Men
Uomo Trussardi 2011
Acordes principales
Descripción
Uomo Trussardi 2011 by Trussardi is an aromatic fragrance for men. Launched in 2011, the nose behind this composition is Aurélien Guichard. The top notes reveal bergamot, nutmeg, Amalfi lemon, and galbanum; the heart unfolds violet, geranium, and statice; while the base notes settle on leather, oakmoss, and patchouli.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Uomo Trussardi 2011 y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
27 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
More than a reformulation, I believe this is a flanker of the original 1983 Uomo (they even used a different nose). Comparing the two, the 1983 version had 20 notes while this one has only 10, but those 10 are enough to delight us and carry us to the clouds. It’s a fresh, masculine fragrance (almost like a Uomo Sport), elegant, and above all, delicious. I’d say it’s very current. It joins the select group of elegant, fresh, masculine, timeless, and colorful perfumes like Chanel Bleu. You must own it!
Another example of deceiving consumers with a cat when they should be selling a lion. Calling this Trussardi Uomo is a serious cultural outrage; they can’t discontinue the good one just to sell the bad one. It’s almost a crime, and it’s our fault as consumers for never protesting seriously.
What a beast of a fragrance! At first, it smells like Polo Blue Sport—super sporty and fresh—and then it brings back memories of Old Spice Fresh from when I used to shave. They share those two base notes: oakmoss and patchouli, plus citrus like lemon, bergamot, and orange. That brought my childhood back to life; it’s a pleasure to smell on my skin and reapply. It puts me in a good mood and I love it. Perfect for summer, I recommend it. Regarding what Juancar7777 said, I disagree: if they changed the name to Trussardi Uomo 2011, it doesn’t have to be the same as the 1983 version. If they change the name, they can change the notes. This perfume is adorable; sometimes reading negative comments when the perfume isn’t even bad is annoying. Give it a try, you’ll see it’s worth it, and you’ll remember me.
Of course, this fragrance has nothing to do with the vintage. I formed my opinion about this perfume relaunched to the market after 18 years, where it changes absolutely in scent compared to the original version.
If I criticize some fragrances, it’s because I don’t like them. I think Trussardi Uomo isn’t a bad perfume, nor does it fade to skin-level scent in less than an hour, nor is it pure water as someone else said. I simply came out to comment what I thought, so other people don’t just read the negative comments and miss the good ones about this fragrance. Greetings and success!
I really like it. It’s a clean, rich, and very linear scent that has great longevity on my skin. I don’t understand those who desperately seek a trail that knocks people over or can be smelled from across the street. This perfume is best enjoyed at medium-to-close range, and it’s one of those rare fragrances.
Alright, this is the usual topic. Everyone thinks what they want. Some love it, others hate it. Some smell it good, others smell it terrible. Juancar, if for you it’s a disaster and a bad reformulation, you have every right to think and say so (I believe). Everyone perceives differently and has distinct experiences with perfumes. ‘I saw her…’ Juancar, I don’t think the Italian brand Trussardi has anything to do with the making of this perfume (nor any other), just as Dior has nothing to do with its perfumes now (they are made by LVMH) and so do all designer brands that have sold their names to cosmetic multinationals like LVMH, L’Oreal, P&G, etc. By the way, I fully agree with Juancar’s first comment, the one at the very bottom.
I like it quite a bit. It’s a clean, rich, and very linear scent, and on my skin it has great longevity. I also don’t quite understand the forum dwellers who desperately seek a trail that knocks people down or makes people on the other side of the street have to smell you when you walk by. Perfume is also enjoyed at medium-short distance, and this is one of those perfumes.
First, the notes on Fragrantica are the same as the sample, just with small changes in the names. The start is fresh with Italian lemon, bergamot, soft nutmeg, and something I think is galbanum. At four hours, the citrus touch remains but is reinforced with sage statice and some geranium. The sage gives it a metallic air, and a sharp, more synthetic note is felt, which could be that one. At nine hours, violet enters and what seems like leather with effort; however, this stage confuses me a bit. At twelve, the finish is similar, with touches of violet and leather. I didn’t clearly feel the oakmoss nor a standout patchouli. The longevity, using the entire 1.2 ml sample, exceeded 12 hours, with a trail that starts heavy due to the citrus but stays moderate. I see it for daytime and autumn use, but I don’t find much charm: being purely aromatic, it doesn’t follow a clear path. It lacks good woods to remember, the floral part is weak, the citrus is a bit synthetic, the leather almost absent, and the finish is confusing. Nothing like the 1983 Trussardi Uomo, which has another character. This one is rather insipid.
Without judging if it’s the same as the original (which I haven’t tried), this reformulated Trussardi Uomo is worth it. It’s made for the modern market but doesn’t give up personality and elegance. It starts citrusy and green, but the secret lies in its development: a mix of black leather with a metallic, salty, and synthetic note. The combination is curious and gives a clean, masculine impression. It’s not an old-school cologne, but something contemporary, fresh yet elegant, avoiding the chocolate or cookie smell and seeking something more than the typical freshie. I’m talking about things like Bleu de Chanel or Invictus. Trussardi, for me, is better and cheaper. Its trail and longevity are moderate, a passable score. Note: 7.5.
I tried it in the store today, and honestly, it smells very weak and doesn’t last at all. Nothing like the original formulation. I won’t buy it.
I haven’t tried the vintage version either (though I tested it once and it was brutal), but this Trussardi Uomo seems more current for this year. It starts citrusy and herbal with a spicy touch. The heart is floral thanks to violet, carnation, and statice, which I love in any perfume. Leather doesn’t just dominate the dry-down; it’s the main reason throughout the entire development; it’s a very dignified black leather worthy of the brand. Patchouli is moderate, and oakmoss gives it consistency. It’s elegant, Italian-style, and offers good performance. I see it for intermediate seasons and it works both day and night. More than aromatic, I feel it as a leather perfume on my skin. For me, 2011 isn’t a reformulation nor a flanker; it’s a perfume with its own life that has little to do with the 1983 classic. One was a perfume, the other is another, and I think each fits perfectly with its era and tastes. It’s a current elegant, very masculine, with infinite sensuality that hypnotizes as time passes. For me, it’s very special and has nothing to do with passing fads.
Uomo Trussardi 2011 smells amazing—it’s masculine and aromatic, fitting perfectly into the fougère family thanks to that blend of notes. Since I’ve never tried the original 1983 version, I can’t say if it’s been reformulated, but this one has definitely won me over. It opens with a light citrus touch, prominent floral notes like geranium that even seem to hint at lavender, along with spices such as nutmeg. The citrus fades quickly, but soon a leathery nuance emerges that doesn’t dominate yet stays present throughout. The dry down is a modern aromatic fern with classic undertones, ideal for fans like me. I see it as super versatile: perfect for the office, casual outings, or formal events. It works for any season. The performance is average; it’s noticeable at first but drops to skin level after two hours, lasting about 6 to 7 hours, so it’s not the most long-lasting. The scent isn’t unique, but it’s very pleasant and affordable compared to other options in this style.
Bought this bottle in March. Even though I’m a bit wary that there might be a different distributor behind it (though the box and bottle are identical), it genuinely surprised me. Lately, I’ve been getting its night side, and it’s brutal: sex in a bottle. It leaves no one indifferent; it wraps around you subtly but provocatively. Leather is the undisputed star, very noticeable in the blend. It doesn’t behave the same at lunch as it does in a night pub (the latter is better). I don’t feel it’s overwhelming, and I recommend it without hesitation. Total versatility, but watch out for summer just in case.
Uomo 2011 smells great; it’s masculine and aromatic. For me, it fits the fougère family thanks to that note mix. I’ve never tried the original 1983 version, so I don’t know if it’s a total reformulation, but I really like this version. It starts with something citrusy, then the geranium comes in, quite present, perhaps with a touch of lavender, and spices like nutmeg. The citrus is fleeting, but soon a leathery note emerges that doesn’t dominate but is always there. In the end, it’s a modern aromatic fern with classic touches, ideal for anyone who likes that style. I see it as super versatile: office, casual outings, formal parties… and for any season. The performance is average: it projects well at first, but after a few hours it drops to skin-level scent and lasts about 6 or 7 hours, so it’s not one of the longest-lasting. The scent isn’t unique, but it smells good and is worth it for the price.
Today I am using this masterpiece. I’ve had it for years and it’s spectacular. I have an unfavorable pH and I applied it about 4 hours ago and it’s still firmly on my skin and not close to the skin, it makes itself felt. Highly recommended. I add: it’s been 5 hours since application and it just enters the phase of feeling close to the skin but it’s still noticeable. Highly recommended.
This Trussardi Uomo 2011 has nothing to do with the original, as has been said. At least they had decency and put the surname 2011 on it. But it’s not a reformulation based on the original that smells similar with current tastes, nothing to do with it neither in the olfactory family nor in the fragrance. My evaluation is for this current fragrance, without comparing it to the classic. It’s pleasant, but with little or no personality. Longevity and sillage are average, below the norm. Versatility I don’t see either, it has an intrusive point. I perceive a soft but stinging citrus opening due to the nutmeg, followed by soft geranium and violet, and little more. What I feel is some unlisted ozonic or aquatic chemical note, those that give a ‘clean’ smell. If you like that type of fragrance and find it at a good price (less than 30 eur/100ml) it’s a better option than Montblanc, but as a purchase in itself, I don’t consider it interesting or good, it falls into the category of those that leave me indifferent. Au revoir.
After thinking about it a lot, I bought it. It has a close resemblance to Mont Blanc Legend, but this Trussardi Uomo stands out more in aroma (less synthetic) and is more pleasant. In projection, which isn’t a monster, it delivers. Let’s say it’s the older brother of Mont Blanc’s Legend. Although they resemble each other and go down the same path, there is a difference; they are brothers, not twins. In summary, this Trussardi Uomo feels more elegant, with more class, creamier, while Mont Blanc Legend falls into the synthetic and doesn’t reach the top. If I had to choose, I stick with Trussardi Uomo. Do I recommend buying it? Yes, if you find it for no more than 30 dollars. Aroma: Pleasant (7.5). Projection: 7.0 in the first 3 hours. Longevity: 6 to 7 hours. Max.
After a lot of thought, I finally bought it. It’s very similar to Mont Blanc Legend, but Trussardi smells better (less synthetic) and is more pleasant. Its projection isn’t monstrous, but it does the job. I’d say it’s the older brother of Mont Blanc Legend; they follow the same path and resemble each other, but there are differences—they’re brothers, not twins. In short, Trussardi feels more elegant, classier, and has a creamier texture, whereas Mont Blanc Legend leans too synthetic and never quite reaches its full potential. If I had to choose between the two, I’d go with Trussardi. Would I recommend it? Yes, if you can find it for $30 or less. Scent: Pleasant (7.5), Projection: 7.0 for the first 3 hours, Longevity: 6 to 7 hours.
Fresh day and I’m using this fragrance which I like a lot… if only it had more longevity, it might be one of the most sought-after. From start to finish, it feels like a very Italian citrus along with nutmeg embracing something very subtle floral and an elegant leather like a blazer of the same material… it’s not intrusive at all and lasts quite a bit close to the skin. I consider it more for closed environments and formal events… even for the office, many compliments will surely be dropped. I hope that in the future the sillage and projection improve, because the aroma is wonderful.
This Trussardi is the pure definition of a masculine fragrance: elegant and versatile, featuring leather, violets, and patchouli. At first, it smells strong and alcoholic, almost like an 80s vintage scent, but within a minute the sting fades, giving way to floral, citrus, and sweet notes that settle into a delicious, manly leather finish. I absolutely loved it—perfect for dates or semi-formal events. Just a heads-up, the longevity was a bit weak when I tested it in summer and it disappointed me, but now, in the middle of winter (August 5th), things have improved significantly. Clearly, this Trussardi is meant for cooler weather. Cheers!
This Trussardi represents the definition of ‘men’s fragrance’ very well. Elegant but versatile aroma where leather, violets, and patchouli stand out. The opening smells alcoholic and stinging, strong. Personally, it gave me a sense of something 80s, vintage. After a minute, the sting subsides and gives way to a more floral, citrusy, and sweet sensation that leads to a delicious, masculine leather. I liked it a lot; its elegance makes it ideal for intimate settings, dates, and semi-formal to formal meetings. Curiosity: performance was the weakest point at first and I felt disappointed, but pay attention, I’m writing this on August 5th (full winter in Argentina) and things changed for the better. Obviously, fresh weather is what goes with this Trussardi. Cheers.
Perfume very similar to Mont Blanc Legend EDT; when it dries down, they are almost identical. Since Trussardi is a cheaper brand, it’s a good option to substitute the Legend. Refined aroma, woody, with a floral touch and intense. But not intense in longevity, rather in components; it feels well-structured and heavy in the Italian style. It’s the perfume an Italian mafia man with a hat and black or grey overcoat would have worn in the 40s-50s, at least that’s the image it gives me. It’s for indoors, very good for the office. If you use it outside, it doesn’t work, it projects nothing, but it makes itself felt in a closed environment if you get close. Longevity is good, it lasts for many hours but close to the skin (more than 10h). Projection is scarce as I claimed. Still, I like it, it inspires class and respect by distancing itself from current cheesy and blue aromas.
Very masculine aroma, reminds me a lot of Mont Blanc perfumes. Smells like leather, bergamot, and a slight touch of nutmeg. The opening is very strong, ideal for fresh seasons like autumn or summer nights. Daily use. My rating is 7 out of 10.
I’m happy because after buying it in March 2020, right during the lockdown days, I opened it today and it’s exactly as I remembered it. Even though the box had another Milan address with a different distributor, I was scared, but no, the performance and scents are the same. For me, it’s perfect as is, it’s pleasing again and I’m thrilled. I love this perfume; with Aurelien Gichard, it fits my skin perfectly and develops its magic in a surprising way.
Final batch of 2022. Two sprays on wrists and neck. First impression: a familiar scent, very worn out. It’s like a Chanel Egoiste Platinum but tacky and generic, closer to a Montblanc Legend EDT which wasn’t a bomb either, but here it’s watery with pitiful longevity and sillage. Anyway, a weaker aroma than a Smurf’s fart. Downgraded reformulation? Seems like it. I don’t notice any longevity, sillage, or the poetic drizzle others mention in the bottle. I didn’t smell the 2011 version, but surely even a little effort would make it better. Trussardi is a veteran Italian company, high-end fashion and accessories. I say this because they care about details and it shows, but with this Uomo 2011 they’ve left a conventional, repetitive perfume with terrible performance and very boring. If it lasted 4-5 hours with moderate sillage of 30-45 minutes, I’d give it a passing grade. As it is today, not even a passing mark. Luckily, it’s not very expensive. Although for the price or a bit more, there are perfumes that kick its ass. Another little perfume I’ll gift when the occasion arises for birthdays, Father’s Day, Christmas, etc.
I have the new version and I agree with Bofifa and Molletmod regarding the old edition. It was strange to see comparisons with V&A Pour Homme or Fendi Uomo made for something fresh and green that initially reminds me of Esika’s Winner Sport, then shifts in nuances to Ungaro III. Of course, it’s a reformulation! A nightmare for collectors. It’s not a bad perfume, but it should have a different name and be separated from the vintage version.