Skip to content

Miss Dior by Dior

Women 1947

Brand
Dior
Perfumer
Jean Carles
Perfumer
Paul Vacher

Description

Miss Dior by Dior is an olfactory jewel from the chypre floral family, created in 1947 for women. This fragrance was designed by master perfumers Jean Carles and Paul Vacher. Its opening features aldehydes, galbanum, heliotrope, gardenia, and bergamot, delivering a bright and sophisticated start. The heart of the composition reveals an exuberant floral burst with narcissus, iris, carnation, iris…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 22%
  • Spring 31%
  • Summer 14%
  • Autumn 33%
  • Day 66%
  • Night 34%

Key notes

Community

3,364 votes

  • Positive 83%
  • Negative 15%
  • Neutral 1.4%
positive reviews 3.4 k community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

6,829 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

2,030 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,253 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Miss Dior

Main accord aromatic Year 1947 Gender Women Perfumer Jean Carles · Paul Vacher

Miss Dior by Dior is an olfactory jewel from the chypre floral family, created in 1947 for women. This fragrance was designed by master perfumers Jean Carles and Paul Vacher. Its opening features aldehydes, galbanum, heliotrope, gardenia, and bergamot, delivering a bright and sophisticated start. The heart of the composition reveals an exuberant floral burst with narcissus, iris, carnation, iris root, jasmine, lily of the valley, rose, and neroli. To finish, the base notes offer a warm and persistent foundation of oakmoss, leather, vetiver, patchouli, labdanum, amber, and sandalwood.

Green, herbal and fougère White flowers Flowers Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic Resins and balsams

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

698 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

818 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

235 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

169 votes

Community reviews

22 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. A true gem of the floral chypre, a pity it’s no longer available. The most perfect and rounded galbanum I’ve ever tried. This fragrance, for me, sums up true aesthetic balance, something that’s being lost every day (the old school I defend without giving up on the modern). I hope this thread helps rescue forgotten treasures. Personality: 10/10, Longevity: 10/10, Scent: transporting and magnificent.

    Reply
  2. A true gem of the floral chypre family, what a shame it’s no longer in production. The galbanum here is perfect and round. To me, this fragrance perfectly captures the true concept of aesthetic harmony and balance, something I feel is lost day by day (the old school approach I defend wholeheartedly, without rejecting modern perfumery). I hope this forum helps rescue lost treasures from memory. Personality: 10/10, Longevity: 10/10. The scent is transporting and magnificent.

    Reply
  3. A few days ago I received a package with three 5ml samples of Dior: Miss Dior EDT, Poison Esprit, and Dune. Although I don’t know the exact year, I estimate they’re from the 90s, since Dune launched in 1990. Starting with Miss Dior: at first, it smells green and lovely, I imagine it’s the galbanum; then it settles into a woody phase, and later a earthy-mossy note emerges that adds freshness. Out of all the Miss Diors, I’d only tried the 2017 version before, and they’re completely different in scent and quality; I definitely prefer this vintage. I absolutely loved it. Edit: I finished the miniature with a heavy heart, not sure if I’ll find another one like it, but I’m glad I got to know this gem that will always hold a special place among my favorites.

    Reply
  4. A few days ago I received three 5ml samples of Dior: Miss Dior EDT, Poison Esprit, and Dune. I suppose they’re from the 90s, since Dune launched in 1990. Let’s start with Miss Dior, my first test. At first, it smells green, I imagine it’s the galbanum, then it turns woody, and finally reveals a earthy-mossy freshness I’ve never felt before. Out of all the Miss Diors I’ve tried (only the 2017 version before), this vintage one is totally different and superior in scent and quality. I loved it. Edit: I finished the miniature with a heavy heart; I don’t know if I’ll find another like it, but I’m glad to have discovered this gem that’s now among my favorites 💗

    Reply
  5. Liquid elegance. Olympic beauty. Zeus turned into a shower of gold to seduce Danae, and Aphrodite must have sprayed Miss Dior on the gods and mortals she charmed. Miss Dior is the child of a post-war era of regained freedom and Christian Dior’s desire to create a fragrance that smelled like love. And so it was born: beautiful and free, like Aphrodite from the sea foam. @allan27880: how well I understand you. It’s dreamlike, no matter how cheesy it sounds. I also got to know it through one of my aunts. I felt a genuine fascination whenever I saw the bottle on her shelf. My memories of Miss Dior are tied to outings with her to the movies or the theater, her heels and her wild silk jackets in vivid colors. Just looking at the bottle used to dazzle me. My aunt would often pull me out of school boredom, and I knew that with her, new and delicious experiences awaited. She’d hold my hand, and the galbanum, moss, labdanum, leather, and all those tough yet distinguished notes comforted me like an exotic elixir. She’s 85 now and hasn’t worn it in years. Not long ago, I bought her a bottle of the 2013 Miss Dior by Demachy, thinking only the packaging had changed. I’d been relying on the same perfumes for special occasions, wearing fresh colognes, and hadn’t yet gotten into collecting, so in my ignorance, I didn’t realize the holocaust being perpetrated in some perfume houses with reformulations. When my aunt sprayed it, she said it was nice, but I still remember her face of disappointment. She’s been switching to soft EDTs for a while. Recently, I tried Cabochard 2019, whose resemblance to Miss Dior is more than intentional (even down to the ribbon on the bottle…), and I let her smell it to see if it would wake up any memories of her old fragrance. No. Her memory just isn’t up to it anymore. It’s the most elegant aldehyde bomb I’ve ever smelled, and no one will convince me anything surpasses it. It seemed, and still seems, unreachable, both in aura and price, though I don’t rule out dipping into savings to grab a vintage EDP bottle. Until now, I’ve been comforted by my Cabochard 2019, which is very beautiful… but not as much as her. Miss Dior is beautiful among the beautiful, and impossible to be more so.

    Reply
  6. Liquid elegance, Olympic beauty. Zeus turned into a shower of gold to seduce Danae, and Aphrodite would have sprayed Miss Dior on both gods and mortals. Born in a post-war era of reclaimed freedom, created by Christian Dior to smell like love itself. Beautiful and free, like Aphrodite rising from the sea foam. It’s dreamlike, however cheesy that may sound. I first encountered it through my aunt; I felt fascinated just seeing the bottle on her shelf. My memories are tied to trips to the movies or theater, with her heels and wild silk jackets. Just gazing at the bottle dazzled me. She would pull me out of school boredom, knowing new experiences awaited with her. Holding my hand, the galbanum, moss, labdanum, and leather soothed me like an exotic elixir. Today she’s 85 and hasn’t worn it in years. I bought her a 2013 Demachy version thinking only the packaging had changed, unaware of the holocaust of reformulations. When she tried it, she said it was nice, but I remember her disappointed face. She switched to softer EDTs. I let her sniff Cabochard 2019, whose similarity is intentional, but her memory just can’t go that far anymore. It is the most elegant aldehyde bomb I’ve ever smelled, and no one will convince me anything surpasses it. It seemed unreachable due to its aura and price, though I don’t rule out saving up for a vintage EDP bottle. I console myself with my Cabochard 2019, which is gorgeous, just not quite as much as the original. Miss Dior is beautiful among the beautiful, and impossible to be any more so.

    Reply
  7. Testing vintage perfumes brings me the same joy as a child in a candy store. Nothing compares in quality, nuance, and depth. Miss Dior is an interesting collection of contradictions: an exuberant bouquet of floral aldehydes in a bottle that looks masculine with its chevron-patterned legs. The top is an absolute delight, alternating fresh bergamot and sage with the resinous charm of galbanum, gardenia, and radiant aldehydes, wrapped in an animalic dirtiness before the feminine varnish takes over. Miss Dior plays with an ingenuity that contradicts its complexity, coming off as shamelessly sexier than its presentation suggests. Perhaps, made for a woman in her forties, it represents a socially repressed yet prominently secret sexuality in the sheets. Vintage florals are wonderful, bruised over a base of leather and tobacco, cut with something sharp and green to make them shine. I wish I could travel back in time to a café with a woman wearing this elixir, savoring every moment. When Dior perfumes were works of art, uncompromising chypres arranged like an evening gown in an elegant hotel. A sensual, challenging, and sophisticated experience. For a trained nose, it’s undoubtedly from yesterday, and that’s why it’s more precious. Miss Dior is a green chypre that will never go out of style, created by a master hand with much love. Outstanding.

    Reply
  8. Scentifolia

    In my childhood home, there was a very unwelcome guest: a bar of ‘Dead Sea mud and sulfur’ soap that invaded my bathroom and my mood like a bad spirit in a Ouija board. My mother said it was good for the skin, recommended by a dermatologist, that it cleaned away whatever dirt you brought home from childbirth. To me, it seemed like a scam, marketing chatter just like the ‘bonne mine’ ads for Vichy water, because I’m too stubborn to believe ozonized water is different from the Guadalquivir river. I went in a loop. I hated that soap and used perfumes to cover up that smell of wet earth. Now I love it. It’s incredibly earthy and mossy with bitter herbs and sage; the heart is a green gardenia similar to Ma Griffe but more subtle, crowned with narcissus, nettle leaves, and the green bite of galbanum. It’s surprisingly unisex, because Dior’s aesthetic was hyper-feminine, the flower-dolphin woman from René Gruau’s illustrations. I don’t see Miss Dior as that, but rather as a Viking racing around carrying moss-stained logs before taking a Jägermeister. But Miss Dior is even more chic. The Viking gets sent to Le Rosey, wears a houndstooth coat and a turtle neck, drinks Sauvignon Blanc, and if you challenge her to a fistfight, she’ll leave your arm twisted. Wonderful. P.S.: Review of the vintage EDC.

    Reply
  9. Casablanca77

    Miss Dior belongs to a nature too wild and distant, like animals extinct due to human fault. On a sad afternoon, I needed such a being to accompany me. It’s like walking at night through the corridors of a castle mansion in Terence Fisher films, not for artificiality but for darkness, yet the shine of its elegance makes it beautiful. It reminds me of clothes recovered from a cemetery, candelabras and candles almost finished. It has a non-eclectic charisma, made to seduce without trying to conquer simple noses. Its keyword is ‘extinct’. It’s an extinct scent of so many disappeared things, like old clothes in a drawer with soaps, herbs and lost photographs. It’s a portrait of an era when you perfumed yourself to fit pre-established norms, with relentless sobriety but very sensitive; minutes later it smells like a dressing room of beautiful, intelligent and ladylike women. I imagine how she combs her hair with a comb engraved with her initials. A marvel, pure breed. It hurts me to think that the sweetness of this extinct feline was known at the dawn of its loss. There’s no doubt that losing this perfume means losing something more than a liquid, one of the best DNA of perfumery.

    Reply
  10. charlotinable

    Ten years ago I gave my mother this perfume that I bought very cheap when it was original; she went crazy for it and it lasted her nothing. It was one of her first perfumes in youth and when she used it the scent was extremely magical, dazzling and of a subjugating elegance. What a delightful perfume, what strength and what magnificent longevity. I wish I could find it again to buy one for her and another for myself.

    Reply
  11. VainillaDulce

    I had the fortune of owning this excellent vintage piece many years ago, the one shown in the picture. You have no idea how beautiful it was, how complex, distinctive and opulent. It referred to the strong side of a woman, like a Zsa Zsa Gabor, María Félix or Ava Gardner, precious, with an overwhelming presence that didn’t flinch. That was Miss Dior when I knew it. I can’t describe its evolution because I was 10 years old when my mom gave it to me (she didn’t like it); it was hard to decipher the notes. I’ll talk about the soul of vintage Miss Dior: it smelled herbal, powdery, with dry tints. Today I’d say it smelled of moss, galbanum, leather, patchouli, vetiver, lily root, carnation and narcissus. At first it could be strong, dry and perhaps masculine, but once it settled on the skin the herbal touch became elegant and powdery, with flowers among which I clearly remember the narcissus and the carnation. I see it as very woody; for me it was herbal, the wood maybe just in the background like a soft breeze. It’s a pity and frustration that they tear apart creations so beautiful, take away their soul, like leaving a flower without its perfume. Miss Dior was elegant, seductive, intense and with great personality, a true jewel.

    Reply
  12. Possibly one of the most important floral chypres in history. Compared to Femme, Mitsouko or Chypre de Coty, you notice how sparkling, vibrant and luminous the aldehyde notes are, present only here and that mark its seal. Surely there are connections with the other four, but the aldehydes make Miss Dior more vibrant. The green moss is excellently worked, just like the galbanum; the narcissus is present and the leather, not so prominent, adds its part. A soft vetiver with citrus drops seals this iconic luxury. As the hours pass the aldehydes give way and the florals emerge. It’s so refined and classy, it perfectly conveys the ‘New Look’ feminine and elegant that Dior wanted. It was sprayed to no end in its first show, surely so the trail would grace the models even more. The feat of its formula could be achieved by two noses that made classics separately; only with the union of the two did they create a great success again. I have the extract, cologne and eau de toilette from old times. They don’t differ much, but the cologne is a bit more soapy, the toilette has more aldehydes and in the extract the flowers (carnation, rose, hyacinth) and the leather shine, with calmer aldehydes.

    Reply
  13. Yadorán d'Vinea

    Miss Dior hit the market in 1947, right at the end of World War II, alongside the launch of Dior’s ‘New Look.’ The fragrance was part of the whole package, targeting a young, debutant but firm and bold audience. In terms of aroma vision, I see it as quite ahead of its time. It quickly became a bestseller, standing out since it had titans like L’Air Du Temps by Nina Ricci as competition. As a fun fact, it was worn by personalities like Eva Perón and actress Rita Hayworth. I consider Miss Dior a fragrance ahead of its time; it could easily pass unnoticed as a seventies launch, appealing to that structure of crisp, soapy, and rough chypre accords found in fragrances like Clinique Aromatics Elixir, Chanel N°19, or even Diorella. It seems an immediate answer to what Ma Griffe de Carven was at the time. Quickly, it wasn’t a gentle fragrance; in fact, it was enthusiastic in a rather jovial yet aggressive and chaotic way. It had a terribly herbaceous, rough, dry, sharp, and crisp profile; reminiscent of the aroma of herbs submerged in mud caused by rain, combined with a series of diffuse floral trails layered over a classic base of clean, soapy aldehydes. Miss Dior managed to combine the earthy tone of green notes with the cleanliness of floral and aldehyde accords to create a unique, effervescent, and magnetic piece that seemed to bubble with joy. Occasionally, it manifested certain smoky, dry nuances reminiscent of incense (from the galbanum note), and visceral sweet/balsamic tones from labdanum and ambiguous flowers. Miss Dior was a multidimensional perfume, boasting the best of classic chypres: the astringent, sharp, concise, and violent edges, combined with the tenderness of psychedelic aldehydes that provided such an ambiguous scent it didn’t seem to be anything like the components that made it up. Green, crisp, electric, clean, and extremely earthy. Miss Dior was simply a brilliant fragrance in many aspects. Longevity was excellent and the sillage moderate. In 2010, it received a ‘remasterization,’ where it was adapted to the emerging context of new-millennium neo-chypres, or in other words, formulated as a response/imitation of Chanel’s Coco Mademoiselle, keeping the name (with a very ugly surname in parentheses) and selling a fragrance that, in my opinion, is simply boring and cheesy (not to mention its flood of flankers, many—if not all—forgettable). Currently, there’s an Miss Dior (Originale) on offer that, theoretically, recalls or evokes the 40s fragrance, with very little success, if you’ll allow me to say so.

    Reply
  14. No doubt it’s the perfume I miss the most (along with Envy and La Nuit). And even though it’s still in production, it’s nothing like before. Nothing. I’m not extremely obsessive about reformulations, but today’s Miss Dior is a completely different perfume. The original, the one I used as a kid (back in the eighties), was like rolling in pure, clean mud—a fresh aromatic water loaded with cold, shady flowers and herbs; and then, for a second, you’d feel a gust of air carrying the scent of some distant, dirty animal. A clean/dirty, chypre, crisp, and incredibly comforting perfume, narcotic in its cleanliness. It wasn’t seductive in a femme fatale way, but naturally, purely, atavically, stripped of adornments. Absolutely unisex, no debates needed, as if the Earth had given birth to a perfume and they just put it in the most beautiful bottle. I miss it so much.

    Reply
  15. Yadorán d'Vinea

    Miss Dior was born in 1947, right as the war was ending and Dior launched the ‘New Look’. It was made for young, brave, new girls. Olfactorily, it was way ahead of its time: it sold incredibly well, even beating out giants like Nina Ricci’s L’Air Du Temps. Fun fact: Eva Perón and Rita Hayworth wore it. Today, the original 40s version smells like a 70s chypre: green, soapy, rough, and crisp, like wet grass in the mud with clean flowers and aldehydes. It’s aggressive yet cheerful, with smoky galbanum notes and the sweetness of labdanum. It’s electric, earthy, and bright. The longevity is good and the sillage is moderate. In 2010, they ‘remastered’ it to resemble Coco Mademoiselle, resulting in something cheesy and boring. The current Miss Dior Originale tries to evoke the 40s but doesn’t quite pull it off.

    Reply
  16. Espartaco

    Very nice review, Yadorán, I love that you note how ahead of its time this fragrance was. In an era of oriental or aldehydic florals, Dior released a versatile, decisive and dynamic fragrance without losing the luxury packaging, qualities that would take twenty years to apply. I’d like to add how ‘expensive’ Miss Dior smelled. Today we’re used to most smelling like Axe deodorant even if they cost a hundred euros. Miss Dior was worth every peseta. It was not only a delight for the senses, but by standing out above the crowd of ingredients, the final sensation was that of using an expensive and luxurious aroma, with class. That’s how money smelled before, the products you couldn’t afford daily… now it smells like cheap chocolate, ambroxan, licorice and nuclear cranberries. With all my respect to gourmand fanatics, I think there are good ones; I myself am reconciling with A-Men by Mugler and I can’t believe it.

    Reply
  17. This is the perfume I miss the most, along with Envy and La Nuit. It’s still in production, but it’s not the same anymore. The original I used as a kid back in the 80s smelled like rolling in clean mud, fresh water with cold flowers and herbs, followed by a dry-down that smelled like some distant animal. It’s clean/dirty, chypre, crisp, and narcotic due to its cleanliness. It’s not a seductive femme fatale type; it’s natural, pure, and primal, without any frills. It’s unisex, as if the Earth gave birth to a perfume and they just put it in a pretty bottle. I miss it so much.

    Reply
  18. I have a vintage EDC Splash bottle my friend gave me and I’m blown away. It’s gorgeous, simple, and has that ‘chicken leg’ design that looks super old-school. I tested it when I was 12 and thought it was ‘for grandma’, but now it’s a whole different story. Opening the 70s bottle hit me with a powerful, clean aldehyde that almost tickled my nose, followed by shy florals (powdery iris, dried rose, jasmine, lily), earthy patchouli, warm amber, creamy sandalwood, and a smoky leather touch. The base notes really stand out: smoky and powdery with a slight green bitterness. Since it’s old, the top notes have faded a bit, but the ingredient quality is noticeable. It’s classy, strong yet gentle, elegant, and full of character. It’s that girl in a dress and pearls, pleasant but with personality. It works all year: warm in winter, soft in summer. It feels original and sophisticated. Cheers from Chile!

    Reply
  19. juancar677

    My mom used this for years, and now my sister does. It’s the classic version that comes closest to the 1947 original. It’s a bit fresher than before, but it maintains its purity, longevity, and sillage perfectly. It’s elegant, romantic, and cheerful. It suits young and older ladies alike, as well as young girls who love harmony and romance. You can find it at all official Christian Dior retailers.

    Reply
  20. diegodeargentina

    No one knows what the original was like, but the version sold in perfume shops between 1998 and 1999 was exquisite… very similar to what Avon later released as Timeless.

    Reply
  21. juancar7777

    A romantic fragrance for women with prominent and beautiful floral and herbal notes. It’s elegant and fresh, perfect for any occasion. A true chypre that also qualifies as a niche perfume. This classic version from 1947 holds its own against all later iterations. Elegant, fresh, and incredibly long-lasting. If a man wears it, the world doesn’t end.

    Reply