Men

Y Elixir

Dominique Ropion
Perfumista
Dominique Ropion
3.75 de 5
1,822 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Y Elixir by Yves Saint Laurent is a men's fragrance from the olfactory family. Launched in 2024, this scent composition was created by Dominique Ropion. Its structure unfolds with a top note of lavender, which gives way to a heart of geranium, while the base reveals an evocative blend of incense and oud wood.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 22%
  • Primavera 27%
  • Verano 24%
  • Otoño 26%
  • Día 51%
  • Noche 49%

Notas clave

Comunidad

1,822 votos

  • Positivo 66%
  • Negativo 21%
  • Neutral 13%

Pirámide olfativa

Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.

Salida 1 nota
Corazón 1 nota
Fondo 2 notas

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Y Elixir y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

40 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • I smelled it today at Druni. At first, it’s quite clean with heavy lavender, but within seconds it reminded me of a fragrance I own: John Varvatos Crimson. The similarity is 96% if you ignore the opening, since Y Elixir is a lavender-based softener, whereas JV Crimson has an opening reminiscent of Coca-Cola.

  • Tested on paper today, my first impression was bad, to be completely honest. It felt too intense; the opening didn’t convince me at all because being so aromatic and strong, it gave off a chemical rather than natural vibe. I left it in my coat pocket, and now that I’m home, oh surprise, that impression has softened significantly (though it hasn’t disappeared entirely). As the base notes emerge, it becomes an extremely clean, almost soapy scent—not Prada-style, but more like an aromatic bar soap. I’ll give it a shot on skin, even though at this price point, I probably won’t end up buying it.

  • I tried it on dry skin today on Julia, and honestly, I’m left wanting more. The scent is good and mass-appealing, but I expected something truer, a real Elixir. Well, that’s beside the point now since prices keep climbing; it’s already 80-something for 60ml at Druni, and even pricier at Julia. Gentlemen, we have niche fragrances for just 20 euros more, while designer scents are dropping like stones.

  • Musclemancer

    After the other Y concentrations, they’ve returned to the original EDT and EDP scent idea. It reminds me of what they tried with Eros Flame: adding a sharp citrus note to an DNA that just doesn’t work, in my opinion. Imagine a Y EDP with orange accents. It doesn’t behave badly on skin; the longevity is excellent, though the projection is more contained. Again, the EDP seems superior in this regard. I suppose this was born out of the need to quickly launch something under the Elixir name, like other brands. I assume once people realize this, they’ll lower the price to make it more appealing, and YouTubers will call it a hidden gem, using the same playbook as with Eros Flame, which never really took off with the public.

  • Out of the endless Elixir lineup, I have to admit this is one of my favorites. But that doesn’t mean it’s a great perfume. It smells good—more than enough, in fact. From the moment I sprayed it, I detected a fruity note distinct from the sour apple vibe of its predecessors, layered over a clean, sweet base that lingers softly throughout the entire dry-down: it’s oud. And no, don’t expect an animalic oud; otherwise, only the usual five enthusiasts would buy it. Here, YSL went the easy route; this oud adds a touch of cleanliness to the blend, reminiscent of Oud Wood. In my case, the lavender comes through intermittently, while I don’t detect any geranium. Does smelling good make a perfume good? YSL charges a premium as if the oud were real, just like other brands, but the scent is aimed at the general public—it’s neither complex nor challenging. There’s no radical twist like Dior did with Sauvage. The Elixir is clearly identifiable as part of the line; that fruity facet ties it closer to the EDP, though only in fleeting bursts that fade quickly. The finish is a sweet, soft lavender with a soapy undertone. Sometimes it reminds me of Bleu de Chanel Parfum for its rounded, creamy profile, free of sharp edges, and well-executed. It’s as versatile as the entire lineup; that blue perfume DNA remains intact. The only real drawback is performance. Compared to the original Sauvage Elixir, the rest fall short. It’s not an exception; from the start, it’s my personal bubble with a standard 6-hour longevity, which seems short given the price and the name, and laughable when compared to the reference Elixir. I wouldn’t recommend it because it serves the same purpose as the rest of the Y line. Aromatically… if I didn’t own any and had extra cash, I’d choose it alongside the EDP version, but that says a lot—or very little—about this unnecessary launch.

  • Tested for the first time a few hours ago, and the initial impression was just a ‘meh,’ like almost every launch this year. It clearly has the Y line DNA, but feels more ‘innocent and clean.’ It performs decently, though I think less than the Y EDP. If you like Y scents, you’ll probably like this, but it’s still more of the same… It’s a downhill ride with no brakes, zero originality, zero innovation, just re-releasing re-releases and flankers of flankers at abusive prices. Edit: I’ve tested it more thoroughly, and the scent might appeal to some or not (it doesn’t convince me; I think it’s the worst in the line), but it lasts very well; you can tell the concentration is there. One spray makes the scent feel heavy, and my jacket sleeve still smells potent a week later.

  • I think Le Parfum is the one I like most from this entire family. It lasts well but gives the impression of being shy; the notes express themselves in a contained way. The oud is barely noticeable, perhaps the geranium is more present, though the saga’s DNA is still there. In my opinion, the price doesn’t match what it offers.

  • Tested 3 hours ago and it’s already gone completely. The opening reminds me, if not to say is similar on my skin, to Polo Cologne Intense. It has nothing to do with Elixir; I can’t find any recognizable DNA of the original Y. A mistake. It smells good, but to create this, they didn’t need to exhaust the Elixir concept, which only Sauvage and Hugo Boss have interpreted well. Fresh, naive, spring-like. But I’d stick with a brighter Polo Cologne Intense or a Versace Dylan Blue, which it copies. Forget about it.

  • I.aprendiz

    The Y line already has its Elixir; I hope we don’t fall behind the other houses… for me, it’s another unnecessary fragrance, with all due respect to those who like it… very much in the EDP line with minimal nuances, maybe a bit sharper and with more oud, though I don’t detect any trace in my case. In the dry-down, there’s a shy hint of something resembling Promise, but light-years away from Frederic Malle’s masterpiece… the good thing is that if you like it, it will last… at least something is something… the price is an outrage!!!

  • Mr. Baskerville

    I won’t defend this ‘Y Elixir,’ but I will highlight some good points. I admit there are more humble products that outperform it in projection and longevity, and its existence feels commercial, aimed at catching the unsuspecting. I don’t believe brands like YSL, Dior, or Chanel will always maintain their gold standards; we’re in tough times, and the industry keeps letting us down. Does Y Elixir meet a minimum quality standard? I think so, if you’re not a collector. Pleasant opening with citrus and lavender (the star), well-blended geranium, and an Oud reminiscent of Oud Wood. The base is generic and mainstream. Overall, it’s a pleasant, elegant, and versatile scent, though not great for nightlife. Conclusion: a good fragrance if you’re not a collector, though you might find better options at the same price if you’re willing to look around.

  • Scam? Absolutely. Yes. It has the DNA of the Y family, but only the name from Elixir. It smells like regular shower gel. I can detect the lavender and geranium, but it smells like Y with a very strong, invasive bar soap note that gives me a headache. Even the Parfum version smells more like Elixir than this. Totally redundant. The Y EDP remains the best in the line, even though I’m not a fan (the sage is too invasive). I doubt there’s any Oud here; it’s trendy to include it just to grab attention.

  • Alanirde11

    Update: It didn’t impress me the first time. After wearing it for months, it still smells like iron soaked in saltwater, lacking body and not to my taste. I fell in love with Y Intense, but this flanker isn’t a true Y Elixir. I expected more, especially given the ridiculous price for a designer fragrance. If they keep this up, niche perfumery will eat the designers alive. Longevity is 7-8 hours, projecting for 2. Since perfumes usually last longer on my skin, I don’t see much performance.

  • As a collector, I’d say this Elixir lacks substance. It smells soapy, citrusy, with slightly better longevity. The evolution is decent, featuring a marine base mixed with oud, but it doesn’t project like other Elixirs. It stays in a personal bubble for about 7 hours. The price is steep for what it offers; I’m sticking with the EDP.

  • beto_ruiz

    Y Elixir is woody and aromatic. The opening is dry and slightly dirty (I assume the oud), but mostly wood, with a fruity base of bergamot and green apple typical of the line. The woods fade in intensity but add body. It’s more versatile than I thought, usable year-round. Longevity is good, over 12 hours, but the sillage drops quickly compared to Elixir de Sauvage. It’s not bad, but it has flaws: the price is high for 60ml, and it smells very similar to Y EDP Intense afterward. Recommendation: try it yourself and decide.

  • Isidro_pupe

    I tried it today and it reminds me of Carolina Herrera’s 212 VIP Black Extra in the dry-down. The opening is so strong that you can’t tell what comes next. Of the Y line, I stick with the EDP and Le Parfum.

  • I like it, especially the opening. But the name ‘Elixir’ sets incredibly high expectations, and that’s where it fails: the projection, longevity, and price don’t match up. If you want to sell an ‘Elixir’, the performance should be worthy of the price.

  • ArmandoPerfumo

    For me, it’s the best in quality and scent. I know people talk badly about it, I hesitated at first, but it won me over in the store. The toilette really highlights its quality; next to it, the other one smells synthetic. It doesn’t smell like soap or nonsense. I respect the opinions, but decide for yourselves.

  • fabriserrano99

    I was surprised when I tried it at my perfumerie: it smelled a lot like Banderas’ The Icon. I hesitated to buy it because I wouldn’t pay that price for something I already own that costs less than a quarter of it. I tried it again today and it’s totally different; I must have been congested that day.

  • The oud here is green, like in Oud Noire. You can smell lots of rosemary and lavender, green and soapy, with the Y base. That’s this perfume.

  • The opening is brutal, almost made me buy it, but the dry-down is another planet. Starts great, better than the brand’s classics, but after 20 minutes it turns into a stale, moldy green scent that gave me a headache. It nearly knocked me off my feet, glad I learned from the experience.

  • Matías212l'homme

    It has the Y DNA in the opening but is neither here nor there. There are perfumes from AB, Guess, or drugstores that cost five times less and smell like this. Elixir, what??? Where??? It doesn’t last at all, and the dry down is repulsive, a mix of Rexona sweat and cat urine. Maybe I’ll give it another chance later; since it’s from the Y line, it deserves it.

  • Jorge Pizarro

    I won’t deny its merits, but it’s not novel. On my skin, the opening is potent lavender with the woody oud, very tamed and soft like suede. Half an hour in, it shifts into something that reminds me of Bleu de Chanel EDP. Performance isn’t befitting an Elixir; it barely reaches EDP levels.

  • Since I got a 5ml sample, I was ecstatic. It’s a scent that fascinates and disorients me. I didn’t stop wearing it in spring, and it’s one of my favorites. If you like lavender and geranium, give it a try; the mix with oud is brutal. Projects to 1.5 meters, lasts about six hours, but that’s enough for me. It’s not a beast, it’s a floral explosion that I’m obsessed with. I didn’t notice much of the Y line touch; the oud and geranium hide it. Rating: 9/10, it’s the best of the year. Not advisable for summer; in autumn, I have other creamier options, but it works as an alternative because it leaves a mark and people ask what I’m wearing.

  • Incrediblerodo

    I tested it on skin and liked it; the top notes are my favorite, making it the best part of the fragrance for me. I see it as very versatile for any season, especially spring and summer. Ideal for a beach wedding at sunset. Rating: 9/10.

  • Perfumadict

    Clean, fresh, soapy summer vibe. Addictive, I loved it, perfect for a young crowd (but not teenagers).

  • The opening smells like chlorine on a piece of cardboard; I didn’t like it at all. The dry down is closer to the classic Y, and I also didn’t enjoy testing it before buying.

  • Matías Alejandro Cayun

    What is this? I can’t find any logic. The longevity and projection are good, but do you really want that in this perfume? I didn’t like it. To be fair, it’s a ‘challenging’ scent; I struggled to find an occasion to wear it and ended up selling it. I always recommend smelling before buying, or send it to Hell—maybe it would have been my thing.

  • It’s versatile for any season and time of day. It resembles the EDP but with a more formal touch. For much less money, you can get the EDP, which I think is the best part of the line. In short, it smells great, lasts, and is versatile, but in my opinion, it’s not worth the price.

  • I tested it on paper and skin and was disappointed. It’s not bad, but very conventional. For the same price, you could buy the Y EDP and have change to spare. It feels more formal than the other flankers but is versatile. Lasts about six hours. Honestly, I don’t recommend it; there are cheaper options out there.

  • It has a lot of incense, smoky, fresh, hard to identify in the opening; it’s a dusty, smoky incense, somewhat cold. Lavender but not sharp; it’s more powdery and of high quality, with some green oud. It’s a mature Y, even niche, stepping out of the line which was more of a blue fragrance.

  • William Thacker

    I think it’s the best in the line. However, the scent is too derivative of the EDP Intense, so I don’t think it justifies the price. $90 for 60ml in my country is ridiculous. For that same money, you can get 100ml of the Intense, which smells very similar. Longevity is its biggest weakness; it hasn’t lasted long for me; I can only smell it passively a few hours later if I apply it to my clothes. The scent is extremely masculine; in the opening, it moves away enough from the fruity vibe of the mass-market Eau de Parfum, but after a while, it returns to the line’s DNA, and honestly, it gets boring. If it were $110 for 100ml, I’d recommend it. 5/10.

  • Fresh, simple, straightforward (that’s where its elegance and good taste come from). Long-lasting and projects well. It’s one of my favorites to wear. The quality-to-price ratio is off the charts; it shouldn’t be this expensive because it is an excellent perfume, just not at this price point. Nothing innovative, sure, but understanding that its simplicity is its essence is key. It settles and evolves beautifully; it has a shower gel vibe (but refined), smelling clean. Lavender is present from the start, and as it settles, geranium comes out, along with a very well-executed incense note and a touch of oud at the very bottom for personal delight. Almost no one mentions it, but I get some faint, pleasant fruity notes, like blueberry or blackberry, very, very light. For me, it’s the best YSL, without a doubt, but I reiterate, not at that price; they really overcharged. It’s in my top 5 with: Allure Home Sport Eau Extrême, Eros Flame, Allure Édition Blanche, Dylan Blue, and this YSL L’Elixir. For day or night, parties or office, casual or formal, it’s a classic versatile blue scent rather than a powerhouse.

  • Guiller28

    When I tested it on my skin, I didn’t like the top note of geranium at all; I think it’s very prominent and it’s a smell that doesn’t excite me, but as time passes, the incense and woody oud start to come through.

  • It still hasn’t fully convinced me; I thought it would be better. It’s not bad, but it’s not the best. The EUA of Parfum is better; that’s the one my wife actually likes.

  • davidmerinom12

    Without knowing their full ‘Y’ range, after going through more than half the bottle, I’d say it’s modern, great for daily use without too much heat, conveys elegance and a certain closeness, and suggests a clean, kind person. That said, while the bottle is gorgeous, the atomizer is terrible—it doesn’t spray, it just sputters. The performance is like an oil-based perfume; projection is mediocre, and it lasts about 8-10 hours. It doesn’t scream, but it does stay with you.

  • Oscar Segovia

    Lataffa Fakhar Platinum gets absolutely crushed by this in terms of quality, price, longevity, and projection. I own both, and for me, buying the other was a total waste of money.

  • Alejandro Sandoval

    To start, I don’t recommend it if you’re offended by incense, because at first it smells like a Catholic church in a 60ml bottle. Then, once it dries down, it settles in, and there’s no doubt it competes with Sauvage Elixir, though it doesn’t even come close. It depends on your skin chemistry: it lasts and projects well, but with mediocre pH, after two hours you can’t even detect the trail (I’ve tested this on several people). Personally, it’s the typical perfume for a wedding, a formal night out, or afternoon golf. If you’re young (under 22), it’s not for you; it’s a very mature and formal scent, not for casual wear (semi-casual is okay). Don’t expect a strong trail; it’s formal, and you don’t want to overwhelm anyone, but rather have people come closer to check that you smell good. Lastly, it feels very linear for the YSL line, which usually offers something different from the commercial stuff. It seems they saw what Dior did and wanted to catch up without innovating. This doesn’t make it bad; the critics are just used to youthful scents, preferring JPG Le Male Elixir over Polo Blue for a wedding. It’s a good scent for its scene, but if you’re going to eat with friends or play bowling, it’s not the right place. Scent: 7.5-10, Projection: 8-10, Longevity: 9-10, Sillage (regular pH): 8-10.

  • Van der wiel

    It keeps the DNA of the collection but elevates it, with a more sophisticated and dark twist—exactly what I was looking for. I never liked the EDP because it was too sweet and mainstream; this smells much more niche. The oud is very low-key but noticeable in the dry down; the incense is spot on, a real treat for those who love that dirty edge in fragrances.