Skip to content

Shocking by Schiaparelli

Women 1937

Perfumer
Jean Carles

Description

Shocking by Schiaparelli is an oriental floral fragrance for women, introduced in 1937. The nose behind this composition is Jean Carles. The top notes feature aldehydes, tarragon, and bergamot; the heart includes white honey, narcissus, jasmine, rose, and ylang-ylang; while the base notes are composed of galia (civet), musk, sandalwood, amber, clove, and patchouli.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 37%
  • Spring 17%
  • Summer 11%
  • Autumn 35%
  • Day 36%
  • Night 64%

Key notes

Community

345 votes

  • Positive 86%
  • Negative 11%
  • Neutral 2.9%
positive reviews 345 community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageStrong Best momentNight CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

1,319 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Winter

201 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

140 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Shocking

Main accord musky Year 1937 Gender Women Perfumer Jean Carles

Shocking by Schiaparelli is an oriental floral fragrance for women, introduced in 1937. The nose behind this composition is Jean Carles. The top notes feature aldehydes, tarragon, and bergamot; the heart includes white honey, narcissus, jasmine, rose, and ylang-ylang; while the base notes are composed of galia (civet), musk, sandalwood, amber, clove, and patchouli.

Green, herbal and fougère Flowers White flowers Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

128 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Strong

161 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

41 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

27 votes

Community reviews

2 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. mentalola

    Agree with Selene: this is a very particular and eccentric fragrance. I defend seeking out unadvertised scents, forgotten versions, or the little-known stuff. Let’s aim for the different, the almost unique, something that doesn’t hit us in the face. Almost everything new is just a tweaked copy of something before… that’s why it’s worth feeling like a ‘flapper girl’ of the 20s or a diva of the 30s. I think perfumes aren’t just for smelling, but for playing with them, why not?

    Reply
  2. I knew nothing about the designer or the notes, but I tried it because of its extravagant design and the liquid’s color. For 1937, it feels bold and eccentric. I love it because it’s different and daring, hard to compare. It was created to set trends, as one would expect from such an influential designer as Elsa. I think there were 3 reformulations; I don’t know which version I have, but for me, it’s very different from its era, almost advanced; sometimes I feel it would fit better in the 80s. Shocking has one of the best honey notes I’ve ever heard. The amber and civet don’t stand out as much, but they’re noticeable. You can also detect rose, sandalwood, and musk. It’s very particular; maybe some won’t like it because of the civet, but I encourage you to try it, it’s worth it.

    Reply