Skip to content

Cabochard by Grès

Women 1959

Brand
Grès
Perfumer
Bernard Chant

Description

Cabochard by Grès is a leather fragrance for women. Launched in 1959, this scent was created by perfumer Bernard Chant. The top notes feature aldehydes, sage, spices, tarragon, asafoetida, lemon (sour lime), and fruity notes; the heart notes include geranium, lily root, rose, jasmine, and ylang-ylang; the base notes consist of leather, oakmoss, tobacco, vetiver, patchouli, sandalwood, musk, amber, and…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 31%
  • Spring 18%
  • Summer 9.6%
  • Autumn 42%
  • Day 55%
  • Night 45%

Key notes

Community

3,000 votes

  • Positive 79%
  • Negative 18%
  • Neutral 3.0%
positive reviews 3.0 k community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageModerate Best momentAutumn CharacterUnisex

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

7,590 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

2,145 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

1,390 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Cabochard

Main accord woody Year 1959 Gender Women Perfumer Bernard Chant

Cabochard by Grès is a leather fragrance for women. Launched in 1959, this scent was created by perfumer Bernard Chant. The top notes feature aldehydes, sage, spices, tarragon, asafoetida, lemon (sour lime), and fruity notes; the heart notes include geranium, lily root, rose, jasmine, and ylang-ylang; the base notes consist of leather, oakmoss, tobacco, vetiver, patchouli, sandalwood, musk, amber, and coconut.

Green, herbal and fougère Spices Fruits, vegetables and nuts Flowers White flowers Musk, amber and animalic Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

902 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

1,114 votes

Character

Leading answer Balanced

469 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Excellent value

372 votes

Community reviews

40 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Psicostasis

    Cabochard feels like a completely different fragrance depending on the year. Lately, I’m getting tired of the patchouli and leather, so now I see it as a comforting, stable dryness with a fresh touch. It’s like a hot towel straight from the shower, with just the right amount of roughness. That smoky, almost incense-like note is what makes it work, where the tobacco balances out a bit of the florals and coconut.

    Reply
  2. Psicostasis

    I like leather and moss on their own, but combined they make me dizzy, especially with tobacco. Maybe it’s a car air freshener I smelled in childhood; this combo takes me straight to the endless curves of the Yesa reservoir. Cabochard is a beautiful, powdery, dry scent—very pretty in that sense. But be careful: for those who associate dry with dizzying, proceed with caution.

    Reply
  3. Psicostasis

    I wrote the previous review after testing it on blotter paper, but on skin it smooths out those notes that I initially disliked. The car leather scent sinks deeper, becoming soft and harmless, though it’s still there to remind me not to overapply. The dry, powdery, almost sweet spices become much more noticeable. While some might find it too close to the wrist, it’s crafted with just enough caution so you don’t feel suffocated.

    Reply
  4. JavierSantana

    Replying to another review: tobacco can have many facets depending on how the nose interprets it. It can range from sweetened nuances to cherry pipe, dry leaves like habano, or my favorite: the tobacco on fingers after smoking a red Marlboro or an ashtray. The last one can be off-putting, especially in public spaces where notes like Russian leather or smoky tobacco aren’t as pleasant. But that interpretation exists, present in era powerhouses like Polo 1978, Quorum, Lapidus, vintage Jaguar, and Hugo Boss No. 1. All feature heavy old-school tobacco, close to leather but without animal tones, with smoky facets less aggressive than birch or cade tars.

    Reply
  5. Amarilisbelladona

    I understand you don’t like it because it’s not for everyone and can be extravagant, but I doubt it’s the tobacco you dislike. In perfumery, it doesn’t smell like smoke or pure cigars; it’s a figurative, refined, precious note that results in a wet, earthy, sweet, and mysterious scent. The tobacco in Cabochard is the most beautiful I’ve ever smelled in a women’s perfume. As you can see, two people interpret the same thing differently. If you didn’t like this, I wouldn’t recommend blindly buying the 2019 versions; they keep the DNA very intense and are more a reinterpretation than a modernization, as they don’t follow current trends. The old version is still available in 30 and 50 ml without any risk.

    Reply
  6. Had to gift this to my mom. It’s dark, sexy, and mysterious, but not for my age or attitude. I see it more as a scent for a woman in her 50s. Still, it’s excellent.

    Reply
  7. Escarlata

    Sure, it’s an aromatic with personality, but for me, it smells terrible. The tobacco scent is very noticeable, and I don’t think it’s pleasant, at least not in this formulation. I suppose it would be different in another era, because back then they wore stronger scents, but now it just doesn’t work; it clashes. Even on an older lady with personality, it will be hard to wear, and she’ll end up not using it. It’s an eau de toilette, but for me, it’s like breathing smoke. I’m curious to try the new Grès Cabochards to see how they’ve modernized it.

    Reply
  8. Escarlata

    Definitely a personality-filled fragrance, but in my opinion, it’s quite unpleasant. I detect a very strong tobacco note and don’t find it appealing in this case. I suppose it might have worked in another era when bolder scents were in style, but now it just doesn’t fit; it clashes. Even on a mature woman with personality, it would be hard to wear, and she’d probably stop using it. The fact that it’s an eau de toilette doesn’t change anything; to me, it’s like breathing smoke. I’m curious to try the new Grès releases named Cabochard to see how they’ve modernized them.

    Reply
  9. @Amarilisbelladona Right now on Amazon Spain, the 100 ml bottle is out of stock at 17.95€, with free shipping via Prime or an extra 3.95€. If you pre-order, you have to wait without a specific date, sometimes months. Disadvantages: they might charge you upfront (usually they don’t), and sometimes they say they won’t restock, but in most cases they do send it, and if not, they refund you. You just need a lot of patience. For me, it’s worth it due to the significant discount. If you need it soon, you can get the 50 ml version for 17.24€ with delivery between May 30 and June 2, under the same conditions. The price hike is ridiculous; last year it fluctuated between 9.95€ and 40€. I got lucky snagging a 100 ml bottle for 9.95€ during a crazy sale, so I had to keep a close eye on it.

    Reply
  10. Amarilisbelladona

    The 1959 EDT formula of Cabochard is dead forever; the Cabochard we know will never be commercially available again. I can’t understand it; it’s a myth, unlike anything else, special and different. It’s the perfume of a woman who’s ‘made and right,’ not a girl; it’s an untamable monster with 21 harmonized notes designed not to leave you cold: you either love it or hate it, and I love it. It stole my heart from the very first day. There are already reviews describing it well, so I’ll just say it’s a luxury, an extravagance of sensations, a masterpiece that defined an era and lasted for years. It seems like a crime to lose it. What Grès did has no name; it’s as if Chanel withdrew its No. 5. The withdrawal of the 1959 edition coincides with the launch of the 2019 versions. But these, although they share DNA, are very different and don’t replace or modernize the original, as they don’t follow current trends. They are distinct fragrances inspired by the original. If they don’t replace or modernize, what’s Grès’ move? Yes, the 2019 versions are of extremely high quality, last a long time, and have good sillage, but they lack the power and magic of the 1959 version; they lack soul. The 2019 versions aren’t Cabochard 1959; they aren’t the exotic fragrance designed by Madame Grès, inspired by her travels to India, which conquered millions. To me, the 2019 versions lack that overwhelming personality, that extravagance of notes, and that slight masculine touch of tobacco and leather that characterizes the original. I’m glad about the new releases, but I don’t understand why they buried the 1959 version; it was unnecessary. It was a very original fragrance, with years on the market and loyal clients, an eau de toilette with the strength of a perfume, a work of art that has sadly been lost.

    Reply
  11. sinestesia

    My first layering! Mother of mercy, I love it!🥰 To sum up: I was going to sleep with my old Cabochard, a tester from the classic bottle just after launch, rubbing the back of my hands because I already know how they get worn out. And there it was, as every time I’ve tried it, smelling it with delight, distinguishing a bunch of nuances with my clumsy and ignorant nose (even though I can’t name them), trying to overlook the tobacco that reminds me too much of an ashtray. I felt like adding something to sweeten it. I opened the drawer, and instead of new, sweet scents, there it was in the front row: Cassandra. It’s a totally ‘vintage’ and strong Ylang-ylang, but sweet, so I thought, ‘They’re contemporaries, it will go well.’ One single swipe where I had sprayed the previous one… Marvel! It’s like a completely new perfume, beautiful, alive, and happy! Note: A very curious sensation that the scent feels ‘stuck to the skin.’ How to say it? Solid? I don’t know. But it’s curious that when I showed my invention to my husband, he observed exactly the same thing without me saying anything.

    Reply
  12. Wildly beautiful… Opening Cabochard feels like traveling back to the 1950s, when Gres was dedicated solely to haute couture and not business. It was a risk, but it paid off. Cabochard, Bernard Chant’s masterpiece, triumphed over its floral rival. It smells like Piguet’s Bandit but with its own soul: an aldehydic and green opening, a generous floral heart, and a base of sandalwood, musk, leather, and tobacco. It’s earthy, ‘dirty,’ yet balanced by the creaminess of the florals. It’s not for everyone; it’s an aromatic hell for some, but a paradise for lovers of animal chypres. It’s the other side of Aramis—more complex and less rough. This is the vintage EDT of the 80s, a challenging, elegant, and mysterious perfume.

    Reply
  13. Mr. Baskerville

    I won double. Today I wore Aramis, and my girlfriend, under pressure, disappeared. When she returned, she asked to smell my wrist and said, ‘No, Aramis, you put that on.’ She then gifted me a freshly bought Cabochard. It’s the other side of Aramis. At home, I compared both: Cabochard has a less intense but more nuanced aldehydic opening, with fruits that aren’t sweet. They evolve similarly, but Cabochard’s base is more complex, featuring worked tobacco and well-supported leather. Is it more feminine? Maybe, but Aramis is more vigorous at the start. It’s a precious gift from someone who truly understood me. Elegant, sensual, and daring for those who know how to see.

    Reply
  14. No perfume has ever left me as perplexed as this one did on first sniff. I went from confusion to laughing to myself, thinking, ‘What the f*** is this?’ I even blamed myself for buying it blindly, but then I realized I was missing it, not repelled by it. From strangeness came fascination. It’s like that ugly, serious baby nobody wants to pay for, but who grows up to become the family’s Don Juan or vampire, and quietly conquers everyone. The current EDT is ambiguous and difficult. The first whiff is a blow to the sinuses, an almost painful greenness like breathing in water. Once the nose calms down, an deceptive lemon emerges with strange herbs, like ingredients in a witch’s potion. What dominates is the moss, tobacco, and leather with a touch of sandalwood. There’s only a brief, very masculine spike of ylang-ylang; I don’t detect any other flower. What left me speechless was a piece of wet, herbaceous, non-sweet coconut, very timid in the background. A natural, wild coconut, like a freshly cracked nut with a stone inside. I pity that coconut is now identified only with sweet sprays from Mercadona when it has so many nuances. This Cabochard is fascinating. It’s a beauty you don’t buy on impulse. In my case, it had a happy ending and became my Scotch Brite; I can’t live without it. But it has so much roughness that I think the original 1959 version or a later reformulation surpasses it by far. Except with family members who know the old-school cypress, I feel too shy to wear it out. Abstain if you love gourmands, ultra-feminine florals, or fresh fragrances. And gentlemen: unless you belong to one of those three groups, Cabochard will suit you very, very well (and you know it).

    Reply
  15. Never has a perfume left me so perplexed. First laughter, then fascination. It’s like an ugly baby that grows up to conquer. The current EDT is ambiguous: it starts with a painful green note, then lemon with magical herbs. The dominance is moss, tobacco, and leather with a touch of sandalwood. Only a very masculine ylang and a wet, wild, unsweetened coconut break the monotony. This fascinating coconut is from a broken nut, nothing childish. It’s a beauty you don’t buy blindly. In my case, a happy ending: it’s my Scotch Brite, indispensable. Although I believe the original from 1959 or later reformulations surpass it. Only for chypre connoisseurs. Gourmands and sweet florals should abstain. Gentlemen, if you’re not part of those groups, it will suit you perfectly.

    Reply
  16. nachovorago

    Totally agree with Javierglez. I collect vintage, and hand in hand, Aramis and this are indistinguishable in the opening. The differences lie in the development: this smells drier and more spirited, while Aramis is more… Aramis. They are brothers, undoubtedly.

    Reply
  17. FlordeLis

    I got it through an exchange. The opening is citrusy and spicy, but as it dries on my skin, leather, oakmoss, and tobacco stand out. The tobacco isn’t intense, and the fruits are almost unnoticeable. I was scared of the tobacco, but I loved it. The asafoetida gives it a peculiar touch. Maybe difficult for untrained noses; it’s dry and bitter.

    Reply
  18. Reading clear reviews with a handkerchief and a drop of Cabochard, I keep trying to understand this strange, dark, and moody creature. I don’t like it and don’t dare to wear it, but little by little I try to appreciate it (thanks to Grès for the olfactory lesson). I don’t smell the leather; I just imagine it. I feel the dry, powdery, and astringent base of moss. The darkness of tobacco, a thick ylang, and a mature, almost withered jasmine. It smells like Madame Edwiga on that fateful night in the Paris brothels, until a gray, desolate early morning. She is Evil, possessing life-and-death power, and she smells like this. It’s the fragrance of erotic anguish, not sensuality. It makes no promises; it’s not an evanescent desire, it’s pure flesh: tough, without doubts, and a bit bitter.

    Reply
  19. After reading reviews with a handkerchief in hand, I try to understand this grumpy creature. I don’t like it; I wouldn’t dare wear it, but I try to appreciate it. I don’t feel the leather; I imagine it. I do feel the dry, powdery, and astringent bottom of the moss. The darkness of the tobacco, a thick ylang, and a ripe, almost withered jasmine. It smells like Madame Edweda on a fatal night in the brothels of Paris, dragging her lover until the gray dawn. It’s the fragrance of erotic anguish, not evanescent desire. It’s pure flesh, sturdy, and a bit bitter.

    Reply
  20. BleuMinette

    I couldn’t handle it. I tried it many times, but I couldn’t. That leather on my skin turns bitter. Smelling my wrists was like sticking my nose into a bag with wet, dirty clothes soaked in tobacco. It’s not a bad perfume; it has exceptional longevity, for example. I would recommend not buying it blindly. I imagined it differently, and it was a huge disappointment; I don’t want to smell like that.

    Reply
  21. BleuMinette

    I couldn’t handle it. I tried many times, but no. The leather on my skin turns bitter. Smelling my wrists felt like sticking my nose into a bag of wet, dirty clothes soaked in tobacco. It’s not a bad perfume; it has exceptional longevity, but it’s not what I expected. It was a great disappointment; I don’t want to smell like that.

    Reply
  22. I got it last week at a good price and was amazed. I won’t add much detail because there are already long reviews… For me, it’s the archetype of a leather perfume for women. A delight, a masterful balance. The opening is powerful leather, sweetened by flowers, a bit aggressive. Then it settles soft, creamy, with tobacco-leather and a halo of powdery florals. It’s glory; what a joy to finally meet Cabochard.

    Reply
  23. I picked this up last week at an incredible price and was absolutely blown away. I won’t beat around the bush since there are already plenty of long reviews out there… For me, this is the ultimate feminine leather archetype. It’s pure delight, a perfect balance. At first, it hits with a potent leather note mixed with an aggressive floral touch, but then it settles into a creamy leather, almost tobacco-like, with a powdery floral halo. It’s glorious; I’m so glad we stumbled upon Cabochard.

    Reply
  24. I bought it in a physical store for under €10. When I got home and sprayed it on my wrists, it was a surprising scent, very vintage, dry, and clean. It’s so different from the current versions that it’s scary. It’s true that it smells very masculine due to the leather and tobacco, and that’s what I like most. Those who adore sweet perfumes should abstain.

    Reply
  25. Oh my god, I have to have this! I want to be soaked in it, body and soul, to feel it inside and out, convinced that it will fill me with life and elevate my being to unsuspected levels.

    Reply
  26. Thanks to REBECAVPF I tried this ancestral brew, from the days when the witches of Macbeth spoke less than they whispered. Powerful and sober opening, so unisex it seems more masculine, but in reality it belongs to no human gender. It is the perfect sibling for any drastically masculine Fougère or wild Chypre. Here there is no cloying sweetness or delicate flowers, but an aromatic accord of ancient, archaic leather, from when only attraction to the dark and the animal existed. Prudent aldehydes that don’t give synthetic shine, but the dark glass of a witch’s phial. Rusty herbs like St. John’s fennel, asafetida dosed to transmute its smell of garlic and cheese into something carnal and orgiastic. Sour juices of lemon and bitter sage that trap you in their poison, more suggestive than any pleasure. Evil and beloved flowers, enraged petals, Ylang-Ylang, rose, and black geranium like the ladies of the night. All wrapped in tobacco-stained leather and deep forest moss where light never reaches. I can’t imagine any current celebrity wearing CABOCHARD; it is the perfume of Mary Shelley, Bram Stoker, Mata Hari, Theda Bara, John Dee, Aleister Crowley, Salieri, and Lucrezia Borgia. It is all one thing. Ordo Ab Chao.

    Reply
  27. The bottle is simple and elegant, looking like a tuxedo. The fragrance didn’t like me at all. It’s dizzying and makes me feel like I’m in the 19th century. Comments when I wore it were negative, and on top of that, it lasts forever. I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  28. The bottle is simple and elegant, like a tuxedo. I didn’t like the fragrance at all; it makes me dizzy and reminds me of my teenage years. The comments when I wore it were negative, plus it lasts forever. I wouldn’t buy it again.

    Reply
  29. I am fascinated by Bernard Chant; his fragrances have a common seal, solid, well-assembled, and with a clear concept that makes me thank the fates. Estée, Aramis, Aromatics Elixir, and this Cabochard could not be more perfect. In Cabochard I perceive mostly leather, some tobacco, and I think listed coconut. It is a comfortable, sober, dry, and austere perfume. I don’t see it as seductive but as sensual, and I understand why some see it as glamorous, but of the glamour of the first half of the 20th century, like an elegant couple in an Art Deco apartment. I think it dignifies both men and women. I like the bottle in its simplicity, though I don’t understand why they skimp on the caps; here it is cheap plastic unworthy of the contents, although even Chanel does it with Antaeus. But at an affordable price, you can turn a blind eye.

    Reply