Men

Carven Pour Homme

Marca
Carven
Francis Kurkdjian
Perfumista
Francis Kurkdjian
3.81 de 5
461 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Carven Pour Homme by Carven is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 2014, this composition was created by Francis Kurkdjian and Patricia Choux. The top notes unfold with violet leaf and grapefruit; the heart reveals sage, nutmeg, and cedar; while the base notes settle on vetiver and sandalwood.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 14%
  • Primavera 34%
  • Verano 21%
  • Otoño 31%
  • Día 64%
  • Noche 36%

Notas clave

Comunidad

461 votos

  • Positivo 73%
  • Negativo 18%
  • Neutral 9.3%

Pirámide olfativa

Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.

Salida 2 notas
Corazón 3 notas
Fondo 2 notas

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Carven Pour Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

4 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • It’s a solid creation in its woody-spicy genre. Although it didn’t seduce me much, except for its brief top notes that clearly announce the perfume. Maybe the fact that it was designed for autumn-winter didn’t allow for the best test conditions due to the summer heat in Spain; it would be worth testing it again. The noses behind it are very skilled, but it feels like this Carven Pour Homme stays too close to the skin with an acceptable sillage. Its clash of notes and obvious, unique originality are notable. Maybe the sillage was the issue, but we’ll see.

  • Just tested it again, now in winter. Nothing new to highlight except that I find the perfume too minimalist in its notes; its alchemy is great, but I’d emphasize its top notes again—they’re the best for me, with a lot of personality that defines an elegant and versatile fragrance (though I assume this because it lasts very little on my skin). I’m certain it’s not for me, even though Lola at the Corte Inglés Sorolla counter says otherwise.

  • Carven doesn’t cut it. Pour Homme is neither good nor bad; it’s something we’ve smelled a million times: a mix of Fahrenheit, Carolina Herrera, Green Irish Tweed, 212, and Narciso without the musk, featuring a metallic and herbal touch that isn’t bad. Asking more than 30 euros for 100 ml is ridiculous. The opening is awful—sticky bergamot and ambroxan, with a repulsive, muddy, fruity sweetness. After 15 minutes, it settles into its final version: a classic violet leaf lotion with an electric aftertaste. It doesn’t smell like tarred or cold violet, but halfway between both; you detect the sugar first, then the ethereal coldness. The sage (which I love) gives it a mystical, spicy vibe, setting it apart from other office lotions and adding an electric, ozony green note. It’s a scent without personality, a generic juice in an pretentious bottle, plus it’s overpriced and overrated.

  • JuanMa2412

    Bought it out of curiosity with a good discount: it smells nice, perfect for the office or a quiet day at home, but it really doesn’t stand out. It’s just one of thousands of fragrances that smell the same; no sillage, no projection, no distinct notes. A ‘meh’—I enjoyed it while it lasted, but I wouldn’t buy it again.