Skip to content

Beautiful by Estée Lauder

Women 1985

Perfumer
Bernard Chant
Perfumer
Max Gavarry

Description

Beautiful by Estée Lauder is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1985, this composition was created by Sophia Grojsman, Bernard Chant, and Max Gavarry. The top notes feature galbanum intertwined with rose, lily of the valley, black currant, fruity notes, cassia, mandarin, bergamot, and lemon. The heart reveals a floral harmony with neroli, carnation, calendula, mimosa, narcissus, jasmine, ylang-ylang,…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 21%
  • Spring 33%
  • Summer 20%
  • Autumn 26%
  • Day 62%
  • Night 38%

Key notes

Community

4,104 votes

  • Positive 71%
  • Negative 23%
  • Neutral 5.7%
positive reviews 4.1 k community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageStrong Best momentDay CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

9,760 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

2,926 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,824 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Beautiful

Main accord floral Year 1985 Gender Women Perfumer Bernard Chant · Max Gavarry · Sophia Grojsman

Beautiful by Estée Lauder is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1985, this composition was created by Sophia Grojsman, Bernard Chant, and Max Gavarry. The top notes feature galbanum intertwined with rose, lily of the valley, black currant, fruity notes, cassia, mandarin, bergamot, and lemon. The heart reveals a floral harmony with neroli, carnation, calendula, mimosa, narcissus, jasmine, ylang-ylang, chamomile, lily of the valley, geranium, magnolia, orange blossom, lilac, freesia, pink violet, sage, and neroli. The base settles on sandalwood, amber, vetiver, musk, cedar, and vanilla.

Green, herbal and fougère Flowers White flowers Fruits, vegetables and nuts Woods and mosses Musk, amber and animalic Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

1,228 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Strong

1,280 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

684 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

586 votes

Community reviews

33 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. This is a beast. It smells like a giant bouquet where no single flower wins, all set against a green backdrop. It reminds me a bit of Givenchy’s Amarige due to the mimosa. Longevity and sillage are medium-high. Although it’s marketed for special occasions, I wear it every day if I want to feel elegant.

    Reply
  2. What you need to read… Alongside Givenchy’s Amarige, these are the best florals in history. The quality is undeniable, but they aren’t for everyone (and they don’t need to be). I love that people call it baroque, old-fashioned, or cloying… whatever, there are people who just don’t know how to appreciate certain things. It has the same galbanum as Loewe’s L, which I adore, but here the white flowers (lily of the valley, magnolia, freesia…) and the fruits take the lead. The woody-green base is top-tier. It’s perfectly balanced despite being an explosion. Very long-lasting with great sillage. If you like florals, try it; it won’t leave you indifferent. I love it.

    Reply
  3. What you need to read… This fragrance, along with Amarige by Givenchy, seems to me to be one of the best florals in history. The quality is undeniable, but it’s also undeniable that they aren’t made for everyone (and they don’t need to be). I love seeing how they try to convince people that this fragrance is ‘baroque,’ ‘outdated,’ or ‘cloying.’ Nonsense; there are people who don’t know how to appreciate the quality of certain fragrances. It has the same galbanum as L by Loewe, and that’s what I love; I adore L too, but this fragrance moves much more through white flowers (lily, magnolia, freesia…) and fruits. Its woody-green base is amazing. It’s a perfectly balanced fragrance within the explosion it is itself. Very long-lasting and with a great trail. If you like florals, try it; it won’t leave you indifferent. Personally, I love it.

    Reply
  4. My aunt used to wear this and she remembered it with fondness, but now it seems to have aged terribly. It feels overwhelming to me; the flowers aren’t natural or fresh, but all clumped together and they suffocate. It’s not my style: I’m looking for something more natural and without that heavy, concentrated “perfume” smell. It can be quite invasive for others.

    Reply
  5. My aunt used to wear this and I fondly remember it, but now that I’ve tried it, I feel it has aged terribly. It overwhelms me; the florals don’t sound natural or fresh, but rather muddled and gross to me. It’s not my style: I’m looking for more natural scents without that heavy ‘perfume’ concentration. It can be invasive for others.

    Reply
  6. jerry drake

    The vintage version of Estée Lauder’s Beautiful doesn’t go unnoticed: at first, it might seem out of touch because today it’s rare to find titans with such aldehydic-floral notes. But that gives sovereignty to the woman who wears it with confidence. It has a medium-heavy weight that makes it seem almost light among the bomb-shells of its era. It starts with a touch of anise and then green mandarin. The flowers dominate but don’t suffocate, offering delicacy amidst that powerful 80s vibe. The pleasure lies in the heart. On my skin, the heart continues to pump flowers much more than expected, blending into a plush, creamy, woody base. Beautiful reflects what we seek in perfumery: perfect interaction for magical moments, like when two people meet, with that special warmth that flows through an unforgettable moment.

    Reply
  7. Rich, romantic, and luxurious. A fragrance of a thousand flowers. Inspired by Evelyn Lauder’s vision to make any woman feel the most beautiful in the room. Always romantic, beauty is represented by a bride symbolizing the most feminine, romantic, and beautiful aspect of a woman.

    Reply
  8. Alicia Munoz

    A classic, elegant, floral, and intense without being overwhelming. Ideal for feeling confident and vivacious. It will always make you feel feminine and tasteful. I like it because it’s not one of those cloyingly sweet scents that bother you after 5 minutes. I love it.

    Reply
  9. Kharynbranchet

    To those who have made it this far to criticize this beauty, I want to ask: what do you wear? Tell me, because to say the mean things I’ve read, I’m intrigued to know if you have the money to buy an Estée Lauder. Because it’s not just about wearing the perfume on your skin; it’s about knowing how to carry it with the right clothes, the correct shoes, and above all, with style… so when you reach that level, C R I T I Q U E.

    Reply
  10. Kharynbranchet

    To those who made it this far to criticize this beauty, I want to ask: what do you wear? Tell me, because to read the nasty things I’ve read, I’m intrigued to know if you have the money to buy an Estée Lauder with Beautiful. Because it’s not just about wearing the perfume on your skin; it’s about knowing how to carry it with appropriate clothing, suitable shoes, and above all, style… so when you reach that level, C R I T I Q U E.

    Reply
  11. Ojos Claros

    Feminine and a source of compliments. I wore it for many years about three decades ago. It lasts more than 24 hours on skin. On clothes, I lose count of the days, especially on winter wool sweaters that aren’t washed often. I wish I could find a perfume with the predominant notes of a modern version. If anyone knows which one… thanks.

    Reply
  12. A journey into the splendid floral and green perfumery of the 80s. A fruitful era marked by the generosity of ingredients. Beautiful is the child of a time when slightly green floral fragrances with earthy and woody accents were understood as beautiful. Always from a very feminine, elegant, and opulent point of view. I can’t help but think of formulas like Chanel’s 19 or Hermès’ Amazone. Beautiful is a sum of a thousand notes that culminate in a unique, compact scent evoking flowers, plants, trees, and vintage gardens. A history of perfumery that very well represents the taste of an era and continues to work. *edit: that note that leads to woodiness without actually being wood is galbanum and hyacinth. Like Feaubourg, 19, Miss Dior original… Fashion notes from that era.

    Reply
  13. catitaperfumada

    For women over 50, it smells vintage, just like the blue Charly. Personally, it’s a total no-go for me; it gives me a headache and feels way too heavy.

    Reply
  14. It smells like a classic, powerful, super vintage floral. There are so many flowers that I can’t tell which one stands out. I don’t hate it, but I don’t love it either—it’s just not my style. I wouldn’t wear it to a formal evening event because its scent screams elegance and maturity.

    Reply
  15. This review is for a mini from the early 2000s. On my skin, it opens with an explosion of floral, green, and citrus notes. I love that initial burst; it’s like walking into a florist that also cuts lemons. It stays floral to the core, but with green notes like chamomile, calendula, sage, and geranium that I enjoy. I barely notice the white flowers, maybe just the bergamot. What really stands out are the pollen-heavy blooms, like lilies and daffodils. It smells like a blooming garden with branches, little trees, and wet earth. It’s floral but not sweet, not innocent or creamy; it’s green and deep. It has gravity and timelessness. The amber drydown is lovely, with a shy hint of vanilla and a hidden musk that I like. It gives a sense of cleanliness and clarity, but it has a certain coldness that makes me hesitate. I haven’t tried the current reformulation yet, but for now, I wouldn’t buy it. Even though there are things I like, something doesn’t win me over—that coldness.

    Reply
  16. Three times with different people at different times, I’ve smelled a very strong, quite ugly, cloying, and even foul perfume. I asked them what they were wearing and all three proudly told me: ‘Beautiful by Estée Lauder’…???. That’s enough for me not to try it on my skin, let alone buy it… I’d rather stick with the fresh floral of Pleasures.

    Reply
  17. I’ve had this happen three times with different people at different times: they smell a very strong, ugly, cloying, and even foul perfume. When I ask what they’re wearing, they all proudly reply, ‘Estée Lauder Beautiful.’ That’s enough for me not to test it on my skin or buy it! I’d rather stick with the fresh floral vibe of Pleasures.

    Reply
  18. It’s one of my favorite perfumes; it defines the feminine, elegant, charming, and conservative woman. Without a doubt, it’s not for every woman, because as soon as you detect it, you can’t help but turn around. Fresh flowers dominate with a touch of elegance. Walking into a meeting with it, you’re sure to catch attention; I always have to have it on. It’s a clean, white fragrance that denotes purity and neatness, almost like education itself turned into perfume. I’ve been wearing it for years and always find something different; I even realized it changes depending on how much you apply, just like other Estée Lauder scents. It’s a jewel.

    Reply
  19. charlotinable

    I refuse to agree with everyone, but this perfume is so annoying and stressful that it doesn’t evoke a beautiful garden to me; it smells like rotting water with flowers that have been sitting in a vase without a water change for over a week. For me, it’s one of the Estee Lauder fragrances with the least charm; yes, the bottle looks cute, but the contents are terrible.

    Reply
  20. VainillaDulce

    Flowers, flowers, and more flowers; that’s Beautiful. It’s a whole floral bouquet; it makes you feel like you’re sitting in the middle of a garden filled with all kinds and colors of flowers; to me, Beautiful embodies spring and the beauty of flowers. Beautiful is a perfume that has always stood out since it was launched in the 80s; back then, fruity and oriental bombs were dominant, but Beautiful hit the market by dusting off the proposals of early perfumes, those from the beautiful era, incorporating their modern air. It took those old floral proposals and made them more intense and aldehyde-free, perhaps closely following the pattern set by Quelques L’Original Fleur (with which it shares much similarity in its opening). This fragrance is a flower bomb that, as it evolves, becomes somewhat sweet, woody, and powdery. Although it has been reformulated, it retains great resemblance to its vintage version and still maintains good longevity and trail. For those who like flowers, this is their perfume; without a doubt, they will love it.

    Reply
  21. VainillaDulce

    Flowers, flowers, and more flowers: that’s Beautiful. It’s a complete floral bouquet that makes you feel like you’re sitting in the middle of a garden full of all kinds of flowers and colors. For me, Beautiful embodies spring and floral beauty. This fragrance has always stood out since the eighties, when fruity and oriental bombs were dominant; Beautiful dusted off the proposals of that beautiful era, adding modernity. It took those old floral ideas and made them more intense and aldehyde-free, perhaps following very closely the pattern of Quelques L’Original Fleur (with which it shares great similarity upon first spray). It’s a flower bomb that, as it evolves, becomes a bit sweet, woody, and powdery. Although it has been reformulated, it retains great resemblance to its vintage version and still has good longevity and sillage. If you like flowers, this is your perfume; they will surely love it.

    Reply
  22. It’s my personal fragrance. A love that turns 24 this December. Fortunately, the reformulations haven’t made it unrecognizable. It remains luminous, luxurious, feminine, with decent longevity and sillage. It’s worn on any occasion, day or night, all year round. It’s a true gem, I love it so much! (Forgive the lack of accents, my mobile keyboard doesn’t have the Spanish alphabet).

    Reply
  23. As I can see in the photo, this is the Parfum version, not a miniature of the Eau de Parfum. NO! It’s the extract, the concentrated perfume. I’m sure it’s the same scent but more concentrated, something I haven’t been able to find in any perfumery, neither in Chile nor abroad. It must be delicious, a field full of flowers.

    Reply
  24. Of the miniatures I bought looking for a charming scent, this is the only one that I kind of liked, although I wouldn’t buy it. It’s a bit baroque for my taste.

    Reply
  25. Of the florals I’ve tried, this is the one I liked the least. Luckily, I only bought the sample size.

    Reply
  26. Few perfumes are truly feminine, and this is one of them… sweet, beautiful, and floral, yet without feeling old or heavy. It’s easy to wear and very romantic. Notes of lilies, neroli, roses, mimosa, and magnolias wrapped in a sweet citrus like ripe fruit. A special fragrance for women whose style doesn’t seek glamour. A great creation; Kirtash says it’s like an adaptation of Coco, just more wearable for any occasion. My mom used it in the 90s and still has a miniature in her collection. Powerful trail, soft, and great longevity.

    Reply
  27. My first introduction to perfumes was through my aunt, who absolutely loves them and always has several. I still remember that at 15, I saw Beautiful as a treasure among her fragrances; it was my absolute favorite. Every time I went over, I’d secretly test it on myself. It was intoxicating, vain, extravagant, enveloping, and luxurious; Beautiful never went unnoticed, and its tenacity seemed to surpass anything else; few dared to compete. Beautiful is marked by the 80s, and in its DNA, we find characteristics of that decade. But it differs from the others: Passion (1988) by Elizabeth Taylor focuses more on leather, Coco Chanel (1984) on spices, and Poison (1985) on fruits. Beautiful represents more of the floral side, aiming to be the scent that evokes a bride’s bouquet. Though more than the bouquet itself, it tries to reflect the purity, beauty, elegance, and cleanliness of the bride. It’s a collection of countless notes, none shining over the other, but its floral nature is undeniable; though more than simple floral, I also see it as chypre. Unlike Paris by Yves Saint Laurent (1983), Beautiful’s finish is dry and not juicy; it has more citrus presence, where chamomile and calendula play an important role. In my opinion, rose and jasmine don’t reign here; they don’t stand out as the other flowers that compose it. It’s very special to me; it was created the same year I was born, and that unites us. If you’re a fan of opulent florals and the 80s, this perfume is a must-have.

    Reply
  28. Beautiful!!! It’s a beauty; it will make the woman inside you shine, totally feminine. It’s a classic floral fragrance, well-formulated, with incredible longevity, one of Estée Lauder’s best-sellers in the US. Though it’s not the national anthem like Coco Mademoiselle by Chanel, it’s worthy of any woman regardless of age, timeless, and one of my favorites. And as a bonus, you’ll always be recognized by it; the quality of Beautiful and its scent are from the same lineage as Coco Chanel, which Kirtash agrees with.

    Reply