Skip to content

Sander for Men by Jil Sander

Men 2000

Description

Jil Sander Sander for Men is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 2000, this composition was created by perfumer Jacques Cavallier Belletrud. The olfactory pyramid unfolds with top notes of ivy, mint, and cinnamon; a heart of pepper, cloves, cardamom, coriander, and nutmeg; and a base evoking cypress, cedar, sandalwood, labdanum, and tobacco.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 10%
  • Spring 36%
  • Summer 31%
  • Autumn 22%
  • Day 75%
  • Night 25%

Key notes

Community

1,143 votes

  • Positive 89%
  • Negative 7.0%
  • Neutral 3.8%
positive reviews 1.1 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

2,590 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

1,152 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

606 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Sander for Men

Main accord fresh-spicy Year 2000 Gender Men Perfumer Jacques Cavallier Belletrud

Jil Sander Sander for Men is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 2000, this composition was created by perfumer Jacques Cavallier Belletrud. The olfactory pyramid unfolds with top notes of ivy, mint, and cinnamon; a heart of pepper, cloves, cardamom, coriander, and nutmeg; and a base evoking cypress, cedar, sandalwood, labdanum, and tobacco.

Green, herbal and fougère Spices Woods and mosses Resins and balsams

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

491 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

560 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

183 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

157 votes

Community reviews

6 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review
  1. Spraying Sander for Men brings a melancholy to me, perhaps even sadness. I first encountered it during a turbulent period of my life filled with hard changes, when I realized I would never be the same. At first, I hesitated. A friend gifted me a bottle she liked, and with my head full of fog back then, I barely noticed, not even in Milan on a December morning. I just sniffed a spritz on my hand to thank the blonde standing there, unsure if I’d instantly fall in love. One Friday night, after showering, I tried it before going out partying with friends where I used to lose myself to avoid thinking. I remember there were several compliments about my scent. Since then, Jil has been a constant, discreet companion, probably one of the few fragrances that stayed close without causing jealousy drama, but rather bringing well-being to others. Over time, I dove deeper into the Jil world, completing the EDT with gel, deodorant, and aftershave lotion—a pleasant set to convey relaxation. Freshness and cleanliness were key, with a woody base adding the necessary masculine vibe after a fresh, spicy opening with lots of mint, cinnamon, and that bitter green ivy note. Although the spices add warmth, the cool tone was always present, floating with a slight sweetness. Testing the current version, I subjectively feel it has dramatically lost its identity and longevity; the quality isn’t what it used to be, but maybe someday someone will bring back this fragrance in its original quality and realize how beautiful it was. I’ll stick with a comment from a friend at a fashion store: ‘Darling, you smell great today. I need to know what it is.’

  2. Young and spicy wood, nothing to get crazy about. It’s like Burberry Touch without violets, like Angel Schlesser pour homme but spicier, like a green, anemic second cousin of 212, like Rochas Aquaman without grapefruit, very similar to the Truth by Calvin Klein—the classic 1999 office cologne: crystal clear, spicy, peppery, and woody. Sander for Men is a super watery formula; if you’re lucky, at first you’ll smell something like a banana leaf (I assume the ivy combined with something else), a mint/pepper mix like Cristasol, and in the mid-phase a green, spongy touch with more prominent ivy and transparent accords of a nice sweetness, which I imagine comes from cardamom, cedar, and cypress. At the time, it was a modern, cosmopolitan, and minimalist fragrance. Today, any young guy will find it old-man-ish. For me, who grew up bombarded by ads of these waters marketed by flawless, poreless heartthrobs who, after ten hours in the office, still had no bad odor in their armpits, it’s something I could use perfectly when I don’t want to complicate my life, because it smells generic like mass-market men’s hygiene lotions from twenty years ago. I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone unless you’re a follower of this 1999 watery minimalist vibe. If that style turns you on, it’s a perfect blind buy. P.S.: Longevity and sillage are abysmal.

  3. Young and spicy wood, nothing to get crazy about. Like Burberry Touch without violets, like Angel Schlesser spicier, green, and anemic 212, type Rochas Aquaman without grapefruit, very similar to the Truth by Calvin Klein, that 1999 office cologne: crystal clear, spicy, peppery, and woody. Sander for Men is a super watery formula; if you’re lucky, you’ll smell a banana leaf (maybe ivy), a mint/pepper mix like Cristasol, then a green-spongy touch with ivy and transparent sweetness from cardamom, cedar, and cypress. At the time, it was modern, cosmopolitan, and minimalist. Today, any young guy will find it old-man-ish. For me, raised on ads of flawless, poreless heartthrobs who, after ten hours in the office, still had no bad odor, it smells like generic men’s hygiene lotions from twenty years ago. I wouldn’t recommend it unless you’re a follower of that 1999 watery minimalist vibe. If that style turns you on, it’s a perfect blind buy. P.S.: Longevity and sillage are abysmal.

  4. william aguirre

    I bought it because of the good reviews on the English Fragrantica site, and I must say it wasn’t what I expected. To be honest, the fragrance isn’t bad; it’s just that it reminded me of Burberry Touch, with its baby-diaper or wet-wipe scent that isn’t to my taste. It has a small touch of cedar wood and perhaps a bit of ivy, but the spices, mint, tobacco, and cypress left me wanting. If you like that type of fragrance that isn’t fresh, oriental, citrusy, fougère, or aromatic… ‘nothing’. But if you like ones with a subtle wood base, go ahead. Scent 6, Longevity 7, Projection 6, Price 10.

  5. william aguirre

    I bought it because of the good reviews on the English Fragrantica site, and it wasn’t what I expected. It’s not bad, but it reminded me of Burberry Touch, with that baby-diaper or wet-wipe scent I don’t like. It has a touch of cedar and maybe ivy, but the spices, mint, tobacco, and cypress left me wanting. If you like that type of fragrance that isn’t fresh, oriental, citrusy, fougère, or aromatic, but has a subtle wood base, go ahead. Scent 6, Longevity 7, Projection 6, Price 10.