Skip to content

Declaration d’Un Soir Intense by Cartier

Men 2014

Brand
Cartier

Description

Declaration d'Un Soir Intense by Cartier is a woody musky floral fragrance for men. Launched in 2014, this composition features top notes of pink pepper and black pepper; a heart of rose and nutmeg; and a base of sandalwood and musk, created by perfumer Olivier Polge.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 29%
  • Spring 27%
  • Summer 12%
  • Autumn 32%
  • Day 35%
  • Night 65%

Key notes

Community

345 votes

  • Positive 82%
  • Negative 15%
  • Neutral 2.9%
positive reviews 345 community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageStrong Best momentAutumn CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

1,048 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

463 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

222 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Declaration d’Un Soir Intense

Main accord fresh-spicy Year 2014 Gender Men

Declaration d’Un Soir Intense by Cartier is a woody musky floral fragrance for men. Launched in 2014, this composition features top notes of pink pepper and black pepper; a heart of rose and nutmeg; and a base of sandalwood and musk, created by perfumer Olivier Polge.

Spices Flowers Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

215 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Strong

266 votes

Character

Leading answer Leans masculine

85 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

81 votes

Community reviews

15 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Tired of experts judging perfumes by comparing them to unrelated siblings instead of evaluating their own quality? We just want to know if it smells good, not if it’s better than its cousin. References are fine, but they shouldn’t define its real character.

    Reply
  2. LosPerfumesDeJavi

    It’s a more potent version of the original d’Un Soir, but the heavy pink pepper and sandalwood make it less enjoyable. It has incredible sillage and longevity, but the scent itself isn’t worth it. It’s refined and elegant, yet Declaration d’un Soir is far superior in both execution and appeal.

    Reply
  3. Jorge Pizarro

    A delightful surprise. Versatile and elegant, like the younger sibling of d’Un Soir, though a step less sophisticated. Perfect for semi-formal evenings. I love the balance between the rose (much subtler than the original) and the nutmeg that emerges as it dries down. Great notes and projection. A smart move by Cartier—distinctive yet keeping the DNA intact.

    Reply
  4. After the original put me in a state of ecstasy, I tried the Intensive with high expectations. It’s very different for me: drier, finer, and more elegant. You can still smell the rose DNA, but the direction has changed. The top is potent with an imprecise fruity touch of fig and plum, very oriental and compact, but less fresh. Longevity and projection are good, but it’s not a true power-up. You could own both, but the original felt more seductive and superior to me.

    Reply
  5. Brutal fixations and potency. If you’re looking for real quality and aroma, this is it. The deep, velvety, masculine red rose is the star all day long, flirting with rich sandalwood and spices. Imagine a jar filled with red rose petals, loose-leaf tea, sandalwood sticks, and a good stir.

    Reply
  6. Brutal longevity and projection. You’re looking for quality and a very realistic aroma. The velvety Red Rose, very masculine, is the star all day long, flirting with sandalwood and some incredibly rich spicy notes. Here’s how I see it: in a jar, place red rose petals, loose-leaf tea, a few sticks of sandalwood, and stir.

    Reply
  7. Espartaco

    I haven’t tried the original or know if this flanker resembles it, but this is the goods. Every time I hit a perfumery, I rush to test it. I can’t pinpoint the exact scent: sweet play-doh? beaten wood porridge? a milky poultice with pollen and pepper? a hazy medicinal fairy remedy? I can’t identify the ingredients, just fragments of nutmeg and sandalwood, but together they are fascinating. It’s in the same league as Boucheron’s Jaipur and the longed-for BLV pour femme: hypnotic, relaxing, veiled like a sheer curtain moving in the breeze, and utterly pleasing. I want it.

    Reply
  8. drakecito

    Also excellent; one of the best from a designer brand right now. It’s floral, though I don’t recognize the rose (it was hard to spot in the original anyway); to me, it smells more like non-indolic jasmine or white flowers. There’s no metallic edge or the silky rose facet. It blends with wood and spices to create a rough sensation, like tree bark, thanks to the noticeable sandalwood, pepper, and nutmeg. I love it, even if it’s a bit rough. It didn’t last long on me in terms of sillage and longevity—it faded quite a bit—but the verdict is: Excellent.

    Reply
  9. Excellent. One of the best from a designer brand with a hard-to-match signature of originality. It makes perfect sense as a flanker: it borrows spices from the original to remain recognizable but creates something new with the rose, something that isn’t typically feminine in our culture. It plays a duality I enjoy: it has body and presence but stays fresh throughout its development. The spices in the original were dirtier, which didn’t fit the Parisian idea of a love declaration; here they keep a tiny bit of that without declaring it outright, using neither cumin nor cardamomo, but they are fresher than dirty. It doesn’t matter if it doesn’t faithfully reflect the inspiration if I like it. That reduced dirtiness fits the idea of love better, keeping just a hint of that ‘dirty’ vibe we know works. The wood and musk provide support and good longevity, and I appreciate that the musk doesn’t take over when dry, avoiding that dusty or soapy cloud found in other Cartier perfumes. This one works.

    Reply
  10. Excellent. One of the best designers out there right now, with an original signature that’s hard to find. It’s a flanker that makes total sense: it takes the spices from the regular Declaration to remain recognizable, but creates something new with the rose, which in our culture isn’t considered feminine at all. It plays with a duality I like: it has body and presence, yet stays fresh throughout the entire development. While the spices in the original were dirtier (and didn’t fit that Parisian love declaration vibe), here they keep a tiny bit of that without declaring cumin or cardamomo, but it definitely smells fresher and cleaner. I don’t care if it doesn’t faithfully reflect the inspiration if I like it; that’s ultimately what matters. That reduced dirtiness fits the love declaration idea better, keeping that dirty edge we know they put in. The wood and musk provide support and great longevity. I appreciate that the musk doesn’t take over when it dries down like it does in other perfumes (take Cartier’s Envol, for instance), undermining the earlier development for those who see a cloud of dust or soap instead of sensuality. This one hits the mark.

    Reply
  11. Espartaco

    I like it, though I’m not sure I’d buy it; it just gives me a little thrill. I’m curious how they managed to blend these notes so well. At first, I smell sweet fig leaf, even aniseed mimosa. I imagine the nutmeg (which I’m loving more and more) and sandalwood recreate that illusion I adore. I even catch a hint of cardamomo, shifting into a delicate, floral, pollen-like tinkle with sweet cedar nuances… This fragrance really amuses me. It’s woody and soft, with a natural sweetness that makes me think of woods, pistils, bees, and a tiny world of industrious winged insects viewed through an HD zoom—a real, natural springtime world. I can only faintly detect the rose at the very end; it probably helps the heart phase acquire a cloudy, grayish tone with hints of coloring wax, modeling clay, or even pencil shavings, which I love. It’s similar in another perfume I adore, Lancôme’s Aroma Calm: the rose isn’t noticeable on its own; it reinforces the other ingredients (cedar and iris) until they become cloudy and leaden, with a spiced-cloudy sweetness, just like here. Absolutely unisex, it has something that reminds you of early 21st-century men’s perfumes—somewhat ambiguous, cerulean, delicate, and androgynous—while also evoking an old gentleman, perhaps English or Viennese, halfway between a postcard landscape and an interior salon with people in formal attire. However, the trail and longevity are poor, unfortunately.

    Reply
  12. I like it, not sure if I’d buy, but it gives me butterflies. I’m intrigued by how the notes blend; at first, I smell sweet fig leaf, even aniseed mimosa. I imagine the nutmeg and sandalwood recreate that illusion I enjoy. I catch a hint of cardamomo turning into a delicate floral polynic tinkle with sweet cedar nuances. It’s amusing: it’s woody and soft, with a natural sweetness that makes me think of woods, pistils, bees, and a microscopic world of winged insects focused on HD—a springtime, real, and natural world. The rose, which I can’t detect until the very end, probably helps the heart phase acquire a cloudy, grayish tone with hints of coloring wax, play-doh, or pencil shavings that I love. The same happens in Lancome’s Aroma Calm: the rose doesn’t stand alone; it reinforces other ingredients until they become cloudy and leaden. Absolutely unisex, it has something that reminds me of early 21st-century men’s perfumes: ambiguous, cerulean, delicate, and androgynous, evoking an old English or Viennese gentleman, halfway between a postcard landscape and a formal salon. Sillage and longevity are poor, unfortunately.

    Reply
  13. If I had to summarize it in two words: smoking jacket and top hat. It evokes elegance and romance with that Declaration signature. Roses from start to finish. I struggle to imagine it outside a gala or a romantic dinner. It’s not effeminate; instead, it shifts from a spicy freshness to an intense, bitter woody note that projects a nearly paternal maturity, with warm nutmeg undertones. At 30 minutes, sandalwood and peculiar spices emerge with a sweet-and-sour base; during the transition, it smells like mint, which is curious (a trick of the spices). I tried it at Christmas and loved it. It’s more of a night fragrance, but in summer, use it discreetly because the rose can be overpowering. On my skin, it lasted 10 hours with excellent projection on clothes. High quality.

    Reply
  14. If I had to summarize it in brief words: smoking jacket and top hat. It evokes elegance and romance with the Declaration seal. Roses from start to finish. It’s hard for me to imagine wearing it anywhere other than a gala, wedding, or romantic dinner at the best spot. It doesn’t seem feminine; rather, it evolves from a spicy freshness to an intense, finely bitter woody note that projects almost ‘paternal’ maturity, passing through warm nutmegs. After 30 minutes, it projects the sandalwood and a peculiar spice combination with a slightly sweet-and-sour effect. In the transition, you might perceive something resembling mint, which is very curious (a trick of the spices). I tried it at Christmas and loved it. I see it more for evening use, though in summer you’d want to wear it discreetly, as the rose can become invasive or dizzying. On my skin, it lasted up to 10 hours with excellent longevity on clothes. High-quality perfume.

    Reply
  15. Top notes are great, and the longevity is flawless. One of my favorites: it smells like nutmeg and wood but stays fresh all day long.

    Reply