first 3 hours at 1M, 4-5 is a consistent bubble at 20cm) Occasions: daily use on cold days, semi-formal occasions (work, informal baptisms, casino, nothing club-style, bar or pub outings) Overall this perfume would be a 7/10. Anyway, all that said, personally I still loved it. The Phantom line, as much as some hate it for being somewhat repetitive or for pleasing the masses, got me into this world of perfumery and the affection I have for it is undeniable. But I made this review as objective as possible, since as it’s something I like you have to understand that tastes differ and someone looking for reviews needs to know about the perfume… I hope it helps 🫡

    Reply
  12. I tried it today, and I feel it’s quite different from the other Phantoms, but I feel that mineral touch is very strong / superior compared to the other notes with the exception of vanilla which you can slightly notice, and I agree with the opinions that this one is designed more for daily use. Although with only 2 atomizations it lasted me all day with very good projection, that point surprised me quite a bit, but for my taste I wouldn’t use it because I find this perfume very mineral, but I’m not saying it’s a bad perfume since I didn’t dislike it. If you like this type of scents I would recommend you try it, and remember: It’s not the perfume, it’s who wears it. LONGEVITY: 7 hours and 5 hours projecting a lot compared to other perfumes I’ve tried. PROJECTION: 8/10. Scent: 7-8/10. Mineral with a marine touch and a light vanilla (what I notice most).

    Reply
  13. I think people don’t understand this fragrance, they say you won’t stand out, I consider that’s not its goal, it’s the most versatile of all because of those mineral and marine notes, I see it for daily use where you precisely don’t want to draw attention like you would with a nighttime one.

    Reply
  14. marco_bergamote

    It’s not a bad perfume, but it’s not something you’ll stand out with. It’s just one of many, another mediocre perfume with the DNA you can find in Paco Rabanne or Carolina Herrera.

    Reply
  15. Ruben.myrrhe

    I see a lot of hate toward this perfume and I think it doesn’t deserve it. It’s sweet and it’s the least versatile of the line, it’s quite different from the other Phantoms. It’s very pleasant but I don’t sense that marine note at all and even less the oud one. People insist a lot on criticizing this type of perfumes (Paco Rabanne and especially this line) when most haven’t tried them and just follow what some reviewers say (ridiculously exaggerated).

    Reply
  16. mateo_santal

    Why so many haters who haven’t even tested it and already rate it badly just like Le Male Elixir Absolu, stop messing around and vote like that for the ones that deserve it, the SpongeBob or Lightning McQueen ones that aren’t worth crap and don’t even last 30 minutes

    Reply
  17. Ugh, I take back what I said, the drydown of this perfume is horrible, seriously, they took a chunk from each Phantom and threw in the most artificial thing from each one. The oud, marine and mineral notes, I don’t know where they got them from, they’re not there. I feel this launch was just an attempt to squeeze the Phantom line to the very last drop, and I actually like the line, but this launch was disgusting.

    Reply
  18. I don’t know where the “mineral notes” are. And the aquatic ones… well, there’s a certain bluish sandalwood. It’s a fruity vanilla, leaning toward pineapple, with nightclub highlights. It has a custardy base with a certain darkness that suits it well, although everything is very immersed in an ambroxan matrix (but without overdoing it). I have to give it credit for one thing, and that’s that it doesn’t try to seem fresh. It doesn’t try to check every box like other “lifestyle” fragrances do. This is a heavy and enveloping, cozy fruity scent, period. I wonder if in 40 years there will be young people who, as soon as they smell the opening, say it smells like a “60-year-old man who can’t get over his party behavior phase.” Or if there will be vintage connoisseurs who rescue these “seducer” or “panty dropper” formulas, and maybe reinterpret them with a fresh perspective, observing them without prejudice. You’d have to mix ylang-ylang/iris with thyme/basil with ambroxan/clary sage with candied flowers/cherry to make a truly intergenerational unisex.

    Reply
  19. Hi my name is Éric Sélène, I’ll give you my first impressions of this interesting fragrance, although it’s a bit controversial, but it’s an interesting option as the hours go by. Paco Rabanne Phantom Elixir is a flanker (new version) that goes into deeper and more sophisticated territory than its predecessor. The bottle keeps the characteristic futuristic robotic design, but with a darker and more elegant aesthetic, reflecting the shift toward a more nighttime and mature fragrance. The packaging is the characteristic one from previous versions, this packaging that speaks of technological boldness, ideal for those who appreciate innovative design. This version of “Phantom” now with “Elixir” version sits in the oriental-woody family with spicy touches. The opening is vibrant and sweet thanks to a caramelized lavender accord, combined with a spicy heart of geranium and a slight fruity nuance. The base, rich and dense, is dominated by vanilla, smoked woods, and a slightly earthy mineral background. The blend is well balanced, achieving a scent that is seductive and addictive. Now I’ll give you details on the good and the bad: The good: – Projection and longevity: Powerful fragrance with a prominent sillage that lasts more than 8 hours, ideal for leaving a memorable impression. – Nighttime versatility: Despite its depth, it maintains a certain freshness, which makes it perfect for nighttime outings or formal events. – Youthful and modern appeal: Ideal for those looking for a scent that combines sensuality and avant-garde. The bad: – Dominant sweetness: Although well integrated, the initial sweetness can feel excessive if you prefer drier or more sober scents. – Less versatile for daytime: Its dark and sweet profile can feel heavy in warm climates or for daytime activities. – Market competition: Too many perfumes with the same scent category. Recommendations: – User: Phantom Elixir is ideal for men between 20 and 35 who enjoy bold fragrances and are not afraid to stand out. Its modern and sensual character makes it perfect for charismatic and confident personalities. – Seasons: It performs exceptionally well in fall and winter, where its cozy warmth and depth complement the cold weather. – Occasion: Definitely a nighttime fragrance, ideal for dates, parties or formal events. My final verdict Phantom Elixir is a bold step for Paco Rabanne, betting on greater depth and sophistication within its line. It is a fragrance that does not go unnoticed, designed for lovers of sweet, intense and modern scents. While not for everyone, its proposal is clear: a perfume to conquer the night with elegance and boldness.

    Reply
  20. dario_benjoin

    On opening, Phantom EDT is very present for about 5 minutes, you can even notice the earthy notes so characteristic of the aforementioned one, then it evolves into a synthetic aroma in the good sense of the word (the Phantom line itself stands out for taking the synthetic into a modern path, they play very well with that), metallic, with a very creamy vanilla in the background and an Oud far in the back, present in a friendly way but adding a very distinctive, creamy and dark weight… Honestly it is the most different I have smelled in the designer sector, or at least one of the most different (Boss Bottled Absolu leads in originality) and rather than marine, the note or accord it has reminds me a lot of the blue touch of Dylan Blue… Besides it is very very faint, the marine is nowhere to be found. Once settled the fragrance stays somewhat linear (quite a lot I would say) with that metallic note and background vanilla (and the Oud almost nonexistent) with that blue note… it is not a perfume that evolves much honestly, but if you are one of those who when wearing a perfume want it to stay unchanged, no doubt this is for you, as it smells the same from the moment you spray. Honestly Rabanne did not complicate their lives 🥱 The elixir I would not give it so much for longevity, because on skin, despite lasting about 7h quite present (by the eighth it drops abruptly to skin level!) please do not overdo sprays! It is too explosive, it projects 4-5 hours consistently, and on clothes? Pfff all holy day and more! If you do not wash it does not come out. Scent: 7/10 (different, boring, nice) Longevity: 7h (cloying, overwhelming, excellent sillage) Projection: 7/10 (strong the first 3 hours at 1M, 4-5 is a consistent bubble at 20cm) Occasions: daily use on cold days, semi-formal occasions (work, informal baptisms, casino, nothing club-style, bar or PUB outings) Overall this perfume would be a 7/10. Anyway, all that said, personally I still loved it. The Phantom line, as much as some hate it for being somewhat repetitive or liked by the masses, got me into this world of perfumery and the affection I have for it is undeniable. But I made this review as objective as possible, since as it is something I like you have to understand tastes differ and someone looking for reviews needs to know about the perfume… Hope it helps 🫡

    Reply
  21. Hi my name is Éric Sélène, I will give you my first impressions of this interesting fragrance, although it is a bit controversial, but it is an interesting option as the hours go by. Paco Rabanne Phantom Elixir is a flanker (new version) that moves into deeper and more sophisticated territory than its predecessor. The bottle keeps the characteristic futuristic robotic design, but with a darker and more elegant aesthetic, reflecting the shift toward a more nocturnal and mature fragrance. The packaging is the characteristic one of previous versions, this packaging that speaks of technological boldness, ideal for those who appreciate innovative design. This version of Phantom now as Elixir version sits in the oriental-woody family with spicy touches. The opening is vibrant and sweet thanks to a caramelized lavender accord, combined with a spicy heart of geranium and a slight fruity nuance. The rich and dense base is dominated by vanilla, smoky woods, and a slightly earthy mineral background. The blend is well balanced, achieving a seductive and addictive scent. Now I will give you details of the good and the bad: The good: – Projection and longevity: Powerful fragrance with a prominent sillage that lasts more than 8 hours, ideal for leaving a memorable impression. – Nighttime versatility: Despite its depth, it keeps a certain freshness, which makes it perfect for night outs or formal events. – Youthful and modern appeal: Ideal for those looking for a scent that combines sensuality and avant-garde. The bad: – Dominant sweetness: Although well integrated, the initial sweetness can be excessive if you prefer drier or more sober scents. – Less versatile for daytime: Its dark and sweet profile can feel heavy in warm climates or for daytime activities. – Market competition: Excess of perfumes with the same scent category. Recommendations: – User: Phantom Elixir is ideal for men between 20 and 35 years old who enjoy bold fragrances and are not afraid to stand out. Its modern and sensual character makes it perfect for charismatic and confident personalities. – Seasons: It performs exceptionally well in autumn and winter, where its warmth and depth complement the cold weather. – Occasion: Definitely a nighttime fragrance, ideal for dates, parties or formal events. My final verdict Phantom Elixir is a bold step for Paco Rabanne, betting on greater depth and sophistication within its line. It is a fragrance that does not go unnoticed, designed for lovers of sweet, intense and modern scents. While not for everyone, its proposal is clear: a perfume to conquer the night with elegance and boldness.

    Reply
  22. Good fragrance, I thought it was going to be the classic sweet one but no, I can perceive all the notes but it’s true that the oud is very toned down and I think that’s excellent. I find it very wearable in all seasons and it can easily be a signature scent as long as you control the sprays…

    Reply
  23. Honestly I don’t know why it gets so much hate, I don’t consider myself an expert, the opening of “marine notes” they describe I perceive as a “Play-Doh” smell but it’s not annoying at all, throughout the day that scent transitions with the vanilla, until at night only the vanilla scent remains, but it’s absolutely not a cloying vanilla… The longevity of this amazes me, also its versatility, about projection I’d say it’s not much though, it feels like a very intimate scent to me, close to the skin…

    Reply
  24. The “mineral notes” I don’t know where they are. And the aquatic ones… well, there’s a certain bluish sandalwood. It’s a fruity vanilla, leaning toward pineapple, with disco-like sheens. It has a custardy base with a certain darkness that suits it well, although everything is very immersed in an ambroxan matrix (but without overdoing it). I must grant it one virtue, which is that it doesn’t try to seem fresh. It doesn’t try to tick all the boxes like other “lifestyle” fragrances do. This is a heavy, enveloping fruity, period. I wonder if in 40 years there will be young people who, as soon as they smell the opening, will say it smells like a “60-year-old man who hasn’t gotten over his party phase”. Or if there will be vintage connoisseurs who dedicate themselves to rescuing these “seducer” or “panty dropper” formulas, and perhaps reinterpret them with a renewed perspective, observing them free of prejudice. You’d have to mix ylang-ylang/iris with thyme/basil with ambroxan/clary sage with candied flowers/cherry to make a true intergenerational unisex.

    Reply
  25. Ugh, I take back what I said, the dry-down of this perfume is horrible, seriously, they’ve taken a chunk from each Phantom and thrown in the most artificial thing from each one. The oud, marine and mineral notes I don’t know where they got them from, they’re not there. I feel that this launch has only been an attempt to squeeze the Phantom line to the last drop, and I do like the line, but this launch has been crap.

    Reply
  26. samir_cassis

    A perfume that doesn’t know what it wants to be, salty vanilla oud with something horribly metallic in the background, with something that hints at seaweed in the background, like if you took some muffins and tried to make sushi out of them but it also smells like unpleasant sharp metal. I think the best way to describe it is like someone ran an entire marathon without deodorant and put on a vanilla oud perfume to hide their smell. Unpleasant and confusing

    Reply
  27. Seeing the other reviews I decided to buy it, I saw a deal where the 150 ml version was cheaper than the 100 ml version for some reason… Far from reality, what a letdown, in my opinion it’s disgusting, it has a vanilla at the end that saves it, but I wouldn’t wear it even if it were the only one I had

    Reply