Men

Lacoste

4.15 de 5
595 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Lacoste by Lacoste Fragrances is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 1984, this composition features top notes of lime, lavender, bergamot, lemon, and helichrysum. The heart unfolds with basil, geranium, green notes, jasmine, carnation, and galbanum, while the base settles on oakmoss, vetiver, cedar, musk, tonka bean, and amber.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 10%
  • Primavera 36%
  • Verano 33%
  • Otoño 21%
  • Día 80%
  • Noche 20%

Notas clave

Comunidad

595 votos

  • Positivo 84%
  • Negativo 9.1%
  • Neutral 6.6%

Pirámide olfativa

Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Lacoste y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

20 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • Shiseido is right. I bought it at a good price and upon testing it, I thought: RAID. It smells like bug spray. It has a nice aroma, but you can smell that scent in your throat, an itch like it’s inflamed. It’s not bad, but I don’t want to walk around smelling like insecticide forever.

  • ShiseidoTactics

    Negative experience: between 1988 and 1989, a relative used it a lot. I had never smelled a Lacoste before; I tested it on my skin. Two things: 1) Although the notes are citrusy, I didn’t identify any citrus, but rather a woody smell. 2) It wasn’t unpleasant; it was very attractive. But at that time, scented bactericides came out, and the brand Sheltox launched one in a blue aerosol with an identical scent, which made me reject not only this fragrance but the entire Lacoste family. I even have a sample of Lacoste Elegance and I don’t like it at all. It was my debut and farewell. Since then, for over twenty years, I have systematically rejected everything from this house. I hope to give them a chance with their new fragrances.

  • priethcallas

    Unlike others, it doesn’t smell like bug spray; the first impression is citrus with lavender, vetiver, and carnation. It has an old-school vibe, like a barbershop lotion, a masculine paradigm that’s been surpassed. However, the dry-down is pleasant. I see it for summer, spring, daytime, and casual activities. It lasts over 10 hours, perhaps its biggest advantage and the longest-lasting Lacoste. The sillage is moderate but can get heavy if overapplied, intensifying that citrusy sensation reminiscent of insecticides. It’s from 1984 (some say 1968). In summary, I found it good but too outdated. Not for young people, only for lovers of citrus and lavender, very old-fashioned.

  • priethcallas

    Unlike others, I don’t think it smells like bug spray; the first impression is citrus with lavender, vetiver, and carnation. It has an old-school vibe, like a barbershop lotion, a masculine paradigm that’s been surpassed. However, the dry-down is pleasant. I see it for summer, spring, daytime, and casual activities. It lasts over 10 hours, perhaps its biggest advantage and the longest-lasting Lacoste. The sillage is moderate but can get heavy if overapplied, intensifying that citrusy sensation reminiscent of insecticides. It’s from 1984 (some say 1968). In summary, I found it good but too outdated. Not for young people, only for lovers of citrus and lavender, very old-fashioned.

  • My boyfriend used to wear it when we met, and I didn’t like it; indeed, it smells like RAID, the bug spray. I told him diplomatically, and fortunately, he stopped using it. Now I buy him perfumes, and so far, he’s liked them quite a bit, to the point that he’s gotten used to using other types and is more selective.

  • alvaro gonzalez flores

    Brutal fragrance with great longevity lasting several hours. It’s citrusy and fresh, almost sporty but with an elegant gentleman’s vibe. It has a formal side, perfect for wearing with a tie. Highly recommended!

  • I first knew Lacoste Classic or For Men in the mid-80s when the best-selling scent was Calvin Klein Obsession. When I tried it, I thought it was rugged and rough, but once it dried down, this Jean Patou masterpiece was a hit with its sillage and masculine presence. It’s a perfume created for a sporting life with a late-60s aesthetic. This icon of my youth is back, and although there’s a slight reformulation, it remains faithful to its spirit, staying virile with performance that surpasses at least 10 current fragrances, with over 10 hours of longevity. At times it reminds me of Puig’s Agua Brava, but with more style and sophistication. It’s a scent that sounds vintage, but its dry-down is wonderful: its 17 notes evolve with a nervous personality and many transitions, giving it an atypical character. Recommended because its formula remains almost intact despite P&G owning the brand. It’s a hard-to-find specimen with limited production; I think it’s worth it before it disappears for 15 years or forever. A must for lovers of classics with history, since this jewel carries the Jean Patou DNA on a sporty fragrance with 60s class. It could also be considered a grandson of Worth Pour Homme, with whom it shares certain similarities.

  • Lacoste Classic or For Men, I met it in the mid-80s when it was an atypical aroma, since the best-selling brand was CK Obsession. When it came into my hands and I used it, I thought it was rugged and rough. However, it was in its dry-down when this marvel by Jean Patou gave me many ‘likes’ with its prominent sillage and masculine presence. It’s a perfume created for sporty life with the aesthetic canon of the late 60s. This icon of my early youth has returned, and although it denotes a slight reformulation, it remains faithful to its spirit, staying virile with performance that surpasses, perhaps due to its nature, at least 10 current fragrances with more than ten hours of presence. At times it reminds me of Puig’s Agua Brava, but with more style and sophistication. Undoubtedly, it’s a vintage aroma, but I insist: its dry-down is wonderful, where its 17 notes evolve with a nervous personality and many transitions, giving it an atypical character within current trends. Recommended because its formula remains almost intact despite P&G being the owner. It’s a hard-to-find specimen; the brand reports limited production; I think it’s worth it before it disappears for another 15 years or forever. A must for lovers of classic and historical aromas, my case, since this jewel carries in its veins the philosophy and DNA of Jean Patou on what a sporty and classy fragrance should be in the late 60s. It could also be considered a grandson of Worth Pour Homme, with whom it maintains certain resemblance.

  • I remember it was a gift from my mother in the mid-80s. I recognize its hypnotic quality. It’s timeless, like entering an Atlantic forest at the end of summer; alongside the citrus touch, the mossy base makes you feel at home, it envelops you… it’s class and seduction.

  • I remember it was a gift from my mother, in the mid-80s. And I recognize its hypnotic quality. It’s timeless; you enter a forest, an Atlantic forest, but at the end of summer. Along with the citrus touch, the mossy base becomes yours, enveloping you… it’s class and seduction.

  • This will be my first review, and I want to rescue this perfume from the bad comments. In my subjective opinion, it’s a classic: it’s not for someone who wants to shout ‘here I come’ to get attention. It’s a subtle, fresh, pleasant, and green scent. It’s for someone with good taste, who knows about gastronomy, is cultured, informed, and successful in their career; otherwise, they won’t appreciate it. I imagine someone finishing a day of an unconventional sport (tennis, paddle, swimming) or dressed casually ready for dinner. Its scent takes me to a forest with a river, sitting among rocks waiting for the evening. Very good perfume; it occupies a special place in my collection. Greetings.

  • wildkatzen

    Finally, I have it again, thousands of memories. Undoubtedly, it’s the second one I like most after Blanc. A sharp, clean, spicy opening between lavender, vetiver, and bergamot, then moving to carnation, sage, and cedar. This is the core, the most exquisite part: a clean spice. I wish it were an EDP to enjoy it more, but it’s a bit short, averaging about 4 hours. At a meter, it gets closer to the skin, although it’s still noticeable when it’s hot and you’re sweating a bit.

  • wildkatzen

    Finally got it again; thousands of memories. Without a doubt, it’s the second one I like most after Blanc. It’s a spicy, sharp, clean opening that blends lavender, vetiver, and bergamot, then moves into carnation, sage, and cedar. That clean spicy core is the most exquisite part. I wish it were an EDP to last longer, but it lasts about 4 hours; then it gets closer to the skin. Though it might be noticeable when it’s hot and you start to sweat a bit.

  • jerry drake

    Lacoste has always had prestige thanks to its polos and tennis connection, despite its detractors. This is one of its best creations, a green-spicy jewel of the 80s that embodies the crocodile spirit, surpassing many new launches. It’s the vanguard of the old school, with a robust masculine silhouette that’s rare today. It radiates elegance and well-being with a balanced mix of fresh, green, and spicy notes, with subtle floral touches of clove, jasmine, and geranium, closing with amber, moss, and vetiver. It’s a cornerstone that, while reminiscent of a faded photo, remains stylistically impeccable. It transports you to the French Riviera, the music and atmosphere of Jimmy’z in Monaco, Saint Tropez, or the beaches of Cannes dreaming of neighbors like Bardot, Hepburn, or Andress. Solid, elegant, and with a classic powdery touch, it works for both sport and formal occasions. It has epic longevity without being intrusive. Undoubtedly, many of the best fragrances were composed in the 80s, and while few survived, the original Lacoste in its vintage version is still available online. It radiates glamour and is worth it.

  • Gentil vagabond

    A sharp and unbalanced citrus-floral fragrance. I tested it in 1993 at its peak, and it was truly out of this world.

  • Gentil vagabond

    It’s a sharp, unbalanced scent between citrus and florals. I tried it in 1993 when it was trendy, and it really didn’t convince me.

  • JavierSantana

    In my opinion, the freshest, sportiest, and most summery of the Powerhouse line. Distinct opening of very fresh and natural citrus, floral heart, and a very marked woody and mossy base. Along with Drakkar Noir, it’s one of the most youthful, jovial, and sporty Powerhouse fragrances of the 80s, where the passage of time is least noticeable. Excellent for daytime, summer, daily wear, autumn in warm climates, etc. Winter is not the best. It feels like a summer day watching the Monaco or Imola Grand Prix with Elton John next to you in 1985. Verdict: if you’re young and want something classic that isn’t challenging, animalic, or aggressive, it’s highly recommended above any other from that era. I see it as an excellent substitute for Lacoste Blanc; although it might seem heavy to young noses, it’s a treat compared to others from that time. Blessings.

  • JavierSantana

    Of all the Powerhouses, this is the freshest, sportiest, and summery one. Very natural citrus at the start, floral in the middle, and lots of wood and moss at the end. Alongside Drakkar Noir, it’s one of the juvilest and cheeriest scents from the 80s without feeling dated. Perfect for daytime, summer, or warm autumn days; not the best for winter. Imagine a summer day at the Monaco or Imola Grand Prix in 1985 with Elton John right beside you. If you’re looking for something classic, youthful, yet not aggressive or animalistic, this is the best option of the era. It seems like a great substitute for Lacoste Blanc; even if some find it heavy, it’s an excellent olfactory dessert. Blessings.

  • Aurelioparfum

    I tried it and won’t be getting it again. That scent just doesn’t suit me; it’s not for me.

  • For me, the Sofipar version from the 80s is superior to the P&G one; they aren’t the same. Has anyone else tried both?