Men
Lacoste Pour Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Lacoste Pour Homme by Lacoste Fragrances is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Launched in 2002, the nose behind this composition is Claude Dir. The top notes unfold with plum, apple, grapefruit, and bergamot; the heart reveals cinnamon, pink pepper, cardamom, and juniper; while the base settles on vanilla, rum, musk, sandalwood, cedar, and labdanum.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Lacoste Pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
34 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Upon opening, soft citrus with sweet touches of apple and plum (the apple stands out more). It gives a strong sense of cleanliness and youthfulness. Midway through the evolution, I notice the pink pepper; the base is deep and ambered, but in reality, it’s vanilla and musk that dominate, with soft cedar and more noticeable sandalwood. It reminded me of the apple handling in Hugo Boss, but what surprises me most in a Lacoste is the longevity: it surpassed 12 hours. If you apply too much, the trail is heavy. Although they classify it as aromatic woody, for me the strength lies in the fruits that give it youthfulness, although it’s one of the most serious and formal from the brand, especially due to that musky and woody finish. It goes well all year, but better for night use.
At first, soft citrus with sweet fruits, especially apple. It gives a strong sense of cleanliness and youthfulness. I only notice a bit of pink pepper in the middle, and the base is deep and ambered, with vanilla and musk dominating, while cedar and sandalwood are more muted. It reminds me of the apple handling in some Hugo Boss scents, but what surprises me most is that it’s Lacoste and lasts more than 12 hours; if you overdo it, the trail gets heavy. Although they classify it as aromatic woody, for me the strength lies in the fruits that give it youthfulness, although it’s one of the most serious and formal from the brand, thanks to that musky and woody finish. I see it for all seasons, but better for the night.
Soft and fresh, but without that summer vibe; clean and with noticeable longevity, although the trail is discreet, perfect for not being a walking ‘perfume department.’ Ideal for work, and although many reserve it for the night, I use it day and night in autumn and winter. A very pleasant fragrance.
Few fragrances have fooled me as well as Lacoste Pour Homme. Its citrus opening made me think of another combo of citrus, pepper, and wood, but nothing could be further from the truth. The vanilla and cardamom make it warm, and the rum gives it a liquorish touch. Lacoste doesn’t usually stand out, but this is a good deal, quality/price worthy of being in everyone’s closet. Sometimes we get fooled by the bottle or marketing, but here there’s a gem. I wear it in cold or mild climates with fewer applications.
It was a gift from my aunt in the summer of 2009, one of my first perfumes with which I fell in love and met my partner. It was very mine, my scent. After discovering that my previous one was horribly reformulated, I bought it again and… surprise! The reformulation is just as bad. Before, it lasted all day with 3 sprays; now I need 6 or 7. The scent is similar but not the same. The current formula is only 35% of the original. Maybe it never had great quality to begin with being a mass designer brand, but perfumery has degraded dramatically and the prices are insane.
It smells like strawberry caramel and violet to me. It’s not intrusive and improves with time, ideal for class, the office, or a quick outing in spring and summer, but not for special occasions. It’s pleasant and youthful, but it won’t make history.
The opening is unpleasant; it gave me a headache. After twenty minutes, it releases everything inside: a sweet blend of something plum-like and other synthetic notes I can’t quite identify, all very generic and intrusive. Honestly, while it’s bearable at times, I didn’t like it. It has an interesting skin-scent finish with vanilla, musk, and a hint of rum, which would have made a great perfume if it had come out earlier. Unfortunately, I had to suffer through the opening just to reach that rich finish that only sticks to the skin. I ended the day disappointed. The trail is moderate and lasts about three hours. It’s a rollercoaster of repulsion, intrigue, anger, and joy, but whatever—I’ll use it one last time.
The opening is brutal; it gave me a headache. After 20 minutes, it unleashes what it has: a synthetic sweetness between plum and indistinct notes that sound like an unfortunate mix. It feels generic and intrusive. Although it lasts for a while, I didn’t like it. The dry-down close to the skin is interesting with vanilla, musk, and rum, but it doesn’t convince. If this had come out earlier, it would have been a great perfume at a good price. Unfortunately, I had to suffer for a rich finish that only smells on the skin. I ended up disappointed. The trail is moderate and lasts 3 hours. It’s a mix of repulsion, anger, and joy, but some will like it. For me, it’s a no-go.
Have you ever not known what perfume to wear due to the weather, the occasion, or your mood? This one gets you out of the mess. I don’t understand why sometimes I put Lacoste in the same line as Guess or Diesel, and not with houses like Versace or Chanel. The bottle is simple but incredibly elegant. It resembles Chanel’s Allure pour Homme at the start (not everyone likes it) and Dior Homme Eau at the dry-down. What I notice most is a pleasant ‘powdery vanilla’ scent, with a spicy cinnamon touch and quite sweet, but not cloying. Watch out, it can be very penetrating for the nose and sometimes intrusive. Lacoste Pour Homme is not pompous or an ‘all-star’; it doesn’t pretend to be what it isn’t nor hide behind the brand; it’s a ‘UTILITY’ perfume, one of those for when you’re rushing out and don’t have time. This lizard is super versatile: office, gym, formal or informal, day or night, any season or age. My bottle is from 2013 and has nuclear projection and longevity. I don’t love it, but I can’t deny the good quality of this ‘silver crocodile’.
Ever wonder what to wear based on the weather, occasion, or mood? This solves the dilemma. I don’t know why I associate Lacoste with Nautica, Guess, or Diesel, rather than houses like Versace or Chanel. The bottle is simple but incredibly beautiful and elegant. It reminds me of Chanel’s Allure pour Homme only at the start (not everyone likes that) and Dior Homme Eau de Toilette in the dry-down. What I perceive most is a ‘powdery vanilla’ scent, a bit of the ‘spicy’ from the cinnamon, and quite sweet, but not cloying. Warning: it can be penetrating for the nasal cavity and intrusive at times. Lacoste pour Homme isn’t pompous or ‘all-star’; it doesn’t pretend to be what it isn’t or hide behind a brand. It’s a ‘UTILITY’ perfume, one for running out the door. This lizard is versatile: office, gym, formal, informal, any time, season, or age. My bottle is from 2013, with nuclear-level projection and longevity. It’s not that I love it, but I can’t deny the good quality of this ‘silver crocodile’.
I see Lacoste Pour Homme as one of those 21st-century fragrances that dared to cover all masculine fronts, from the office to the party, without issues. It opens super fresh, fruity, and clean, with that soapy touch and a hint of alcohol that soon gives way to herbaceous Virginia juniper and a spicy trio of cinnamon, pepper, and cardamom. Cardamom is the king here, lasting until the very end and blending with musk, cedar, and that barely perceptible rum. The bottle is sober yet classy, just like the women’s version, with its textured silver cap and the embossed crocodile giving it an extra visual touch. The box is top-notch too, with its texture, color, and chrome edges; it’s one of the best designer packaging I’ve seen. It’s not a masterpiece or of spectacular quality like the women’s version (that’s a great job by Olivier Cresp), but it delivers and smells good. Fragrance: 8/10 Longevity: 8/10 Projection: 6.5/10 Versatility: 9/10
The best part is its scent of cinnamon, rum, vanilla, and plum. When I had it in 2005, it wasn’t as soft; they must have reformulated it like many others. Good perfume for meetings or hanging out with friends, nothing complicated. Longevity is 5 hours, sillage 1 hour. Costs between $25 and $35 online. I’d give it a 6.5/10.
That combination of plum, cinnamon, rum, and vanilla… wow, it’s indescribable. I loved it; I was skeptical, but it was a very pleasant surprise to discover. It’s an all-rounder: day, night, any season, even on the train.
The subtlety is the secret to this rich fragrance. Imagine a glass of plums bathed in rum, with cinnamon and a slice of apple. After a few hours, that sweetness provided by a subtle yet intense vanilla emerges. Very sweet, yes; strong, no. It’s a subtle, elegant, and incredibly rich sweetness that invites you to relax. At first fresh, woody, and spicy, then the spice fades to make way for something soapy, clean, and elegant, with a sweet woody base. Its simplicity gives it versatility, projecting class, tenderness, and sweetness. One of Lacoste’s best. I recommend it; it should be in your collection. Projection and sillage are soft but sufficient to generate compliments. Sometimes shy, but always reliable.
Subtlety is the secret of this rich fragrance. Does anyone like a glass of plums with rum, a cinnamon stick, and a slice of apple? After a few hours, that’s the sweetness you notice, enhanced by a subtle but very sweet vanilla. Very sweet? Yes. Strong? No. It’s a subtle, elegant, and incredibly rich sweetness that invites you to relax. At first, it’s fresh, woody, and a bit spicy; then the spice and wood fade, giving way to something soapy, projecting a clean and elegant aroma with that sweet and woody base. In summary, its simplicity gives it great versatility, projecting cleanliness, class, tenderness, and sweetness; it’s rich, one of the best from Lacoste. I recommend it and it should be in your collection. The projection and trail are soft on my skin, but enough to generate compliments and make a presence. Sometimes it’s shy and discreet depending on the weather, but always reliable.
I owned this years ago and always got compliments. It’s fresh but sparkling, with citrus and a very pleasant touch of sweetness. I plan to buy it again because it drives me crazy. I’ve read they reformulated it, but I don’t care; when it’s a classic fragrance, reformulated or not, you buy it for the feelings and memories.
Very sugary aroma that wasn’t dizzying; it was addictive. The downside is it didn’t last on me at all, so I overapplied it. I think it fits young people with a Hollister vibe perfectly.
I picked this up in 2006 on a trip to the Canary Islands. I didn’t know it, and the moment I smelled it, I was hooked—I think the perfumery was called El Trebol. I bought about nine perfumes; my girlfriend thought I had lost my mind, haha. It’s a sweet scent but not cloying, clean, and everyone loved it. It didn’t last long, but it was 2006, so who knows what it would hold up to today. I’ll give it another try.
I picked this up in 2006 while traveling to the Canary Islands; I didn’t know it, but the moment I smelled it, I loved it. I bought it at the perfumery El Trébol and brought back about 9 perfumes; my girlfriend thought I’d lost my mind. It’s a sweet scent but not cloying, clean, and everyone loved it. It didn’t last long, but then again, it was 2006. Fifteen years later, who knows how it holds up? I’m going to try it again.
I just bought it and thought it was great. The moment I smelled it, I pictured an office manager—someone serious yet fresh. It’s sweet and gives off the vibe that you enjoy wearing it and that your income is solid. Excellent perfume.
I just bought it and thought it was great. Upon smelling it, I immediately pictured an office manager—someone serious yet fresh. It’s sweet but conveys that you enjoy wearing it and that your income isn’t low. Excellent perfume.
It starts very citrusy and seems to stay there, but a few minutes in, the warm, soft middle note kicks in and that’s where it settles. No extreme projection or longevity; it stays close to the skin and lasts about 5 to 6 hours. Best for fresh weather or climates that aren’t too hot.
This is my go-to office fragrance. I can’t quite pinpoint the notes, but it smells clean and fresh. I’ve received so many compliments and highly recommend it: perfect for hot days, though worn close to the skin, it’s ideal for cool spring evenings.
It’s all synthetic. I’ve had it for years and given it many chances, but it has never been to my liking.
What a perfume disaster! Don’t buy it blind or let yourself be swayed by YouTube reviews. It’s one of the most generic scents I’ve ever smelled, a total fiasco. It doesn’t stand out at all in the opening and only dries down to a very faint rum note. The longevity is also awful. Don’t buy it; you’ll thank me later.
A disaster! Don’t buy it blindly or get fooled by YouTube reviews. It’s one of the most generic perfumes I’ve ever smelled, a total fiasco. It doesn’t stand out at all in the opening, and only after drying down does it smell very faintly of rum. The longevity is also terrible. Don’t buy it, you’ll thank me later.
A great perfume, unjustly forgotten. It’s clean, slightly sweet (though I hate sweet scents, this one I like), and has a hint of rum. It’s the younger brother of ‘The Tragedy of Lord George’ by Penhaligon: niche, superior quality, and more pronounced notes, but the Lacoste has that cleanliness touch. Very wearable in any season, though not on summer days. It’s an elegant signature fragrance that doesn’t project or bother anyone. Some young people won’t like it, but most will. It’s not old school, but it’s for men over 30. It lasts 6 hours. Good value for money, except for not including outrageous ingredients.
I love it! Fresh opening with bergamot, grapefruit, plum, and apple, which then turns sweet with vanilla, cinnamon, and rum, giving it a slightly boozy touch. That warmth dominates until the end, where woods like sandalwood and cedar add elegance and maturity. Ideal for semi-formal situations. It works for almost any weather except extreme heat. Longevity is low, about 5-7 hours, but the projection is very good.
It’s not a beast mode like the Lacoste ones usually are, but in my opinion, it’s the best current one alongside the Booster. Those who say it smells like Hugo Boss Bottled are exaggerating. It doesn’t smell like fresh apple or rum. To me, it’s a mix between Blue de Chanel and Fierce by Abercrombie. It lasts 4-5 hours on skin. I’ve had Lacoste since the 80s, and none surpass 5 hours, even with many sprays. Maybe the current ones are reformulated. It smells good, it’s affordable (40-50€ for 100ml), fresh without being summery, elegant without being stuffy, and versatile for men aged 25 to 50. For going out at night, it lacks a bit of punch. It doesn’t overwhelm; it smells rich without being overly modern or using impossible leather notes. It’s quite traditional.
It’s fruity, spicy, and woody. The opening is fresh with spices and a dry but creamy base, perhaps sandalwood and vanilla. After 4 hours, the spices fade, leaving a musky touch. It reminds me of Boss Bottled in structure, not scent. It’s timeless and elegant, good for the office or outings in spring and autumn. It lasted me over 8 hours, though the sillage is average. If you’re looking for something similar to Boss but different, it’s a good option.
I liked it, though not loved it. It starts citrusy with grapefruit and bergamot, then moves to spices like cinnamon and cardamom. Longevity and projection are decent, about 3 to 4 hours. Previously, under P&G, it had an unbeatable booster that’s no longer available. Now, as a gift, it’s my go-to for casual outings on mild nights. Rating: 6/10.
I neither liked nor disliked it; I used it because it was a Christmas gift. At first, I thought about selling it, but I kept using it until it was gone. It’s sweet and casual, nothing more. The longevity is low, it doesn’t project, and the sillage is weak without anyone complimenting me. I wouldn’t buy it myself.
At first, I didn’t see anything special, until I noticed that fruity and musky similarity to Rasasi Hawas Ice. It’s like their more serious and mature version, though less potent. Ideal for work or formal situations where you don’t want to draw too much attention.
It was my first gifted fragrance, but in my youth I ignored it in favor of louder options like Eros. Recently, finding a last drop, I realized that while the plum note is strong, the dry-down is a pleasure. Maybe I’ll buy it for nostalgia, though I recommend it more for experienced wearers.