Men
Eau Sauvage
Acordes principales
Descripción
Eau Sauvage by Dior is an aromatic citrus fragrance for men. Launched in 1966, the nose behind this composition is Edmond Roudnitska. The top notes include lemon, bergamot, basil, rosemary, caraway, and fruity notes; the heart notes are jasmine, coriander, carnation, patchouli, iris root, sandalwood, rose, lavender, and Hedione; the base notes are formed by oakmoss, vetiver, musk, and amber.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Eau Sauvage y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
A true icon within men’s fragrances. My opinion is subjective because it brings back memories of my adolescence and youth, when fresh fragrances with a soapy chypre touch were popular. Today, I tried it again surprised by a significant discount (maybe because it’s starting to phase out) and… this fragrance has aged beautifully. It’s fresh, with a spicy aromatic lemon, and shows evolution compared to today’s linear perfumes. It stands out at the start with a lemon that evolves into a soft but punchy vetiver wood note and rosemary. It would be great if young people today tried it. Its citrus-and-wood scent in pure Mediterranean style gives distinction and elegance. An old-school perfume that remains current and perfect for spring and summer days. Oh! And for any age.
An iconic fragrance that marked a before and after in perfumery. It’s very far from current trends. A fresh, pleasant, and masculine aroma, zero intrusive. In my opinion, it exudes genuine class, something only possessed by discreet and educated men. 100% versatile, it’s an excellent option for daily use. On my skin, it lasts about six hours with heavy application. It creates a delicious aura about a half-meter away, truly unmistakable. I still struggle to believe it was John Lennon’s personal fragrance… Those were other times.
Simply excellent. A very subtle and delicious fragrance that smells like bitter lemon cream with a touch of barbershop cream. It keeps that vintage 80s touch that gives it an aristocratic personality. Perfect for spring, summer, and autumn. Very versatile and recommended for the office or night outs. I use it a lot for my trips to northern Spain where the heat is drier and it adapts better than in humid coastal areas. Performance and projection are quite acceptable.
A fragrance marvel, classic, pleasant, elegant, and classy. A legendary immortal.
Elegant and absolutely timeless. An extremely versatile fragrance for any moment or situation, from sports to a fancy night out. It adapts to all occasions without risk of error. It has won over men of all styles, ages, and backgrounds, and it also works well with the female audience. It’s a great introduction. It’s Dior’s first men’s perfume, created in 1966 by Edmond Roudnitska, and was the best-selling fragrance in the last quarter of the 20th century. Although it embodies the old school, I think young men can fit right in. It’s part of the classic trio along with Chanel’s Pour Monsieur and Guerlain’s Habit Rouge; the first is my favorite in the entry-level segments. The opening is nice, fresh-citrusy, but with basil and rosemary it becomes pleasant, refined, and classy. Later, the scent drops quickly into the heart where spices bring out the vetiver and a slightly sweet base. For fans of old formulations (my sample is from the 90s), the current version seems to have fewer nuances and a lighter smell, though it’s a shame it’s a bit thin and shorter-lasting than the old version, which lasted six hours. Despite these classics being overshadowed by the lack of moss, they still stand above all trends. If you don’t know it, I recommend trying the modern version.
I used it once. At first, it smells like lemon, like lemon oil for furniture—a conservative, clean scent, then it shifts to herbs while retaining some lemon. I hope when it gets hotter, that lemon-and-shaving-cream scent I’m looking for comes through. I’ve used it more since, and after an hour, it’s definitely that lemon-with-shaving-cream vibe.
I had it when it first came out, never really convinced by it, ended up using it as a car air freshener.
Love or hate, I love it.
A gem! A true Hall of Fame fragrance classic. Nothing to add, though its longevity is moderate, it projects class in every sense of the word. Ideal for hot days with a sharp outfit. How many commercial and niche vulgaritys would kill to have the success and history of this beauty.
The decant of the 2001 grey bottle is one of my favorite summer classics, but on my skin, the longevity is fleeting—about 1.5 hours. That gorgeous bergamot with thyme and rosemary, plus the classic lavender, are light and easy to detect, but the issue is they leave no trail and barely linger after an hour. That’s why you literally have to douse your skin with sprays rather than just misting. It makes me think it competes with 4711 due to its extremely low longevity. I stick with Armani Pour Homme, which has better fixation and intensity.
Amazing citrus, green, herbal, woody fragrance with a slight barbershop/shaving foam note. It’s incredible that a perfume sold since 1966 still exists because, at 55 years old, you can’t tell its age. It’s a completely timeless fragrance that smells more modern than many newer perfumes. I simply love it.
It can’t be missing from my collection. Its sibling, the Parfum, is my favorite perfume, but this classic summer scent, to feel good as a clean fragrance… It’s a marvel. It’s one of those perfumes where jokes and laughter are unnecessary; it’s all about presence and packaging. Paul Newman.
The lemon stands out immediately upon application, and generally, the citrus and acidic scent is prominent. Personally, it doesn’t catch my attention. I can understand why someone might like this type of aroma; it’s pleasant, but I wouldn’t wear it. That said, it seems to have quite good longevity and sillage, contrary to what I usually read about this EDT.
A timeless fragrance. An icon in perfumery, super classic, and elegant. A very fresh, herbal scent with a tiny citrus note, like a barbershop, with woody nuances, though they don’t dominate. Vetiver predominates at the end, adding cleanliness, accompanied slightly by cilantro and a touch of oakmoss. A very clean, revitalizing fragrance, like a fresh shower. People over 30 would appreciate it more. An aroma for a successful gentleman, with personality, a mature-youthful vibe, and presence. Longevity is a maximum of 6 to 7 hours. Projection is about one meter for the first hour, then a personal bubble.
Let’s see… I’m a Dior person, but these? They’re memories… This isn’t used anymore… Very vintage, lacking longevity, projection, and trail; it’s just an average perfume. Now there’s the Parfum, which is what you can actually wear, but it’s still very vintage. At least for me, nah, leave that alone. You can’t spend money on this. If you want masculine bergamot, buy Club de Nuit Intense Man. This shouldn’t even be made anymore, and if they do, it should cost less than $30 because you can’t pay more for this. It’s practically a splash.
Fragrances are meant to be worn. That’s obvious, but not necessarily so when considering that perfumes can carry the wearer: this happens when the scent is invasive (monstrous projection). Eau Sauvage is not the case here. It shares many points with classic EdCs: a citrus base, some herbs, Hedione, a synthetic molecule that adds accords similar to jasmine and oakmoss within the limits allowed by regulatory offices. I expect from it all the beauty of traditional colognes plus a bit more—what includes discretion, as good taste demands. I could also contrast it with the current Sauvage to see how things have changed over fifty years. Yes, for some, the sense of elegance has changed; for others, it has disappeared.
In my collection, I’ve sprayed Dior’s Eau Sauvage on one hand and Chanel’s Pour Monsieur on the other. I have to say, they’re 95% identical in the opening, almost indistinguishable. The difference lies in the dry-down: Dior features a potent, dominant lemon, while Chanel settles into a touch of basil and cilantro (subtle, with that lemony note) and cedar, which sets them apart. This difference makes the Pour Monsieur dry-down feel slightly older, but not much, as they share a similar spirit. This fragrance is like a Terre d’Hermès from the ’60s, but instead of orange and vetiver, you get lemon and vetiver, with the lemon dominating until the scent fades to the skin. Even then, you’ll still perceive that lemony-citrus accord with a vetiver touch. If I had to choose between Eau Sauvage and Pour Monsieur, I’d pick Dior because it surpasses Chanel in trail and projection (though the projection is low, I must clarify, because the Pour Monsieur’s longevity is scandalously short-lived). Eau Sauvage is a simple fragrance with a lemony opening, but that simplicity is wrapped in undeniable elegance and refinement. Just like simple scents such as Pour un Homme de Caron (pure lavender), Eau Sauvage is a fragrance to feel good about yourself, making you feel clean and in a good mood. It’s a huge shame that such an exquisite, high-quality fragrance has such short longevity, projecting for barely over an hour.
My mother wore it in her youth, my father years ago, and I do too. It’s wonderful: a sober, fresh EDT packed with understated elegance. It’s elegant because of what it doesn’t say and how effortlessly its notes harmonize. I use the ’90s version. On my skin, the citrus lasts a while before slowly turning into a marvelous herbal scent with spicy hints. I’m not sure if the current version differs much from the bottle I keep with some reluctance, spraying it occasionally for fear it will run out. I haven’t dared try it at any perfumery for fear it won’t be my Eau Sauvage. It doesn’t have a huge sillage; it’s discreet, and on my skin, it lasts about 5 hours.
I gifted this to my brother, but it gives me a headache. It smells like an old-school gentleman and is very classic, kind of like 7 Macho but for the rich, haha. Honestly, it’s not for me. That said, the longevity is incredible; right after a shower, it just keeps going.
I prefer the eau de cologne and eau de parfum versions for their longevity.
To my taste, the opening is unpleasant; I imagine the basil and caraway combination causes that. However, its drydown, which moves into a blend of vetiver, citrus with floral nuances, and mossy notes, delivers a much more pleasant result. It claims territory without being cloying, overwhelming, or aggressive; it works well if you want to project seriousness and power, regardless of age. A proper chypre. Smelling it transported me to the beaches of Rio de Janeiro in the late 60s, coming out of the sea when the fresh breeze dried my hair on my chest. The Girl from Ipanema passed by, looking at me mischievously. In the background, ‘Mais Que Nada’ by Sergio Mendes was playing. Final verdict: a classic of classics; the opening lasts a short time and settles into an excellent drydown. Its only downside besides the opening is the longevity—nothing from Dior is this low, lasting only about 4 or 5 hours with minimal projection. I’d prefer Eau Brava for its lower price, or for just a bit more, a Monsieur or Antaeus from Chanel. Blessings.
I’m writing this because I found a little bottle over 10 years old in one of my drawers. It’s curious—I just tested it in the store a few weeks ago, and now I sprayed a bit to check if it was still good, and the scent is almost identical. It’s strange; of all the perfumes, this is the one I least remembered owning, but my aunt gifted it to me along with others. To me now, it smells like a bygone era; I remember smelling it 30 years ago on gentlemen and classmates. Even more than 10 years ago, I thought it sounded old, but I suppose now that I appreciate perfumery more, I can value it more. It’s still usable, fresh, and citrusy, suitable for any season. Although for me, the memory is the scent of an older gentleman.
Timeless no matter how many years pass. The reactions it provokes in both older and younger people are incredible; that’s because the work was brilliant. It’s a success due to its simplicity and excellent development. The opening is citrusy with lots of lemon, moving into a floral and woody heart that is incredibly delicious, almost magical, with a earthy base of oakmoss and patchouli. Maybe it doesn’t have the greatest longevity, but it has good sillage; I hope Dior keeps it around, just like they did with their 1947 Miss Dior.
Good heavens, I read comments saying this marvel smells old, as if current perfumes were better; though I don’t mean all new scents are bad—I’ve smelled extremely cloying aromas on the street that are annoying. This smells clean: lemon, lavender, rosemary, vetiver, moss; perfect for everyday wear or special occasions. It’s very wearable, though it lacks much sillage and longevity.
Exquisite, I’ve added it to my collection. A sparkling basil scent; it’s incredible that something so fresh and rich could be labeled ‘old.’ Smells like nature, lemon, rosemary, basil, leaves… how can that smell bad?
I have a decant and it would be among perfumes like Alvarez Gomez. It reminds me of a gentleman from the 90s, dressed semi-formally. An old man sitting in a patio with gardens and flowers in the Mediterranean. From my point of view, it’s that: a semi-formal fragrance for someone over 60 who likes 90s-style perfumes. For me, I don’t like it, although I love smelling it, because it reminds me of my grandfather.
Dior’s Eau Sauvage is a classic and emblematic fragrance that captures the essence of the elegant and sophisticated man. From its top notes, it opens with a vibrant freshness of bergamot and mandarin, complemented by the herbal freshness of basil. This initial combination is citrusy and aromatic, perfect for a dynamic and refreshing start. In its heart, Eau Sauvage reveals a spicy and floral bouquet. Cloves and nutmeg add warmth and depth, while the lily of the valley adds an elegant and masculine floral note. Finally, in the base, a classic and woody structure develops with oakmoss, sandalwood, and patchouli. These notes create an earthy and sensual base, complemented by a subtle musk touch that provides a clean and lasting trail. Eau Sauvage is a timeless fragrance that combines citrus freshness with aromatic spices and noble woods, ideal for the modern man seeking a classic and distinctive scent.
Very good, today I’m talking about Eau Sauvage. With fragrances like this, you feel like writing honey about them, but I think it’s understandable that younger people or those unfamiliar with the field might have reservations, whether because it’s classic… or because it’s so copied… yes, because it’s so versioned. It’s not for the current mindset, but it does have a timeless stamp that I affirm; it might not be understood or accepted by many users due to prejudice or ignorance, but it effectively possesses a certain charm regardless of the path it took since its creation: An eminently masculine fragrance within the temporal realm of the classic gentleman of the 20th century. By this, I don’t mean a lady can’t appreciate or use it, but I believe whoever wants to understand will know what I mean. Fresh, invigorating, masculine, with a touch of boldness and carefreeness but without falling into postmodern excesses, Eau Sauvage has the right to consider itself emblematic as both a product and a fragrance because of its complexity of notes (now perhaps a bit diminished by regulations) and the image it wanted to imprint on its users. We’re talking about what endures more than the 15 minutes of glory the current era gives us: style, not fashion; attitude, not pose; identity, not bad temper… It’s annoying that it lacks the projection and longevity of the past at the price it’s sold, but it doesn’t end up being that bad, though the future is scary. I think an open-minded trial is at least worth it, and if you’re not willing, so be it, there’s plenty of people who like it and don’t need anything more than their own satisfaction, just like in anything else in the world. If it pleases and makes you happy, the rest is superfluous.
I’m 27 and Eau Sauvage takes me back to the 60s. If you want to travel to that era, this is the perfect icon… I’ll definitely buy another bottle soon ❤️.
The way back was a diffuse trance between past and present. The roads to the village seemed immutable, as if life refused to move forward there. A tragic event brought me back, and now, in my childhood home, solitude enveloped me. Dust floated in beams of light among furniture that no one had moved in years. The portraits hanging on the walls watched me like silent witnesses of a time that no longer belonged to me. The next morning, rummaging through boxes of memories, my fingers brushed something familiar. Dior’s Eau Sauvage. The bottle was still there, with its thick glass and its silver cap slightly opaque from the years. My pulse quickened. I remembered with sharp clarity those mornings before school, when with clumsy fingers I opened my father’s bottle and put a few drops on myself, wanting to smell ‘man’. It wasn’t just a fragrance. It was a shield, a breastplate of courage to face the days when my feelings were bigger than me. And above all, I remembered the true reason why I did it: her. The girl with blue eyes who disarmed me with a single glance. The one who never knew how much I secretly loved her. I headed to the bathroom with the bottle in hand. In front of the mirror, I uncorked it and dripped a few drops on my wrist. The aroma burst forth with the same strength as always: a clean, elegant, timeless explosion of lemon and bergamot. I rubbed it gently and closed my eyes. In the base notes, the oakmoss and vetiver whispered stories of a previous generation. I exhaled slowly. My reflection returned my gaze, and for an instant, I saw my father in the mirror. He was identical to me. I took a deep breath. I applied it without thinking too much and stepped out into the street. The cold morning air mixed with the warmth of the cologne, creating an instant that existed outside of time. The aroma of freshly made coffee wrapped around me as I entered the café. I ordered one, no sugar, and while I waited, I saw her. The world seemed to shrink. There she was, with years reflected in her face in the only way time is generous: with history in her eyes, with a serene maturity that hadn’t erased her light. She didn’t need more than a second to know it was her, the same girl who had kept me on edge for decades. And then, the unexpected happened. She turned her head, as if something invisible had called her. Her eyes landed on me. And then, she frowned slightly. She tilted her head a mere millimeter, as if trying to recall an elusive detail. The perfume. Eau Sauvage. The same aroma that floated in the school hallways, the same one that had once brushed against her when I, with my child’s heart beating in my throat, pretended it didn’t matter to me. A barely perceptible smile appeared on her lips. “Do we know each other?” she asked, with a tone that seemed to swing between certainty and doubt. The past, encapsulated in a fragrance, had returned to write an unfinished story. I looked at her, and for an instant, I thought about what I could answer. In a version of the story where the right words would change destiny. But no. That moment didn’t belong to me. No more than the aroma in the air or the reflection in the mirror. I returned her smile gently and shook my head. “I don’t think so,” I replied calmly. She held my gaze a second longer, with a slight expression of confusion, before turning and disappearing into the crowd of the café. I exhaled and closed my eyes for an instant. Eau Sauvage remained on my skin, intact, like my father’s memory. Like an invisible bond between what was and what never will be. Two farewells in a single day. And a single fragrance to witness it.
Masterpiece, the definition of pure class. Even after 60 years on the market, it still sounds incredible today; I’m 20 and I love it. It has that classic Italian masculine vibe, with citrus, aromatic herbal notes, and a comforting woody base. It doesn’t last long, but every minute you wear it is enjoyable. Perfect for semi-formal occasions on hot days. I bought the 200ml because I love bathing in it, it’s a delight. If you value perfumery, take a trip back in time to the pioneers of olfactory fashion; the classics never die, gentlemen, this is true perfumery. Scent: 10/10. Longevity: 6/10 (about 5-6 hours). Sillage: 6/10. Recommended.
The freshest and cleanest of the Eau Sauvages. Classic and timeless.
My grandfather’s perfume.
This is a proper fougère. Although officially it’s an aromatic citrus, the essence is clearly a fougère. It has a marked barbershop character: soapy, clean, elegant, with that classic air of neatness. We’re talking about the 1966 Dior Eau Sauvage, a historical composition that, despite the years, hasn’t gone out of style. Yes, it’s perceived as a mature scent; I wouldn’t recommend it for a young audience; I see it ideal from age 30, extremely versatile in that range, even though it’s a white shirt scent, it also works as an after-gym. Within its category, it seems the best, because, even being a classic fougère, it maintains its own personality. The main drawback is the quality-price ratio. Today there are alternatives, even identical clones with over 95% similarity, at much lower prices, some for 15 euros for 100 ml, with better performance than current Dior batches. Therefore, although the aroma is one of the best in men’s perfumery—100% masculine, clean, elegant, soapy, with an irresistible barbershop character—I can’t recommend buying it today. The high price and mediocre performance make it more sensible to opt for alternatives. In short: as an aroma, an absolute marvel; as a purchase, not recommended today.
An addictive perfume. The more you use it, the more you want it. It’s fresh and makes a difference. Pity that, in my case, it has very poor longevity. After two hours, I can’t even smell it on my skin.
It’s paradoxical that if I had to describe this 1966 perfume in a few words, it would be: a modernized fougère. These are masterpieces, timeless. Beau de Jour by Tom Ford or Scandal by Roja smell old-fashioned next to this Dior. I see it closer to Fiero by Casamoratti, with that slightly sweet lemon refreshed with mint; although this has much more, the clean, soapy, and subtly amber aroma. Elegant, neat, and versatile. I had my 28 and 23-year-old sons smell it, and neither thought it smelled like an old man; both liked it. Suitable for any time and situation, from office to dates. Yes, masculine, but with a masculinity lightened of stale stereotypes. Average duration and projection. It does have points that vaguely remind of Armani’s Eau pour Homme, another jewel, but the Dior feels curiously more modern. 10/10.
It smells like 80s shaving foam, masculine to the max, rich. It doesn’t last long and projects terribly. Is it worth it? If you have money to spare, yes; if not, no. It requires constant re-application. All ingredients are of outstanding quality, but they last a breath.
I think it’s a charming scent for older people; this is truly ‘noble’ perfume, nothing of the nonsense promoted in pretentious social media videos. The first time I smelled it, I was foolish and thought it reminded me of 4711, but this is on another level; no comparison. It has a citrus note that doesn’t evaporate easily, with a pleasant moss, basil, and vetiver that give it a herbal and green touch. For me, it falls into the ‘vintage’ category. I wouldn’t wear it myself, but it’s incredibly well-made. It’s ideal for someone over 50; I’d have to think about it calmly. It’s elegant, fresh, and distinctive, with that old-school touch that commands respect. Very, very good.
I’ve always spoken highly of this perfume. The opening is exquisite, fresh, and citrusy, like a classy men’s cologne. But the problem hits at 15 minutes: the dry-down smells like a 60-year-old person. I tested it in-store, and then the Ulric de Varenne VIP smelled sweeter, without that wonderful Dior opening, but its dry-down is much better. They feel similar, but Ulric doesn’t leave that particular smell behind when it settles.
This perfume made me fall in love with the world of fragrances. Until then, wearing perfume didn’t seem interesting to me, until I found an old bottle of Eau Sauvage. Its astringent, citrusy, almost anise-like opening threw me off, but there was something different: it smelled like an elegant man who knows what he’s doing, nothing generic or boring. The rest is history, but I hold it in special affection. Dior became my reference for finding good perfumes: Fahrenheit, Dior Homme, Dune… What memories, and what a pity to see the brand stopped making distinguished perfumes to go for commercial stuff.