Gabrielle by Chanel
Women 2017
Main accords
Description
Gabrielle by Chanel is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2017, the nose behind this composition is Olivier Polge. The top notes are grapefruit, mandarin, and black currant; the heart notes are orange blossom, jasmine, ylang-ylang, neroli, lily of the valley, pear, and pink pepper; and the base notes are musk, sandalwood, cashmere wood, and iris root.
Show more ↓Quick summary
When to wear it (votes)
- Winter 14%
- Spring 37%
- Summer 24%
- Autumn 26%
- Day 75%
- Night 25%
Key notes
-
Top
grapefruit
-
Heart
orange blossom
- Base musk
Community
7,700 votes
- Positive 68%
- Negative 22%
- Neutral 9.1%
The olfactory pyramid
A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.
The community speaks
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
In the collection
Leading answer I own it
14,809 votes
What do you think?
Leading answer Like it
7,700 votes
Season
Choose severalLeading answer Spring
6,326 votes
Time of day
Choose severalLeading answer Day
3,374 votes
Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.
Fragrance profile
About Gabrielle
Gabrielle by Chanel is a floral fragrance for women. Launched in 2017, the nose behind this composition is Olivier Polge. The top notes are grapefruit, mandarin, and black currant; the heart notes are orange blossom, jasmine, ylang-ylang, neroli, lily of the valley, pear, and pink pepper; and the base notes are musk, sandalwood, cashmere wood, and iris root.
White flowers Flowers Fruits, vegetables and nuts Spices Woods and mosses
It may remind you of
Ranked by what the community voted.
More from Chanel
Related editions
More from Olivier Polge
How it wears
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
Longevity
Leading answer Moderate
3,005 votes
Sillage
Leading answer Moderate
3,456 votes
Character
Leading answer Traditionally feminine
1,768 votes
Value perception
Leading answer Fair price
1,559 votes
You may also like
Community reviews
40 reviews
Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.
It’s a lovely perfume, perfect for work without any issues. I see it as ideal for spring and for women of any age, even those in their fifties. The citrus opening fills you with energy before transitioning into white florals. I’m very sensitive to neroli and can’t stand it, but here it appears very soft alongside the ylang-ylang. The only downside is that it lasts about three hours; after that, it’s barely on the skin.
I tried this beautiful perfume in a store a few days ago. I loved it; it’s feminine, elegant, and powdery. A masterpiece. I’ll be buying it.
The perfume exudes undeniable sophistication. Its intense citrus opening leads the way to a captivating bouquet of white florals; as it settles, it leaves a powdery trail that adds elegance. Ideal for cold climates, it can be a bit overwhelming in warmer settings.
Following the last review, I felt inspired to write about Gabrielle. I have mixed feelings about Mr. Polge (the son); I’m not a fan of his creations except for Spicebomb, though I recognize his merits and how he has positioned himself in this new millennium. My reservations may stem more from my personal tastes. Still, I believe the pressure to create a perfume like Gabrielle must have been immense: combining the name of Mrs. Chanel as a symbol of her person before she became who she was, current tastes, the house’s fame, her individuality, and public expectations seems incredibly difficult. I was reading in an English review how many expectations would be high and hard to meet, and how it would be difficult to explain what Gabrielle (long before becoming Coco) would have worn, considering both that era and today. I’m not sure if I’m overthinking that. I also don’t know if Mr. Polge has met his own expectations, but I do recognize his move away from the mold of his contemporaries, especially regarding sweetness. It seems like a nice fragrance; while not spectacular, it’s very suitable for daily life, work, and casual dates. I also find it quite ‘girly’ (as another review says), but not in a cloying way, rather owning a subtle elegance without pretension. I share the feeling of some people who perceive the grapefruit/raspberry combo so prominently in the foreground that it’s almost hard to get to the white florals (of which I reluctantly recognize the neroli). That said, the projection and longevity aren’t amazing, and I’m not entirely convinced that everything combined is worth the price. It seems like a correct, pleasant, and quite versatile fragrance. It suffers from a high price for what it offers, from my point of view, but with enough financial ease, it’s a good option for daily wear.
The perfume is beautiful but doesn’t last at all.
I was looking for something for daily wear, subtle and elegant for the office. Gabrielle fits the bill, although it didn’t convince me at first: the grapefruit overwhelms me and smells like iris, almost like the No. 5. After a few hours, the magic arrives: those delicate, feminine white florals that make it ideal for wearing all the time. It’s pure glamour, very ‘girly’, with a heart note that reminds me of Jour d’Hermès. It doesn’t shout, it just overflows with class, like an aristocrat having afternoon tea in spring. Try it before buying.
The opening is pure elegance and good taste, worthy of a white silk dress: jasmine, neroli, and roses alongside peach, coconut, raspberries, lemon, bergamot, and pear. A subtle touch of ylang-ylang that catches without being heavy. It’s feminine and, because of me, perhaps too subtle. One of the best fragrances I’ve smelled in decades. But, and I regret it, after two hours on my skin it’s already skin scent. After eight hours it’s still there, but barely perceptible.
At first, it closed in on me with that smell of rancid grapefruit, but then it softened and the notes bloomed. It’s not sweet or fresh; it’s pure Chanel: serious and formal, ideal for the office where you need to maintain decorum. The bad part is that it disappears in two hours like magic; when reapplied, it lasts the same amount of time. It’s capricious and, given its price, lamentable. Maybe it serves for an afternoon tea on cool days, but not for winter. If you’re unsure, try other Chansels: it’s not bad, but it’s expensive for what it offers.
Of all Chanel’s ‘beasts’, this and the No. 5 won me over. The grapefruit gives a flutter to a classic, innocent, sweet but delicate scent, without excesses. You have to try it. However, it can go unnoticed; it doesn’t have the iconic presence of the No. 5, and other perfumes can overshadow it in the same room. It’s gorgeous, but its performance and projection aren’t the most powerful.
I love it, and much more than the Essence. While the other is bold with lots of neroli (which isn’t my strength), here it’s softened, cheerful, and luminous, with a soapy and creamy touch. It doesn’t seem generic; it has its own personality and I’d recognize it on another person. The longevity surprises me: the trail fades, but on the skin it lasts a long time. It’s not meant to overpower or seduce, but to be flirtatious; I imagine a cheerful woman in jeans and a white t-shirt. Ideal for spring or autumn, those days with shy sunshine. Perfect for front-of-house jobs due to its friendliness, although it doesn’t convey authority like Gabrielle does. The only flaw is that lingering ‘newly washed’ scent with a citrus touch and Chanel’s typical pajama smell. Still, I love it and prefer it to the Essence.
Like an expensive wine it enters softly and then reveals itself: subtle luminous and elegant. It’s so comfortable in any season that it becomes addictive. You have to try it to understand. It has everything to be your signature scent or one of the ones you’ll use most. The shower line is gorgeous too: a yellow container full of light a gel that looks like liquid gold and a matte light gold geometric bottle.
Pleasant but generic fragrance. Smells like a fruit salad at a garden party. Key notes: pear blackcurrant mandarin peel grapefruit and a touch of orange blossom. Its sweetness makes it feminine and daytime wear for all year; the white flowers give it depth. It’s a Chanelized J’Ador. I associate it with an adult woman sweet and compassionate perhaps because it’s one of my mother-in-law’s signature scents. I’ve smelled it on her several times: trail and longevity are regular something that annoys me at this price (we know what kind of colognes Chanel has been selling lately). It didn’t impress me enough to buy but I’d use it if someone gifted it to me. Pleasant: 7/10 Interesting: 2/10 Versatile: 7/10 Original: 1/10.
Despite the negative reviews I love it. It’s fresh you can smell the citrus but what I like most is that it carries white flowers without being overwhelming. That subtle rich neroli is exactly what I’m looking for. It included the neroli perfectly: you perceive it without it weighing you down pure harmony.
After reading so many negative reviews I refused to buy it. A year ago I tried it and my god how delicious. It’s a citrus that isn’t as grating and overused as the CM. I tested it in all seasons: with excessive heat (I live next to the beach) it lasts nothing it goes away and you never perceive it again. With cold it stings the throat and is annoying. But on windy days at 60 km/h (dry and fresh weather) or heavy rain it’s enchanting! That’s when I’ve received the best compliments; it becomes powdery with mandarin. I feel it’s more mature and personality-driven than the Essence. At 30 years old in the office it gives me seriousness since gourmands feel a bit too informal for me.
After reading so many good comments I went to the store to try it. Wow citrus doesn’t work for me: either they get too pronounced or they decompose and here both happened. It has acceptable drydown but it feels soapy like an orange ambient air freshener very critical and unpleasant. It has good longevity and trail but I won’t buy it. It’s not for me I’m sticking with Coco Mademoiselle. You don’t buy Chanel blindly; you have to try it.
WHAT A SCENT! I can’t stop buying it and buying it again. Heavily criticized by critics who didn’t know how to appreciate it. It’s sublime. A blend of white flowers citrus and woods worthy of trying. It accompanies me excellently for the first 6 hours; I use it for conferences or business meetings. It makes me feel like I’m carrying the great Gabrielle Chanel with me and pushes me to make good decisions as a woman in a company. It has much more presence than its little brother Essence. I LOVE IT.
I had the opportunity to apply it generously a few days ago (thanks to the salesperson at the perfumerie). It accompanied me all afternoon but only that. It’s a beautiful scent some beautiful wild white flowers growing in a sunny meadow. It’s elegant and exquisite however for the price the longevity leaves a lot to be desired. What’s happening today with perfumery that new fragrances seem to lose strength more and more? Now they seem like EDPs are the new colognes. If it didn’t cost what it costs I’d buy it to bathe in its scent on a hot summer day with a white dress. But since it costs what it costs I’ll have to settle for wanting it.
Despite the many negative reviews for me it’s a marvel. It’s a delicate and extremely fine floral. The fixation for a perfume water could be better. Anyway I don’t regret having it in my collection. I give it an 8/10.
It’s a super easy super friendly very likable fragrance. It’s the painting that mimics Sorolla warm and luminous which looks good in any place. It’s the box-office family movie that everyone likes because it’s harmless and graceful. It’s that Vivaldi Four Seasons record that inhabits all homes and is always a safe gift. It’s a good perfume but the question is: reaching the bearing and personality necessary to occupy that unique place that previous Chanel creations have: Coco Cristalle Egoiste Allure…? The answer is no.
I just got to know this scent and as soon as I heard it I was transported to a dawn in the countryside where it just rained or is raining and I needed something like that. It smells like something herbal so feminine and subtle.
It really kicks my butt because it smells like Jour d’Hermès but with more sweetness. These are two I wear non-stop in the summer. For me, the sun, the sea, citrus, and white flowers define that season.
I love it; I’m one of its few fans despite the criticism. It reacted well with my skin and lasts about 5 hours with moderate sillage, though I reapply if needed. It smells peculiar: citrus with an elegant touch of white flowers. I’m tempted to try the Essence, but I’m glad Chanel isn’t replacing it. It’s for those who don’t want the massive sweet and candy-shop scent. If you feel the same, try it on your skin.
What a shame! I didn’t buy it, but they showed it to me a few days ago. I prefer Chanel No. 5 or Coco Mademoiselle… Greetings from Mexico.
Normally, Chanel fragrances don’t go with me, and I don’t notice the notes, but this was an exception. The fresh, clean floral harmony I loved when they showed it to me, even replacing my usual perfume. I detected delicate neroli, ylang-ylang, jasmine, fresh roses, and sandalwood, though not the citrus. The demonstrator said it was Gabrielle, and it seemed odd that it was paying homage to the founder, but the perfumer said it was inspired by the lady. Highly recommended: it lasted all day and has good sillage. Ideal for flower lovers without pretensions.
Gabrielle is being badly treated by critics, probably due to the high expectations of being a Chanel. For me, it’s good: it starts fresh and innocent, then the flowers, especially jasmine and orange blossom, take over giving it a youthful, carefree touch. As it blends, it stops being innocent to become delicate but with character. My only gripe is the price, which is very high, and the longevity is short, around 4-6 hours. If you see it just as a fragrance, it smells good and delivers, but the price is for the brand, not the quality. What a shame.
I don’t know why people complain so much; I absolutely love it 😍😍😍.
Chanel broke into commercial luxury with aldehydes—No 5 shouldn’t be forever. In the 80s they launched the dense, spiced Coco, and flankers shouldn’t be forever either. In the 90s they made a powdery, fruity oriental, which also shouldn’t be forever. We’re used to launching dense, sweet scents like there’s no limit… from Shakira to YSL. It doesn’t smell like flowers like Chance Eau Tendre; it’s a suggestion of vegetal elements: honey, pollen, green leaves, spicy seeds, breeze, and sun. It’s not a static bouquet; it’s a manicured park in summer or an overgrown garden with trees, herbs, and weeds. It shocks me that they’re launching sweet, greedy flankers just to play it safe. This came out at the peak of fruitcholi, and many were baffled because it doesn’t smell like Coco, Allure, or No 5. I love it; it’s a fresh breeze that doesn’t smell like soap among the clones.
The actress with the androgynous face didn’t catch my attention. What did stand out was the sprays in the modules: refreshing citrus notes, followed by fragrant flowers that filled the space. I asked to try it on skin, and it was a long-lasting scent that soaked into my vinyl clothes until the next day. No elegance, just a touch of the house, leaving me overwhelmed by artificiality.
Chanel used to say a woman should never smell like flowers, as if a bouquet were vulgar. And this perfume is exactly that: warm flowers, nothing more. The bottle is beautiful and excessively delicate, but the neroli and jasmine are boring. Kristen’s campaign doesn’t help at all. Too rebellious but without class… Ugh, getting worse and worse.
I don’t like it. It smells acidic; I don’t know how to explain it. Neither here nor there.