Skip to content

Wish by Chopard

Women 1997

Brand
Chopard

Description

Wish by Chopard is an oriental vanilla fragrance for women. Launched in 1997, the nose behind this composition is Nathalie Lorson. The top notes unfold with coconut, strawberry, blackcurrant, black acacia, pear, blackcurrants, Brazilian rosewood, honeysuckle, yuzu, and orange blossom; the heart reveals honey, milk, orchid, heliotrope, violet, osmanthus, magnolia, jasmine, and valley lily; while the base notes land on…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 48%
  • Spring 13%
  • Summer 7.2%
  • Autumn 32%
  • Day 45%
  • Night 55%

Key notes

Community

5,757 votes

  • Positive 70%
  • Negative 24%
  • Neutral 6.3%
positive reviews 5.8 k community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageModerate Best momentWinter CharacterFeminine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

14,321 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Winter

4,312 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

3,009 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Wish

Main accord sweet Year 1997 Gender Women Perfumer Nathalie Lorson

Wish by Chopard is an oriental vanilla fragrance for women. Launched in 1997, the nose behind this composition is Nathalie Lorson. The top notes unfold with coconut, strawberry, blackcurrant, black acacia, pear, blackcurrants, Brazilian rosewood, honeysuckle, yuzu, and orange blossom; the heart reveals honey, milk, orchid, heliotrope, violet, osmanthus, magnolia, jasmine, and valley lily; while the base notes land on caramel, vanilla, patchouli, tonka, incense, sandalwood, amber, and tonka bean.

Fruits, vegetables and nuts White flowers Woods and mosses Sweet and gourmand Musk, amber and animalic Flowers Spices

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

2,062 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

2,233 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally feminine

921 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

843 votes

Community reviews

20 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. It instantly transported me back to Angel; if you like one, you’ll absolutely love this other one.

    Reply
  2. Thaiss🌷

    I own it but it’s not really for me; it smells like milk with a hint of honey, incense, and patchouli. My mom likes it more, but even she isn’t crazy about it because of that incense note. Longevity: good, about 6 hours. Sillage: moderate.

    Reply
  3. Thaiss🌷

    I own it, but it doesn’t suit me much. It smells like milk with a hint of honey, incense, and patchouli. My mom likes it more, though she’s still not fully convinced by that incense note. The longevity is good, around 6 hours, with moderate projection.

    Reply
  4. Fragrantica needs to recheck the notes; this scent, which used to be delicious, has been absolutely ruined. They stripped away all its sweet elegance; now it’s a green, swampy, acidic, soapy, sharp scent that reminds me of old Avon fragrances. It’s not worth a penny.

    Reply
  5. FRAGRANTICA needs to check the notes; this scent, which was once delicious, has been destroyed in the worst way possible; they left nothing, absolutely nothing of its elegant sweetness. What’s in its place now is a swampy green liquid, acidic and soapy, sharp; strangely, it reminds me a lot of some old AVON fragrances; it’s absolutely not worth it.

    Reply
  6. A total delight. The opening is sweet, with noticeable caramel, milk, and my headspace goes straight to marshmallows and cotton candy. After 5 hours, I’m getting honey, milk, strawberry, and coconut. Delicious. Longevity exceeds 6 hours.

    Reply
  7. Andy.Skam

    I bought it blind, hoping to get its gorgeous bottle and figure out why, being a Chopard, it was so much cheaper than the brand’s other fragrances. It’s true that regarding longevity and sillage, it’s more of an EDT than an EDP, but in my case, its combination of notes results in a delicious, cozy mist that invites closeness. I’m not addicted to gourmand perfumes, but this one fascinates me—not so much for winter, but for autumn and cold springs. I’ve received many compliments, especially from men, more than with more intense or famous perfumes. On my skin it lasts at most 4 hours, but given the value I paid (less than $20 for 75 ml), I happily reapply.

    Reply
  8. Andy.Skam

    I bought it blind, eager to own its beautiful bottle and understand why, being by Chopard, it was so cheap compared to the rest of the brand. It’s true that regarding longevity and sillage, it’s more of an EDT than an EDP, but for me, the combination of notes creates a delicious, cozy mist that invites closeness. I’m not addicted to gourmands, but this fascinates me; it’s ideal for autumn and cold springs. I’ve received many compliments, especially from men, more so than with more intense or famous perfumes. On dry skin, it lasts about 4 hours, but at the ridiculous price I paid (less than $20 for 75 ml), I happily reapply.

    Reply
  9. I bought it blind (we addicts love that risk, haha) for its attractive notes and because of the similarity to Angel and Lolita Lempicka, my favorites, and they were right: it has that powdery, sweet style I love, enveloping and mysterious without being explicit. It’s closer to Angel but more subtle and doesn’t last as long (not that it’s bad) as Lolita, which emphasizes the violets and cherry more (I’m talking about the old version; the latest one disappoints) and also lasted longer. On Wish, the vanilla adds sweetness but isn’t the main note; it’s balanced, just giving a touch without overpowering. If you’re looking for a gourmand but softer, Wish might be for you, because it smells clean without being soapy or citrusy. The bottle is gorgeous. At first, I thought it lasted 3 hours, but then I realized it does, especially on clothes where it lingers for days, though it doesn’t have a huge sillage or is invasive. It’s a great alternative to Mugler’s Angel for a ridiculous price. In the opening, I sense shy strawberries, something soft and citrusy, maybe yuzu (for me, it’s like a sweet lime without acidity) and flowers. After 5 minutes, the powdery aroma of heliotrope, violets, creamy milk, and nectar sweetness with vanilla appears. As it dries down, it leaves caramelized sweetness, vanilla, talc, and sandalwood holding it together. I feel like it has many declared notes and I struggle to identify them. It’s not a very current scent, but I like the feeling it gives.

    Reply
  10. I bought it blind (we addicts love that risk, haha) because I saw its appealing notes and they mentioned similarities to Angel and Lolita Lempicka, two of my favorites, and they were right: it’s that powdery, sweet style I love, one that envelops and has that non-traditional mystery and sensuality. It’s more similar to Angel but subtler and with less longevity (not bad) than Lolita, which has more marked florals like violets and fruits like cherry (I’m talking about the old Lolita; the latest version feels lacking) and also had greater longevity. In Wish, the vanilla adds sweetness but isn’t the standout note, so I feel it’s balanced; it gives a little touch rather than a piercing invasion. If you like gourmand fragrances but want something softer, maybe Wish is for you, because I also sense a clean aroma without being soapy or fresh citrusy. Separate mention to its bottle; it’s gorgeous. The first few times I used it, I felt it didn’t last more than 3 hours, but in later uses I realized it’s there, even if I don’t smell it much, especially if applied on clothes where it stays impregnated for days, though it’s not a perfume with a huge, invasive sillage. It’s a good alternative to Mugler’s Angel because it’s ridiculously cheap for its quality. In the opening, I sense timid strawberries, something slightly citrusy but not strong, maybe yuzu (I don’t know that fruit); to me it’s like a sweet lime (the non-acidic kind) and flowers. After 5 minutes, that powdery floral aroma of heliotrope, violets, creaminess (probably from milk), and sweetness appears, but not honey-like, more like floral nectar with vanilla. As it dries down, the caramelized sweetness, vanilla, talc, and sandalwood woods remain, holding everything in the base. I feel it has many declared notes, but I struggle to identify them on my skin. I also feel it’s not a very current scent, but I like the feeling it produces.

    Reply
  11. The opening is strong, lots of alcohol, and it smells almost identical to Lolita Lempicka; it’s a bad copy of that perfume.

    Reply
  12. wildkatzen

    Exquisite! The bottle is a stunning diamond-like shape with a liquid that changes color depending on the light, neither sky blue nor dark green, but a shifting hue. A luxury made into a scent, like a fine rich dessert for fresh or cold days. It has reminiscences of Mugler’s Angel but with more European fruits and sweet notes. Wow, an endless array of pleasant sensations. You’ll enjoy its trail and drive many men crazy.

    Reply
  13. I was really eager to try it, but it left me cold. The opening is awful, at least on my skin. The heart does let the honey and muguet show, a note I appreciate. I don’t find it as sweet as people say, so I have better florals. Once it settles, I like it more. I won’t be buying it again and will use it up this winter.

    Reply
  14. It reminds me of Mugler’s Angel; they almost seem like the same fragrance, but Chopard has slightly inferior longevity on the skin.

    Reply
  15. Never tried or seen it before. Years ago I placed a blind order and it came out wrong, including this one. I was expecting something sweeter, but it just doesn’t work on my skin. Still not sure if I’ll give it another chance or just gift it away.

    Reply
  16. I used this back in 2000 and couldn’t identify the notes that lingered on my skin. It started very fresh, then had lots of scattered notes, but the intensity faded quickly; after just a few hours, it was gone. I like feeling the scent trail, not having to ask if it’s still there. Never wore it again, I think I even gifted the rest.

    Reply
  17. I have a love-hate relationship with this perfume. I smelled it in Aachen about 20 years ago; it was a gift from a Russian colleague, an elegant beauty. The scent knocked me out, not in a good way. I tried giving it a chance, but at the time I was more into DKNY for day and Gucci Rush for night. Wish didn’t catch me at my best, and I never found its place; maybe it’s my skin’s acidity, as some scents smell sour and unbearable on me. In the end, I gifted it to my mother, and then I loved it with all my heart because on her skin it was a whole different story: sweet and clean, a scent that tempts you to get closer and keep it near. I recently found it online; it’s hard to get, so I gifted it again. Smelling it on her again was a flood of memories. I rubbed my wrist, and maybe with age my nose is seeking deeper, rounder, heavier fragrances. This time it almost convinced me to keep it… but no, I preferred to let it remain her scent, not mine, remembering it as such. It shares similarities with Angel, though much lighter; I really wish I could wear Angel, but it’s just too much for me.

    Reply
  18. Sweet, aromatic, and balsamic all at once. The opening can be intense; you have to let it settle. Then it leaves a pleasant aroma that blends beautifully with the skin. Some people say it reminds them of Angel; it can resemble it, but it’s less intrusive.

    Reply
  19. the churumbel

    Very pretty, but for my taste it stays very close to the skin; I have to hunt for it. Honestly, Chopard left Wish wanting: sweet and vanilla-infused, refined, but too weak for me. If you like very discreet perfumes, this is for you. P.S.: It doesn’t last long either; an hour and it’s gone.

    Reply