Skip to content

Modern Muse by Estée Lauder

Women 2013

Perfumer
Harry Fremont
Perfumer
Olivier Cresp

Description

Modern Muse by Estée Lauder is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. Launched in 2013, this composition was created by Harry Fremont and Olivier Cresp. The top note features the freshness of mandarin; the heart unfolds sambac jasmine, Chinese jasmine, lily of the valley, honeysuckle, flower petals, and neroli; while the base rests on musk, woody notes, patchouli, patchouli…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 15%
  • Spring 38%
  • Summer 22%
  • Autumn 25%
  • Day 75%
  • Night 25%

Key notes

Community

3,716 votes

  • Positive 74%
  • Negative 20%
  • Neutral 6.4%
positive reviews 3.7 k community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

7,374 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

2,671 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,541 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Modern Muse

Main accord white-floral Year 2013 Gender Women Perfumer Harry Fremont · Olivier Cresp

Modern Muse by Estée Lauder is a musky floral woody fragrance for women. Launched in 2013, this composition was created by Harry Fremont and Olivier Cresp. The top note features the freshness of mandarin; the heart unfolds sambac jasmine, Chinese jasmine, lily of the valley, honeysuckle, flower petals, and neroli; while the base rests on musk, woody notes, patchouli, patchouli leaves, amber, and Madagascar vanilla.

White flowers Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

1,300 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

1,464 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

608 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

512 votes

Community reviews

33 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Oliver Cresp is still a total hit; it never fails. It’s a gem that blends creamy, citrusy, and sweet notes all at once. Honestly, I’m absolutely in love with it—it’s even hypnotizing.

    Reply
  2. Maquillajecancunmx

    One of my favorites. It smells like white florals with an amber touch and very little citrus. It’s delicious for an elegant woman in the morning. It lasts forever; even the next day, it becomes more woody and sweet. It’s very similar to Narciso Rodriguez’s Her, especially in the dry-down.

    Reply
  3. Maquillajecancunmx

    One of my favorite perfumes. It’s a white floral scent, not very citrusy and very amber. Smells deliciously like an elegant woman in the morning. It lasts for hours, even until the next day I can still smell it, though it becomes more woody and sweet. People compare it to Narciso Rodriguez For Her and yes, it’s very similar, especially in the dry down.

    Reply
  4. Soyfemenina

    I tried this fragrance and didn’t notice the tangerine at first; instead, I sensed something weakly floral in the heart. It ends with weak vanilla and musk. It smells romantic, like those paintings of a virginal lady and a gentleman. It’s not for me because I’m looking for something strong and noticeable. Plus, it doesn’t last long, so you need to carry a refill. It’s a fine, quality scent, but very expensive with no price drop.

    Reply
  5. JuliLeggiero

    Big disappointment. It’s complex but linear; it barely changes from the moment I apply it, which bothered me. From the start, it felt unpleasant to me. It’s not ‘for ladies’ as they say; it’s very subjective. It has a repellent or insecticide vibe—very chemical and disruptive. I don’t recommend buying it blindly; it’s not for everyone. It doesn’t match its name: there’s no muse, and it’s not modern. It’s hard to hate a perfume, and this is one of them. It’s not well-balanced; it’s not fresh, floral, or feminine. I find it repulsive and nothing like a clean scent. I recommend testing it first on your own skin and your mom’s (on her, florals dry out sweeter); it smells pretty bad on her.

    Reply
  6. Quality and art in a perfume! I’m a collector and I buy blind. I bought it in kamikaze mode—I hate patchouli, and here it is, that note x2… I’m not regretting my bravery! At first, it wrapped me in white flowers, jasmine, and fresh orange blossom, like a freshly watered garden. I thought it was for daytime or mild climates, something summery. After two hours, it changes almost 100%: wood, amber, and bitter tangerine. THERE IS NO PATCHOULI! It’s like Basi’s In Red; it becomes nocturnal, formal, and sexy. That’s when you notice the quality and art, that unfolding of notes you won’t find in cheap perfumes. What a wonder! I love being surprised like this. The longevity is good, about 8-12 hours. Great sillage at first, then more intimate and sensual.

    Reply
  7. Quality and art in a perfume! I’m a collector and buy blind; I bought this on a hunch because I hate patchouli and it’s listed twice… and I’m not regretting it! At first, it wrapped me in white flowers, fresh jasmine, and orange blossoms, like a freshly watered garden. I thought it was for daytime or mild climates, just another cool summer scent. After two hours, it changes almost 100%: it becomes wood and amber, the mandarin shows up (more bitter than citrus), and to my delight, THERE IS NO PATCHOULI! It reminds me of Bvlgari’s In Red, now it’s nocturnal, formal, and sexy. That’s where the quality and art show, that unfolding of notes you don’t find in cheap perfumes. What a wonder! I love being surprised like this. The longevity is good, about 8-12 hours. Great sillage at first, then more intimate, which is why it feels so sensual.

    Reply
  8. I find it a bit strong, more suitable for a mature woman, maybe over 30. I liked it, but I didn’t love it. Generally, I buy perfumes for any occasion, but I felt this one was for afternoon-to-evening events. It’s not for everyone, so I recommend asking for a sample at the mall before buying.

    Reply
  9. Rosario.90

    It’s a very rich, feminine, and elegant perfume. But on my skin, it doesn’t last at all; with luck, two hours. I used it and finished the bottle, but I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  10. I agree with those who say it’s similar to Narciso Rodriguez for Her EDT (95% to my nose). Although it’s a pleasant and clean scent, on my skin it only lasts a couple of hours, at least more than the NR. If you catch it on sale, it’s half the price, but given its poor longevity and sillage, I don’t think I’ll buy it again.

    Reply
  11. I love all Estée Lauder perfumes: floral, feminine, and fresh. Tired of smelling sweet and cloying things, when I got a sample of Modern Muse it was a joy. I don’t agree with those who say florals are for older people; it’s like saying people who like sweet things are childish. Taste breaks down genres and ages. I’ve received many compliments, even from men. It lasts about seven hours on me; not much compared to others, but it depends on everyone’s pH. A simple, very floral perfume, dominated by jasmine. I don’t detect the mandarin, but in the woody notes I notice a hint of pepper. I use it year-round.

    Reply
  12. I love Estée Lauder perfumes: floral, feminine, and fresh. Tired of smelling overly sweet and cloying things, when I got a sample of Modern Muse, it was a joy. I don’t agree with those who say florals are for older people; tastes break down gender and age barriers. I’ve received many compliments, even from men. On me, it lasts about seven hours—not much compared to other fragrances, but it depends on pH. On me, it lasts seven hours; on others, four. It’s a simple, very floral perfume; jasmine dominates. I don’t sense the tangerine, but in the woody notes, I detect a hint of pepper. I use it year-round.

    Reply
  13. I remember the first time I tried it and I loved it, until I bought it and it was a huge disappointment. It usually doesn’t last anything on my skin; I think the max is an hour and a half. People around me don’t smell it and I barely do either. If I apply more, it gets strong and makes me dizzy; I can’t stand the intensity. Also, two sales associates said it was for older people, but to me it seems young girls or older ladies can wear it. In short, I would never buy it again. As my first perfume from a recognized brand, it left me totally disappointed: so expensive and the scent doesn’t last absolutely nothing.

    Reply
  14. I remember the first time I tried it and I loved it; I saved up to buy it, and it was a huge disappointment. It usually doesn’t last anything on my skin; I think max an hour or half. People around me don’t smell it, and I certainly don’t. If I apply more, it becomes very strong and I get completely dizzy; I can’t resist the intensity. Also, two salespeople said it’s for older people; I don’t know what to think, but in my opinion, young girls and ladies can use it. In short, I would never buy it again. As my first perfume from a recognized brand, it left me totally disappointed—so expensive and the scent doesn’t last at all.

    Reply
  15. Chrystiane

    Fresh and woody, it smells different from the competition and really sets itself apart.

    Reply
  16. VainillaDulce

    I absolutely love Modern Muse; it sticks and stays with me all day. It’s sensual, feminine, and intense, where Sambac jasmine takes the lead before settling elegantly with amber and vanilla. For me, those three notes really stand out. When I wore it, I felt like I was walking through a grove of beautiful jasmine flowers. In my opinion, it smells similar to Narciso Rodríguez for Her and Sarah Jessica Parker’s Lovely. Rating: 8/10.

    Reply
  17. I know everyone says it, but at least it doesn’t smell like those overly saturated gourmand fruit bombs out there. For an Estée Lauder, I was expecting something better.

    Reply
  18. Morder doll

    I had this a while back and it was one of those disappointing purchases. It doesn’t smell bad; honestly, the scent is nice but nothing spectacular to my taste. It smells floral and woody, but very linear—it doesn’t change from the moment I apply it until it fades. The longevity is about an hour and a half on my skin, and the sillage is very poor, only noticeable up close. I wore it for daytime but had to reapply it several times because it vanished quickly. It smells clean and fresh, and that’s about it. I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  19. One of the worst from Lauder. To a house with masterpieces like Estée Lauder, one demands respect—not from its clients, but from its own history. Lauder is the perfect fusion of French mastery and American simplicity, a brand that unites those worlds while respecting that concept: slow, worked-out launches, with care, unique, and not following trends. For me, it’s the younger sister of the great French houses that are getting further and further away (Guerlain, Chanel, Dior, Saint Laurent). A Lauder perfume is usually a safe bet for quality due to its longevity and personality. Aromatics Elixir, Youth Dew, Pleasures, Cinnabar, White Linen, Aromatics in White, even Happy (though I don’t like citrus), are fragrances that tell a story and convey integrity. They all come to stay; they aren’t products made to last five seasons and disappear. With Modern Muse, I see none of this. It’s a generic, weak scent, a fragrance that asks permission not to bother, not to make noise. And even then, it doesn’t say anything about itself. There are perfumes enjoyed at skin level, intimate, and yet magnificent. This Modern Muse wants to be nothing; it has no ambition. It simply tells you that you’ve already smelled it before in countless places. If Modern Muse is irrelevant, the latest version, Modern Muse Le Rouge Gloss, is infinitely worse. It’s not just disappointing that Lauder jumped into the flanker game, so vulgar, so tacky, so garrulous fashion house style. The worst part is that it’s a nauseating aberration of what’s trendy today in women’s perfumery. It’s a shame to see Lauder copying everyone else. It never was like this.

    Reply
  20. I had this a while ago and it was one of those disappointing purchases. It doesn’t smell bad, honestly the scent is nice but nothing spectacular to my taste. It smells floral and woody, but very linear; it doesn’t change from the moment I apply it until it stops projecting. The longevity was an hour and a half on my skin and the sillage was very poor, only skin scent. I used it daily but had to reapply it several times because it faded quickly. It smells clean and fresh, and that’s it. I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  21. Absolutely one of Lauder’s worst. A house with masterpieces like Estée Lauder deserves respect—not just from its customers, but from its own history. Lauder is the perfect fusion of French mastery and American simplicity. It’s the brand that unites those two worlds and has always respected that concept: slow, thoughtful, unique launches that don’t follow trends. To me, it’s the younger sister of the great French houses that are now further away (Guerlain, Chanel, Dior, Saint Laurent). A Lauder perfume is usually a safe bet for quality due to its longevity and personality. Aromatics Elixir, Youth Dew, Pleasures, Cinnabar, White Linen, Aromatics in White, and even Happy (though I don’t like citrus) were talking about something, about a shift in the century… they were fragrances that told a story and conveyed the brand’s integrity. They were all meant to stay, not products designed to last five seasons and disappear. With Modern Muse, I see none of that. It’s a generic, weak scent, a fragrance that asks for permission not to bother, not to make noise. And even then, it doesn’t say anything. There are perfumes you enjoy up close, intimate ones, and yet they are magnificent. This Modern Muse wants to be nothing; it has no ambition. It simply tells you you’ve smelled it before in many places. If Modern Muse is irrelevant, the latest version, Modern Muse Le Rouge Gloss, is infinitely worse. It’s not just disappointing that Lauder jumped into the flanker game—so vulgar, so tacky, so typical of loud fashion houses. The worst part is that it’s a nauseating aberration of what’s currently trendy in women’s perfumery. It’s a shame to see Lauder copying others. It never was like this.

    Reply
  22. It smells very delicious, and the bottle is beautiful, but it lacks strength. It’s too weak, suggests nothing, and no one remembers it. It lasts about an hour on my skin… or less.

    Reply
  23. It smells nice, fairly soft, floral, and musky; I also detect some wild musk. It’s modern, yes, but the projection is quite low—it doesn’t say anything to me, no matter how much I want to give it a chance… It’s expensive for what it offers. I imagined it would be like L’Extase or Sì by Giorgio Armani, but it’s nothing like that… The one I’d like to try is Modern Muse Le Rouge.

    Reply
  24. This modern muse feels a bit flat and plain: it smells okay, but has a touch that makes it feel outdated, nothing magnetic or seductive. It resembles dozens of fragrances already flooding the market… I’d categorize it as a boring musk-floral. Its trail is minimal and its longevity precarious… in my opinion, I wouldn’t recommend it.

    Reply
  25. This modern muse turned out to be a bit timid and simple: the scent isn’t unpleasant, but it has a note that makes it smell somewhat outdated. It’s not magnetic or seductive; it’s similar to many other fragrances flooding the market… I’d place it in the category of a boring musk-floral. Its sillage is very limited, and its longevity is precarious… in my opinion, it’s not very recommended.

    Reply
  26. It’s a pleasant, soft fragrance, but nothing special that makes it stand out. Common and short-lived on my skin. Expensive for what it offers.

    Reply
  27. Simple and short-lived. The saleswoman offered it to me as a jewel, the brand’s novelty, even claiming it had technology and practically transformed. Well, they applied it, and the scent didn’t seem pleasant or spectacular to me. I waited for it to change (transform) into something better, but the only thing that happened was that it disappeared. Neither here nor there, a bad perfume. Also, I remember it was priced high; I wouldn’t buy it for anything, and it’s worse than an imitation perfume.

    Reply
  28. Plain and not long-lasting. The saleswoman sold it to me as a jewel, the brand’s novelty, claiming it even had technology, saying it practically mutated. Well, I put it on and the scent didn’t seem pleasant or spectacular to me. I waited for it to change (mutate) into something better, and the only thing that happened was that it disappeared. Neither here nor there, a bad perfume, plus I remember it was expensive, I wouldn’t buy it for the life of me, worse than a knock-off.

    Reply
  29. Super feminine fragrance, soft with that enchanting floral musky touch. Jasmine and wild orchid shine, but the lily really takes the lead, very intense. Amber and vanilla give it that perfect sweetness, though I don’t detect any patchouli at all. Ideal for young girls, ages 15 to 25, and for days that aren’t sweltering.

    Reply
  30. Given the advertising and because I love the brand, I expected much more. And upon trying it, it seems like any other perfume, with nothing to highlight or elegance. Basically, it smells like wood and soft (but not in a good way, almost unnoticeable). Nothing to remember, and far less that it met my expectations.

    Reply