Skip to content

You by Glossier

Men Women 2017

Brand
Glossier
Perfumer
Dora Baghriche
Perfumer
Frank Voelkl

Description

You by Glossier is a floral musky woody fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2017, You was created by Dora Baghriche and Frank Voelkl.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 18%
  • Spring 33%
  • Summer 27%
  • Autumn 22%
  • Day 76%
  • Night 24%

Key notes

Community

9,067 votes

  • Positive 78%
  • Negative 9.8%
  • Neutral 12%
positive reviews 9.1 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageIntimate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

31,011 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

10,663 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

5,107 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About You

Main accord musky Year 2017 Gender Men · Women Perfumer Dora Baghriche · Frank Voelkl

You by Glossier is a floral musky woody fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2017, You was created by Dora Baghriche and Frank Voelkl.

Flowers Spices Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

5,138 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Intimate

4,766 votes

Character

Leading answer Leans feminine

5,180 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

4,597 votes

Community reviews

27 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. thesongofhecate

    It’s one of the ugliest perfumes I’ve ever tried. I don’t get the hype; it smells like public bathroom deodorant.

    Reply
  2. thesongofhecate

    One of the ugliest perfumes I’ve ever tried; I don’t get the hype. It smells like public pool deodorant.

    Reply
  3. If Musk brought this, well done, by the way. You is exactly that, but the perfume’s soul, with pink pepper really standing out. I don’t see the ’90s vibe people talk about, maybe it’s the pepper giving that idea; back then, perfumes were spicier and more animalic. Some people also smell paper, notebooks, or even ink, which is a bit abstract but necessary to describe something similar. For me, this is subtly accentuated makeup with a kick of pepper, giving a flirty touch to that cleanliness, a wink, something naughty and spicy, yet very abstract or minimalist that will make innocent noses go ‘what is that?’ and think for a few extra seconds. It also has that something I only find in L’Imperatrice and here, some unlisted chemical note I can’t explain but find totally addictive; it’s refreshing or solar, making you smile and lift your mood without being ‘cheerful,’ it’s chemical. Finally, it’s very lightly sweet (which I find charming) but not sugary, ethereal, subliminal, and definitely not gourmand. 🌬️✨

    Reply
  4. It’s a perfume that leaves you dizzy at first, hard to define. If you were born in the 90s or 2000s, it smells like what kindergartens and elementary school hallways smelled: not just cleaners, but everything—the felt decorations, crayons, the products kids and teachers used, the wood of the benches. It gives nostalgia, but at the same time it’s sexy; a mix of sensuality, tenderness, and nostalgia, as if the 90s-00s had their own scent. It’s like Another 13 but more playful, tender, and young. At first it seems unisex-feminine, but for those starting with unisex, once you get used to it, you realize it’s truly unisex. It gives off the vibe of someone with great style, living in New York, loving animals, wearing a Yankees cap, and making a basic outfit like a white tee and blue jeans look incredible. If this perfume were a song, it would be ‘Put Your Records On’ by Corinne.

    Reply
  5. Daniela Fragance

    It’s a scent of its own, but you have to give it time: at first, it smells like nothing; you have to let it settle. After a few minutes, it’s 50% Juliette Has a Gun and 50% Nina Ricci Ricci. On my skin, it’s sweet and intimate, as if you just took a shower with purple flower soap; smelling your skin feels clean, milky, and like fresh towels from the dryer. I don’t like the Juliette one because it feels incomplete, it doesn’t smell like a perfume as its name suggests, but this You smells like its complement, less synthetic. It’s one of those perfumes where if you smell it on someone else, you’re left wondering what it could be; it has something mysterious and sensual.

    Reply
  6. GreciaDaniela14

    My first review because I don’t understand what’s happening to me. Seeing the notes, I imagined it delicate and feminine, but on my skin it smells like aged whiskey in a wooden barrel. Period.

    Reply
  7. JohnAcosta25

    What a rich aroma, ugh… quite peculiar and special; women have always killed me with it. It smells like water with a subtle cleaner or chlorine, maybe sanitizer with delicate musk and iris. Actually, it’s zero invasive, but very memorable and not sweet at all. I suppose it’s an acquired taste, because in its molecular composition it tends to disappear and then return. I’ve smelled it firsthand on two or three girls throughout my still young adult life; the last time I smelled it was in an intimate setting and I couldn’t resist asking what that fine, delicate, clean aroma was. I don’t know, maybe it’s also a nostalgic factor since I’m the youngest of my family with three older sisters, and I remember hearing something like this in my childhood or adolescence; I find a very vintage touch, perhaps from the eras that remind me of boybands like Five, Westlife, or even NSYNC, which my sisters were obsessed with and wore or used perfume with. I can easily compare it to an ultra-delicate iris soap bar, which for me denotes natural feminine beauty at its full splendor without being loud or overwhelming like some very loud or invasive trends of the last era. This is my fourth review of a supposedly feminine perfume, although the site says it’s totally unisex and I believe it even more today; it could easily be compared to a slightly cheaper fragrance from lines like Dior for men that are based on that slightly more marked iris. Honestly, I’m a total fanboy of this scent in a lady.

    Reply
  8. It smells like chlorine, saltwater, and iodine; nothing floral or gourmand. It’s synthetic, cold, and clean like the metal of a roadside bar, yet cozy. Very addictive and versatile for the day, although its longevity is ridiculous: it disappears in half an hour. A shame for such a vanguard and hard-to-find perfume here.

    Reply
  9. JohnAcosta25

    What a rich and peculiar aroma that kills it for women. It smells like water with a hint of cleaner or chlorine, mixed with delicate musk and iris. It’s not invasive, memorable, and not sweet at all. I guess it’s an acquired taste, as it tends to disappear and return. I’ve smelled it on several girls, and the last time I wondered what was so fine and clean. Maybe it’s nostalgia; I remember something like this from my childhood and it evokes 90s boybands like Five or NSYNC. It’s like an ultra-delicate iris soap that denotes natural beauty without being loud. Although the brand says it’s unisex, I see it as such today, comparable to mid-range men’s fragrances with a marked iris. I’m a total fanboy of this scent on a woman.

    Reply
  10. Agree with everyone: it smells like soap with iris, powdery, and super 90s/2000s. Soft, not intrusive, and very pretty, though without much presence. Scent 9/10, projection and longevity 8/10.

    Reply
  11. VirginiaCabello

    Very elegant and with a strong 90s vibe. It didn’t last long on my skin, but people have told me the iris is very present and gives it a chic touch.

    Reply
  12. verdepensativo

    Upon application, I felt it herbal, then raspberry-like and subtle. It evolved into a herbal iris with a sweet touch that made me feel very elegant. It’s sophisticated, has sillage but little trail. It’s intimate and you smell it on yourself for hours. Recommended, it has a 90s vibe.

    Reply
  13. verdepensativo

    When I applied it, I thought it was herbal, then raspberry and subtle, evolving into an herbal iris with a sweet touch that makes me feel elegant. It’s sophisticated, has sillage but little trail, very intimate, and recommended. It has that 90s air that I like.

    Reply
  14. I was looking for something soft and powdery, but I stumbled upon something super masculine. I smell dirty, strong, and heavy iris. Ugh, the opening didn’t do it for me at all. Once it dries down, it becomes softer, almost like Prada’s Infusion d’Iris on my skin, but it doesn’t say anything special to me.

    Reply
  15. I expected a soft talc-like fragrance and found something that smells extremely masculine on my skin. I sense a dirty, strong, heavy iris. Ugh, the opening didn’t like it at all. In the dry-down, it’s softer, something like Prada Infusion d’Iris, very similar. But it doesn’t say anything special to me.

    Reply
  16. Glossier You review after a week: my expectations were low, and what a surprise! It transports me back to the 90s and 2000s. The first spray made me feel like I was dancing with S Club 7—fresh and youthful—followed by that scent of ‘waiting for yellow flowers’ that never quite arrived. But yes, I loved the notebook paper smell, the kind where I used to write Westlife songs. Then came the teenage romance, like Lizzie McGuire in Rome; everything was cute, but it didn’t last long. It doesn’t last long on my skin, but it holds its own. The scent is rich. Sorry for the personal references, that’s what it evokes for me, and I wanted to share.

    Reply
  17. At first, smelling a decant, I thought it was ‘meh’, but with so many good reviews, I didn’t want to rule it out. I went to Sephora, tested it on my wrist, liked it but didn’t love it, and kept wanting it. Six months later, I went back to the store, tested it again, and liked it, so I bought it. WOW! It’s not the same as a little spritz; you have to apply it well and feel it all day. It lasted my entire workday, and my coworkers said it smelled great. It’s soft, clean, a ‘natural’ aroma; it doesn’t smell like anything specific but smells good. I recommend it for those days when you want to feel clean and leave a good scent on others.

    Reply
  18. I just smell makeup-like iris, beautiful. If you like Dior Homme Intense, this is one without the cocoa. It’s a subtle scent that leaves a mark.

    Reply
  19. Mademoiselle

    The Delicacy scent is ethereal and fine. To me, it smells totally of musk, so delicate it’s like a second skin. It smells clean, like you just showered with a fine iris soap and are left with a powdery touch. It’s beautiful. But for me, it doesn’t work because its sillage is personal and sometimes disappears completely until a movement or a breeze brings it back. I prefer stronger perfumes and feeling them all the time. I recommend it for those seeking soft scents or who don’t want anything ostentatious.

    Reply
  20. Gretakinngard

    I love its scent! It’s super feminine, smells clean. It seems quite similar to God is a Woman, just more polished. I’ve been wearing it for five years, and people always tell me I smell good.

    Reply
  21. My friend has it, and I love it. It’s a very indescribable scent, but I’m sure most people will like it. The only downside is that there’s very little product in the bottle…

    Reply
  22. It’s the first blind buy I’ve made with a slightly higher price tag, but I was so eager to try it that I was almost sure I’d like it, and luckily I wasn’t wrong. So far, it’s the only ‘molecular’ type that has really won me over. Glossier You smells like slightly chlorinated water (which I love), iris, and musk, all very subtle. It’s zero-invasive but leaves a mark. Sometimes it seems like it doesn’t smell like anything, but you feel it for hours, as if it appears and disappears; when you think it’s gone, it comes back. Very curious. Recommended for iris and musk fans; I don’t think it will disappoint. It’s close-to-the-skin, but pretty.

    Reply
  23. It’s my first blind buy of a molecular perfume, and it was worth it. It smells slightly chlorinated water, iris, and musk, all very subtle. It’s zero-invasive but leaves a mark; sometimes it seems like it doesn’t smell like anything, then it reappears hours later—very curious. I recommend it to iris and musk fans; it doesn’t disappoint. It’s a skin scent, but beautiful.

    Reply
  24. Clean and aquatic at the same time. It smells clean, soft, and unisex. It projects very little; you only feel it on the skin even if you just applied it. I don’t sense the floral note; to me, it’s more talc-like than anything. I’ve tried it several times at Sephora and think I’d buy it to wear at home and relax, as it’s a perfume you probably only smell yourself.

    Reply
  25. Powdery and watery at the same time. It’s a clean, soft, unisex aroma. Projection is very low; I only smell it close to the skin even right after applying. I don’t detect the floral note; for me, it’s more powdery than anything. I’ve tested it several times at Sephora and think I would buy it. It’s perfect for staying home and relaxing; it’s a perfume you probably only smell on yourself.

    Reply
  26. I bought Glossier You without a second thought, swept up in the TikTok hype. They say it smells like you—clean, molecular, with pink pepper and ambrette notes. But for me, it’s an adventure: it smells like water, pools, iron, and that warm steam from the laundry room in winter. My sister noticed it as lettuce with iodine, and my mom called it dried potpourri; everyone agrees on that aquatic, soapy vibe. It doesn’t smell like Santal 33 or Ariana Grande, and while I didn’t pick up the florals, the longevity is excellent—over 10 hours. It leaves me feeling clean and accompanied, super versatile with personality. Maybe I need to create new memories to love it more, but it’s peculiar and highly recommended to try it on skin. Already obsessed.

    Reply
  27. I got the chance to buy a Glossier You and did it without thinking about pros or cons. I blame TikTok for the hype. Now I have it, and I feel ‘influenced’. It’s supposed to be that perfume that ‘smells like you’, molecular, clean, and with low projection. Their website says it opens with pink pepper and has ambrette and white flowers. My experience has been an adventure. Definitely not usual. My first impression was: ‘I’ve heard this scent before’ followed by a cascade of memories from my swimming classes. To me, it smells like the concept of water, a bright, blue, clean place, a liminal space. I perceive the chlorine from pools, the steam from an iron, or the smell of the laundry room at home with cold outside and heat inside. It’s very strange! My sister tried it and smelled lettuce with iodine; my mom said dried potpourri and shampoo. All these images fit within the semantic field of ‘water’. Places with lots of water, bathrooms, cleaning, hydroponic vegetables… Then I wonder if it smells like water to me because I’m a Pisces. I can smell the musk and the pink pepper at first, but the notes don’t help unravel the mystery. It’s not a scent I dislike, but it depends on your memories. Perfume is always evocative! It also doesn’t resemble Santal 33 or Ariana Grande perfumes. I don’t perceive flowers; it’s more watery than anything. The longevity is good; although designed without sillage, it lasts me over 10 hours. I feel clean and accompanied. Super versatile, definitely a signature scent. Maybe I should allow it to form new memories to like it more, but overall, it’s not a bad perfume, just peculiar. I do widely recommend testing on skin before buying. Edit: I’ve miserably fallen into its claws. I’m obsessed. It’s beautiful.

    Reply