Men
Armani Eau Pour Homme (new)
Acordes principales
Descripción
Armani Eau Pour Homme (new) by Giorgio Armani is an aromatic citrus fragrance for men. Launched in 2013, this composition features top notes of bergamot, mandarin, and basil; heart notes of cloves, nutmeg, and lily of the valley; and base notes of oakmoss, sandalwood, and patchouli.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Armani Eau Pour Homme (new) y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
31 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Honestly, I don’t know what to think… sometimes I think this reformulation equals the original and surpasses the first unannounced version of Eau de Armani Pour Homme. Be that as it may, this version or flanker (I don’t know how to define it right now) is an absolute delight. It really made me levitate with this ‘new’ fragrance… HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
The best of Giorgio Armani: In my opinion, without a doubt, Armani Eau Pour Homme is the best men’s fragrance from the brand. It manifests the true Italian charm in its maximum expression and keeps the brand’s prestige alive: clean, elegant, noble, with a lot of character and personality. I describe it as wonderful, with bright citrus notes and green nuances. The opening trident (bergamot, mandarin, and basil) is splendid. Without any issues, it enters my top senior list for ages 30 to 120. After all, I totally recommend the purchase, as it has nothing to envy from any youthful men’s fragrance of today.
What a rich fragrance. It smells powerful and intense; at first, citrus and cloves, then very pleasant woods, very 80s style. It leaves a clean aroma, as if you had used a strong essence soap. I think it’s more for mature men, over 35. It works for any season and as a daily scent. Update: it’s a pleasure to wear. If you like Dior’s Eau Sauvage or Chanel’s Pour Monsieur, you’ll love it. The only downside is that it doesn’t last long and it’s expensive.
Pretty much in agreement with the previous reviews. It’s a very classic fragrance based on citrus with a background of spices and wood. Not much more. Suitable for daily use, perhaps for people over 30, and generally quite pleasant. I must say that I also prefer this version over the original, which, in my opinion, was too harsh. As a fellow reviewer mentioned earlier, it’s very similar to Eau Sauvage and Pour Monsieur. Perhaps too similar, so if I had to choose between the three, I might stick with the others (speaking of current formulations). I don’t find it as strong as they say; it’s quite contained. With moderate longevity (maximum 6-7 hours) and moderate-to-low sillage at all times. Perhaps a bit too discreet. Really, among current ‘designer’ offerings, it’s one I would consider buying a full bottle of, and coming from me, that’s a compliment in itself. For me, without a doubt, it’s the best in the brand’s current catalog. Very pleasant, classic, and without the strange ‘sweetness’ that is so prevalent nowadays. Recommended. NOTE: As a curiosity, it’s a fragrance that is barely perceptible up close to the skin if you bring your nose near; it’s better noticed at a certain distance. I found that curious.
Excellent update of Armani Eau Pour Homme: bright citrus notes with green nuances reminiscent of its predecessor, but more vibrant and luminous. A successful remix of the classic that now feels modern without abandoning its venerable essence. I went to the Armani counter, they applied it on me, I took a walk, and observed its evolution. Half an hour later, I bought it. Little to add to what others have said, perhaps: moderately mixed with Guerlain’s L’Eau Boisée, it generates a spectacular aroma. The reference for this scent is a bottle I had in the 90s; although similar, the current one is much better. Sillage and longevity are moderate. If you like citrus aromas, highly recommended.
A huge improvement over the original Armani Eau Pour Homme: very vivid citrus and green notes, with that classic touch but more electric. I tried it at the counter, went for a walk, and within half an hour I was already wearing it. If you mix it with Guerlain’s L’Eau Boisée, it’s on another level! I compared it to my 90s bottle and while it’s similar, this version is superior. Medium sillage and longevity, ideal if you love citrus.
Seeing the launch date, I couldn’t believe it; it’s a very classic aroma. It smells like someone 40 or older, a daily fragrance that is citrusy and spicy—not sharp, but soft and dry. A very good proposal for those who like the classics, who don’t take risks and don’t offend. I don’t like cloves; they bother me, but in this perfume, they didn’t bother me at all. Everything is very good; I recommend it 100%.
I wore this fragrance in the 80s because it was different from the masculine scents of the time (which were strong and animalic). I love the nutmeg masterfully blended with citrus and oakmoss. It has been reformulated, but it still retains the same character. In the 80s, it was very popular among youth and competed in popularity with Drakkar Noir. Although the Armani one is and was more versatile, I like that it keeps surviving and is easy to find in perfumeries. It’s one of those fragrances distinguished by that unmistakable Mediterranean touch Armani gave in his best years, the 80s and 90s.
Clean and classy. It makes perfect sense why it dominated the 80s among 35-year-old men; it smells like a successful executive. Back then, when Gordon Gekko was the moment’s god, everyone wanted to smell like winners. It starts a bit strong but then settles into soap and cleanliness—a penetrating, old-school soap scent. Pleasant but with a serious punch. If you were born in the 70s or 80s, you’ve smelled this half the planet over; it’s one of those scents etched into collective memory. It smells familiar and is a great fragrance, but for my taste, it’s a bit strong and fits a very specific profile: suited-up men with pomade. Once it fades, it becomes extremely cozy. If it smelled this good all the time and didn’t cost what it does, it would be perfect.
Many times the word poetry is used without meaning, but this perfume is total poetry. I used it back in the 90s thanks to a friend who gifted me a sample; my first impression was not only that it smelled good, but that it had the rare quality of covering me with a halo. Today, much time later, my wife, my accomplice on this journey, brought it to me as a gift from a trip. It’s still the same fragrance, totally radiant, unique, and sophisticated. Unjustly overlooked in rankings and happily available for anyone wanting something distinctive, exclusive, and energizing. My son, who is only 10 years old, when he thinks he’s done something good and we go out, asks me, knowing he’s crossing a complicated line: ‘Dad, can you put on your Armani perfume?’
I had it hidden and put it on right after showering… with perfumes, it’s like with the design of a dish in a professional kitchen: over time, you understand that expressive raw materials combined with sense yield better results than any bold mixture. This one is solid, pleasant, and retro in my opinion. It makes you feel calm, relaxed, clean, and elegant. In the morning, it was ‘The One Grey,’ luckily it was a sample. Cheers.
Intense, citrusy, spicy, and mature fragrance. It smells like that barbershop lotion they put on you after a clean, fresh shave; not recommended for very young people. Worth mentioning that its longevity on my skin is incredible: today I applied about 6 sprays very early before heading to work, 17 hours have passed, and I can still faintly detect it on the skin. If you’re interested, the batch is from this year, 2020.
I’ve never tried the original Armani and I must say it’s very well done. Despite the current formula, the lemon and bergamot smell incredibly natural, which is impressive for a designer brand. I already owned the sweeter versions like AdG Profumo or Mania, but I unfairly dismissed them until I finally gave this a chance. It’s masculine and exceeded my expectations; in the store, I kept thinking, ‘How haven’t I smelled this before?!’. At 30, I really appreciate it, and maybe one day I’ll buy a vintage bottle without breaking the bank. Lasts about 6-7 hours, half at arm’s length. Scent: 10, Longevity: 6, Sillage: 4, Price: 7. Satisfying: yes, there are still people who know how to value a gentleman with a classy cologne like this. Perfect for a lifetime signature.
The best of Giorgio Armani: without a doubt, Eau Pour Homme is the crown jewel of the brand’s masculine line. It manifests true Italian charm at its peak and keeps the house’s prestige alive. Clean, elegant, stately, with lots of character and personality. This is the marvel composed of bright citrus and green notes; that initial trio of bergamot, mandarin, and basil is splendid. No problem, it enters my top list for people aged 30 to 120. Totally recommended, even more so because it has nothing to envy from any youthful perfume of today.
I’ve never tried the original Armani, and I must say it’s brutally well-made. Despite the current formula, the lemon and bergamot sound super natural, which is impressive for a designer. I used to have sweet ones like AdG Profumo or Mania, but I always looked down on THIS until I gave it a chance. It’s masculine and exceeded my expectations; in the store, I kept thinking: ‘How hadn’t I smelled this before?’ At 30, I appreciate it a lot, and maybe someday I’ll buy a vintage without spending a fortune. Longevity: 6 to 7 hours, half on the skin. Scent: 10, Longevity: 6, Sillage: 4, Price: 7. Satisfying: yes, there are people who still know how to value a gentleman with a classy cologne like THIS. Perfect as a lifelong signature.
It was one of my father’s scents in the previous version; he returned to his usual perfumer and brought this new one. I don’t know if it’s his skin, but to me, it smells exactly like the previous one. I sense a good balance between spices and patchouli.
For the love of God… I tried it at a perfumery in Zacatecas. The saleswoman recommended youthful, fresh, aquatic essences (I’m 19 and had just gotten a haircut and shaved, so I looked like a ‘good kid’). I saw the Armani Pour Homme bottle and asked her to show it to me. She sprayed it on me… I have to repeat it: FOR THE LOVE OF GOD. A classic delight, a noble essence, reminiscent of an equally noble perfumery. It boils down to pleasant citrus (mandarin) and a soft wood (sandalwood). Naturally, green notes will come out, the moss, it’s just a matter of buying it. (I didn’t buy it that time). By the way, this perfume has tremendous class; it smells like a very well-groomed man.
I agree with the last two: it’s a citrusy, herbal, masculine, timeless, very wearable, and non-intrusive fragrance.
You’re right: this Armani Eau Pour Homme smells a lot like Dior Eau Sauvage; I’m not sure I could tell them apart blindfolded. Personally, neither convinces me because I have no preference for fougères or barbershop scents. Olfactorily, the barbershop vibe does hook me: it takes me back to the golden age of the American Way of Life, to those Norman Rockwell-style scenes of optimism. Maybe the reason I don’t fall in love with it is that it’s a fragrance for older men, and I’m only 62. I’ll give it another shot when I’m older.
One of the most solid classics: if you like this style, it’s elegant without being macho or overpowering. The silver cap is subtle, nothing synthetic, and in my opinion, it surpasses Eau de Sauvage. I have the 2013 batch of the new version, and it’s the best of Armani.
Great perfume, a classic jewel that’s hard to find in modern perfumeries. In my country, Argentina, it pops up occasionally on sale, which is how I got it. Very much in the style of the classic Eau Sauvage, it starts with a luminous bergamot that makes the two seem identical at first. This lasts only a few minutes, as the Armani takes a different path, veering toward clove, which gives it a darker character than Dior. Others might say it’s more Italian, and they’d be right too. I wore it during winter in Buenos Aires (bought it a few days ago) and it didn’t stand out; it vanished very quickly, so it’s undoubtedly a spring-summer scent. It will sleep the sleep of the righteous until temperatures get warmer, where I’m sure it will shine a bit more.
A great update of a classic. I haven’t tried the original 1984 version, but I’ve been told it was elegant, a modern alternative to Dior’s Eau Sauvage, with excellent projection and longevity, maintaining a sober and distinguished profile. I don’t know if that’s true, but the 2013 version reminds me quite a bit of the old one. In my opinion, it’s elegant. I like the citrus opening aromatized by a discrete, rounded basil. Within seconds of applying it, I get a feeling of distinguished confidence. The development is also beautiful, with cloves and flowers that aren’t far from a classic base. I’m surprised they respect that old-school integrity, even with current limitations. The only thing that fails is longevity, which is just okay, and projection, which is a bit short. But the price-to-quality ratio is still acceptable. I think it’s an excellent proposal for those who want to step into the adult world with that aura of distinction from the vintage version.
In the 80s, Armani Eau Pour Homme made a triumphant entrance and has since earned its place as a classic in any collection. I was lucky enough to own both bottles, and the difference is negligible; in fact, the new design looks nicer, but the scent hasn’t changed, which is why it has such a loyal following. It has created a connection that endures. It’s a spicy citrus with soapy sensations. It starts with mature citrus, orange, and tangerine, then nutmeg joins in to add warmth and that particular spicy touch, plus a very subtle note of cumin that gives it the perfect dirty edge. In the base, patchouli evokes earth and a soft wood, a mix of sandalwood and cedar. It’s like a walk through the forest, a liquid representation of nature that connects with peace and serenity. A perfume from the old school, a classic that defines the image of a mature, elegant man.
A worthy successor to that aromatic classic: the current version (note: batches prior to 2020 hold up well). If you’re young and hear it and think it sounds outdated, you’re wrong. The 2013 launch is just as citrusy as the original but softer, without that sharp bite. As it evolves, the herbal notes give it a revitalizing vibe; while the old one was a bit soapy and rough, this shines with a metallic touch. The soul is still there, just less intense. It’s good, I like it: it’s been rounded off, polished, greener, and fresher. In short, Eau Pour Homme is the olfactory definition of masculine elegance: striking, discreet, and radiant.
A masterpiece of perfumery. I usually don’t like fougères, but there are exceptions: Oligarch by Roja Dove, Beau de Jour by Tom Ford, and this Armani Eau Pour Homme. It’s a classic due to its age on the market, not because it’s outdated, and it remains relevant. It absolutely crushes Roja Dove’s Scandal. Citrus, herbal, and soapy profile. The opening is already well-rounded thanks to the basil, nothing piercing, and as it dries, that soapy, clean tint emerges. Elegant and manly, in that order. Whoever wears it needs the attitude to match it, like someone lifting Thor’s hammer. Perfume for any age, but only for those who know how to dress elegantly without showing off, naturally and nobly. Only those with that condition wear it with dignity without falling into anachronism. Ideal for any occasion, especially spring and autumn. A perfect signature. Alongside Acqua di Gio Essenza, these are Armani’s two great creations. Test before you buy.
Retro. Sublime.
The previous vintage version is what I wore in my youth—the best designer perfume that ever existed and probably ever will. The current one smells just as good, but it lasts zero seconds. For the price, honestly, it’s not worth it. It’s a shame because, to repeat, it’s the best designer perfume ever created; I don’t know any that even come close.
I picked up a mini Armani collection, and this was one of the 5ml bottles. Honestly, it’s not for me: it smells like a refined old man and Tuanis, which doesn’t suit me being young. The patchouli notes dominate and I just don’t like them. Since it’s an EDT, it doesn’t last or project much, but it’s decent. I feel it’s better for cold weather; if it’s too strong, it can be annoying. I wouldn’t recommend it if you’re under 40.
I bought a mini collection of Giorgio Armani colognes in 5ml bottles, and this was one of them. Honestly, I don’t like the scent; it smells like ‘grandpa,’ but in a refined, dapper way. It’s not something I’d wear since I’m young, and the patchouli really stands out, which I just don’t like. As an Eau de Toilette, it doesn’t last or project much, but it’s decent. I’d say it’s a cold-weather scent because, being a strong aroma, it can be a bit overwhelming. Don’t buy it if you’re under 40.
The tangerine note feels so real! I absolutely love this vintage perfume vibe.
Armani Eau Pour Homme is the modernized version of the 1984 classic, a benchmark of a golden era when dressing up with scent was a whole different ballgame. Sparkling citrus, nutmeg, and lots of oakmoss, all put together without any harsh edges. Smells great, with a subtle yet constant presence that screams cleanliness and good taste. Forget the typical barbershop dry-down; this is genuinely fresh and spicy. It sits in the same lane as Sauvage, Estée Lauder, and Chanel’s Pour Monsieur—all excellent. It’s aimed at men aged 30-35, so younger folks probably won’t get it. As a vintage lover, I recommend it 100%. No wonder it carries the ‘Pour Homme’ name from Armani. JGS