Skip to content

Y Elixir by Yves Saint Laurent

Men 2024

Description

Y Elixir by Yves Saint Laurent is a men's fragrance from the olfactory family. Launched in 2024, this scent composition was created by Dominique Ropion. Its structure unfolds with a top note of lavender, which gives way to a heart of geranium, while the base reveals an evocative blend of incense and oud wood.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 22%
  • Spring 27%
  • Summer 24%
  • Autumn 26%
  • Day 51%
  • Night 49%

Key notes

Community

1,822 votes

  • Positive 66%
  • Negative 21%
  • Neutral 13%
positive reviews 1.8 k community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageModerate Best momentSpring CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

4,297 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

3,210 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,645 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Y Elixir

Main accord fresh-spicy Year 2024 Gender Men Perfumer Dominique Ropion

Y Elixir by Yves Saint Laurent is a men’s fragrance from the olfactory family. Launched in 2024, this scent composition was created by Dominique Ropion. Its structure unfolds with a top note of lavender, which gives way to a heart of geranium, while the base reveals an evocative blend of incense and oud wood.

Flowers Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

1,065 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

1,034 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

1,092 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Very expensive

1,068 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Van der wiel

    It keeps the DNA of the collection but elevates it, with a more sophisticated and dark twist—exactly what I was looking for. I never liked the EDP because it was too sweet and mainstream; this smells much more niche. The oud is very low-key but noticeable in the dry down; the incense is spot on, a real treat for those who love that dirty edge in fragrances.

    Reply
  2. Alejandro Sandoval

    To start, I don’t recommend it if you’re offended by incense, because at first it smells like a Catholic church in a 60ml bottle. Then, once it dries down, it settles in, and there’s no doubt it competes with Sauvage Elixir, though it doesn’t even come close. It depends on your skin chemistry: it lasts and projects well, but with mediocre pH, after two hours you can’t even detect the trail (I’ve tested this on several people). Personally, it’s the typical perfume for a wedding, a formal night out, or afternoon golf. If you’re young (under 22), it’s not for you; it’s a very mature and formal scent, not for casual wear (semi-casual is okay). Don’t expect a strong trail; it’s formal, and you don’t want to overwhelm anyone, but rather have people come closer to check that you smell good. Lastly, it feels very linear for the YSL line, which usually offers something different from the commercial stuff. It seems they saw what Dior did and wanted to catch up without innovating. This doesn’t make it bad; the critics are just used to youthful scents, preferring JPG Le Male Elixir over Polo Blue for a wedding. It’s a good scent for its scene, but if you’re going to eat with friends or play bowling, it’s not the right place. Scent: 7.5-10, Projection: 8-10, Longevity: 9-10, Sillage (regular pH): 8-10.

    Reply
  3. Oscar Segovia

    Lataffa Fakhar Platinum gets absolutely crushed by this in terms of quality, price, longevity, and projection. I own both, and for me, buying the other was a total waste of money.

    Reply
  4. davidmerinom12

    Without knowing their full ‘Y’ range, after going through more than half the bottle, I’d say it’s modern, great for daily use without too much heat, conveys elegance and a certain closeness, and suggests a clean, kind person. That said, while the bottle is gorgeous, the atomizer is terrible—it doesn’t spray, it just sputters. The performance is like an oil-based perfume; projection is mediocre, and it lasts about 8-10 hours. It doesn’t scream, but it does stay with you.

    Reply
  5. It still hasn’t fully convinced me; I thought it would be better. It’s not bad, but it’s not the best. The EUA of Parfum is better; that’s the one my wife actually likes.

    Reply
  6. Guiller28

    When I tested it on my skin, I didn’t like the top note of geranium at all; I think it’s very prominent and it’s a smell that doesn’t excite me, but as time passes, the incense and woody oud start to come through.

    Reply
  7. Fresh, simple, straightforward (that’s where its elegance and good taste come from). Long-lasting and projects well. It’s one of my favorites to wear. The quality-to-price ratio is off the charts; it shouldn’t be this expensive because it is an excellent perfume, just not at this price point. Nothing innovative, sure, but understanding that its simplicity is its essence is key. It settles and evolves beautifully; it has a shower gel vibe (but refined), smelling clean. Lavender is present from the start, and as it settles, geranium comes out, along with a very well-executed incense note and a touch of oud at the very bottom for personal delight. Almost no one mentions it, but I get some faint, pleasant fruity notes, like blueberry or blackberry, very, very light. For me, it’s the best YSL, without a doubt, but I reiterate, not at that price; they really overcharged. It’s in my top 5 with: Allure Home Sport Eau Extrême, Eros Flame, Allure Édition Blanche, Dylan Blue, and this YSL L’Elixir. For day or night, parties or office, casual or formal, it’s a classic versatile blue scent rather than a powerhouse.

    Reply
  8. William Thacker

    I think it’s the best in the line. However, the scent is too derivative of the EDP Intense, so I don’t think it justifies the price. $90 for 60ml in my country is ridiculous. For that same money, you can get 100ml of the Intense, which smells very similar. Longevity is its biggest weakness; it hasn’t lasted long for me; I can only smell it passively a few hours later if I apply it to my clothes. The scent is extremely masculine; in the opening, it moves away enough from the fruity vibe of the mass-market Eau de Parfum, but after a while, it returns to the line’s DNA, and honestly, it gets boring. If it were $110 for 100ml, I’d recommend it. 5/10.

    Reply
  9. It has a lot of incense, smoky, fresh, hard to identify in the opening; it’s a dusty, smoky incense, somewhat cold. Lavender but not sharp; it’s more powdery and of high quality, with some green oud. It’s a mature Y, even niche, stepping out of the line which was more of a blue fragrance.

    Reply
  10. I tested it on paper and skin and was disappointed. It’s not bad, but very conventional. For the same price, you could buy the Y EDP and have change to spare. It feels more formal than the other flankers but is versatile. Lasts about six hours. Honestly, I don’t recommend it; there are cheaper options out there.

    Reply
  11. It’s versatile for any season and time of day. It resembles the EDP but with a more formal touch. For much less money, you can get the EDP, which I think is the best part of the line. In short, it smells great, lasts, and is versatile, but in my opinion, it’s not worth the price.

    Reply
  12. Matías Alejandro Cayun

    What is this? I can’t find any logic. The longevity and projection are good, but do you really want that in this perfume? I didn’t like it. To be fair, it’s a ‘challenging’ scent; I struggled to find an occasion to wear it and ended up selling it. I always recommend smelling before buying, or send it to Hell—maybe it would have been my thing.

    Reply
  13. The opening smells like chlorine on a piece of cardboard; I didn’t like it at all. The dry down is closer to the classic Y, and I also didn’t enjoy testing it before buying.

    Reply
  14. Perfumadict

    Clean, fresh, soapy summer vibe. Addictive, I loved it, perfect for a young crowd (but not teenagers).

    Reply
  15. Incrediblerodo

    I tested it on skin and liked it; the top notes are my favorite, making it the best part of the fragrance for me. I see it as very versatile for any season, especially spring and summer. Ideal for a beach wedding at sunset. Rating: 9/10.

    Reply
  16. Since I got a 5ml sample, I was ecstatic. It’s a scent that fascinates and disorients me. I didn’t stop wearing it in spring, and it’s one of my favorites. If you like lavender and geranium, give it a try; the mix with oud is brutal. Projects to 1.5 meters, lasts about six hours, but that’s enough for me. It’s not a beast, it’s a floral explosion that I’m obsessed with. I didn’t notice much of the Y line touch; the oud and geranium hide it. Rating: 9/10, it’s the best of the year. Not advisable for summer; in autumn, I have other creamier options, but it works as an alternative because it leaves a mark and people ask what I’m wearing.

    Reply
  17. Jorge Pizarro

    I won’t deny its merits, but it’s not novel. On my skin, the opening is potent lavender with the woody oud, very tamed and soft like suede. Half an hour in, it shifts into something that reminds me of Bleu de Chanel EDP. Performance isn’t befitting an Elixir; it barely reaches EDP levels.

    Reply
  18. Matías212l'homme

    It has the Y DNA in the opening but is neither here nor there. There are perfumes from AB, Guess, or drugstores that cost five times less and smell like this. Elixir, what??? Where??? It doesn’t last at all, and the dry down is repulsive, a mix of Rexona sweat and cat urine. Maybe I’ll give it another chance later; since it’s from the Y line, it deserves it.

    Reply
  19. The opening is brutal, almost made me buy it, but the dry-down is another planet. Starts great, better than the brand’s classics, but after 20 minutes it turns into a stale, moldy green scent that gave me a headache. It nearly knocked me off my feet, glad I learned from the experience.

    Reply
  20. The oud here is green, like in Oud Noire. You can smell lots of rosemary and lavender, green and soapy, with the Y base. That’s this perfume.

    Reply
  21. fabriserrano99

    I was surprised when I tried it at my perfumerie: it smelled a lot like Banderas’ The Icon. I hesitated to buy it because I wouldn’t pay that price for something I already own that costs less than a quarter of it. I tried it again today and it’s totally different; I must have been congested that day.

    Reply
  22. ArmandoPerfumo

    For me, it’s the best in quality and scent. I know people talk badly about it, I hesitated at first, but it won me over in the store. The toilette really highlights its quality; next to it, the other one smells synthetic. It doesn’t smell like soap or nonsense. I respect the opinions, but decide for yourselves.

    Reply
  23. I like it, especially the opening. But the name ‘Elixir’ sets incredibly high expectations, and that’s where it fails: the projection, longevity, and price don’t match up. If you want to sell an ‘Elixir’, the performance should be worthy of the price.

    Reply
  24. Isidro_pupe

    I tried it today and it reminds me of Carolina Herrera’s 212 VIP Black Extra in the dry-down. The opening is so strong that you can’t tell what comes next. Of the Y line, I stick with the EDP and Le Parfum.

    Reply
  25. The first half-hour reminded me of ironing clothes, or a freshly pressed shirt.

    Reply
  26. beto_ruiz

    Y Elixir is woody and aromatic. The opening is dry and slightly dirty (I assume the oud), but mostly wood, with a fruity base of bergamot and green apple typical of the line. The woods fade in intensity but add body. It’s more versatile than I thought, usable year-round. Longevity is good, over 12 hours, but the sillage drops quickly compared to Elixir de Sauvage. It’s not bad, but it has flaws: the price is high for 60ml, and it smells very similar to Y EDP Intense afterward. Recommendation: try it yourself and decide.

    Reply
  27. As a collector, I’d say this Elixir lacks substance. It smells soapy, citrusy, with slightly better longevity. The evolution is decent, featuring a marine base mixed with oud, but it doesn’t project like other Elixirs. It stays in a personal bubble for about 7 hours. The price is steep for what it offers; I’m sticking with the EDP.

    Reply
  28. Alanirde11

    Update: It didn’t impress me the first time. After wearing it for months, it still smells like iron soaked in saltwater, lacking body and not to my taste. I fell in love with Y Intense, but this flanker isn’t a true Y Elixir. I expected more, especially given the ridiculous price for a designer fragrance. If they keep this up, niche perfumery will eat the designers alive. Longevity is 7-8 hours, projecting for 2. Since perfumes usually last longer on my skin, I don’t see much performance.

    Reply
  29. Scam? Absolutely. Yes. It has the DNA of the Y family, but only the name from Elixir. It smells like regular shower gel. I can detect the lavender and geranium, but it smells like Y with a very strong, invasive bar soap note that gives me a headache. Even the Parfum version smells more like Elixir than this. Totally redundant. The Y EDP remains the best in the line, even though I’m not a fan (the sage is too invasive). I doubt there’s any Oud here; it’s trendy to include it just to grab attention.

    Reply