Men
Salvatore Ferragamo Pour Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Salvatore Ferragamo Pour Homme by Salvatore Ferragamo is a woody musky floral fragrance for men. Launched in 1999, the nose behind this composition is Jean-Pierre Mary. The top notes are fig leaf, grapefruit, caraway, Brazilian rosewood, African geranium, cyclamen, and neroli; the heart notes include carnation, cardamom, rose, jasmine, and iris root; while the base notes consist of cedar, vetiver, sandalwood, leather, musk, and oakmoss.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Fig Leaves
-
Corazón
carnation
-
Base
cedar
Comunidad
1,176 votos
- Positivo 84%
- Negativo 10%
- Neutral 5.1%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Salvatore Ferragamo Pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
28 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
No longer this easy to get. Another must-have for summer nights.
Exquisite and super Mediterranean, it smells like fig leaf. One of my favorites: it lasts well, leaves a great trail, and is hard to find these days. If you find it, don’t let it go.
Exquisite and super Mediterranean, dominated by the fig leaf scent. It’s one of my favorites: good longevity, excellent trail, and it’s already hard to find. If you find it, don’t let it go.
I was gifted this fragrance today, and honestly, it’s very elegant. It’s the first from this house, and I think I’m too young to wear it, but despite that, it’s very pleasant to my nose and would suit me well. It’s fresh, somewhat subtle, and I agree that it’s suitable for summer nights. In my concept, it’s a good fragrance but it didn’t impress me. Age range 20 and up.
This has to be the most misunderstood perfume in my collection. I absolutely love it: the opening is super fresh and sweet, yet has character thanks to the fig. It’s subtle and refined, with strong presence for the first hour, but then it fades. The trail is good for the first 30 minutes, then it decays quickly. After half an hour, it sits very close to the skin. On my skin, it lasts no more than 4 or 5 hours, being generous. I wouldn’t repurchase it due to performance. Did I say it was misunderstood? Well, if I take an average, out of every 10 people who smell it, 8 or 9 say it stinks, that it’s repulsive… haha, I don’t get why they won’t accept it. For me, it’s a delight, and I don’t care what they say; I keep using it. (My girlfriend hates it, and yet I still wear it when she’s around, haha). The ideal situation is summer evenings/nights, walking near the coast or beach, with a breeze to disperse the scent… mmm, it’s a delight! 7/10.
This must be the most misunderstood fragrance in my collection. I love it: the opening is super fresh, sweet but with a marked character due to the fig. For me, it’s subtle and refined, with a lot of presence in the first hour, but then it evaporates. The sillage is good for the first 30 minutes, then it fades quickly. After an hour and a half, it feels very close to the skin. On my skin, it lasts no more than 4 or 5 hours, being generous. I wouldn’t repurchase it for the performance. Misunderstood? If I take an average, out of 10 people who smell it, 8 or 9 say it stinks, that it’s repulsive… lol I don’t understand why it’s not accepted. For me, it’s a delight and I don’t care what they say, I keep using it. My girlfriend hates it, and yet I use it when she’s around, lol. The ideal situation is summer afternoons/nights, walking near the waterfront or beach, with a lot of breeze to disperse the aroma… mmm, it’s a delight! 7/10.
What can I say? They knew how to mix it very well, it’s so harmonious. It ran out on my husband, and I definitely want to have it again. It’s so elegant and fresh; I love it when he wears it, it definitely makes me fall in love. A perfume says a lot about your person; when my husband wears it, it highlights that he is a productive, sexy, confident, and firm man. It conveys so many things, it’s incredible. It lasts about 6 hours, it’s generous to apply (it’s always been like that). I don’t know if that’s why it lasts so long or because of its pH. I associate it with meetings, dinners, and special occasions. It’s super versatile, but if it were a man, I’d use it only for special moments. Sillage 9/10, longevity 9/10, perfume 10/10.
Do you know when they stopped making it? I want to buy some vintage and make sure with the batch code that they aren’t selling me a fake… I miss it so much…
I discovered this fragrance in 2006 and used it uninterruptedly as a reference since then. Unfortunately, production seems to have been discontinued (incomprehensibly), so it’s getting harder to find every day. When it first came out, fig tree notes (refined, spectacular) dominated over a citrus and spicy background. After the dry down, it adds delicious floral and woody nuances. It evokes spring and summer (though I use it all year round). Perfect for day and night. Lasts about six hours, and the sillage is moderate for up to two hours. Elegant, urban, sophisticated, balanced, and versatile. For me, simply perfect. A true masterpiece, 10/10.
I discovered it in 2006 and have used it non-stop as a reference since then. It’s a shame production seemed to discontinue (incomprehensibly), as it’s becoming harder to find. Upon spraying, the fig notes dominate (refined, spectacular) over a citrus and spicy base. After drying down and hours later, it adds delicious floral and woody nuances. It evokes spring and summer (though I wear it year-round). Perfect for day and night. Lasts about six hours with a moderate trail up to two hours. Elegant, urban, sophisticated, balanced, and versatile. For me, simply perfect. A true masterpiece, 10/10.
I see that with this fragrance there’s a day I love and another I hate. Fig leaves dominate, just like cedar. The magic is in the dry down: it’s very different from the original Diptyque or Marc Jacobs. It has a complex mix that makes it creamy at the end. It’s ideal for sophisticated nights and cold climates. Sexy, romantic, and seductive after the dry down on a cold or windy autumn night.
Salvatore Ferragamo PH is one of the most overlooked fragrances in the community. It’s almost identical to the 2002 Marc Jacobs but with more depth, considering it launched in 1999, even though Diptyque’s Philosykos came out first. It’s a curious blend of wood, coconut, and fig. I bought it blind, drawn by its resemblance to the MJ for Men I’ve always wanted, but it’s pricier and harder to find. Longevity and sillage are moderate to soft (maybe 7 hours with 7 sprays), but the price is great. Why spend a fortune on Diptyque Philosykos when you might get similar or worse longevity for nearly four times the cost, as niche brands love to do when you have the option to choose this Ferragamo instead? To the snobs: ingredient quality matters just as much as the price-to-longevity ratio. I’ve seen reviewers say longevity doesn’t matter, sure. When they’re getting paid, they’ll rarely mention a fragrance’s flaws. The only thing that didn’t quite convince me is the atomizer, which has a very weak spray.
Salvatore Ferragamo pH is one of the most forgotten fragrances in the community. It’s almost identical to the 2002 Marc Jacobs but with more body, considering it came out in 1999, although Diptyque’s Phylosykos was first. It’s a curious mix of wood, coconut, and fig. I bought it blindly because of its resemblance to the MJ I always wanted, but it’s more expensive and harder to find. Longevity and sillage are moderate (maybe 7 hours with 7 sprays) and the price is good. Why spend a lot on Diptyque if I don’t know if it lasts the same or worse for almost 4 times the price? Niche brands love charging high prices. Ingredient quality counts, but so does the price-to-longevity ratio. I’ve seen reviewers say longevity doesn’t matter, of course, when they’re paid, they’ll hardly say the downsides. The only thing that didn’t convince me is the atomizer, which is quite stingy.
Late 90s Ferragamo was already making waves in fashion; in 1999, Pour Homme arrived with the prized pH tag. Aromatic archaeology shows us the trends of its time. This forgotten success reminds us that the fragrance world leaves beautiful proposals in obscurity… though I appreciate exiling myself from trends where you smell the same thing for the fifth time in every corner. Ferragamo pH contributed so much that Nina Ricci launched Memoir d’Homme in 2002 and Givenchy its famous Pour Homme the same year. All similar, but Ferragamo pH takes the crown for its balance. It escapes the nervous licorice of Memoir and is less mature than Givenchy. It bears great resemblance, but here the pink fig/sweet sandalwood note gives it a unique charm and masculinity, with medium leather shining with woody touches. Forgotten? Yes. Outdated? No. Beauty is timeless. It’s not a must for everyone, but it’s essential to know it before it disappears. Welcome to the collection.
By the late 90s, Ferragamo was already making waves. In 1999, Pour Homme arrived with its signature pH. This fragrance showcases the trends of its time. Its forgotten success proves that the perfume world leaves beautiful proposals in oblivion… although I appreciate escaping the trends that repeat around every corner. Ferragamo Pour Homme contributed so much that it prompted Nina Ricci to launch Memoir d’Homme (2002) and Givenchy its forgotten Givenchy Pour Homme the same year. All similar and with the same approach. Unlike the others, Ferragamo pH takes the crown for its balance. It escapes the nervous licorice note of Memoir and is less adult than Givenchy. It bears great resemblance, but in pH, the fig note mixed with sweet rose and sandalwood gives it a unique, masculine charm, where the medium-grade leather shines with woody touches. Forgotten? Yes. Outdated? Absolutely not. Beauty is timeless. Although it’s not a must for everyone, it’s essential to know it before it disappears. Welcome to the collection.
Excellent review, the one before mine. Just that my first love for this scent was in 2002-2003, when I was 21-22. It was almost my signature alongside the classic Givenchy Pi, after buying the iconic D&G in 2001. They were my first three purchases with my paycheck, lol. It was unique; almost 20 years later, two came out (Ferrari Noble Fig and Zegna Milan) with a certain similarity but not the same, thanks to that fig leaf note I didn’t know until diving into this during the pandemic. Basically, it smells like cedar with a lemon twist (though I see it doesn’t have lemon, but grapefruit). Cardamomo probably adds depth and sandalwood the creaminess.
One of Ferragamo’s lesser-known gems, where fig takes the lead. If you compare it to Dune, it’s an extreme, intrusive, and powerful version, yet it works despite its strangeness. It has a subtle balsamic touch drowned in green. If you get the chance, try it: that fig note is fresh, green, and distinct. It’s an elegant all-rounder in a special bottle, with quality you won’t find in every drugstore. Acidic, fruity, and spicy notes make it unique. Leather and fig form a duo that elevate each other. Over time, moss and vetiver gain ground, but the fig stays juicy and concentrated. I probably won’t find it again soon, so I’m glad I added it to my collection.
It’s a charming aroma with outstanding performance. I don’t mean testing it on blotter paper in a store or using it years ago… I own it, use it, and recently acquired it. It’s a 2022 batch, so I can speak with knowledge: it’s a marvel, both in fragrance and performance. Those who commented before gave a fabulous description; I just want to add that for me, it’s among my favorites. I reaffirm that it’s a recent batch with outstanding performance. I applied it today at 7:30 AM, and it’s now 6:50 PM, and it’s still very present, projecting and not fading to skin scent. A marvelous creation; I recommend it with eyes closed to those who enjoy perfumery beyond the commercial. Thanks to those who shared their experience, they sparked my interest in this marvel.
When you first smell it, you wonder how it has been on the market for over 25 years without being overshadowed by all the overpriced garbage still sold as a bargain. A pure delight.
When you first smell it, you can’t help but wonder how it’s possible that it’s been on the market for over 25 years without having the same pull as many abominations still sold like hotcakes at bargain prices. A DELIGHT.
Salvatore Ferragamo pour Homme. Smells literally like fig leaves or branches with its milky liquid and the sweetness of so many flowers. Then the woody notes, but what a crazy fragrance, niche quality because of how natural it feels. Watch out—it’s from 1999! Opens very fresh; it’s a god on earth for anyone who wears perfume. Its notes are: top of fig leaves, grapefruit, rosewood, caraway, geranium, cyclamen, and neroli; heart of carnation, cardamomo, rose, jasmine, and lily root; base of cedar, vetiver, sandalwood, leather, musk, and oakmoss. It became my favorite perfume, and I hope it stays unnoticed as it has been until now 🛸
In my search for fig/fig tree fragrances, I found this. When it arrived, I was with my dad, and his first impression was: ‘smells like a garden.’ Of course, there’s a fig tree in his house, so the association was obvious because the fig scent is very noticeable. But it wouldn’t feel like a garden without the flowers accompanying this main note, adding innocence and a more unisex touch. In the background, the sandalwood takes the lead and sometimes gets heavy. I don’t think it’s appropriate in hot weather; better suited for intermediate climates. Longevity and projection are correct; it’s not a beast. After 5 hours, it feels lighter, though occasionally there are bursts of flowers and woods on the clothes. I think its low popularity is because it evokes something very specific that not everyone wants to project. As a masculine fragrance that smells like a garden, it stands apart from other synthetic ones that don’t recall things so clearly. Personally, I expected to use it more, but sometimes the sweet-bitter blend overwhelms me. Other times, I lean toward synthetic proposals because I don’t feel like smelling like a garden. Still, I consider it a necessary perfume, even if just to smell occasionally or before bed because it brings me peace.
Amazing perfume. I tried it and was surprised that its beautiful scent lasted all day and into the next day on the skin. Definitely worth adding to your collection.
Excellent perfume. I wore it summer evening and it lasted about three hours on the skin and clothes, and around six hours on paper. The real test was at the gym; I’m not sure if the sweat reactivated it. To me, it’s very citrusy, bitter at first, but as it dries down, the wood notes emerge. I got it for $25, so I think it’s worth trying for the price. I’d say it’s for people over 30.
Just arrived today, and honestly, it smells very similar to the opening of Amouage Interlude. 🫰🫰
A flamboyant, fresh, elegant, and friendly fragrance for everyone. My brother gifted it to me—he’s not into woody scents—but it really cheered me up. I think anyone would like it: very citrusy, fresh, and suitable for daily wear and any occasion. Perfect for temperate to warm weather. I wouldn’t wear it out at night, but great for a casual daytime outing, the office, etc.
Fresh geraniums, as if just taken out of an old cigar box. The scent is linear, strong yet clean, consistent, and refined. The wood is very present with freshly cut grass. Not for the office, but perfect for a mid-afternoon ceremony; not for night. I detect few notes because they are in perfect balance; the cardamomo projects while the cedar is barely perceptible. It’s for an audience over 40. Projection lasts 3-4 hours and longevity 6 hours; the wood remains.
I’ve been wearing this for 8 months in all kinds of weather and occasions, and it never fails. It reminds me of fig trees, but with a creamy twist from sandalwood and musk—both robust and soft at the same time. It’s very wearable, subtle in a crowd, and smells unique. Lasts 8 hours with a moderate sillage. I love that it breaks away from current trends; it could easily be a niche fragrance.