Men
Habit Rouge Eau de Toilette
Acordes principales
Descripción
Guerlain's Habit Rouge Eau de Toilette is a woody oriental fragrance for men. Launched in 1988, this composition was created by Jean-Paul Guerlain. The top notes include lemon, Brazilian rosewood, orange, bergamot, lime, tangerine, and basil; the heart reveals rose, carnation, sandalwood, cinnamon, patchouli, jasmine, and cedar; while the base notes consist of vanilla, leather, benzoin, amber, oakmoss, and labdanum.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Habit Rouge Eau de Toilette y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
A legendary oriental that has endured for 55 years (that’s something). Tested the current version, personally I don’t see it as so old-fashioned or outdated, no more than other classic aromas. Maybe in the past it was more heavy-handed, but the one available today (red cap) is rather light, in no way cloying. What cannot be denied (tastes aside) is its complexity. It evolves and evolves, and the changes can be clearly perceived. Just for this, it deserves a try, because 90% of perfumes on sale today aren’t built like this; they’re more linear. For me, a long middle phase stands out, with a masculine, realistic, and frankly beautiful rose note that stands out among the others, a marvel for the olfactory senses. In the dry down, a powdery vanilla predominates, not sweet at all, which reminds me of Caron Pour Homme. I think this part might turn off more than one and provoke associations with old scents. I don’t dislike it, to be honest. Other classics have become more linear in their recent versions (e.g., Egoiste, although it’s very well done, it has lost the complexity of the version available in the 90s and early 2000s. I have a bottle from 2003 and another from 2018, and the difference is noticeable). Guerlain has taken care in the current formulation of Habit Rouge, and it shows. In short, I don’t think it’s a ‘mass appeal’, but it has elegance, discretion, classicism, and impeccable workmanship.
August 2020: I’ve re-read all the reviews and I’m even more confused. What on earth did the lady at the perfumery put on me?? Because I left with a smell of a hospital, 80s hair lacquer, and cat pee that they used to throw away (as I told Spartacus). But how can it be, MON DIEU!! Another measured test and tasting is needed, I’ll let you know something when I clarify this confusion (if it is one) and see if it’s me, the perfume, or the lady! PS: Anyway, whether it’s a legendary fragrance or not, the fact that it’s Keith Richards’ favorite is a point against rather than for me; I don’t identify with that gentleman at all (not physically, mentally, aesthetically, or spiritually). EDITED OCT 21 2020: It’s clear that what was previously applied to me for testing was another fragrance or was spoiled. Definitely this fragrance has well-earned its legend. Quality ingredients, complexity, depth, and, also, undeniably, a different scent from current ones, but in my opinion very wearable. That said, for me, it’s a fragrance for women; those of us from the old school remember the smell of makeup from back then, and this is the scent that comes to my mind in the first phase, with lots of rose and jasmine in the old style, and of course patchouli. It smells like timeless elegance and class. It’s only at the end, in its dry down, that it acquires a masculine touch with the leather, amber, and oakmoss, gently softened by the vanilla. This phase is delicious to me and makes me want to keep smelling it without stopping. Another sign of the fragrance’s genius: during the dry down, which lasts several hours, its scent is very current, modern (I imagine due to the vanilla), but at the same time distinguishable and different from the others. And we’re talking about 55 years of life since it was created! Chapeau! Having said all the above, honor and glory to Habit Rouge, but it’s not something I’d wear. And regarding Keith Richards, I still hold my ground, so… Au revoir
Spectacular, all-rounder. At first, you might detect that retro air that, if you’re accustomed exclusively to modern scents, might turn you off, but as it dries down… It seems the precursor to fragrances of the so-called ‘new masculinity’ (iris) and becomes as current as any, adding a prominent lemon note that brings versatility. Lemon, rose, and vanilla are the standout notes. Classic but modern.
Smells like an old man, not recommended for young people.
A perfume I had high expectations for due to the good reviews and because I’m a lover of vintage, but it’s an aroma that went out of fashion a long time ago. Pure citrus, rose, and leather, it smells more feminine than masculine. My grandmother smells exactly like this, I don’t know why, maybe she uses this perfume. I don’t recommend it at all… old-fashioned, vintage, outdated, and smells like grandma.
I like the opening, but after a short while it turns into a doll-like smell, meaning, it smells like some dolls.
It’s not easy to write reviews about classics as famous as this. On one hand, I fear I won’t do them justice; on the other, so much has already been said that it’s like pouring a cup of water into the ocean. Habit Rouge by Guerlain, born in 1965, is clearly on the podium of the best from this house. However, it’s a classic, for many a sort of masculine Shalimar (the latter in its corresponding vintage version is more potent, to be honest), a symbol that brings together elegance, classicism, and nobility. In fact, right from the opening, a bit of Shalimar suddenly appears: it opens with evident citrus notes—spicy with an excellent implementation of orange, where bergamot and lemon are highlighted by this well-refined note—but already in the base, there’s a touch of leather, vanilla, and, more lightly, that soft powder sensation typical of Shalimar. The sweetness, used here so discreetly and skillfully, doesn’t seem out of place at any moment. Beautiful, with classic elegance and noble behavior. As it dries down, it enriches with a pleasant and complex heart of floral and woody notes; the floral variety of carnation, jasmine, and rose is led by the carnation. These mix very well and are another indication of the care that went into this original formula before giving way to a base always welcomed in warm Guerlain style. Very pleasant and well-made, it’s a fragrance suitable for a wide variety of people: just like a movie actor in the best years of their career, or a young construction worker on a weekend at the trendiest club trying to meet women they find out of reach, or the laboratory scholar preparing for a romantic evening with their sweet half. Anyone who hasn’t heard of Habit Rouge has a significant gap in their journey through this fantastic world. Review based on a vintage from the 2000s.
Today they applied a spray, and it met my expectations. It’s one of those fragrances that deserve to be smelled with a sigh. I had doubts because there are two camps: those who say it smells like ‘old age bomb’ and those who associate it with vintage things; I stick with the latter. At first, it’s very fresh and rich, then it starts emitting that curious scent that everyone interprets in their own way. People have commented it smells like old doll hair, an antique shop, or a trunk full of vintage items; a friend told me it smells like an old library. I work at a museum with a lot of history, and for me, this fragrance is very interesting because the visitor, besides seeing the old artworks, would smell this perfume that you don’t know if you like or what it reminds you of, but it definitely makes you think. In conclusion, it’s not easy to wear nowadays, especially if you consider yourself young, but that’s exactly what makes it extremely intriguing; whoever smells it will pay more attention to where the scent leads than to what it smells like itself. I’d only see its use if you want to smell vintage on purpose. Also, the powder note isn’t strong; I tested it alongside Heritage, and that one is literally a powder bomb, as already said, it smells purely like a barbershop. I think the powder association comes from the very old person who applies skin creams and yes, it smells purely of powder. Don’t panic, Habit Rouge doesn’t make you smell like an old person; it makes you smell like you’re in an old museum or library. Observations: *Only they gave me one spray; other fragrances start taking shape from the second one—like Guerlain’s Vetiver—which smells very citrusy and aromatic with one, but in the second, the tobacco and earthy notes enter to give it exquisite depth. *The blind test with a mask might have prevented me from smelling the fragrance well. *The version was the silver cap; I don’t know if the new one with the red cap has undergone reformulation.
A wonderful, magical, deep, sensual, and hypnotic fragrance. Now it’s globalized, like almost everything. It smells very rich and I like it, but it has lost some depth…
What an exciting discovery! I asked for recommendations on men’s perfumes that suit women, and they suggested this one. I was surprised that, far from being masculine, it’s unisex with a much stronger feminine charge, proving how volatile fashion and gender labels can be. To me, it smells like Shalimar or Samsara EDT, but much richer in rose and carnation, yet powdery and clean; nothing of that thick oriental vibe. It’s perfect for day, night, and any season. It has that quintessential ‘Guerlinade’ touch. Now I want it for myself.
Humbly, I don’t think a new review adds more than a warning for those who don’t know it: it’s addictive! 10/10.
A legendary fragrance that paved the way for oriental perfumery. Its opening is powerful. Citrus notes fade quickly, giving way to florals, with rose standing out. Gradually, they evolve, revealing vanilla, leather, and amber. In every phase, it shows a powdery character, though it truly shines in the dry-down with its exquisite scent and a wonderful talc-like trail. Regarding longevity, I don’t know about the vintage versions, but this reformulated one lasts 7–8 hours, with a solid trail and projection for the first two hours. Conclusion: even though it’s well-known, I think it’s underrated, since its scent not only defined an era but still offers excellent performance today without feeling outdated. It’s a masterpiece.
This beauty belongs to an era where men’s fragrances distilled elegance. Habit Rouge is far from those steroid-like scents that followed later. The idea was to wear a cologne that complemented clothes without overwhelming them. We’re talking about a time when it took six years to release a new Vetiver; today, it’s only six months before the nineteenth flanker of anything hits the market. Those were quality days; mass production didn’t exist. Vetiver had won hearts with its woods and tobacco; Jean Paul raised the stakes with Habit Rouge, a bold floral bouquet of roses, carnations, labdanum, and woody citrus. He adds vanilla and leather, nodding to the classic Shalimar. While Shalimar floods with animalic vanillas, Habit Rouge dives into its floral-woody side, subtly spicy. The rose, carnation, citrus… woods bathed in spicy balsamic vanilla, with labdanum and resins that make anyone who tries a drop succumb. It held up well through reformulations; the top and heart notes are almost identical, maybe it lacks that previous velvety finish, but overall it’s great. Its trail is moderate, soft on the skin, with very good longevity. A true gem; I surrender to this fragrance.
A legendary fragrance I enjoyed to the fullest; I must have gotten the early 90s formulas. I loved it so much—a quirky amber blending cinnamon, vanilla, sandalwood woods, a bit of leather, and moss that give a powdery touch, sweetening the benzoin tincture. A perfume to never forget, an elegant citrus opening, nothing flashy, very Guerlain. Scent 10/10, Projection 10/10, Trail 10/10.
This masterpiece is practically my age. My father used to wear it when I was a kid, and I remember that whenever he put it on to go to the office, I immediately felt reverence and respect toward him.
I’m fascinated by this fragrance from day one. It’s an explosion of scents that leaves no one indifferent. I really like that the longevity is excellent and the trail reaches everyone—my wife loves it, and I’m very satisfied with the quality.
I love it, but I don’t have the personality to wear it at my almost 33.
Guerlain never disappoints; elegant aroma. The only downside is I don’t see it for ‘young’ people. It smells like someone in their 40s or 50s with class. At 26, I don’t think it would suit me or appeal to my generation.
One of my all-time favorites and the first oriental sold in Europe… that gives it that vintage touch. 100% recommended for any age.
Hey, don’t joke, this is pure delight. I almost got wet from how good it smells. It’s a classic, masculine, and elegant—a real masterpiece. I don’t even have it in my collection, and it’s already in my top 5 favorite fragrances.
Here I disagree with the one who says you need to be older. I’m 32, and it seems perfect and correct for the office and executive meetings; age is no excuse to enjoy perfumes. Habit Rouge is a sophisticated citrus floral masculine. If you’re 20, 18, and you love it, so what? You just need to know how to wear it. Habit Rouge is for galas; it radiates money and class like very few “fragrances” nowadays that boast of “elegance” with the same hyper-sweetened pseudo lavender and vanilla.
Habit Rouge EDT, the legendary 1965, the first with the EDP, the original. Luxury, quality, elegance, style, formality, and masculinity. Despite being from the 60s, I don’t smell it too mature or rancid; there are perfumes from the 2000s that seem older to me. Some compare it to Tom Ford’s Noir. In my opinion, TF lacks a lot, specifically 8 or 9 more notes to be equal to Guerlain. A great perfume in its time and today. I don’t know if it’s been reformulated, although I suppose so (it’s logical, you know), or if the current EDT smells different from the old one. It doesn’t bother me much, and I advise people not to eat their brains. This scent has spawned a bunch of dizzying flankers in 58 years. Advice: since there’s no original, there’s no other. Naturally, it has old-school performance: 7-8 hours on skin and a decent trail for a while, radiating about half a meter. No nonsense. This is a vintage fragrance, friend. Classic. In short, one of the best of the old French school, the best in the world. Although it won’t suit everyone, especially the youth and millennials, it has loyal fans among serious collectors and men over 30 looking for a good masculine aroma for work, a traditional signature scent, versatile without excessive beast mode, exaggerated sweetness, experiments, or vulgarity; elegant, not mass-produced, designer, hence easy to find (not niche) and not excessively expensive. Great choice if you fall into these groups.
I’ve been using this cologne for nearly 50 years and always considered it a marvel, but the last one I bought, the square bottle, seems to have been degraded so much that it’s not even a shadow of what it used to be. Those who have never used it might like it because they don’t have the olfactory memory of the old ones.
@ Lupo. The problem is that the tester offers the perfume just as you could buy it in 2009, but it was reformulated, and the result is the bottle you bought. You can tell because the color used to be garnet and is now red. It’s no longer available. I advise you to get the new version; at least it has better performance: Rouge Privé.
Something curious happened to me: I tried it in winter, liked it, but its latest evolution transported me to something very old, so I passed on it. This summer, on vacation, I entered a large chain and sprayed two, one on each wrist. The opening was great, but then its presence, its maturity, its jumps, fell in love with me. I went the next day like a maniac and bought it, and… what a disappointment. It’s not similar, it doesn’t evolve, it doesn’t sparkle, or anything; just a bit of lemon at the start and that’s it. The problem is I loved it but I don’t know where to find it. That happens to me when I trust those chains; when they ask for 60 euros, the official website asks for double. Does anyone know where to find it? Is it necessary to order it by mail from Guerlain? Thanks.
I had the luck of getting a brand-new tester with a 1989 batch recently, and it’s insane in projection and presence for hours, creamier than today’s version. The current one is quite good, and Guerlain hasn’t cut corners too much, but I admit the vintage I have is a total work of art.
What is this? It hit me with a citrus kick; it’s potent, sharp, kind, deep, rich, complex. It slaps you and then caresses you. Old school all the way. 4×4 in my opinion, maybe less wearable in summer but I don’t care, it’s a perfumon.
Habit Rouge EDT: Citrus aromatic opening (citrus peel). Middle: powdery notes and a floral bouquet, where the fragrance gains punch. Final dry-down: an aroma halfway between a vintage cologne and talcum powder. Projection and longevity: about 6 hours of projection and 10 hours of longevity. Conclusion: A Guerlain classic, citrusy, floral, clean, powdery, simple, and plainly exquisite; you can’t ask for more. The ingredients are masterfully formulated, hence its popularity and flankers (the EDP is also worth it). It’s all-terrain, suitable for any moment, even though some consider it aggressive for summer; I think it’s ideal, thanks to the heat its citrus facet becomes more enjoyable. If you want a kinder version for daily wear, the EDT is enough; its performance is good. If you live in a cold area, perhaps the EDP is a better alternative.
Can it be used in the heat? Reviews say no, but seeing the citrus notes, I’d think yes. Has anyone tried it? How does it behave?
I wouldn’t recommend this for hot weather. Although the note list includes citrus, it doesn’t smell fresh; the dry-down makes the sweetness of cinnamon and vanilla very clear. It’s not syrupy or chemical; it adds body and keeps it away from that cloying, sugary trend. The opening is interesting and pleasant, with that oriental introduction others mention. For me, it plays in the same league as Boucheron’s Jaipur Homme, Givenchy’s Pi, or Calvin Klein’s Obsession for Men (playing in that league isn’t the same as being identical). These are complex fragrances for fresh or very fresh seasons. Is it work-appropriate? As a purist, no… but I’m not one, and I think it’s usable daily if you consider it elegant and class-distilling, so at least shoes and shirts will look appropriate. Is it for old men? Damn straight, if you’re a bit obtuse! Ford Mustang ‘Bullitt’s, 1937 Harley Davidsons, Puccini, Creedence Clearwater Revival, AC/DC solos, and the Parthenon are old, formulated by old people in an old but timeless style, living outside fashion. Easier: Let’s go! It lasts longer than our phones, our youth, or our neighborhood gangster Russian tattoos (I say this because of skin turgor). As for girls? No idea, but if you want to play it safe, cultivate yourself inside and out; that never fails, and if it does, you probably won’t care. Excellent purchase that doesn’t have to please everyone but deserves recognition.
Wow! I really liked this perfume! It smells classic, refined, clean, from another time but still current. Don’t think it’s old-school, barber shop, or vintage. Even if it is, it doesn’t present itself that way. JPFernaud described the top, heart, and base notes very well. The opening is citrusy with a well-acidic, juicy, sharp, and pleasant lemon note. At some point, it reminded me of typical English colognes but super refined. Later, spicy and floral notes emerge (the latter very subtle and delicate). Here it takes a subtle powdery nuance, always with the citrus note. It has a vibe similar to Boucheron Jaipur, only here the spicy notes are presented delicately and softly, which is not unpleasant. With Boucheron Jaipur, the spicy notes almost didn’t work for me; it smelled old. Here, I didn’t feel that. Finally, it settles into a fragrance with an astringent, almost invisible vanilla, with a retro nuance but pleasant, maintaining a slight acidic touch but very faint. For me, it’s an oriental family perfume; the spicy note is supposedly cinnamon, but I don’t smell it at all; I really don’t know what spice it is, because it does have a spicy note in its second phase and until the end. Maybe the cinnamon, when blended with the rose, unfolds a different type of aroma. Let’s say it’s a softened Boucheron Jaipur, or better yet, Boucheron Jaipur is a potent and spiced-up Habit Rouge. The duration is average for today’s perfumes versus Boucheron Jaipur, which is infinite (I have the EDP). I consider it a versatile and distinguished fragrance; it’s not for wearing with ripped jeans and t-shirts featuring Homer Simpson or Rolling Stones. It’s not just for older people; young people can wear it too with appropriate clothing; it doesn’t have to be formal. Obviously, it’s not for clubbing, but it’s perfect for work, meetings, or events in enclosed spaces. Will you receive compliments for wearing this? Hmm… I don’t know. What I’m sure of is that it won’t offend because it’s a friendly and non-intrusive fragrance. In my opinion, it’s a beautiful, well-crafted perfume where every note is in its place, creating a symphony. It’s a bit pricey in Argentina, but it was worth the purchase.
I bought this fragrance at the start of the week, saw it at a good price, and went for it with my eyes closed, though with doubts, thinking that since it’s Guerlain, I’d surely like it. But after reading reviews knowing it’s vintage and that the floral accords aren’t my thing, I had a bad feeling. It arrived yesterday, and I sprayed it on my hand between my thumb and index finger, and the first impression wasn’t what I expected; doubts were rising. I tested it on my official dog, you know they have a keen sense of smell, and his first impression was like mine, a bit of rejection, and I trust his judgment. A very floral opening, I barely perceive the citrus, but as hours passed, I started to get used to it: rose, vanilla, and leather, a very pleasant combo, slightly powdery and sweet, and my opinion started to change. So by night, when I got home from work, I sprayed another dose on the same spot, and that’s when my nasal passages threw a party and settled in with this gorgeous aroma. I thought again: damn, it’s Guerlain, I knew it… I went from thinking about selling it to falling completely in love, because that’s how this fragrance is, totally addictive. Today I’ll wear it to see how it performs, but I agree with the majority: this is a beast of a perfume. And if it’s still relevant after nearly sixty years, there must be a reason.
My experience: I took it out months ago in the summer, used it for shopping, after a shower, and stuff like that. Honestly, that sharp citrus note I noticed gave me a gradual aversion. Summer passed, then spring, autumn, and finally winter. With 3/4 of the bottle left, I spotted it in a corner of my collection. Before heading to work, I sprayed it 10 to 12 times and was surprised—what a marvel! A beautiful perfume, aromatic citrus opening, with a creamy woody heart and a very masculine, almost non-sweet vanilla base. I love it. This perfume gave me a huge lesson: always give perfumes several chances in different climates and occasions before drawing conclusions.
A classic perfume in the best sense, from classic French men’s perfumery. Timeless. A clean scent, like expensive shaving foam, but not vintage; it has a dryness in both the citrus and soapy notes that distances it from pure barbershop aromas and places it squarely in elegant masculine scents. A scent to wear with maturity, versatile in climate and situations but always with a touch of elegance. Excellent as a signature. It’s addictive, making you want to smell it every time you visit a perfumery, just like its sibling Vetiver, even if you don’t buy them. They have something that attracts you even if it’s not your profile: aromatic quality. Performance is more than acceptable. One of the perfumes that will always be in the hall of fame.
Definitely not my cup of tea. It’s a complex scent, too spicy, and yes, it smells like another era. Don’t get me wrong, I love the Vetiver EDT, and that one is older than Habit Rouge. I also adore Heritage and l’Instant, but I just can’t handle Habit Rouge. I gave it several chances, but I don’t see the right moment or occasion to wear it. I would never recommend buying it blindly.
Luckily, I managed to get a new 150ml bottle without knowing what it was… Excellent choice. I loved it. It’s a unisex perfume with a citrus opening and a dry-down of rose and cinnamon that’s very powdery yet natural. Some people with less sensitive noses might think it smells like a perfume for an older woman, but they just lack good taste. Lasting power is average, about 5-6 hours. I think it’s ideal for anyone over 30. Without a doubt, this is a must-have bottle for any collector.
The first time I encountered Habit Rouge, I admit, I didn’t get it. It seemed like I walked into the wrong room: too feminine, powdery, and floral, as if they’d spilled orange blossom water into a vintage handbag. My nose felt overwhelmed by the clash between the citrus and that creamy vanilla base. I couldn’t reconcile the tension. Was it aiming to be a classic cologne or a baroque dessert? But there was something about it I couldn’t let go of. Maybe its pedigree or that bright, bitter orange note floating in the air. So I kept coming back. Over time, it revealed its genius. That opening? It’s not just citrus; it’s a classic, precise sparkle of bergamot that cuts cleanly before giving way to an almost equestrian heart. The leather, which at first seemed like an old handbag, is now refined, warm fine leatherwork. The vanilla doesn’t cloy; it anchors everything with sensual depth. It’s not linear or easy, and that’s exactly the point. This EDT version (the silver cap, ‘Listerine’ style) has sober elegance. It doesn’t demand attention; it evolves. There’s something gratifying about a fragrance that asks for time and patience. The more I used it, the more it became my reference. I didn’t choose it easily; it became mine through effort. Now it’s a cornerstone of my collection. I don’t just love it, I respect it. Habit Rouge taught me how to smell. And like everything worth having, it’s enjoyed more when you’ve earned it.
I bought this for a ridiculously low price… What an idiot I would have been if I didn’t take that opportunity. But, wait, what did they do to this beauty, this work of art from such a noble lineage? It still smells just as good with that sweet-smoky, sensual tone and that characteristic something, but it’s shameful that it lacks the power it had before. But it comforts me to know I have half a bottle from 30 years ago intact—super oily and resinous, macerated like fine wine. I’ll wear the new one with a bit of the old, and boom, power renewed. My god, along with Calvin Klein’s Obsession for Men, these are the two fragrances I bow down to and pray to. If there’s a perfume that embodies class, sensuality, and supreme elegance, it’s Habit Rouge.
This is an old fragrance that didn’t try to trick anyone, so I’m guessing they didn’t sell many units. But oh, when it dries down! It’s absolutely exquisite and cozy. Only a genius could have formulated this. I recommend the EDT version to catch the fascinating evolution it goes through, as others have mentioned. It’s a masterclass in smelling good.
Hello, I picked this up online on sale for €74 back in November 2025. It’s a classic EDT that fits me like a glove. While it leans masculine, it still looks great on girls too. The opening is citrusy, elegant, and clean. It feels fresher and punchier than the EDP or Parfum versions, which tend to get creamier over time. The dry-down is noticeable but subtle, giving that signature Guerlain elegance that makes the Habit Rouge line so unique. As an EDT, it lasts about 6 hours on skin (not its strongest suit), but on clothes, it hits 10. It works year-round and could easily be your signature scent. I highly recommend it and will definitely buy another bottle when I run out. Cheers!