Men
Pasha de Cartier Edition Noire
Acordes principales
Descripción
Pasha de Cartier Edition Noire by Cartier is an aromatic woody fragrance for men. Pasha de Cartier Edition Noire was launched in 2013. The nose behind this fragrance is Nathalie Feisthauer.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
1,269 votos
- Positivo 76%
- Negativo 13%
- Neutral 12%
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Pasha de Cartier Edition Noire y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
35 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
“A LUXURY VERSION OF HUGO BOSS” – It opens fresh, sweet, and refined. A pleasant scent with green notes, though quite generic. Cartier (pronounced Cag-tee) made it to please everyone; it’s a safe bet. “There’s not much info on the notes; I smelled patchouli and it’s not on the list, so we’ll have to wait for the brand to confirm.” I expected more. I didn’t buy it because it smells like other brands and is pricey for what it offers ($120). Cartier is stepping out of its comfort zone (gentleman scents) to target a younger, easily pleased audience. Ideal for casual wear in mild or warm climates, for guys 25+. Good projection for the first hour, then it clings to the skin.
A luxury version of Hugo Boss: fresh, sweet, and refined. Pleasant green notes, though a bit generic. Cartier (pronounced Cag-tee) made it safe for everyone. I detected patchouli, even if they don’t list it. I expected more; it smells like other brands and is pricey for what it offers ($120). Cartier is stepping away from the staid to appeal to a younger crowd. Ideal casual wear for temperate/warm climates. Best for ages 25+. Good initial projection, then settles on the skin.
Smells nice, but it’s a generic fragrance without a soul; it feels like others I’ve already tried. I guess they made it to sell to the masses because nobody will hate it, but it won’t surprise you either. It smells good, sure, but it’s very common.
It seemed pleasant to me, though a bit sweet and youthful compared to the original Pasha or most of the brand. Yes, it might sound generic, but in my judgment it’s a thousand times better than Bleu de Chanel (which also tends to be generic). Unlike Bleu, I actually liked this one. Obviously, I know this perfume could receive criticism from the older demographic that usually uses the brand and is accustomed to other scents in their fragrances.
Pasha de Cartier Edition Noire is the citrusy and ambered version of the classic Pasha, leaving behind the dominant mint of the original for those tonalities. With improved performance, this flanker maintains the same olfactory base but shines more when the sun has set, although its daytime use is also notable with about 4 hours of projection and a skin finish of 7 to 9 hours with pleasant reappearance. It results in being very fresh even in heat, but its best evolution is after sunset. Although Cartier doesn’t change much more than the intensity, personally I lean towards this version for being punchy and effective. Highly recommended. 4 seasons 9.6 absolute.
Cartier Pasha Edition Noire is the citrus-amber version of the traditional Pasha, where the dominant mint of the original is omitted for the tonalities described above. With improved performance, this flanker, which shares the same olfactory base as the original, is oriented to shine more after sunset, although its daytime use is far from negligible with its marked 4-hour longevity and a long skin trail between 7 and 9 hours with very pleasant re-emergences. It turns out to be very pleasant, even on hot days, but without a doubt its greatest performance and evolution are the hours after dusk. While Cartier doesn’t propose major differences, except for intensity, personally I lean more toward this version whose presence seems punchy and effective. Highly recommended! 4 seasons, 9.6 absolute.
Almost no other fragrance makes people stop to ask what I’m wearing; this is one of those exceptions. At least one or two people a day comment on how well the aroma suits me.
A bit of everything… A perfume that doesn’t break any rules. Our colleague Beto explains it simply: No personality of its own. Its scent is similar or rather diffuse in a specific point of various fragrances, such as a bit of Lacoste White, Lacoste Noir, a touch of Bleu de Chanel, Paco Rabanne XS Black, Diesel Fuel for Life, Givenchy Xerys Rouge, and to a large extent, Issey Miyake Nuit d’Issey, etc… etc. Bad? No, but it’s a Cloned Soul, a ‘Cartier Frankenstein Noir’… Good longevity and good projection. P.S. We must admit that the best Pasha is the Classic. (Although I don’t like it myself).
At Cartier, a house I respect for not chasing trends (La Panthere, Carat, Declaration of an Evening Intense), they also have to eat. In certain cultural or artistic circles, commercial projects made out of necessity because the bills don’t pay themselves are called ‘nutritive works’… and that is exactly what Pasha Cartier Edition Noir is. A nutritive project. On top of that, it’s ugly. During the test, I struggled several times with the urge to wash my hands to avoid that sticky, sugary ambroxan smell, fake cardboard-like mint, and amber gum. I didn’t do it to see if it would evolve and offer another perspective, but honestly, I could have washed it off in the first minute. This flanker of Pasha is the millionth version of Invictus but with barber-shop notes, with the same stale ambroxan demeanor found in all modern perfumes. It’s fine to sign off on a few generic fragrances; both currents can coexist in perfumery, besides Cartier isn’t an NGO or a philanthropic foundation, it’s a business. But this is simply cheap; whether it’s generic is secondary. P.S. The price isn’t bad, but it’s very expensive considering it smells exactly like an Antonio Banderas perfume.
At Cartier, a house I respect for not blindly following trends (La Panthere, Carat, Declaration of an Evening Intense), they also have to eat. In certain cultural or artistic circles, those commercial projects undertaken because there’s no other way out and the bills don’t pay themselves are called ‘nutritive works’… and that’s exactly what Pasha de Cartier Edition Noir is… a nutritive project. On top of that, it’s ugly. During the test, I fought the urge to wash my hands several times to avoid feeling that sticky, sugary ambroxan scent, fake cardboardy mint, and amber gum. I didn’t do it to see if it would fade and offer a different perspective, but honestly, I could have washed them off at the first minute. This Pasha flanker is the millionth version of Invictus but with barber-shop notes, with the same stale ambroxan demeanor found in all modern perfumes. No harm in signing off on a few generic fragrances; both currents can coexist in perfumery, besides Cartier isn’t an NGO or a philanthropic foundation, it’s a business. But this is simply cheap, whether it’s generic or not is secondary. P.S. As for price, it’s not bad, but it’s very expensive considering it smells exactly like an Antonio Banderas perfume.
I can’t believe the lack of seriousness in some Spanish reviews, for example comparing it to Antonio Banderas, come on, that’s not funny. It has something of Issey Miyake’s Nuit d’Issey, memories of Paco Rabanne XS Black, and something fresh like Lacoste Blanc. It’s chameleon-like, having familiar echoes of several but isn’t a clone of any of them, and it’s very pleasant, like an Invictus or a One Million. Even if they’re repetitive, you’d always wear them and they have formidable sillage. Obviously, it won’t be a work of art or my holy grail, nor will people say it’s trash, that would be unprofessional. I invite you to check reviews in English, French, Italian, and other countries; there’s more seriousness and you’ll get a more accurate picture.
I bought this because I couldn’t find the original Pasha and thought I’d see what it added. Honestly, it resembles its mother, but it has scents they don’t share. Personally, I liked it. To properly value both, you need to be objective; they’re similar but not identical, there are changes. I liked both the first one and this Noir. If you like the first one, try this too; it’s very pleasant. If you can have both, even better; if not, try this Noir, give it a shot, and you won’t be disappointed.
After years of treating us to magnificent fragrances, perhaps for a more mature audience, Cartier was seduced by the market and launched Pasha Edition Noire, 21 years after the classic Pasha (1992). This version, in the same bottle inspired by the feather but in black, don’t be fooled. It’s an all-rounder for day and night. The opening is powerful and youthful (more so than the original), but in 45 minutes it mutates into the classic DNA in a 3.0 version and settles with a regular 6 to 7-hour longevity. The opening is powerful, youthful, with amber, cedar, green citrus, volatiles, and a touch of ambroxan that makes it modern (it faintly recalls Nuit d’Issey). As it dries, it mixes that lavender, mint, and oakmoss DNA with dark spices (clove, pepper) and sweet, powdery florals (iris, violet, heliotrope). The result is well-made, pleasant, versatile, masculine, and modern without giving up its mature side. It can be your signature or daily wear, an updated version for new generations without losing the house’s seal.
Anything new? No, it seems generic. I’d say yes, but it’s a mix of things that remind you of something else. It catches attention. Out of my entire collection, this is in the top 3 for compliments and questions I get. Nothing like the original or the Parfum; Cartier didn’t even try and released something everyone likes. I’m a lifelong Cartier fan, and this isn’t their best work… but it’s the one that gets the most compliments and turns the most necks. It looks good worn anywhere; it’s an all-rounder that always adds up. Performance? A bit above average. I had a batch from 2013 and bought another from 2014 just last week. It’s not innovative, unique, or exclusive… but everyone likes it, it gets crazy compliments, and it works in any situation.
Pasha Édition Noire has almost zero relation to the original. It’s made to please the masses, but calling it Invictus is too drastic. It’s a good blind buy, but if you like the classic, you’ll be disappointed because they share nothing. Pasha Noire should have been exotic and dark, not so undefined. It’s not bad, but I feel it’s a bit cheap for Cartier; if you compare it to the Sport, that one definitely doesn’t match the brand’s prestige. Fortunately, years later, the Parfum came out, which is the one that actually deserves to be called Édition Noire.
Pasha Édition Noire is a fragrance that has almost 0 relation to the original. It’s meant to please the masses, but I think it’s too drastic to categorize it as Invictus. It’s a good blind buy, but if you like the classic, you’ll be disappointed because it shares NOTHING. Pasha Noire should have been an exotic, dark version, not something so undefined as this. It’s not a bad fragrance, but I feel it’s a bit cheap for Cartier; if you compare it to the Sport, that one definitely doesn’t match the Pasha insignia at all. Fortunately, the Parfum version came out a few years later (which, in my opinion, is what should have been called Édition Noire).
This Cartier fragrance is terrible; they should stop making it. Its performance is disappointing. Cartier has gems in perfumery like the entire Declaration line, Santos, and Pasha Parfum. But this flanker is a disgrace. What a pity, and if they throw some air at aromas like Invictus, which are among the worst for me and even bother my olfactory senses.
This fragrance from Cartier should stop making it. It’s disappointing; the performance is poor. Cartier has gems like the Declaration line, Santos, or Pasha Parfum. But this flanker is an embarrassment. What a shame if you’re throwing yourself into scents like Invictus, which are, for me, some of the worst and bother my sense of smell.
(This review took a lot of work; a ‘Like’ would be hugely helpful.) Pasha Edition Noire (2013) by French house Cartier starts with bright, juicy, slightly bitter citrus, with mint in the background and a watery touch; it might remind you of Invictus by Paco Rabanne at first, but then it mutates into something much more special and crafted. To me, it also has a herbal tone at the start. As it dries, thanks to its tenacity, it reveals a floral heart (powdered iris, non-cheap violet, heliotrope) with warm clove spices and fresh black pepper. I feel it has a fair amount of rose aroma-chemicals, like geraniol, which combined with the powdered iris creates a delicious floral bouquet. The base is wood and amber. Based on my experience as a perfumer, the pyramid is: Top: Citrus, mint, aquatic. Heart: Iris, violet, heliotrope, clove, and black pepper (the latter very noticeable in the dry down, though it could be a top note due to its brightness). Base: Amber and cedar. I find a worthy comparison with Gucci Guilty Eau de Parfum (a synthetic rose accord with chili, aldehydes, and eugenol), which I haven’t tried, but based on my olfactory memory, I can imagine it; sometimes I dream I smell something or have an irrational thought of remembering a perfume. I assume they are comparable due to shared aroma-chemicals like eugenol (clove), alpha isomethyl ionone (powdery iris and rose), and geraniol (rose). There are surely other chemicals they share, plus undeclared notes. Final verdict: I don’t consider it similar to Invictus except at the start. Its dry down and evolution show more creativity and better ingredients. A delight. I like to believe I’ve overcome my irrational hatred of synthetics, even though some so-called “experts” get sick to their stomachs; frankly, it sounds natural to me. I highly recommend it, worth a try, and even better than Gucci, which can have a medicinal and sour tone due to the vinegar and costs only a bit more. Cheers.
This review took a lot of effort; a ‘Like’ would help a lot. Cartier Pasha Edition Noire (2013) opens with bright, slightly bitter citrus, mint in the background, and an aquatic tone. It might remind you of Invictus at first, but it quickly shifts into something much more special and crafted. There’s also a herbal touch at the start. As it dries, thanks to its tenacity, it reveals a floral heart (powdered iris, natural violet, heliotrope) with warm spices (clove) and fresh ones (pepper). I believe there’s an aroma-chemical type rose (geraniol) that, combined with the iris, creates a delicious bouquet. The base is wood and amber. My olfactory pyramid is: Top (citrus, mint, water), Heart (iris, violet, heliotrope, clove, pepper), Base (amber, cedar). I compare it to Gucci Guilty Eau de Parfum (a rose aroma-chemical, chili, aldehydes, eugenol); I haven’t tried it, but I imagine they’re similar due to those shared ingredients. It’s not Invictus except at the very beginning; its evolution shows more creativity and better ingredients. A delight. I think I’ve overcome my hatred of synthetics, even though some ‘experts’ get stomach-turning from them, it sounds natural to me. I highly recommend it, it’s worth trying, and perhaps even more so than Gucci, which can feel medicinal and cost a bit more.
This 2013 flanker brings a more modern Pasha by Cartier, without that vintage vibe of the classic (which remains the best in the series). Although I read harsh reviews comparing it to Invictus, if it smells like Invictus, I’m sorry to say either Covid messed with your nose or you know nothing about perfumes. Edition Noire opens citrusy, with mint in the background (the only note left from the original) and then spicy (like most of Cartier’s men’s scents) with a slight smoky touch. It’s not bad at all, but it doesn’t smell anything like Invictus. After an hour, I feel a faint reminiscence of the old 1992 Pasha, but that’s where it stops. Just a gentle breeze of wearing a Cartier Pasha. Would I compare them? Without a doubt, it’s rich, elegant, versatile (day and night), refined, and modern. People like it; it’s a friendly flanker made by Cartier to please the masses. It escapes the trend of elegant retro perfumes so characteristic of the brand. I’d rather use this Pasha Edition Noire a thousand times in this season than a Bleu de Chanel or a Sauvage, which are ultra-massified.
This 2013 flanker updates the Pasha by stripping away the vintage vibe of the original (which remains the best in the line). Hey, if you’re comparing this to Invictus, I hope COVID damaged your sense of smell or that you know nothing about perfumes. It starts citrusy with a minty background (the only note from the original), then moves to spicy with a smoky touch. It doesn’t smell anything like Paco Rabanne’s Invictus. After an hour, you barely catch a glimpse of the 1992 Pasha. It’s a rich, elegant, versatile scent for day and night, refined and modern. People love it; it’s approachable and made to please everyone. It moves away from Cartier’s retro trend. I’d wear this a thousand times before reaching for a Bleu de Chanel or a Sauvage, which are oversaturated.
I happened to test a sample and loved it so much I added it to my wishlist. Even though I’ve never been interested in Cartier, this smells elegant and masculine—classic without those cloying sweet or ambroxan notes that are everywhere. It works great for any weather.
Nothing to complain about, it does its job.
The most modern Pasha; the others are great but have that vintage vibe I wasn’t looking for at the time, since I already own several and needed something friendlier. And that’s exactly what it is. Women at the office melt over the scent, and while it’s not necessarily projecting, it makes itself felt. The best is the EDT, which is more potent, but this was the best option. That friendly iris with that pepper is sublime.
I didn’t like this perfume, although its longevity is brutal and its opening is rich; after about two hours, the orange notes turned terrible, like spoiled orange, a smell very close to cat urine. I’m sorry, Cartier, my skin and your perfumes just don’t match.
The Pasha Edition Noir is sober, modern, and elegant. The citrus notes are barely noticeable at first, but overall I perceive it as a mostly woody/amber fragrance with violet taking center stage. The mint and aquatic notes add freshness and tie everything together, making it versatile and wearable. I see it as perfect for the office and casual use, though given its elegant profile, I think it requires attire that matches that vibe (elegant/sport). Personally, it reminds me a lot of Trussardi Uomo 2011, except this Pasha has a less sharp opening and a more powdery dry-down than its Italian counterpart. As for performance, I’m still testing it since it’s a very recent acquisition.
Indeed, it’s a modernized version of the Pasha, or perhaps Feisthauer’s personal interpretation of what the Pasha would be today in its ‘Noir’ version. Projection and longevity are excellent. The opening is great: a citrus burst that’s not excessively fresh but juicy, with a subtle sweet mentholated nuance in the background that, along with the woody imprint, mutates without disappearing or perhaps shifts to the base as support, all present but not mixed up. The development is interesting because floral notes kick in, giving a fresh identity like freshly cut flowers—an elegant personality without being overly formal and a classic modern masculine character. The spicy note is so well-developed that you can perfectly identify the pepper, slightly held back by the clove. I don’t see the resemblance to Invictus because that one carries an ambergris that reinforces a core that might be harsh or artificial, whereas the Pasha Edition Noir does not. This Pasha maintains a modern identity, more oriented toward the modern gentleman in pleasant, semi-formal moments. Sensual without being sexual in a relaxed setting. Very useful for adding maturity without aging the young adult and bringing youthful energy to the mature adult. It’s an excellent proposal, with good value for money; while not the holy grail, it’s a very good buy.
At first, I felt it was very powdery and slightly sweet, with that old-school vibe, but then a smoky sensation emerged that I love, like smelling cigar smoke; I think it lives up to the name, the Noir edition. It has great evolution: starts powdery, then smoky, and finally leaves a very rich fresh sweetness.
Versatile, elegant, with excellent projection and longevity, especially thanks to the iris. Lasted about 6-7 hours on my skin, much longer on clothes. It starts with fresh mint, wrapped in a bright, sparkling iris, backed by smoke and woods, with a green herbal halo. Then the fragrance transforms, perfectly blending the mint and iris with the woods and a slight smoky touch. It’s one of my favorites and yet it’s talked about very little. 10/10.
Versatile and elegant. Projection and longevity are excellent, especially due to the iris: 6-7 hours on skin, longer on clothes. Fresh mint opening wrapped in bright, sparkling iris. Base of smoke and woods with a green herbal trail. Later, the mint and iris blend perfectly with the woods and smoky touch. One of my favorites and very underrated. 10/10.
This is how you make a great product… clean, elegant, mature, versatile, pleasant, and with decent performance. What more could you ask for? If you can try it, don’t hesitate.
It’s a good perfume, one of those risks you take and always pay off. Smells great, could be your signature, versatile, pleasant, not annoying, with good sillage and longevity. It’s not memorable because it lacks any standout feature. It reminds me of Polo Explorer.
Very good perfume, mature and quite versatile. If you have this, you don’t need the Gucci Guilty Eau de Parfum.
I stumbled upon this by accident at a perfume shop, right when the salespeople were pushing me to try things. Since it’s Cartier (I already own the Pasha EDT) and I’d never smelled it before, I stopped to test it alongside the Noir Absolu (that one was a bust). I was instantly captivated by that clean, well-groomed, masculine scent upon leaving; it’s clearly not invasive or a beast mode, just very pleasant and easy to like. The only downside besides longevity is the price—in Mexico it’s over $100, and to be honest, at that price point I’d prefer a Mancera, but I just couldn’t resist buying it.