Men
Montana Parfum d’Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Montana Parfum d'Homme by Montana is a leather fragrance from the leather family, launched in 1989. The nose behind this composition is Edouard Flechier. The top notes are aldehydes, lavender, cinnamon, pepper, bergamot, lemon, tarragon, and mandarin; the heart notes are pine needles, carnation, sage, rose, geranium, jasmine, and nasturtium; the base notes are leather, oakmoss, incense, patchouli, ambergris, labdanum, cedar, vanilla, and sandalwood.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
aldehydes
-
Corazón
Pine Needles
-
Base
leather
Comunidad
533 votos
- Positivo 91%
- Negativo 6.4%
- Neutral 2.4%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Montana Parfum d’Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
27 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
It’s a marvel, I recommend it 100%.
Smelling this fragrance again today brought back pleasant memories and a growing love for 80s perfumes. Montana Parfum d’Homme is synonymous with class and elegance; it has the same masculinity and vigor as Cartier Santos, Kouros, or Quorum, but it’s softer, less dense, and less aggressive, giving it great versatility and allowing it to be worn even starting at age 25. The ferns, woods, and spices coexist in harmony with vanilla and citrus. I’m surprised that a cologne of this caliber sells for such a low price, which makes it extremely worth it. Stunning fragrance!
At first, what I noticed most was the lemon (not as strong as in Montana Pour Homme), aldehydes, tarragon, and lavender. In the dry down, a balanced floral structure with carnation, jasmine, rose, and geranium. The base has soft patchouli, leather, sandalwood, moss, cedar, labdanum, and vanilla with a slight sweet touch. This fragrance, at the start and end, reminds me of Halston Z-14, but more softened and polished. Its trail is heavy with aldehydes and citrus, perhaps reinforced by pepper. Longevity is over 12 hours. Although it’s leather, it’s not dense like others; with the citrus, it has potential for both heat and cold, but more for day than night.
The only thing I’d add is that it doesn’t work well for nighttime wear.
This perfume is awesome. I’m surprised the price is so comfortable for this quality. I’ll definitely get another bottle of this underrated classic soon. Montana Parfum D’Homme is very much in the line of 80s fragrances, but much more friendly to modern ears. It has great projection and longevity. Many people hate the bottle, but I love it; it’s a small architectural sculpture holding a refined fragrance. A total gift for the eyes and nose. Its only flaw is the atomizer: when you press it, the liquid squirts out instead of spraying, like many other perfumes. User priethcallas already talked a lot about its composition, with very interesting concepts. Highly recommended without even looking at the price, quality, and bottle. NOTE: I bought the 100ml version less than 24 hours ago. The opening is very strong, enveloping, and wonderful, dominated by leather, lavender, and sandalwood. It reminds me of Quorum by Puig, but cleaner and more aromatic. After an hour, floral and citrus notes come out more. Unfortunately, after 2 or 3 hours, it smells very close to the skin; that’s when you notice the cedar and vanilla. The fixations aren’t as optimal as the version I had 17 years ago; they must have reformulated it. Now it’s made in Italy. Anyway, it remains a classy and characterful great fragrance. Scent: 9/10 Longevity: 6/10 Projection: 7.5/10 Price: 10/10
Great fragrance with an incredible quality-to-price ratio. It does share similarities with Aramis Havana, but I prefer this one: it’s more refined and has better longevity and projection.
This is an excellent cologne!
Today, after some time, I sprayed about 4 sprays of Montana Parfum D’Homme. Feeling it on the skin is re-falling in love with this excellent fragrance; it’s rare that it’s not under the microscope of reviewers for creations from the past. It has a quality worthy of highlighting. Its scent is superb, elegant, and warm, with a leather base and well-balanced herbaceous and spicy nuances. The dry-down is delicious, animalic, and fresh, settled on a bed of incense with a fine sweetness. I’ve always seen it as a link between the virile creations of the 80s and cleaner proposals from the 90s; it combines the best of both eras. Plus, its packaging is a sort of futuristic skyscraper. Designer Serge Mansau was inspired by the Tower of Babel. Highly recommended for lovers of classic masculine scents. Fragrance: 9.8/10, Longevity: 10/10, Projection: 9/10, Versatility: 8/10.
90% is similar to Van Cleef’s Tsar.
Truly delicious, with those 80s notes of pine, lavender, leather, and a touch of floral, tobacco, and woods. The opening reminds me of Quorum or Polo, but as it dries down, it becomes dry, magical, and sparkling, with that frozen lavender inherited from Drakkar Noir. It’s cheerful and has great longevity. It’s hard to describe something so complex. It has naughty and dirty fern traits, but without being them. It’s an achievement to be both things. It’s an exact photograph of the change in the 80s, like Aramis New West. Could Bogart One Man Show be the Sport version? Its creator, Edouard Flechier, also created the exquisite Aramis Havana. Aramis is a man in a white suit and pristine; Montana is that same man with messy hair, a leather jacket, a t-shirt, and an eternal cigarette. Two versions of the same type, both valuable. Aramis Havana could be a flanker for Montana. The first version comes in a red box, made in Paris, with a dark bottle. Then it moved to Italy, red box but a smoky gray bottle. Opinions vary, but I find the price very fair. Be careful not to confuse it with Montana Pour Homme, blue box, which is a citrus-floral-musk scent. My verdict: a masterpiece, at whose feet I fell in love as a teenager in front of my Latin teacher.
MPdH seems to me more than a leather fragrance, a dark and very smoky fern due to that mossy base; for me, it represents the reflection of a wet, dark, gloomy forest, just like a punk made up, painted, full of piercings, leather wristbands, and dressed in black, all of this captured in the background of a perfume bottle, like in a time capsule. The amalgam of notes that make it up never ceases to surprise me, making it a faithful and more than worthy reflection of the era it was created in, the late 80s, undoubtedly, the baroque era of perfumery. Attributes like outdated and antique, but with great class, masculine and powerful, with three well-marked phases as classic, I find just as wonderful as Parfum de Peau. Rating: 9/10.
This time, the aldehydes dominate, but relaxed leather, moss, and a soft pine follow the composition. Ambroxan is the core of the personality—complex and prominent. The pepper takes over from the lavender, while the cinnamon steps back. There’s an interesting interplay between citrus, vanilla, and patchouli in the depth. The florals temper the leather and woods. It’s sweet, dry, and fascinating. This review is about the vintage.
To me, MPdH is more than leather: it’s a dark, smudged fern, the reflection of a gloomy forest. Imagine a punk guy full of piercings and wristbands, trapped in a time capsule. It’s a faithful reflection of the 80s, the baroque era of perfumery. It’s outdated but classy, masculine, and powerful. I love it as much as Parfums de Peau. Rating: 9.
Montana is a pure hallucination, a fantasy explosion that lifts you up like a glorious sunrise. If you cross paths with it on the street, you turn around looking for the woman wearing it, because it smells like that urban, seductive charm of Opium. Montana Parfum d’Homme wraps you in its wings, trapping dreams and desires like true first love. It’s not for the past or the future; it’s so your heart can fly free.
My father had it; I remember this scent perfectly, transporting me to my childhood, to parties, 15th birthdays, people I love, weddings, since he wore it on those special occasions. It’s an indescribable scent; you could call it fresh woody, but without a very marked style, it’s multifacetic… I really can’t write an objective review; it’s incredible, it’s the best thing I’ve ever experienced: it’s class, it’s sophistication, it’s happiness, it’s emotion, it’s joyful tears, it’s family, it’s the center of attention, it’s UNIQUE.
My father had this, and I perfectly remember this scent because it takes me back to my childhood, to parties, 15th birthdays, people I love, weddings, since he used it for those special moments. It’s an indescribable scent; it can be described as fresh woody, but without a very marked style, it’s multifacetic… I really can’t make an objective review about this perfume, it’s incredible, it’s the best thing I’ve ever experienced, it’s class, it’s sophistication, it’s happiness, it’s emotion, it’s joyful tears, it’s family, it’s the center of attention, it’s UNIQUE!
Montana is pure hallucination. An explosion of fantasy for the senses. An offering loaded with joyful litanies for the soul. It’s a glorious ascent to the summit wrapped in morning mists. The word that fits me best to describe Montana is: Spell. Who would ignore this scent if you cross the street and don’t know where it’s coming from? At first, you might turn your head looking for the woman wearing it, as it can remind you of the enigmatic, ravishing presence of Opium for women. If Opium describes the urban charm of an updated Cleopatra, Montana wraps you in its wings, encoding dreams and desires in an ineffable code. Just as true first love leaves indelible photographs, Montana is an open possibility to the impossible. Without declaring itself a child of yesterday or tomorrow, it imprisons reason so the heart can fly free, beyond the real.
A perfume of full 80s style, very aromatic but not invasive, persistent, strong and delicate at the same time, with many nuances. I perceive a spicy freshness that fits rainy days well, those days when you want to be in front of a fireplace in good company, with the aldehydes and pine clearly present, giving nostalgic emotions. It offers good longevity and is well-constructed, a good option for lovers of this style. Definitely suitable for special occasions; if my nose isn’t betraying me, I note a fusion between Krizia Uomo and Azzaro Old. A respectable proposal I discovered thanks to Bofifa.
Exuberant and flashy, a peacock made into perfume. It’s no surprise the creator is the same as Havana’s; both Parfum d’homme and Aramis are to a perfume what a Versace shirt is to clothing: overdressed, baroque, yet masculine, a mess. Parfum d’homme is the next step in the fougère trend of the 80s, which felt drier or greener; here, the fougère vibe isn’t lost, but you can smell a new, brazen, youthful current on the horizon, between green and bluish, with a magnetic, resinous sweetness. In this late-80s transition, I see three paths: the aromatic-spiced route, the new marine fougère route (lavender and leaden), and the overloaded route with a thousand notes like Zinno, Egoiste, and Heritage. Parfum d’homme chooses the second path, destined to perfume the collars of the coolest guys at the bar, a fougère that knows oceanic lavenders like Kenzo and Cool Water exist, modern fougères like Drakkar Noir, but wants to hang a gold medal around its neck. It’s a perfume I don’t like for myself, though it seems more interesting than the previous ones because it unfolds, splendorous like a chorus of drunk crickets, revealing wonderful incense-pine flashes, as if unveiling a hippie pine resin with patchouli and orange à la Karma Lush. That explosion of sweet, balsamic greenness distinguishes Parfum d’homme from its twin Aramis Havana, and watch out, they’re very similar. According to my tests, the Aramis one is more bluish, with an antiseptic aura like a piece of blue-hued myrrh, more marble-like and with gravity between floral and tobacco notes; accords that Aramis also boasts, but with its own personality when the carnation snaps with incense and pine, and you want to die of pleasure feeling that herbaceous, ecclesiastical sweetness, a Miami Sound Machine or Jean-Claude Van Damme version of the classic Magno or Badedas. Undoubtedly, it’s very much of its time, but it holds up better than Kenzo or Cool Water, thanks to its androgyny and its strange composure between discotheque and sacramental. P.S.: It feels a bit artificial, but most of the 90s new wave was like that; they didn’t want naturalness. The blue-bottle Havana already had a manufactured taste. I’m not saying they sound synthetic as a criticism, but they had that indefinable thing of their era. P.S. II: It has nothing unisex about it, just like its female companion, Parfum de Peau, one of the best chypre/leather perfumes ever made and that all men tired of today’s trash should try. Still, I invite women without prejudices to see how it sits on their skin; more than one will be surprised when the heart notes arrive. P.S. III: Editing to add another similar perfume: Aztek by Yves Rocher.
Exuberant and cool, a peacock made into perfume. No wonder the creator is the same as Havana’s; both Parfum d’homme and Aramis are to perfume what a Versace shirt is to clothes: something overloaded and baroque, but masculine. Parfum d’homme is the new step in 80s fougères; they felt drier or greener, here the ferny vibe isn’t lost, but you smell a new, bold, and youthful current, between green and blue, with a magnetic and resinous sweetness. In this late-80s transition, I see three paths: the aromatic spicy one, the new marine and lead fougères, and the overloaded ones with a thousand notes like Zinno or Egoiste. Parfum d’homme chooses the second, destined to perfume the necks of the coolest guys at the bar. It knows about Kenzo’s oceanic lavenders and Cool Water, and modern fougères like Drakkar Noir, but it wants to hang a gold medal. It’s a perfume I don’t like for myself, though I think it’s more interesting than the previous ones thanks to its wonderful incense-pine flashes, like a hippie resin of pine, patchouli, and orange. That explosion of sweet green and balsamic sets it apart from its twin Aramis Havana, which is more blue, with an antiseptic aura, more marble-like, and with a certain floral and tobacco gravity. Montana has its own personality when the carnation snaps with the incense and pine; you die for that herbaceous and ecclesiastical sweetness, like a Miami Sound Machine or Jean-Claude Van Damme version of the classic Magno or Badesse. Undoubtedly, it’s very much of its time, but it holds up better than Kenzo or Cool Water thanks to its androgyny and composure between discotheque and sacramental. PS: It feels a bit artificial, but most of the new wave of the 90s was like that; they didn’t want naturalness. PS II: It has nothing unisex about it, unlike its female companion Parfum de Peau, one of the best chypres/leathers ever made, which all tired men should try. Still, I invite women without prejudice; more than one will be surprised when the heart notes arrive. PS III: Editing to add another similarity: Aztek by Yves Rocher.
I miss it. I wore it around ’97 and fell in love: the wood and the variety of flowers that adapt to each skin, an explosion of sophistication and sensuality. I can’t get it in Argentina anymore. If it were available, I’d get it again without thinking twice. Highly recommended.
UNIQUE, MALE, SO MANY COMPLIMENTS, NO LONGER AVAILABLE IN ARGENTINA. AN EXCELLENT MEMORY OF A PERFUME THAT MARKED AN ERA.
What a spectacular men’s perfume, what a shame they discontinued it. For now, to remember its scent, there’s the Montana Black Edition black bottle, which looks very similar.
Now I have to go on a hunt to get it; so many good reviews can’t be wrong. At first, I hated it; I don’t know why. I loved Montana as a designer, got lucky wearing his clothes, and was fascinated by his bottles, but I couldn’t stand this fragrance: it seemed too alcoholic, too pine, too spicy, too lavender… too everything. The worst part was that everyone wore it. Back then, the scents of the late 70s (pure pine) and early 80s (sophisticated, spiced, oriental) coexisted; Montana combined all of that, and for me, it was too much. A few years later, Gaultier used the same tactic with Le Male, but it didn’t bother me as much; in fact, I liked it. That’s why I’m going to look for it to have it in my collection and not be left with only that wrong impression.
Rest in peace.
A miniature in my collection made me realize it’s not worth crying over this perfume: yes, it’s a totem, but it doesn’t deserve the exorbitant prices speculators are asking, considering it’s very similar to its younger brother, Montana Black. I’m not saying one is better; they have nuances that suit different tastes. The older one is more vibrant, warm, and green; the newer one is rougher, with musk and incense notes. Anyway, they’re almost the same.
Actually, I tried the ‘light’ version, which isn’t listed here. It’s less potent than the original, which is intense and mature. It’s not for everyone; maybe it doesn’t fit these times anymore, but when it first came out, I fell in love. Sensual, powerful, smells like leather, something animalistic.