Skip to content

Heat by Beyoncé

Women 2010

Brand
Beyoncé
Perfumer
Claude Dir

Description

Heat by Beyoncé is an oriental vanilla fragrance for women. Launched in 2010, this composition was created by Claude Dir and Olivier Gillotin. The top notes unfold a fruity and floral accord featuring peach, orchid, magnolia, and neroli. The heart reveals a sweet and woody blend of almond, sweet macarons, musk, and honeysuckle. The base settles on amber, tonka bean,…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 32%
  • Spring 14%
  • Summer 18%
  • Autumn 36%
  • Day 39%
  • Night 61%

Key notes

Community

3,664 votes

  • Positive 66%
  • Negative 29%
  • Neutral 5.1%
positive reviews 3.7 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentNight CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I owned it

7,431 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

2,453 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

1,715 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Heat

Main accord sweet Year 2010 Gender Women Perfumer Claude Dir · Olivier Gillotin

Heat by Beyoncé is an oriental vanilla fragrance for women. Launched in 2010, this composition was created by Claude Dir and Olivier Gillotin. The top notes unfold a fruity and floral accord featuring peach, orchid, magnolia, and neroli. The heart reveals a sweet and woody blend of almond, sweet macarons, musk, and honeysuckle. The base settles on amber, tonka bean, and red cedar.

Fruits, vegetables and nuts Flowers Sweet and gourmand White flowers Musk, amber and animalic Spices Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

1,093 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

1,148 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

496 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

470 votes

Community reviews

35 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Very vintage, but the excess amber makes it heavy and, worst of all, it sticks to clothes and smells boring.

    Reply
  2. It’s terrible, very vintage, too amber-heavy, and worst of all, it lasts forever with just a tiny bit, but the sillage is overwhelmingly heavy.

    Reply
  3. It’s rich, soft, and cheerful, with an elegant and sweet touch that I love. Although it doesn’t last as long and doesn’t go crazy on me as I expected, it’s simply delicious and everyone notices when I wear it. Maybe it’s simple, but it’s worth trying; it’s perfect for daytime.

    Reply
  4. CamiAckerman

    What’s weird about all these bad reviews? On Fragrantica in English, people love it. My mom gifted it to me years ago and thought it smelled like ‘old lady,’ but I, at 13, finished the 100ml bottle in two months. It seemed super sensual and perfect for warm, sweet summer afternoons. It has nothing to do with Rihanna’s Rebel or Katy Perry’s Killer Queen. Now I’m torn: buy it because it’s ridiculously cheap or stick with more expensive but higher-quality perfumes.

    Reply
  5. CamiAckerman

    How strange that this perfume looks so bad! On Fragrantica in English they praise it a lot 😯. My mom gave it to me when I was 13; to her it smelled like ‘lady,’ but watch out, it wasn’t an insult, just that it was the type of aroma older women prefer. The funny thing is that me, being a girl, I finished the 100ml bottle in two months 😂. To her it smelled very ladylike and to me I loved it, I took it out of the closet daily. I thought it was super sensual and great for summer afternoons, warm and sweet. It has nothing to do with Rihanna’s Rebel (which smells stronger) or Katy Perry’s Killer Queen (where patchouli dominates). Anyway, I’m doubting whether to buy it. Here I find it ridiculously cheap, less than a VS… I don’t know what I prefer: having cheap and varied perfumes or fewer but of better quality?

    Reply
  6. I wore it years ago and several times thought about buying it again, but in the end I prioritize new scents over familiar ones. The truth is, I don’t understand why it has such bad reviews… it’s a sweet, feminine, slightly tipsy, and watch out, feminine scent. Nothing masculine or unisex, it’s definitely sweet and sensual. It’s super appetizing; I received more compliments from men than from women when I wore it. I loved wearing it in spring-summer, I think it looks spectacular for nights and parties. I remember it with good trail and longevity, and nothing cloying. Packaging: 10/10, very comfortable and pretty. Value for money: 10/10, here it has a ridiculously cheap price. Scent: 10/10, warm, sensual, appetizing, sweet. Longevity: 10/10, good duration. Trail: 6/10, it didn’t project much. Versatility: 5/10, although it’s delicious, it’s not for everyday use. Visualizing everything, I think I’ll buy it again; what gave us pleasure can be repeated. Let you know how it goes.

    Reply
  7. I used it years ago and always thought about buying it again, but I ended up choosing new scents. I don’t get why people hate it… it smells sweet, feminine, a bit intoxicating, and very sensual. I got more compliments from men than from women. I loved wearing it in spring and summer for parties, with great sillage and longevity without being cloying. The bottle is comfortable and the price is laughably low. I’d definitely buy it again; what gave us pleasure can be repeated.

    Reply
  8. You can tell there’s a soapy base; it’s not bad, but not what I expected based on the notes. A bit heavy, but not terrible. However, I don’t think I’ll buy it again because the bottle is very uncomfortable to use.

    Reply
  9. Zahira-Salamanca,Chile

    An enigmatic and dark perfume, ideal for cold climates or for evening wear. When I apply it, I can’t distinguish the notes, unlike with other perfumes. On my skin, it smells sweet with floral touches, highlighting the amber and tonka bean; I feel sexy and mysterious. Although the sillage and longevity aren’t the best, it lasts 4 to 5 hours on skin and projects for about 2.

    Reply
  10. Zahira-Salamanca,Chile

    An enigmatic and dark perfume, perfect for cold weather or night. When I apply it, I can’t distinguish its notes like with others, but on my skin it’s sweet with floral touches where amber, vanilla, and flowers stand out. I feel sexy and mysterious, although its trail and longevity aren’t the best: 4-5 hours on skin and 2 of projection.

    Reply
  11. I bought it blindly and ended up using it as a room spray; it wasn’t wearable, it just lasted forever.

    Reply
  12. I bought it without testing, and when I finally tried it, I decided to use it as a room freshener instead of a perfume. It felt endless on my skin.

    Reply
  13. I didn’t like it; I perceive it as very synthetic and heavy. It even gave me a stomach ache when I wore it.

    Reply
  14. Smells nice, like a sweet, powdery pear, but with something weird. I wouldn’t recommend it; it feels very ‘granny’.

    Reply
  15. I agree it smells more masculine; the sweet peach has a dark floral touch perfect for night. It reminded me of Black Orchid by Tom Ford, but less intense. I grabbed it for $3 in 15ml, so no risk. I’ll use it and let you know, but it’s perfect for men.

    Reply
  16. I’m really sorry, but on my skin it smells masculine. In the end, the wood and musk take over. It overwhelms me and feels very heavy.

    Reply
  17. It doesn’t smell synthetic or bad like others say. To me, it’s rich, floral-fruity, and very summery. The longevity is short, but given the scent and the low price for daily use, it’s worth it.

    Reply
  18. Romix lunática

    It’s rich, fruity, and sweet for hot days, but it has a problem: IT DOESN’T LAST AT ALL. What a pity; you have to reapply it two or three times a day. I don’t know how it is for others, but this one just won’t hold up.

    Reply
  19. Yadorán d'Vinea

    To me, Heat is an olfactory tantrum. It leaves me with furious, choleric vibes, as if one of the seven deadly sins had taken over my skin, only to crash down abruptly and leave everything in confusion. Heat tries too hard to achieve too little: an undefined and incomprehensible scent (and I don’t think there’s much to understand anyway). I detect intense peach and well-placed musk, but the rest gives off a synthetic or low-quality impression. It’s not that it smells bad—no one would say, ‘Ugh, you smell terrible!’—but it’s inferior to products of equal or lower price. Like its packaging, the scent is loud and intense, as if shouting, ‘Smell me!’ I think it was a rushed attempt by Beyoncé to achieve commercial success, especially with other celebrities like Britney, Celine, and Paris raking in millions; but unlike them, Beyoncé lacks quality and commitment here. It seems the perfumers had good ideas, but when they mixed them, they created an olfactory ‘Frankenstein.’ The trail could be flattering, but it drops so abruptly it’s like a model tripping mid-runway. Verdict: if you want something by Beyoncé, go for Heat Rush, which is far superior to the original.

    Reply
  20. Yadorán d'Vinea

    To me, Heat is a tantrum: it leaves me with furious, choleric vibes, like one of the seven deadly sins, then abruptly cuts off and leaves everything confused. It tries too hard for what it achieves; it’s an undefined, incomprehensible scent (and I don’t think there’s much to understand). I detect intense peach and well-placed musk, but everything else gives the impression of being synthetic or low quality. It’s not that it smells bad—nobody will say ‘Ugh, you smell bad’—but it’s low quality compared to products of equal or lower price (and like its color, the scent is loud and intense, as if shouting: ‘Smell me!’). I think it was a rushed attempt to achieve commercial success in perfumery for Beyoncé, especially with other stars like Britney, Celine, and Paris earning millions; unlike them, Beyoncé is lacking in quality and commitment here. It seems the perfumers had good ideas, but by mixing them, they created an aromatic ‘Frankenstein’. The sillage could be flattering, but it drops so abruptly that it’s like a model tripping mid-runway. Conclusion: if you want to wear something by Beyoncé, go with Heat Rush, which is quite superior to the original.

    Reply
  21. Miriam Ponzio

    The perfume quality doesn’t justify its price; it feels mediocre and cheap.

    Reply
  22. Miriam Ponzio

    The quality doesn’t justify the price; it feels cheap and mediocre.

    Reply
  23. It smells strong and I love it; it suits me perfectly. I like the intense mixed scent and I feel happy wearing it. I’m one of those who prefers potent perfumes.

    Reply
  24. Although many say it smells simple and cheap, I always find the special thing in each one and in this it’s the scent of something hot and very sexy; it’s great that people ask you what you smell like, especially when you’re wearing it.

    Reply
  25. Although many say it’s simple and cheap, I always find something special in each one. To me, this smells hot and very sexy; it’s nice that people ask what you smell like, especially with this on.

    Reply
  26. Honestly, it smells synthetic and could scare off sensitive noses… although it’s pleasant, it doesn’t smell like air freshener or floor cleaner, but the word ‘cheap’ came to mind (first time, by the way). At first, it smells of acidic fruits (let’s say peach) with sweet, warm caramel (you can feel the ‘heat’ here), full magnolia, and a super synthetic orchid touch. Then comes strong synthetic musk and something like whisked egg white with sugar when it dries (let’s say macaron notes?). Finally, something ‘woody’ and ‘vanillic’ (tonka bean) with synthetic amber, but covered up by those top notes and the musk that stand out. I agree with others: it can go from heavy to extremely heavy depending on who wears it. On my part (I like intense scents), I tolerate it, but if I can avoid it, I prefer not to use it. However, my skin carries it well, and after 20 minutes, it smells quite good haha. In conclusion: ‘neither here nor there’, average, cloying… very cheap… but okay! Whoever wants to draw attention with something sweet but undefined (noses that don’t analyze much will just perceive something sweet, striking, and okay), it could work. I clarify that it’s not unpleasant, nor does it diminish Beyoncé’s effort; I’ve smelled designer perfumes that last less and smell equally or more synthetic. I think it’s better for daytime, in cool or cold climates; in heat, it could be excessively ‘heat’ 😀 … although its potency and sillage drop significantly after an hour and a half. Jeri1510 says she uses it in summer… it could be… for my taste, it’s better for night or the beach (with salty water and coconut, it works better) or outdoors; in fact, the first thing I thought when I tried it was ‘beach perfume’… but that’s in my case, where I perfume myself ON the beach. I think what Wilmito said is possible; it smells good on his uncle… because when it dries, it smells like a pleasant and sexy perfume FOR MEN!; yes, siii, men can wear it without worry 🙂

    Reply
  27. It carries a lot of weight but tastes the best. The secret is to put just a few drops on the neck. Sounds like a paradox, but I wear it in summer. And as I said before… it depends a lot on everyone’s pH.

    Reply