Men
Oud Wood
Acordes principales
Descripción
Oud Wood by Tom Ford is a woody oriental fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2007, this composition was created by perfumer Richard Herpin.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
Comunidad
16,477 votos
- Positivo 84%
- Negativo 8.4%
- Neutral 7.7%
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Oud Wood y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
It’s one of the top three or four most beautiful scents in perfumery. It’s elegant, seductive, clean, and distinctive. I don’t doubt it: I value the scent over longevity or projection, but it should last at least two or three hours. In this case, there’s no trace after an hour. Buying it today is a mistake with Carved Oud by Thameen on the market. I’m not a fan of clones, but I’ve heard some that match it in quality and surpass it in longevity.
You’re basically forced to wear this with a suit; it smells very refined thanks to those soft woods. The downside is the longevity and projection: I wore it to a wedding and after the first hour, everyone else overpowered me, even feminine scents. I’m not saying it lasts an hour, but if someone else nearby is wearing perfume, forget about being noticed, not even by yourself. For the price, buy a clone that actually lasts, even if the ingredients are luxurious.
It smells good but has unjustified hype. It smells like soap with exquisite woods, but its projection and longevity are bad: one hour of projection and between 4 and 5 hours of longevity depending on skin pH. It’s disappointing; they should remove it from the Private Line and price it like Ombré Leather or Costa Azzurra, which are better fragrances. At the current price, it’s not worth it.
It smells delicious, very rich… but it’s absurdly expensive for what you get. It doesn’t last at all and the sillage is poor. I prefer the clone that costs 40 euros and works much better.
I tried it in 2014 and today it smells completely different. Does it smell good or bad? I don’t know; I can’t even tell if I like it… This new version lasts two hours tops. Some say it’s ‘my skin,’ but no—even on blotting paper after four hours, there’s nothing left, unlike other fragrances from the brand. My girlfriend didn’t even notice it. That soapy, extraordinary scent from before is gone; I’m just indifferent. Eau de parfum? Definitely not, it’s more like Eau de Air. What a pity.
It’s a top-tier balsamic woody scent if you like woods, but don’t expect magic because it fades fast. The oud isn’t dirty; with vetiver and cardamom, it comes out clean and sophisticated, reminding me of Encre Noire. The downside is the longevity: at best two or three hours, even with many sprays. It doesn’t lack quality, but it’s a letdown for such an expensive perfume.
I’d wear it every day! It’s perfect; I mix it with Terre d’Hermès and I’ve never felt as comfortable with anything else.
Oud Wood smells nice: dry, clean woods, well-made, nothing like that dense oud you usually get. To me, it smells like a wooden cabin with freshly washed sheets. It’s unisex. They say it doesn’t last long, and they’re right—it lasts less than two hours on the skin and costs a fortune.
I don’t get why people complain about the longevity—I can still smell it all day.
I ordered a decant and it smells like a dentist’s office; plus, the longevity is ridiculous.
Very good Tom Ford fragrance, getting used to that brand’s quality. At first, it’s very woody and aromatic; after a few minutes, you smell the oud. While present, it’s not felt much; it’s not that animalic or burnt oud. It makes me think of a clean, elegant, and sexy man, confident, dressed neatly and elegantly in a black suit.
Oud Wood opens with very good woody notes; the first thing you feel is the oud, which I’d describe as a cold oud, quite good. It’s a perfume that doesn’t project much; you won’t fill a room if you wear it. Once dried, it smells very sweet close to the skin. It’s a good perfume to get to know oud, as many say it’s not animalic to me, but I wouldn’t say you can buy it blindly; given the price, it’s better to test how it goes with your skin and if you really like it.
Oud Wood opens with woody notes, oud, and spices that give a prickling sensation. The oud is perceived lightly and is in no way animalic or dark; however, it’s a synthetic oud that lacks the woody intensity of other types. Personally, I find a certain resemblance to Penhaligon’s Halfeti oud. In the dry down, cardamomo stands out, accompanied by pepper and rosewood. During the first 20 minutes, it feels soapy, elegant, and clean, yet at the same time a bit dirty due to the oud and rosewood. This contrast between clean and dirty is peculiar, making it special and distinctive. In the dry down, the spicy part diminishes, giving way to a more woody and slightly balsamic sensation. The wood scent is dusty, slightly dark, but the oud adds a wet wood appearance, transporting you to an old house with wooden furniture and ‘old money’ aesthetics. As hours pass, amber and vanilla become the protagonists, though woods and cardamomo remain perceptible. It’s not long-lasting; it lasts about 4 to 6 hours with intermediate projection.
Oud Wood is a ‘second skin’ scent, very woody, soapy, soft, airy, medicinal, slightly smoky, and spicy. Harmless synthetic medicinal oud supported by sweet exotic woods and a clean soapy accord, with a base of Iso E Super, tonka bean, and Ambroxan. Performance, projection, and longevity are weak. It’s the typical composition where some notes ‘eat’ others, canceling each other out, generating a subtle projection. The scent is there, you feel it, but it’s like a ‘second skin’. Great scent, clean, sweet, very woody. Slightly smoky and animalic. Ideal for the office, dates, and family gatherings.
Hello, cordial greeting… Oud Wood disappointed me a bit, rather, it was a total letdown. At first it was good, spicy and woody, then it felt like pure pepper, oud, and sandalwood, which I disliked because the pepper was too strong. In the end, only that remained: pepper. That’s my opinion, respecting all others as always.
Tom Ford is to perfumes what Ford is to cars: they launch new models, they’re durable, and they’re everywhere. I can’t deny that Oud Wood is a great perfume, but I find it overpriced for its trail performance. It’s a Ford at a Ferrari price with Volvo style. It’s good, I don’t deny it, I was gifted it and I use it, but it’s not one of my favorites. Like everyone, sometimes I wear a fragrance just because I haven’t used it in a while. I don’t know, I think I’ve always preferred Chevrolet.
The first Tom Ford I bought. The typical bottle that smells until the cap without even needing to spray. A classic imitated for its merits. It’s not youthful, certainly not versatile, but it’s uniquely original.
I don’t like oud, but the balance of this perfume is among the best on the market; exquisite and elegant scent. Pity the high price for 50ml.
I wish I had a more refined sense of smell. I’m looking for something with body: clean, sweetened wood. The sweetness doesn’t quite convince me; maybe the vetiver is a bit medicinal, or the wood-vanilla blend, but it’s a good perfume. It starts sweet with vetiver, moves through sweet wood, and ends in a sweet amber where it shines and stands out. I like its night performance. It would be great for ladies; I see it as unisex, which holds me back from using it often. Good perfume, pity my dislike of sweetness, oud, and the price.
Way too strong for my nose, simply unbearable. Tom Ford and I just don’t get along, neither in perfumes nor in anything else.
This is my signature fragrance, the one that introduced me to Tom Ford. Of his entire collection, this is number 1. I just wish it had better performance, as its price-to-quality ratio should warrant it. Otherwise, it’s simply spectacular.
If you like experimenting with layering, mix one spray of TF Oud Wood with two of Ombré Leather and another pair of Insolence by Guerlain (yes, I know it’s 100% feminine). You’ll get a mix almost identical to Loewe San Miguel, with its touch of violets and rose. A masculine result but with something very special. There’s a Penhaligon’s that gives this result too. A way to use this TF one with another twist.
Like many Tom Fords, I think it’s not for everyone’s taste, budget, or occasions. It’s a scent that I like; it evokes an elegant forest with all its woods. It has a fresh opening, like vetiver, that evolves to let out the woods and settles on a quite good amber base. I think it’s for semi-formal or formal wear, clean and well-groomed. For people 25 or 30 years old and up, a good but not youthful ‘den’ aroma. Very elegant, quite good to my taste. Like many Tom Fords, I consider they’re not for receiving many compliments, but for making a statement and knowing how to wear the perfume that best fits your personality. Happy with the purchase, not happy with the price for my wallet.
Oh, here’s London, ‘the home of the daring, the exaggerated, and the free’. But is it real? Tom Ford Oud Wood is a fragrance designed to please from the first moment, but… is it that good? Hmm, not really. The hype from reviewers gave it a high status, but there are things that don’t convince me. It opens with woody notes, almost medicinal, with sweet tints and vanilla intertwining, then very timid touches of amber emerge. The oud seems too Westernized, designed to please everyone. It’s not a bad fragrance, but the performance of TFOW falls short. I don’t know if it was reformulated, but in the end, I enjoy it as a designer fragrance, without grand pretensions and versatile. Would I buy it again when the bottle is empty? I don’t think so, there are more interesting things out there without so much hype.
It’s a joke what they’re selling these days. Total disappointment with this reformulation: it lasts and projects absolutely nothing.
Besides being an original scent, it smells frankly good. It doesn’t project much on my skin. Since it smells clean, I use it in spring and early autumn.
As a standalone perfume, it doesn’t do much for me, but I layered it with Another 13 by Le Labo and it changed completely. It’s simply a perfect layering. If you can try that combination, do it; you won’t regret it.
I love the scent, but I must be critical: on my skin, it lasts 2 hours and sometimes 3. That’s my pain point, paying for something that doesn’t last. This review is purely personal experience. It’s a unique aroma that doesn’t disappoint and will definitely stay in my collection for a long time, because I’ll use it on special occasions to enjoy it without pressure.
I’ve never smelled anything soapy in Oud Wood, something that’s always repeated, and I wonder why. Maybe it’s my olfactory bulb, but looking at the notes, I don’t see anything that would produce that effect. Or maybe there are soaps that smell like petroleum that I don’t know about. If anyone is thinking of buying it blind for fear it’s soapy, I recommend trying these truly soapy ones first: Pure Soap by Clean; Prada L, Homme L, Eau; Marseille (Comme des Garçons); Prada Infusion d’Iris; Gentlewoman (Juliette has a gun); 724 by Francis Kurkdjian; or Castile by Penhaligon’s.
I’m from Argentina, and here Tom Ford is only for millionaires. I tried it once at a perfume shop, and they asked for a third of my salary. But there’s an ultra low-cost Argentine version from Marchand d’Aromes called Revolution Oud at $25. It smells exactly the same and is a delight. It lasts 2-3 hours, but reappling doesn’t hurt. For my fellow countrymen, this is the great option.
A perfume that masterfully blends the modern with a vintage vibe. The elegant and the robust. Pity the weak performance. It’s a scent so well-made that no dupe I’ve tried comes even remotely close.
Woody, spicy, and balsamic. A striking, attractive, and yet subtle aroma. Made for elegant, confident men who don’t need to make a noise to attract attention.
That mother smells like a diaper bag with talcum powder, that’s all. It’s good for the cold, but it’s not soapy; don’t let the reviewers fool you, it’s very expensive for what it offers. I liked it, but only because I got used to it; however, the first time I used it, it seemed to smell like poop.
It’s not cheap, no, don’t buy it blind. While the longevity isn’t too good… between 5 and 6 hours it’s an interesting, different, and striking scent… the drydown is wow. I recommend it, but not blind…
I consider OW to be a completely different fragrance of superlative quality. On my skin, it lasts over 8 hours and on clothes even longer. It’s one of my favorite fragrances, for winter, spring, summer, and autumn, just adjusting the application. In short, it’s irreplaceable for me 😎
A lesson in character, friends. If there is a fragrance that teaches you a lesson in character, it’s this. I’m talking about Oud Wood by Tom Ford, and let me tell you, it’s a serious thing. If you’re like me and shy away from woody perfumes that sound ‘stuffy’ because they remind you of ‘grandpa’ or ‘too serious,’ prepare to have your prejudices shattered! This fragrance is so incredibly well-made that it doesn’t smell old; it smells like MAN. Yes, with a capital M. It’s the kind of scent that makes you feel clear-headed, like you know what you want. At first, it’s pure wood, but a soft, polished wood with that slight stuffiness that, far from detracting, adds elegance. But the real magic happens in the final drydown. If you pay attention, very deep down, almost whispering, vanilla and tonka bean appear. Watch out; don’t expect cloying sweetness. It’s a light, subtle sweetness, just enough to round out the fragrance and give it an addictive warmth without taking away a shred of its seriousness. Note: this isn’t for daily use or for everyone. Let me be clear: test it on your skin before jumping in. Why? Because Oud Wood demands attitude, maturity, and a taste for the different. I can’t imagine it on a teenager; this is for a man with presence, with that ‘something’ that makes people pay attention. It’s for those moments when you want your scent to speak for you without saying a word. My rating: 8/10. Masculine, elegant, and full of character.
I detect cardamomo alongside something mineral, or perhaps unlisted aldehydes. To me, it’s one of the most complex perfumes in the world upon first sniff. Then came the wood; I didn’t even know what oud was at the time, and when I discovered it years later, I couldn’t find it here… but it’s so well-integrated with the cardamomo and dry vetiver that it’s what made me fall in love with perfumery. I’m not saying it’s the fragrance where you’ll best appreciate the oud, but for me, it was such a complex scent (or at least, it was then) that it marked a before and after in my life. Now there are millions of interpretations, copies, and inspirations, and maybe it’s not the same, but believe me: if you’re just starting, try it. If you can, buy it. Enjoy it. Its only flaw is longevity. On my skin, it lasts two solid hours, followed by another seven of slow evolution but staying close to the skin. It doesn’t matter; that’s not what it’s about. For a while, you smelled like a millionaire. Now it’s more common, but for untrained noses, it remains epic and unforgettable.
Very rich. I had already tried a dupe that smells very similar. It’s a rich, pure, creamy wood, slightly sweet and warm (nothing gourmand or overly vanilla). It reminds you of the vibe of sandalwood, but here the wood is less sawdust-like and more wet. Besides the wood, the most noticeable note is cardamomo deep in the drydown; it gives that same Noir Extreme vibe. I don’t know if everyone will like it, but I love it. The only downside is it doesn’t give me a sense of elegance, and I struggle to think of a specific use for it. It evolves into something warmer. Quality and scent are excellent, but considering the price and performance, I’d stick with the Perfumería HC5 dupe.
This was my first Tom Ford perfume. It smells like burnt woods, like a warm winter day in front of a fireplace with leather accents. It’s an expensive, unisex scent perfect for cold climates. It’s worth it, even though it doesn’t last long—about 4 to 6 hours on clothes.
I gifted a 100ml to a friend I see at the grocery store downstairs and kept the 50ml for myself. I gave it a shot, and at first, it smells boozy—probably due to those unlisted aldehydes. It has fresh spices, like biting into cardamom or smelling pure pepper, well-balanced with vanilla and amber. The base is deep, creamy wood with a spicy-amber typical of the house (like in Noir Extreme), featuring vetiver, synthetic amber, vanilins, and terpene/cashmeran spices. Plus, there’s Iso E Super giving it a modern touch. Greatly composed; I’ll definitely finish this with winter. P.S.: For the price, I’d rather stick with Noir Extreme.