Men
Bogart
Acordes principales
Descripción
Bogart by Jacques Bogart is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 1975, this composition was created by Lucien Ferrero and Maurice Maurin. The top notes unfold with rosemary, neroli, orange, and yellow mandarin; the heart reveals a harmony of nutmeg, cloves, geranium, juniper, lavender, and cedar; while the base notes settle on oakmoss, birch, and leather.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Bogart y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
36 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I bought and tried it as a teenager; it was one of my first perfumes, almost by chance. Maybe it wasn’t ideal for my 17 years, but I liked it a lot. Although I don’t remember the notes well, I have it fondly in my memory: the pleasant orange blossom opening and the leather and moss that lasted long at the end.
Another aromatic offspring of Worth Pour Homme from 1932. This wonderful and cheap perfume is the blend that unites Paco Rabanne Pour Homme and Loewe Essence. Bogart is recommended for smelling like a man without spending what you’d pay for Loewe Essence, which smells like this cute little guy costing 8 times less while carrying the nobility of Spanish fragrance in its DNA. It has its own personality, a demi-sport masculine touch similar to Paco Rabanne, but it’s herbal where the smoky, persistent leather makes it marvelous. The price is ridiculous ($12). Want to kill two birds with one stone? Buy it and avoid spending on Loewe and PR. With bulletproof longevity and projection, it’s perfect for bars and clubs where it crushes expensive and common fragrances. It’s a rough, masculine man; with semi-formal attire, he’d fit right into fancy parties. Two seasons, avoiding heat. If you put attitude into this ugly bottle with appreciable liquid, you’ll get many compliments. You’ll see what well-crafted leather can do without spending much. Value for money: 10. Longevity: 8 hours and counting.
Another olfactory son of Worth Pour Homme, dating back to 1932. This wonderful, budget-friendly uncle is the perfect blend of Paco Rabanne Pour Homme and Loewe Essence. If you want to smell like a man without dropping a fortune like Loewe demands, this charming Bogart is a must-have—it costs eight times less while somehow inheriting the nobility of that Spanish fragrance in its DNA. Yet, with this duality, it has its own distinct personality. It carries that demi-sport masculine touch reminiscent of Paco, but here the leather note is herbal, smoky, incredibly persistent, and beautiful, making the perfume simply amazing. The price I found it for was ridiculous (just $12). Want to kill two birds with one stone? Buy this and skip spending on Loewe and Paco. With bulletproof longevity and projection, it’s perfect for bars, clubs, and smoky environments where it will crush fragrances ten times more expensive and common. It’s a rugged, masculine scent; if you style it right (semi-formal), it’ll steal the show at fancy parties thanks to its intense, northern vibe. Best for two seasons, avoiding the heat. In short, if you put some attitude on this ugly bottle hiding precious liquid, people will shower you with compliments and you’ll see what well-crafted leather can do without breaking the bank. Value for money: 10. Longevity: 8 hours and counting.
Herbal opening with rosemary and a fresh lemon orange blossom, though it doesn’t last long. After two hours, rosemary with clove and nutmeg, the spicy phase. After five hours, oakmoss and leather. After nine hours, leather with birch and moss. It follows the path of Paco Rabanne and Loewe, being a simpler and cheaper version. I’d love for the orange blossom to last longer or have an amber touch at the end, but it left me feeling it fell short. Lasted over 12 hours with heavy sillage at the start and moderate later. Ideal for intermediate seasons and daytime use.
Starts quite herbal with the rosemary note and a nice lemon blossom note, which is quite fresh but doesn’t last too long. Two hours after application, rosemary remains, but along with clove and nutmeg, entering the “spiced” phase of this fragrance. At five hours, oakmoss and leather kick in. Nine hours after application, leather is boosted by the birch note with traces of oakmoss still present. Obviously, as my friend Marcus mentions, this Bogart followed the path traced by Paco Rabanne Pour Homme and Loewe Pour Homme in the aromatic fougere category. I found it to be a simpler version of both fragrances, which isn’t bad given the lower price of this Bogart. If the lemon blossom note had been more persistent or had included an amber note alongside the final leather, I would have loved it within this type of fragrance, but it left me with a feeling that it fell short. My performance was over 12 hours of longevity and a trail that was heavy to moderate in the first hours, stabilizing at moderate. I see it as appropriate for intermediate seasons and daytime wear.
For the price of 90ml, it’s a steal. Classic notes and very clean. Longevity and sillage are moderate on my skin. The downside is the bottle, somewhat cheap-looking, just like the spray.
JACQUES BOGART gives a lot and asks for little (money), like good lovers or the best father. BOGART POUR HOMME is the fougère of the seventies, now almost impossible to find. Current tastes don’t seek forest, fern, or earthy scents, but this has it all: lavender, moss, wood, coumarin, cilantro, thyme, rosemary… It evokes an intense, masculine forest. The opening is decisive: rosemary, moss, lavender, birch, geranium, juniper… a crucible of wet leaves and mists. Then it softens with leather and study-room woods. As it dries, the woods dominate with a surprising touch of incense. High sillage and longevity, excellent value for money.
Classic, masculine, and bold. The opening reminds me of One Man Show, but it quickly evolves into something akin to Pour Homme: simpler yet no less beautiful. Notes of rosemary, nutmeg, and leather… delicious! Moderate projection but with presence, excellent longevity, and great value. I love it; definitely my favorite Bogart.
Top pick for everyday wear. Smells a ton like One Man Show, though I still prefer Bogart. Nicely woody with floral touches; didn’t disappoint.
Classic, masculine, and bold. Starts just like One Man Show but quickly evolves into Paco Rabanne Pour Homme—simpler but exquisite. Rosemary, nutmeg, leather… Delicious. Moderate projection but present, lasts long, and is affordable. I’m about to say ‘I love it.’ Note: 03/04/2018, definitely my favorite Bogart.
I ordered this online by mistake, thinking it was Pour Homme. Mistakes like that make you smile because they open you up to new sensations. Smells like green grass in a mountain forest after rain, with sunbeams. Imagine a blend of Paco Rabanne Pour Homme and Loewe Essence, with leather, birch, and orange blossom. If you can get your hands on it, you won’t regret it.
I absolutely love it. It has that Kouros vibe but softer and lighter. Perfect!
A quality Vintage!! Similar to Paco Rabanne Pour Homme but with more leather and juniper. Impactful perfume, premium quality and longevity. Here I’m not talking about ages or who should wear it; that’s for novices who are fooled by marketing nonsense making them believe there are perfumes for young, young-adult, and old people; that’s just commerce to sell more. If you’ve ever tried Loewe Esencia and Paco Rabanne Pour Homme but wanted something with more power, woody, fresh, and leather for longer hours, this is the fragrance: Jacques Bogart Signature 90ml or BOGART POUR HOMME. Intense scent of rosemary, oakmoss, lavender, birch, geranium, juniper, cilantro, thyme, artemisia, and all aromatic herbs. It goes in the line of Azzaro but evolved 100 times, super star.
Although I agree there’s no age for perfumes, if you’re interested in buying it, you need to know that the first thing this aroma brings is the vintage vibe: those barber-shop lotions, old school. At first, it didn’t convince me; I thought about gifting it because I didn’t like the first impression. It felt very vintage. Then, feeling the sillage, I thought about giving it another chance. So, as time passed, it became more addictive, and now I find it delicious. I won’t pretend to be a fragrance master. It feels green, earthy, and very masculine. If you like strong, bold, and earthy old-school fragrances, it’s yours. And that ‘old’ air might discourage you like it did me at first, but give it a chance and you’ll fall in love with that slightly woody, masculine earthiness from the past, with superior projection and longevity.
Unfortunately, a deficient perfume… low sillage, very scarce longevity, and a weak scent. Suitable only as a collectible piece to know the history of aroma evolution. It might have been reformulated or just doesn’t interact well with my skin, but on me, it’s very weak and the scent has nothing special. I bought it just for collection without expecting much.
Pity, a poor perfume… weak sillage, short longevity, and a thin scent. It only serves as a collector’s piece to learn about fragrance history. Maybe it’s been reformulated or just doesn’t work on my skin, but on me it smells very weak and lacks any special character. I bought it solely for collection without high expectations.
I could wear One Million or Invictus and not stand out, but now using a vintage-style fragrance that stays so faithful to its formula is a taste few are lucky enough to enjoy, and if it’s at a good price, better quality. It’s similar to Paco Rabanne Pour Homme but with more leather, juniper, and that forest green I love. Just in case, it doesn’t resemble Azzaro much, which is spicier, leans sweet (patchouli, amber, anise, and tonka bean), and kills the forest freshness, leaving you a bit dizzy.
Well… it must be reformulated or something, because I bought it on Amazon USA and it doesn’t seem like a powerhouse. The opening is extraordinary with that rosemary and saffron in harmony: strong, fresh, evocative of something big coming. As it dries down, the sillage drops to skin-level and the oakmoss and leather change the opening into a more serious scent, though it remains pleasant and very masculine. Longevity is good, over 10 hours, but it feels like a cologne-type lotion. Compared to Loewe Esencia, it falls short, as the Spanish one is far superior. Even Paco Rabanne Pour Homme has more sparkle and interesting shifts. As a collectible curiosity, it’s very acceptable, and for the price, it’s a good acquisition. The bottle is a vintage object in itself, but the box with that signature is worthy of showing off on perfumer forums.
I was gifted a bottle with about 20cc from 2014; I thought it was a good men’s fragrance. Very similar to Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, one of my all-time favorites that I also own in my collection. Very talcum-powdery and masculine. Great projection and longevity. Recommended. After 2015, they might have reformulated it, so it’s probably not as good.
The first Bogart I bought was 20 years ago. For me, it sums up the power and immense beauty of 70s aromas, like Polo RL, Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, Van Cleef & Arpels Homme, Brut, or Quorum (the last two from the late 60s and early 80s, but in the same vein). I haven’t tried the current version; recently I picked up a fresh bottle of One Man Show and found Bogart did a decent reformulation. I hope they did the same with this gem, though I have doubts since it’s a pure fougère with prominent oakmoss; according to forums, that note has been massacred by IFRA restrictions. If you love ‘retro’ proposals and nostalgia, it’s a must-have. Some will say it ‘smells old’ (it makes my eyes bleed reading that about a classic), others say it’s outdated. For me, it’s a MASTERPIECE; it’s lucky that, starting the second decade of the 21st century, we can enjoy this piece of history at an irrisible price. Let it stay this way for a long time…
I get a strong similarity to Quorum, but Bogart feels sweeter and less harsh. I recommend it; it’s a great fragrance, 100% vintage scent.
Best blind buy ever: $20 for a scent almost identical to the current Paco Rabanne Pour Homme formula but with a greener twist, reminiscent of Roger & Gallet’s Open Black. It’s classic, elegant, and comforting. If you love classics, barber-shop vibes, or what my millennial generation calls ‘old-man scents,’ this is super great for standing out. The box looks even better than the photos; for the price, the details like the printed pen and the shiny ‘Bogart’ logo are a nice touch. It smells less soapy than the PR. Lasts 5-6 hours with moderate sillage (what a surprise!), but for the price, it’s a steal. I’m curious to try the vintage version…
A true old-school perfume whose citrus and green opening reminds me of Paco Rabanne Pour Homme. In the dry-down, I notice a similarity to the dried-out version of Loewe Esencia, perhaps due to shared notes. Ultimately, it’s a fusion of both: soapy, green, totally 80s, and very original. The longevity and projection aren’t excellent, but they’re decent (6 hours projecting well at the start). I understand concentrations have been lowered due to reformulations, but I still think it’s an authentic vintage gem.
Old school perfume. Green opening, very green, due to the rosemary. Then comes the leather, always with that green note that later disappears along with another scent I can’t identify. The leather isn’t alone. I’m not good at describing scents, but it’s astringent and rough. If it were a wine, it’d be the kind that scrapes your throat due to tannins. I don’t spray many times, max three or five, but it has moderate projection at the start and then fades. Lasts about 7 or 8 hours. IT IS NOT A METRO SEXUAL PERFUME (the kind worn with creams, tonics, gym gear, and supplements). IT IS AN ACTION PERFUME, not for dates or picnics with tablecloths and puddings. IT IS A MACHO MAN PERFUME but with sensitivity for men who write poems; although its strength is showing love with abandon, stealing deep kisses before boarding a ship or plane toward the front lines of an unjust war. Just like in Humphrey Bogart movies in Casablanca.
Old school perfume. Green opening, very green, due to rosemary. Then leather appears, always with that green that later disappears to join another scent I can’t identify. The leather isn’t alone. I’m not good at describing scents, but it’s an astringent, rough perfume. If it were a wine, it would be one that scrapes your throat with tannins. I don’t identify the woods well, maybe a hint, but if I bring my nose close to my skin, I’m not sure. I don’t spray many, max three or five, but it has moderate projection for the first few hours, then fades. Good performance, around 7 to 8 hours. IT’S NOT A METRO SEXUAL PERFUME (with anti-wrinkle creams, dyes, gym workouts, and vitamins). This is an ACTION perfume, not for dates or picnics with tablecloths and pastries. IT’S A MACHOMAN PERFUME, but with enough sensitivity for men who write poems; although its strength is showing love with abandon, stealing deep kisses before boarding a ship or plane towards the front lines of an unjust war. Just like in Humphrey Bogart’s Casablanca movies.
Classic fragrance, Mediterranean, barbershop style, and strictly masculine. It’s a mix of Agua Brava, Brumel, and Quorum in equal parts, but with better performance than current versions of those three. Lasts 5 hours. If that style is your thing, go for it; there’s no margin for error on price. Suitable for temperate and cold climates, day and night, though I don’t see it as seductive for current times. These aromas remind me of family members who are no longer here; when I wear them, I feel good and remember them. I’m not bothered wearing them; at 34, I feel more comfortable with this than with a synthetic One Million. PS: Paco Rabanne Pour Homme seems superior in all phases and more refined.
If you like vintage, this is a must-have. It’s masculine, rustic, more so than other vintage scents. It has spiced freshness and very integrated moss, giving refreshing virility with a woody and birch-incensed base. The birch adds a subtle smoky touch that blends well with the leather, rustic, and animal aspects. In summary, it follows the classic vintage line but with a more rustic proposal. It’s not like Paco Rabanne (sweet moss), nor Quorum (vintage/modern), nor One Man Show (greener). Here in Bogart, the woody, smoky, dirty, masculine, leather/animal facet stands out, but very pleasantly.
Personally, I don’t see it as similar to Paco Rabanne Pour Homme; the latter is a classic fougère, almost syrupy. Bogart is a green fougère with leather: the leather base mixes with the green of rosemary at the start, and becomes more noticeable as it dries. Bogart would be a ‘dirty green’. If you like 70s retro vintage, you’ll like it. I choose Paco Rabanne for its greater finesse and elegance.
Reminds me of Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, but the latter is more aggressive and much superior in quality. Performance is correct, just like the Paco. A must-have in any vintage collection for the scent and low price.
Excellent old school perfume with a lot of personality. Not for acne-ridden teenagers. Ideal for formal and professional situations. It has an animal touch that makes it sensual and wild. Activates great with sports. Very good quality and highly recommended.
Male scent? While reading top reviews, I stumbled on one saying: ‘This perfume is worthy of an Alpha, yep, for its sweetness and masculinity… on my skin it smells like caramel, milk with hints of honey.’ Reading that made me wonder first if there really are human male Alphas out there—types who, like wolf pack leaders, are rough and tough but have short, difficult lives until a stronger one appears, and once defeated, end their days in a rather unpleasant way. The same goes for lions and gorillas, dominant males: short, hard lives, full of responsibility and above all violence. The second thing I wondered is that assuming human male Alphas exist, would they smell like that? Caramel, milk, and honey? I’ve always imagined a truly macho man would smell wild during work hours and like bar soap once cleaned up. That’s roughly what I remember of my grandfather who worked in an electromechanical workshop: smell of metal tools, skin, and sometimes sweat…, then after a bath, Palmolive soap. My father was similar. Were they male Alphas? No idea, but they were old-school types who sometimes did silly things to maintain that sense of “manhood,” yet in the worst moments they stayed silent, enduring the storm without complaining or giving up. I imagine if they’d been interested in fragrances, they’d smelled more like Bogart than caramel, milk, and honey. Obviously it’s a personal impression, but I’m still surprised by the heterogeneity of opinions regarding what virility is and what its characteristics are. It was hard for me to get a sample of Bogart, but it definitely plays in the same league as Paco Rabanne Pour Homme, Quorum, and Brut, though I think it differs because the herbal imprint has a touch of spiced wood from the leather, giving it a tone closer to the animal. I love it, and although personally I think the whole “male Alpha” thing is nonsense, I agree with @zeroka in his review that this isn’t for everyone. Longevity and projection are very good. I recommend it.
Masculine scent? Reading reviews, others say it smells like caramel, milk, and honey, worthy of an ‘Alpha’. I wonder if those pack leaders, with short and violent lives, really smell like that. I always thought a tough guy smelled like a workshop, metal, skin, and sweat, like my grandfather, and then barbershop soap. My dad too. Were they alphas? Maybe, but they smelled old school. Bogart smells more like that than dessert. It’s a personal impression, but the heterogeneity of opinions on virility is surprising. It was hard to get a sample, but it plays in the same league as Paco Rabanne, Quorum, and Brut, though its herbal imprint with leather and spiced wood makes it more animalistic. I love it. Although the ‘macho alpha’ thing seems silly to me, I agree with @zeroka: this isn’t for everyone. Longevity and projection are excellent. Recommended.
It was a gift; otherwise, I wouldn’t have bought it. It smells very strong and alcoholic, almost giving me a headache. It’s a peculiar scent that I absolutely don’t like; maybe I’m just not used to this style—I prefer sweet or citrusy fragrances. I wouldn’t recommend buying it blind.
I got this as a gift; otherwise, I wouldn’t have bought it. It smells very strong and alcoholic, even giving me a headache. It’s a peculiar scent, but I don’t like it at all. It seems to smell like something else; maybe because I’m not used to this, I prefer sweet or citrusy scents. I don’t recommend buying it blindly.
Back in 1982, at 15, this was my only option. An exclusive perfume of supreme quality. Today I see many hyped colognes using the same base notes without acknowledging it, restyling classics and selling them as novelties. Fashion in perfumery always comes and goes.
Ugly beast but with a saintly character. Green, strong, and dirty opening, but not like cat urine as other greens do; it’s more like old leather dancing with bitter scrub. It punches you in the nose, maybe thanks to the oakmoss. As it dries down, it softens, revealing lavender and woods, keeping that brutal masculinity few possess. More macho than Paco Rabanne Pour Homme and better quality than Quorum. If it weren’t for the headache, I’d wear it more; once you get used to the scrub punch, it stops hurting and becomes a fougère caress.