Skip to content

Escape by Calvin Klein

Women 1991

Perfumer
Claude Dir

Description

Escape by Calvin Klein is a floral aquatic fragrance for women. Launched in 1991, this composition was created by perfumer Claude Dir. The top notes reveal a vibrant blend of melon, chamomile, calendula, marigold, blackberry, hyacinth, oakmoss, apple, cilantro, tangerine, ylang-ylang, blackcurrant, lychee, and cassia. The heart unfolds with the freshness of peach, valley lily, carnation, rose, jasmine, and cloves.…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 17%
  • Spring 29%
  • Summer 26%
  • Autumn 29%
  • Day 64%
  • Night 36%

Key notes

Community

3,340 votes

  • Positive 69%
  • Negative 25%
  • Neutral 5.6%
positive reviews 3.3 k community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageStrong Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

8,674 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

2,723 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,639 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Escape

Main accord aromatic Year 1991 Gender Women Perfumer Claude Dir

Escape by Calvin Klein is a floral aquatic fragrance for women. Launched in 1991, this composition was created by perfumer Claude Dir. The top notes reveal a vibrant blend of melon, chamomile, calendula, marigold, blackberry, hyacinth, oakmoss, apple, cilantro, tangerine, ylang-ylang, blackcurrant, lychee, and cassia. The heart unfolds with the freshness of peach, valley lily, carnation, rose, jasmine, and cloves. Finally, the base offers a warm, enveloping foundation of oakmoss, musk, sandalwood, amber, vetiver, cedar, and vanilla.

Fruits, vegetables and nuts Flowers Green, herbal and fougère Woods and mosses White flowers Spices Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

1,271 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Strong

1,454 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

711 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

653 votes

Community reviews

39 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Once again, Calvin Klein doesn’t disappoint. So far, every perfume I’ve bought has pleasantly surprised me. This one was a blind buy thanks to the great price. I have to say, it smells very similar to Anick Goutal’s Grand Amour, but it’s more persistent and intense, which I absolutely love because Grand Amour felt too light on me, like a cologne. The Escape on my skin feels powdery and slightly floral; honestly, I don’t know or distinguish the notes well, so I get confused when people say it smells like certain things. But overall, the word that defines the Escape is SPECTACULAR.

    Reply
  2. Tordo Uruguayo

    I love it. I bought it online because it’s not available directly at pharmacies or perfumeries in Uruguay. You can tell it’s floral, but in a more subtle way, mixed with fruity and woody notes, creating a pleasant combination that’s slightly sweet and fresh, reminding me of some room powder. It’s an EdP; just a few sprays leave a nice trail and good longevity, so you have to use it carefully so it doesn’t become overwhelming. I recommend it 8/10!

    Reply
  3. Benjamin Alamo - 1389

    The Escape was my introduction to the world of Calvin Klein. I was surprised by the sheer number of notes it has. It marks progress in that powerhouse perfumery from the 70s and 80s. It’s outrageously fruity. The top notes are cheap-tasting and melon-like, feeling juicy. As for the florals, the carnation takes center stage, while the valley lily plays a secondary role; its carnation is much more modern than contemporaries like Eternity, though it doesn’t stop from being sharp. During the dry-down and throughout its evolution, it always circles back to the melon and carnation notes. Personally, there’s something in the opening that makes me think it contains aldehydes because a few minutes in the air it smells like fruity hairspray, which sparks some debate… I tested it on a summer day and it works perfectly; I’ll have to try it in winter and spring to see how it evolves. Longevity: about 7 to 8 hours. Projection: good. Sillage: you’ll definitely radiate a very fresh fruity aroma, as if you just took a fruit juice shower. It’s versatile; I don’t see any negative aspects, nor do I think it’s hard to wear or smell like other classics. L’Eau D’Issey Miyake and Sunflower smell similar to the Escape, but while LDM feels aquatic and watery, and Sunflower is warmer and cleaner, the Escape is much fruitier.

    Reply
  4. karitalinda

    The Escape is my eternal pleasure, it’s also a luxury, never reserved. If you don’t have character, stay away; I’m a Capricorn, and while I might not mix easily, you’ll surely remember me or my perfume. People either love us or hate us, but the latter only happens because they don’t know how to read us; we are firm, yet intensely loving, and that shows when you are reflective, attentive, and analytical. Otherwise, how would you discover every note in us?

    Reply
  5. Calvin Klein in its golden years still surprises me when I see old magazines pricing a CK scent as high as Chanel. Of course, this designer’s fashion fever was unstoppable; nobody could cast a shadow on him in the 90s, he had youth firmly in his hands. His prestige was built on years of experience and a following dating back to the late 70s. The marketing power was immense, featuring stunning models, many of whom became stars born from the brand itself. The photo and ad production was truly enviable. Basically, he molded an entire era. The 1991 Escape never revealed its gender… The TV ads showed a couple kissing on a beach, wrapped in sand under bright sun, with the beautiful shimmer of the sea in the background. It just said ‘Escape’… nothing more. The whispers of those in the ad, the longing gazes, were the two protagonists; it could have been a custom-made scent for the two of them, redefining a shared moment… there was no gender, period. The Escape didn’t specify, only revealing its male alter-ego two years later, yet even then, its box and description, ‘as a whim,’ avoided ‘pour femme’ and ‘for her.’ The concept of a woody floral with aquatic tones was just beginning to emerge; Aramis’s New West for men (1988) and women (1990) were paving the way for a trend that would change the rules of the game up to that point. It was a radical turn compared to what had been offered aromatically in the 80s. The idea that men and women return to the sea from where they came, that idea of escaping to have an intimate encounter. In contact with the beauty of nature in simple, comfortable clothes, far from extravagant ostentation. This aquatic issue, that olfactory memory of evoking liberation through water, sun, and sand between two bodies ready to be together. Calvin Klein understood this concept would prevail and he wasn’t wrong; it was the kind of fragrance that reigned for a long period. Analyzing the olfactive structure, I find that Escape is a delirium of fruity florals, woods, and soft spices. The scent is quite intense, not far from the intensity of the 80s, but of course, it gives a quite different aromatic turn. A perfect fruity combination with the sweetness of peach and melon, the fresh wetness of apple, a white floral bouquet with well-defined green notes, a prominent and neat woody imprint. That play between sweet, bitter, and salty that drove the youth of that time crazy. My first impression with Escape wasn’t good; testing the Coty version first, it seemed like a horrible, linear, nonsensical syrup. When I tried the vintage made by ‘Calvin Klein Cosmetics,’ I realized how different it was; I could feel the scent ranges of the fragrance and its real beauty. I know it’s not a perfume for everyone, it has a lot of character and presence, but I fell in love, a late love for which this review was born.

    Reply
  6. perrolabrador

    This perfume is unbearable! Invasive, suffocating, cloying, a true olfactory nightmare. Fortunately, it’s no longer in fashion, and I rarely have to endure it now on the bus or in public transport. Thank goodness the years passed and people stopped using this unbearable scent along with some similar ones, like the horrible L’Eau D’Issey, Sunflower, and a similar Kenzo scent that fortunately also went out of style.

    Reply
  7. LiliBerríos

    Honestly, it’s very vintage for me. My inexperienced nose finds it so potent that it can’t distinguish any single note. 🥲

    Reply
  8. I gave it to my mother in 1991; she loved it so much (and so did I) that it became her winter perfume from then on. She was faithful to it until she passed away in 2012. I want to buy a bottle because it’s her scent, just like Eau de Rochas was hers in the summer too. I need to smell it, I need it desperately. Since I don’t have her embrace, which I miss so much in this difficult time of my life, I’ll have her most characteristic scent. I have to find a reliable website so they don’t sell me a fake, because I haven’t seen it in a physical store. What a wonderful perfume! I never used it despite how much I liked it; I lent it to her.

    Reply
  9. Carolina B.

    I love Calvin Klein perfumes because each one is original and unique. Escape is spectacular. It doesn’t seem annoying at all like people say. The aquatic note feels perfectly right; it’s soft and fresh. The difference with perfumes nowadays is that it has very good projection and longevity, so people get scared and say it’s strong, but NO! It’s an excellent quality perfume. It’s probably because my first perfumes were from my adolescence in the 90s, and I’m set on that era, so I adore them. Long live 90s perfumes!

    Reply
  10. I’ve always been a fan of L’eau d’Issey, but now it smells everywhere, even at Mercadona. Thanks to this site, I discovered that Escape is its twin and bought it blind: what a hit! Turns out L’eau is the copy of Escape, only this one is cheaper, lasts longer, and leaves a stronger trail. The only downside is that everyone around me smells the same, so I’ll remain the scent of old, hehe.

    Reply
  11. Ragdoll89

    I’ve had it for years as a Christmas gift. At first, it didn’t grab much attention, but the trail it left on my skin after a while, especially after sweating or showering, was amazing. I hope to get it again soon.

    Reply
  12. I used it for many years and I’m sure I’ll buy it again… it’s like first love, you never forget it.

    Reply
  13. I bought it recently and it’s a wonder. I’ve worn it several times; here in Chile it’s summer and it smells incredibly fresh.

    Reply
  14. Alafi kisieko

    I recently acquired it and at 42, it transports me back to 15 or 16, when wearing it was the trend: platform shoes with peep-toe details, Levis jeans, and sunflower t-shirts, with guys absolutely infatuated by the scent. I recommend it without hesitation: it’s citrusy, fresh, and smells like the 90s summer.

    Reply
  15. charlotinable

    I picked this up for an absurdly low price. Even though I knew the scent, I’d never actually tried it. Thank goodness they didn’t reformulate it; it still packs that same punch. On my skin, I detect rose with chamomile, melon, and herbal notes. It’s strong, beastly, and radioactive—exactly how I like it. A little goes a long way, lasting hours and leaving a trail. It’s a vintage jewel. It was my mom’s favorite, but 26 years ago cancer gave her chemo treatments that ruined her face until she hated it. Now, when she smells it, she enjoys it without reacting, only telling me once I put it on her wrist, ‘It’s not for me anymore.’ Every time I bring it, she sniffs it off me, and that’s the only way I get to enjoy it through her.

    Reply
  16. CK Escape was one of my first perfumes; I loved it and held it dear. I stopped wearing it during my first pregnancy because it irritated my throat. It didn’t give me nausea, but I felt like my nose was running like I had a cold. I missed it because its trail and longevity felt eternal. I bought it again for the nostalgia, and to my surprise, I actually like it, though it still triggers that allergic reaction. It’s a shame because I adore it and don’t want to give it away. Maybe I’ll wear it only on clothes or spray it from a distance. It’s an excellent perfume, lasting forever on skin with an impressive trail and longevity that rivals expensive brands that promise and fail. I’ll update later if I find a way to wear it.

    Reply
  17. I just bought it on sale. I hesitated because of its age, but it smells so current and delicious! I definitely smell the melon. It’s an exquisite, soft yet persistent scent, slightly sweet without being heavy. I think it’s perfect for summer and spring, and I absolutely loved it. Sometimes blind buys pay off, and this was definitely one of them. Super feminine, it wraps you in a fresh, floral, fruity aura. I recommend it, but it depends on your pH; it can make a huge difference. On me, it’s perfect.

    Reply
  18. To me, it’s superbly constructed, a true ‘escape from monotony.’ I consider it a brilliant example of harmony among all its ingredients; thanks to this design, I discovered the scent of chamomile within the fragrance—it’s detectable and interesting. It was a great creation from the 90s that I discovered with my neighbor. Super feminine with an impressive projection that left trails, like the scent in Patrick Süskind’s book. It’s a pity it’s discontinued or heading toward eternal oblivion. Projection: 10/10, Scent: 10/10, Trail: 10/10. I greatly admire master Dir.

    Reply
  19. This perfume marked an era in my life in the 90s; I wore it with many bottles and it was my signature. It has a peach aroma, and its dry-down on skin is spicy apricot, very intense. It lasted days on clothes, with massive projection and longevity. It brings back lovely memories, and I’d use it again soon. Update: I’m wearing it again, and it still has that impressive radioactive power and trail. That balance of notes is wonderful; I’m in love with this classic all over again.

    Reply
  20. It’s impossible not to compare it to Sunflowers, which I never liked. I see it as a precursor to that overly fruity, people-pleasing, synthetic, cloying style—a real torture for melon haters like me. I don’t get why so many people love Sunflowers when Escape exists. But I do understand: Escape’s complexity and intricacy make it hard to love at first. The crowded notes, the weirdness of those wild, bitter flowers, and that old aftershave-like aromatic accord can scare off anyone. But that’s exactly what makes it so fascinating to my nose. It’s not my favorite scent, but I appreciate its intention and merit in trying to differentiate itself from the conventional and supposedly acceptable. Despite its flaws—which might stem from a reformulation—I admire that it chose paths that aren’t easy. Deconstructing it is a very complicated task. There’s no single standout note; rather, it’s an incredibly interesting mixture where elements, well-integrated, emerge intermittently. The opening is very fruity and liquorish, showing an astringent greenness from cassia and early hints of mossiness. Among the fruits, more than the melon (discreet and fresh, praise be to Mr. Dir), it’s the peach or apple that stands out, with the most perceptible being the aquatic, metallic air of lychee, accompanied by the herbaceous and bitter nuances of calendula and chamomile. It continues floral and honeyed, briefly highlighting a valley lily before joining with carnation, cloves, and peach to create sweet yet slightly prickly nuances. It finishes mossy, slightly musky, woody, and very ambered. This amber, combined with a lingering green residue, gives that old aftershave vibe I mentioned earlier. Its projection and longevity are notable, and as hours pass, it takes on a very aromatic yet sophisticated air, without lacking femininity. Escape reminds me of those liqueurs you happily accept from kind hosts until horror sets in when they reveal they made it themselves from their pantry and garden. You drink it, squint through the burn, and tell them it’s delicious while thinking your Aunt Rita could have swallowed the potion. But then you start to enjoy the taste, ask for more, and another, and another. Before you know it, you’ve had a very pleasant buzz and are asking them to gift you a bottle. It’s still impossible not to compare it to Sunflowers. There’s plenty of evidence that the latter owes a lot to the former, and the egg-and-chicken dilemma is clear here: Escape came first, then Sunflowers. However, despite their similarities, they are very different in attitude. What Sunflowers shouts, Escape whispers. What Sunflowers wants to show off, Escape suggests. The brushstroke Sunflowers smashes onto the canvas, Escape dilutes and nuances. So, what’s the problem with Escape? That to modern noses, it can seem bizarre and convoluted. But it’s much subtler than Sunflowers and at the same time more challenging. And I like challenges, especially olfactory ones.

    Reply
  21. I loved this in the 90s; it brings back so many memories. It’s super fruity with an uncommon melon note. I bought Sunflower because I was told it was the same, but I let the price fool me—it had nothing to do with it. Escape is more elaborate, a true iconic beauty from CK.

    Reply
  22. AuryUnicorn

    To be honest, the first time I smelled it, I didn’t like it. It felt heavy, very spiced, with a vintage vibe. However, I kept giving it chances, and today it’s the perfume I use the most. I love that non-typical fruity scent it has. Plus, its longevity is immense, and its trail is impossible to miss. I find it incredible for evening wear or a summer or autumn day. Just a heads-up: it’s not a fragrance for everyone; you need to know how to wear it.

    Reply
  23. I absolutely love Magic on my skin. One of my all-time favorites. If it were a phrase, it would be: ‘here I am.’ It lasts on me for many hours, maybe up to 12. In my country, it’s not sold in perfumeries, so I’ve had to order it from travelers or online retailers.

    Reply
  24. I like the fragrance; it’s sweet, fruity, and moves away from classic aldehydes, having a more modern and youthful touch while retaining the quality of those classics. This is achieved thanks to the experience of the Master Perfumer who created it. Another perfume I have by him that I like is Kim Kardashian’s Honey. It’s very good and affordable.

    Reply
  25. I’m the only one who no longer detects the melon. What happened? No fruit at all for me today; it’s a salty/aquatic floral, super green, raw, and astringent. Literally, it burns my nasal cavity, like smelling the cut stem of flowers rather than the flower itself. There’s nothing creamy about it; instead, it’s soapy, loud, and metallic. I can’t handle it, and I know it’s due to the reformulation. They haven’t diluted it; it’s still just as potent with a good trail, but I feel they lowered the quality of the ingredients.

    Reply
  26. This perfume reminds me of a few 90s romances, parties, vacations, and dance nights. It’s impossible to ignore. It hails from the era when teenagers and young women weren’t afraid of perfumes with presence and personality, and we didn’t say, ‘run away, mister.’ Contrary to what one might think, the melon note doesn’t make it tropical at all. On the contrary, it’s more suitable for cold climates due to its potency. Sexy, complex, and distinct. Escape never goes out of style.

    Reply
  27. MdmButterfly

    One of the best vintage perfumes. For Calvin Klein, it’s what Angel is to Mugler, Poeme to Lancôme, Chanel No. 5 to Chanel, and Shalimar to Guerlain.

    Reply
  28. Finally, I got a little bottle. Even though it’s a fragrance directed at women, I dared to buy it for myself because I like challenges, I feel very confident in my sexuality, and I believe a fragrance should adapt to the person wearing it, regardless of gender (the person defines their gender, not the fragrance they use). It’s one of the few truly strong fragrances that imposes itself. It has kept its DNA intact this decade, and I’m fascinated by it. On my skin, the fruity notes mixed with flowers stand out, with hyacinth and carnation taking the lead. Later, strong notes like sandalwood, cilantro, musk, and cloves emerge, competing with the floral notes which refuse to die, creating a war of floral and spicy notes trying to prove who is more dominant. It has a surprising trail, like few others, and its longevity is excellent. What more could I ask for? I’m amazed…

    Reply
  29. Valelibre

    I remember using it when I was a bit over 20, and now, 20 years later, I bought it again, and it brought back so many memories. It’s a very classic and unique fragrance, which is why not everyone likes it. When it first came out, I smelled a lot of cilantro, and that note stayed with me for hours, making it fresh but slightly sweet at the same time due to its melon, peach, and apple notes. I’ve been wearing it for three hours, and I must say it’s still intact, as if just applied. The longevity of this perfume is excellent, and so is the trail. I don’t see it for use on excessively hot days, although some people say it always works well, but for winter, autumn, spring, and even some summer days when the sun doesn’t melt your thoughts, it’s perfect. If you like it, it’s an ally to keep in your vanity. And at least in Chile, the value is more than good. Edit: My husband hates it, haha. The truth is, he likes very few scents, so I still wear this for those days when I’m at work and he’s at his, so I don’t have to hear him complaining, haha.

    Reply