L’Eau Jolie by Lolita Lempicka

The least ‘Lolita’ of the collection: it’s a generic fruity floral that dries down to a musky finish, the typical profile you’d find on any shelf. It smells great, it’s excellent, but as the busty vixen said: ‘It’s beautiful, but brainless.’ It says nothing, lacks personality, and its performance is barely there. Of my discontinued LL scents, this would be the last one I’d save.

I don’t know why it has such bad reviews; it’s not bad, it’s decent for summer. It’s watery, green, fresh, and light, somewhat verdant and acidic. The cherry is very natural, like freshly cut, not like the Kenzo one which is creamier and sweeter. The molecules are high quality. I liked it, not a ‘wow, wonderful’ level, but it’s quite decent for humid climates. As an eau de toilette, it’s feminine and youthful. It lasts more than 5 hours on hair; it lasted 12 on me. It doesn’t have a great sillage, but you can feel if a breeze passes when it’s cold. If it’s very hot and humid, it’s gone in 2 hours. It’s one of the perfumes that have complimented me the most.

Marvelous, subtle, soft, and delicate, with no single note fighting for first place. A delicious blend; I had only tried the Lolita L, which is no longer commercially available, if anyone has one, please let me know. In conclusion, if you can get it, you won’t regret it, it’s a delight.

This time you missed the mark, Lolita. L’Eau Jolie feels very different from your other fragrances, especially lacking the brand’s key notes like licorice, iris, violet, or anise. While it does have my favorite note, peach blossom, the pear ruins the whole vibe. It’s flat and linear—you can tell where the top, heart, and base are—but the mistake is another: it smells literally like a banana smoothie. Imagine milk, bananas, and sugar blended together; that’s L’Eau Jolie. The bland blackcurrant and blended peach blossom don’t make up for it, while the cedar and neroli are ghosts. It doesn’t evolve; it smells the same from start to finish. For a fragrance as aggressive as the ad suggests, it’s weak, silly, and edible—a conceptual disaster. It doesn’t last long, has a weak sillage, and is ideal for summer, but I fear it’ll make it look like you ate a smoothie instead of brushing your teeth. At least Midnight Couture will step up to defend Lolita after this.

It smells like baby powder… It seems very seventies.

It opens with a Nashi Pear note and reminds me a lot of the pear in Dior’s J’adore, though this one is softer; then come the flowers and an acidic touch in the dry down, sweet but not cloying, more like the sweetness of pear with musk. Quite young and cheerful; in fact, it can lift your spirits on a cloudy day. The bottle is beautiful, as are all in the line. It was a blind buy and I have no regrets.

The 30ml bottle arrived and I absolutely didn’t like it; it smells like a generic cologne, I’m even embarrassed to give it away. It’s not for me, what a pity.

It’s the perfume of the forest fairies. Feminine, romantic, charming, unique, and special, with a halo of magical mystery. I usually find Lolita Lempicka scents too sweet and dark; I prefer lighter ones. But with this new version, I’m thrilled because it’s softer and more suitable for me. Finally, I’ve fallen for the charms of Lolita Lempicka. Longevity: 7/10. Sillage: 7/10.

Exquisite, undoubtedly a perfume that makes you want to hug it or fall asleep in it. Ideal for young people because it’s very sweet for mature women.