Men
Chanel No 19 Eau de Parfum
Acordes principales
Descripción
Chanel No 19 Eau de Parfum by Chanel is a green floral fragrance for women. The top notes are green, bergamot, and neroli; the heart notes are iris, rose, narcissus, lily of the valley, and ylang-ylang; the base notes are oakmoss, vetiver, leather, and sandalwood.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
green notes
-
Corazón
iris
-
Base
oakmoss
Comunidad
6,467 votos
- Positivo 83%
- Negativo 14%
- Neutral 3.4%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Chanel No 19 Eau de Parfum y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
39 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
For a distinguished woman who projects magnetism with simplicity, of any age (perhaps too sober for girls under 18). It’s for women. It has one of the most elegant leather notes I’ve ever smelled. Vetiver, moss, cedar, iris, rose, and narcissus combined exquisitely. Excellent longevity and fair sillage; a modest application lasts many hours.
It simply smells ‘green,’ like watering plants in the garden. Soft, with wet earth tones and powdery floral nuances. In my opinion, it doesn’t fit the Chanel price tag; I’d rather stick with my watered garden.
I tried it out of curiosity and found it very elegant. It’s herbal, floral, and mossy, with a vibe reminiscent of 70s feminine fragrances. The green notes and fresh bergamot give an immediate sense of freshness. Then the florals appear with ylang-ylang, rose, and narcissus, maintaining the green character. After two hours, the masculine base with leather, vetiver, moss, and sandalwood turns into soft woods. It’s not very youthful; it’s for someone with maturity, ideal for spring and summer during daytime hours due to its green-floral nature. It lasts quite a while with moderate sillage.
Fresh, floral, and powdery, very distinguished and inspired by the 70s/80s. It’s an old-school perfume, suitable for those over 20. A little-known marvel that makes you unique.
Another Chanel classic. N°19 has elegance, personality, and the appeal of evoking moments from our lives. I’m a man, and I see it as very unisex thanks to its earthy, green scent, though it does have a powdery touch and is quite chypre. It’s a masterpiece of perfumery that doesn’t know trends, and that’s the best part.
Once, Chanel defined the eternal feminine with N°19, the green, pastoral sibling of the legendary N°5. It was Coco’s farewell to perfumery, a fragrance that transcends sentimentality. I’m talking about the classic formula, though the current version might be best ignored. N°19 evokes the civilized vegetal beauty of nature in elegant harmony. Crisp citrus, rose, vetiver, and mossy green notes provide natural energy, amplified by a complex iris. The floral heart is fresh, rich, and allegorical; rising from humility to display a bold, sophisticated floral arsenal. The base adds minimalist leather, a chypre punch, and an oriental breeze of sandalwood. It’s a memory of rural life in emerging metropolises, natural light, and harmony between city and tree. I imagine the reformulation would be the fall of that balance due to urban overpopulation. With exceptional longevity and moderate sillage, it’s distinguished, magnetic, and sparkling. It’s the starting point to distinguish a ‘Coco Chanel’ product from a ‘Karl Lagerfeld’ one.
No, no, no. The moss with the green notes creates a strong smell of wet earth and herbs that make you dizzy. It’s the Chanel perfume I like the least.
My favorite Chanel, but… zero fixation, even less than Chanel No. 5 Eau de Toilette. I don’t like the 35ml bottle; it’s too bulky. What a pity.
Pray for the soul of Chanel N°19. It’s refreshing, delicate, precious, youthful, with a revitalizing chypre edge, and luminous. If Miss Dior evoked Greek ephesians for me, N°19 presents a 1930s metropolis: clean steel, sparkling crystals, and rural life nearby. I tested it in a perfumery and didn’t cry, but I did feel sadness and injustice. The bottle is the most beautiful, and the loveliest green hides a fragrance that seems like the tenth rehash of a usurer. It’s no longer N°19; it’s nothing. It doesn’t recall the original and doesn’t last more than 45 minutes. R.I.P. (I’m not a maniac about reformulations, but this is a disgrace).
Pray to God for the soul of Chanel No. 19, a refreshing and delicate fragrance, precious, youthful, with a revitalizing ‘chiprez’, luminous, decisive, intellectual, absolutely unisex. If Miss Dior always made me think of an idealized vision of young Greek ephebes cultivating body and intellect, Chanel No. 19 presented the fantasy of an American metropolis in the 1930s, when the steel of skyscrapers smelled clean, the crystals shone, and rural life was less than a quarter-hour drive away. I just tried it at a perfumery because I wanted to buy something new, and I haven’t cried because I must have already spent all the tears God granted me. What sadness and injustice what they’ve done to it. The most beautiful bottle (in this, Chanel knows no one can outshine them) and the most beautiful green hides today a fragrance that seems like the tenth draft made by a greedy usurer. This is not Chanel No. 19; it is nothing. It doesn’t resemble the original and doesn’t last more than three-quarters of an hour on the skin from the start. D.E.P. (I’m not a maniac about reformulations, but what they’ve done to No. 19 and Miss Dior is a disgrace).
I grew up hearing the wonders my mother told me about this perfume, but I never had the chance to smell it. My mother longed for it, and I know she didn’t use it again after she got married; she also couldn’t find it. I only knew that one day I would find it and give it to her. That day was today. I was about to buy Black Opium when I saw a gorgeous vintage edition of Chanel 19. Without thinking, I left Black Opium and bought the Chanel. When I gave it to my mother, she even cried with happiness. She’s so happy with her Chanel. I also need to try it to understand my mother’s love. It’s quite sophisticated, elegant, classy, and poised. I wouldn’t say its scent is ‘too much’ in any way. It has a sublime balance between powdery and woody notes, even seeming slightly spicy. On my skin, the ylang-ylang, leather, moss, and iris stand out. The rose stays in the background along with the lemon and neroli. Totally bright green, like a fresh spring morning under the sun. It’s a supremely gentle aroma. Moderate sillage and longevity. Although it’s pleasant and cloudy, it’s not totally my taste due to my aversion to the leather scent. However, I understand my mother’s fascination. It’s truly a well-thought-out work of art.
Good morning, magnificent! I recently heard it on a coworker playing bridge. I couldn’t resist and asked what she was wearing: ‘Chanel 19’. She said it suited her perfectly; it was the EDP. I remembered hearing about it years ago on exquisitely dressed women; their scent made me notice them, and it seemed like a perfume for goddesses. I thought it wouldn’t suit me as well, but today I went to the department store exclusively to try it. I couldn’t believe it! It’s the perfume I remembered so vividly, and a coworker brought it back to life for me. Divine on my skin! It doesn’t resemble anything else. It’s not trendy; if it were, I’d have smelled it more often. The fewer people who wear it, the more exclusive it becomes. It’s a masterpiece, a perfume for goddesses. In my opinion, it’s super feminine (I love perfumes supposedly for men), and while a man could wear it, I prefer it on a woman. I can’t pinpoint which note stands out (it doesn’t smell like leather). The opening notes are green, but don’t get confused; later it’s infinitely better. It’s very balanced, like a sweet melody where all instruments form a single harmony. It doesn’t exist in nature; the human hand has improved nature. Is there anything more beautiful than a wild forest? Maybe a garden cultivated by humans. They were out of stock, only the tester remained. I was glad to see how it evolved. It got better and better. I’ve been wearing it for 7 hours, and with just 2 sprays on my wrist, it still lingers. Today I played bridge, and my colleagues told me they could smell a rich aroma. You can’t judge a perfume on a strip of paper. For heaven’s sake, spray it on your skin and let it blend with you; that’s the least a good perfume deserves. Only then does it ‘bloom’. Heavy sillage, great longevity. Although it’s not cheap, it’s not expensive either. A little goes a long way. It will be my next acquisition and is already one of my favorites.
CHANEL N°19 EDP: Magnificent! I smelled it on a friend playing cards and couldn’t resist asking. She said it was EDP, and it suited her perfectly. I remembered smelling it years ago on exquisitely dressed women, a perfume for goddesses. I thought it wouldn’t work for me, but today I went to try it, and it’s divine. It doesn’t resemble anything, isn’t trendy, and that makes it exclusive. It’s a masterpiece, super feminine, though a man could wear it; I like it more on a woman. It doesn’t smell like leather. It starts green but then becomes infinitely better, very balanced, like a sweet melody where all instruments harmonize. It’s not found in nature; man has improved it. Is there anything more beautiful than a wild forest? Perhaps a cultivated garden. There was only the tester left. I enjoyed it for 7 hours with 2 sprays; at the card table, my companions noticed the rich aroma. It needs to be sprayed on skin to ‘open up.’ Heavy sillage and great longevity. It’s not cheap but worth it. It will be my next acquisition and favorite. Cheers.
Wonderful fragrance, an enveloping and elegant violet scent. One of my favorite perfumes. It’s not for a young girl, but for a more mature woman.
I sprayed it on my skin while passing a department store. It reminded me of old times with my mother, who always wore it and adored it, just like I do. It’s pure elegance, magnificently stately, evoking a majestic pleasure when smelled and worn. A beloved Chanel classic. I felt it was slightly reformulated and lacked the strength it once had, which had a brutal sillage. Still, I’d happily get it again. The vetiver is the note that stands out most to me, evoking the smell of wet earth. It’s a work of art, something beautiful.
I bought it blindly from a friend, used. It was the first time I smelled something like this: green grass, dusty flowers, and a slightly off-key leather base. Totally unfamiliar! Even though I already knew several Hermès gardens, I still loved it. Later, I wanted to wear it again, but the sharp opening was too intense, almost like cleaner. I thought my nose had changed its mind. I was heartbroken and went back to searching for Kelly Caleche EDP. But today, I put Chanel 19 back on, and what a charm. I feel that delicate balance between greens, flowers, and leather again. What a pleasure. I think the factor was the temperature: now it’s autumn, between 13 and 19 degrees, whereas before it was a stifling summer of 30 to 38 degrees. Cool weather favors it; today it feels warm, its flowers are creamy and comforting. A delight for winter.
Chanel 19 EDP is exquisite, elegant, and full of personality. It’s long-lasting and endearing, worthy of use on any occasion and any time of year.
Vladlena1994, you’d say it gave you nausea. You’d say people wear it just because it carries Chanel’s indisputable seal. You’d say it smells like cut grass and scrubbed floors. You’d say it’s the worst thing you’ve ever heard. And I repeat, the most stupid thing I’ve read in your review is that people only wear it because it’s Chanel… that can’t be true. It simply wasn’t to your liking and doesn’t match your tastes. So what? Those who value a classic fragrance (and it’s no longer just ‘classic’), green and woody, and different… do they now smell like scrubbed, nauseating grass? What you added isn’t a personal review sharing your opinion, but a lack of respect for those who either can’t or do enjoy smelling like Dior Addict (vanilla), and I must state that. I, a regular user, feel completely targeted by this lack of respect and empathy when reading such absurd reviews about perfumes I love, and I feel completely identified with that sentiment. Now, fine, let the criticism rain down for not respecting an opinion, but I believe there are ways and ways to describe an opinion and write a negative review about a perfume, and this one just didn’t seem respectful to me.
I never tried the old version, but this one was super intense and lasted for hours. The downside is that it felt repulsive to me; we just don’t vibe. It smelled green, but in a bad way… with an overwhelming density. I’d love to wear it on someone who can sweeten up the scents.
HORRIBLE. It’s like you stepped in grass and put it on your skin. One of the worst perfumes I’ve ever heard. It gave me the heebie-jeebies. It’s overrated just because it has the Chanel brand. If it had an unknown brand, it would rot there. I don’t get how something that smells so bad sells so much just because it says Chanel on it. Anyway.
I used Chanel 19, just like No. 5, back in my youth (about 20 years ago) in Paris… they were so expensive! But I deserved them, and they smelled absolutely divine. Now I’m thinking of buying them again, even though I’ve read and heard so much about how they’ve been reformulated and no longer last or smell like before. Is it true? I’m torn on whether to buy them or not. Hi to all perfume lovers!
Absolutely stunning fragrance, like a Debussy melody, a moonlit night in a garden under a starry sky. The reformulation made it less intense, but the DNA remains the same, which is why I don’t understand certain reviews that, in my opinion, are just snobbish. Long live Chanel 19.
Frankly disgusting, a simple perfume that just smells like grass, but not refined grass—just bad grass. Within minutes it turns sour and I felt like vomiting. Plus, it’s quite watery; for such an expensive Chanel fragrance, the performance is terrible, lasting only 30 to 45 minutes. I expected better longevity from Chanel, but the sillage barely registers next to my skin. What a shame, I was so excited about this scent.
It’s a very original, elegant, and feminine scent; yes, it has a vintage touch and suits me better as a mature woman. At first, it’s tender and floral, gradually becoming more mossy. Unfortunately, the longevity isn’t great, max 3 hours even with heavy application. In conclusion, I wouldn’t spend that much money for these characteristics, though if you’re a woman who loves herbal and classic scents, it could be your fragrance.
This is a perfume for women, not little girls. It’s pure elegance, very classic, feminine, herbal, green, and mossy. A woman should smell like this, not like a cupcake.
Out of all Chanel perfumes, this is my favorite. It’s unisex because it starts smelling like rain, then becomes slightly powdery, and in the final phase turns floral.
My ex’s mother used to alternate this with the classic L’Eau d’Issey. Her style, at this stage, is legendary in that small coastal Mediterranean town where she lives. Almost always dressed in black, with a strict, high brown mane, and always smoking—hard to get along with. An Aries woman who speaks her mind, sophisticated and with an otherworldly temper. Her scent had to match her eternal cigarette and a glass of something. I see a bottle of Chanel No. 19 and I see her. Timeless, exquisite taste, loves shrimp and alcohol; her languid silhouette always gave her away. No need to please the masses, elegant and strong-willed, she wasn’t here for roses and sugar. Only for sophisticated tastes. Unforgettable.
Genial perfume with a lot of personality, it stands out among all the same old scents nowadays. A classic that smells modern, perfect if you’re tired of everything sweet. Imagine a walk through a greener-than-floral garden, fresh and humid breeze; it’s a well-rounded aroma.
I’m going to bore you with a review that probably no one cares about, but this gem deserves more than six or seven lines. About six years ago, I got a call from a not-so-close friend, one of those that sets off an alarm. She told me her grandmother had just passed away and mentioned she remembered I collected old perfumes because they had found bottles in her house. She invited me over to see if I was interested in anything before she threw it away. I accepted. I didn’t want to ask too much; it wasn’t the time to touch a wound, but I guessed things. Rosario must have been a young widow with one son and never remarried. From the house and what was in it, I deduced she lived comfortably with opulent tastes, perhaps bordering on the ordinary. The room where she slept seemed taken from a black-and-white 50s movie: a double bed with a canopy full of velvet cushions, green curtains with ruffles, a faded floral screen, and a dark wood vanity with a three-mirror. A treasure that would have been the star of any antique shop. On top of it, I saw several bottles. Some empty, others with just a thin film of oily residue. I started moving bottles and opening those with liquid, to my misfortune, checking that most had gone bad. The last one was almost full; I turned it over and didn’t recognize it. When I brought it to my nose, I smelled something familiar that excited me. The liquid had an amber color, like 30-year-old whiskey but less bright. Curiously, it didn’t accumulate dust; surely Rosario took great care of her treasures. I turned the bottle and read the label. The first thing I thought was that it had been refilled. It wasn’t possible that Chanel No. 19, which I knew, smelled like that. How wrong I was… Dear Rosario: May God hold you eternally in His glory. What a pity I can never thank you for the moments I spent smelling this wonder. Maybe that’s why I use it with such respect and feel a connection with someone I never knew, but to whom I pay homage every time I use it. I don’t know when the edition is, but I calculate it’s from the 80s; probably it has more years than I do. I consider myself immensely fortunate to be able to enjoy it. Although I use it drop by drop, it’s already halfway gone, and I’m conscious that it will end; I don’t even want to think about it. It’s a fragrance where the ‘green notes’ reach their maximum expression. It has a fleeting but perceptible opening, slightly citrusy. A bitter citrus, very green, with rind you can almost chew. A few minutes later, it smells like a very green garden, with flowers soaked in rainwater; sometimes I even notice the clay of the pots. Gradually, the flowers fade, and I start smelling the earth, but the iris is still there, with a slight hint of bergamot; that’s my favorite phase. By the 7-hour mark, there’s nothing colorful left, just wet, alive green wood and more earth. It smells like wild, virgin nature, but let’s not fool ourselves, it’s much more than that. May 3rd is Cross Day in my town. It’s a local festival, and the custom is to put on your oldest tracksuit and spend the day lying in the field with family or friends. That’s how it’s been since I was little. I remember being 15 or 16, when you want to grow up faster; family days sound like an infinite lead weight, and the only thing you want is to spend that rainy day at a friend’s house watching Titanic for the thirtieth time. I used to wander all day around my grandparents’ country house, getting my pants wet with the humidity of the shrubs reaching my knees, leaving footprints in the soft, dark earth that had drunk from a timid, cold spring. From time to time, I’d sneak into the woodshed between two pines, with the roof half-collapsed, to smell the damp wood and smoke a cigarette in secret. This perfume evokes those days with all their essence: the temperature, the humidity, the happiness of my carefree innocence, the light of those longer days, the distant crackle of a bonfire in the open, the wet ivy climbing green up the walls, the dust in the rooms that were never used, the sensation of having cold feet, the almost metallic shine of the soaked earth… Many people have called me irresponsible, crazy, capricious, for spending an amount they consider high. Luckily, finding Chanel No. 19 was a wonderful stroke of fate with no cost to my wallet, but when they say things like that, I always ask them how much happiness is worth to them… Many times I’m not able to describe how a perfume makes me feel, where it transports me, or what memories it brings; but when something is so powerful that it makes you smile from the inside, simply, it has no price. I adore perfumery. Thanks, Rosario.
I loved it! It reminds me of Givenchy III. With those wonderful green and mossy notes.
Does anyone know if it’s similar to Givenchy III or Y by Yves Saint Laurent? I own both and would like to know the difference if they have the same vibe or which one is better. I love them both; they’re beautiful, perfect for summer and spring, they bring me joy, and I feel like I’m in a fresh green field. Thanks!
I’ve surrendered to this masterpiece. The other day I tried it at an airport and was fascinated by all its nuances and olfactory twists. I don’t have much experience in perfumery, but I can assure you they don’t make fragrances like this anymore, with that drive for immortality. I’m eager to try the different versions of Chanel 19 to see which one suits me best. I’m really looking forward to smelling Chanel Poudre and another called Bel Respiro, which Fragrantica says are very similar. Sorry, this isn’t a review; it’s pure instant love after smelling this amazing perfume for the first time.
For me, it’s one of the most classic, elegant, and sublime scents in the world. Without a doubt, one of my favorite Chanel perfumes. I don’t have it in my collection because I own 19 Poudré, though they are very different and this one outperforms it in longevity. It’s a natural, green, slightly earthy scent with a soapy and powdery base. It’s the scent I’d wear as a forest fairy bringing a ray of sun between the trees to give us joy. It’s very polished; neither the green notes, nor the oakmoss, nor the iris stand out or clash. Compared to similar scents, it’s more powdery, fresher, and less rugged than Silences by Jacomo. 19 Poudré is sweeter and more talcum-like, with more iris. Jontué by Revlon is sweeter and more floral due to the mimosa and ylang. All four are distinct and can be worn together if you like greens. On my skin, it has moderate projection and lasts 9-10 hours. Scent 8.5/10, longevity 9.5/10, sillage 7/10, value for money 7/10, packaging 7/10. Would I buy it again? I didn’t buy it.
One of the most classic, elegant, and sublime aromas in the world. Without a doubt, one of my favorite Chancels. If I don’t own it, it’s because I have 19 Poudré, though this one surpasses it in performance. It’s natural, green, earthy, with a soapy and powdery base. It’s the scent of a forest fairy bringing a ray of sun between the trees. Very polished; neither the green notes, the oakmoss, nor the iris are out of tune. Compared to similar scents, it’s more powdery, fresher, and less wild than Silences by Jacomo. 19 Poudré is sweeter and more powdery with more iris. Jontué by Revlon is sweeter and more floral due to the mimosa and ylang. All four fit in a collection for green lovers. On my skin, moderate projection and 9-10 hours of longevity. Scent 8.5/10, Longevity 9.5/10, Sillage 7/10, Value/Price 7/10, Versatility 6.5/10, Packaging 7/10. Would I buy it again? I didn’t buy it.
I’m obsessed with herbal green fragrances. I understand this is the category leader and I was dying to try it. The first time I smelled it, I almost cried. It reminded me of my grandmother, who never used perfume that I knew of, but smelled like Chanel 19… I’m sure it was her Pravia Hay soap, which no longer exists. It affected me so much I had to wait before trying it again, and now I finally pay attention with my pH in mind. I liked it a lot, though it’s still out of my budget for now. It’s a goal I’ve set myself to reach along with some professional milestone. Not today, not tomorrow, but someday it will be my olfactory signature.
I love it; it’s a timeless perfume. I feel super special when I wear it, like it was made just for me. That’s what it’s all about: finding the perfume that represents you and brightens your day.
I loved it. It smells tied and green, like a creamy soap. It feels unisex to me. For some reason, it reminded me of my grandmother and her Pond’s cream.
Cream of vast green meadows. It evokes that 70s atmosphere when green, earthy, root-and-soil perfumes were all the rage. Some survived like Cabochard, Magie Noire, Ô de Lancôme, or Chanel 19. It was Gabrielle Chanel’s green and woody farewell contribution. What a wonder: it’s an elegant, luminous, and subtle scent, nothing invasive. It has a green aura that evokes gardens and meadows full of trees. For me, it takes me to British green landscapes like in ‘The Remains of the Day’, ‘The Secret Garden’, or ‘Jane Eyre’. It’s classic, timeless, and modern all at once. Contemporary beauty verdancy.
The first perfume with the full juice of the iris infusion, something super expensive that only Myrurgia and Guerlain used to make. Nowadays, like everything else, reformulas are done for cost reasons and the concentration is lower, and like sheep, we keep buying it… are we like that?