Men
Soir de Lune
Acordes principales
Descripción
Soir de Lune by Sisley is a floral chypre fragrance for women. Launched in 2006, the nose behind this composition is Dominique Ropion. The top notes unfold with coriander, pepper oil, nutmeg, bergamot, lemon, and mandarin. The heart reveals a harmony of May rose, mimosa, iris, jasmine, valley lily, and peach. The base settles on honey, oakmoss, patchouli, musk, and sandalwood.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Soir de Lune y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
38 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
For people who like it, they’re incredibly lucky; the longevity is amazing. For me, it’s overwhelming and reminds me of men’s fragrances. On top of that, it’s ridiculously expensive.
It’s horrible. My mother uses it and she loves it. Every time I smell it, I break down. It smells like stale tobacco.
It’s terrible. My mom uses it and she loves it, but every time I smell it, I get sick. It smells like stale tobacco.
With this perfume, it seems they tried to emulate Eau du Soir’s composition, but perhaps made it sweeter, more floral, and accessible to a wider audience. Personally, I don’t like it; it feels like just that—an attempt. It smells like those dried flowers and leaves, painted and perfumed, placed in a bowl to scent the living room, the potpourri. But where did the rest go? Where is the mystery and darkness? It’s a good perfume, but for me, it’s almost unbearable due to how sweet it is. The bottle could not be more beautiful, but unfortunately, the fragrance seems to let it down.
With this perfume, it seems they tried to emulate Eau du Soir but make it sweeter, floral, and closer to an older audience. But personally, I don’t like it; it seems to me just that, an attempt. It smells like those dried flowers and leaves, painted and perfumed, placed in a bowl to scent the living room, potpourri. Where did the rest go? Where is the mystery and darkness? It’s a good perfume, but for me, it’s almost unbearable because of how sweet it is. The bottle could not be more beautiful, but unfortunately, the fragrance does it a disservice.
My mother’s perfume. Intense and different. A floral chypre that stands out for using real natural essences. Sisley crafts them by hand, and it shows in the price, but it’s worth paying more for an elite perfume. The rose, the fetish flower of traditional French perfumery, is very natural, and the mimosa gives it a romantic aura. The fixative and projection are excellent, hard to find in commercial perfumery. It has class and looks perfect on confident, elegant women, even for a gala. It’s sweeter than Eau de Soir due to the honey note, giving it a romantic, dreamy touch. Masterpiece.
My mother’s perfume. Intense and unique. A floral chypre that stands out for its natural essences, which are clearly noticeable. In fact, Sisley uses naturally crafted essences. You can tell by the price, but it’s worth paying a bit more for an elite fragrance. The rose shines through, the fetish flower of French perfumery tradition. Very natural, and the mimosa adds a romantic aura. The longevity and sillage are excellent, hard to find in commercial perfumeries. It has class and suits confident women with an elegant style, even for a gala. It’s sweeter than Eau de Soir (due to the honey note), giving it a romantic, dreamy touch. Masterful.
Beautiful. It smells like silk muslin or velvet, with all the textures of these fabrics. It’s rough yet velvety, dry but with a hint of sweetness. The word ‘sweet’ doesn’t quite define it; it would be a sweetness of mimosa and macerated honey, like a medicinal balm, an aged and almost stewed sweetness. Testing Sisley’s insignia scents is like remembering those times when designer launches smelled of luxury, expensive, and excellence. The key note is a crisp, fresh rose boosted by the dry, ruthless tone of oakmoss; however, it doesn’t shine alone like in Soir d’Orient, which is more ammoniacal; here it’s hinted at, felt, but first complemented as a slap of haughtiness by the moss and then by warmth from the honey. Coriander gives it a slightly aromatic, raw, and spicy touch that I don’t like at all; I suppose it’s the note that makes me, while appreciating how beautiful Soir de Lune is, not want it for myself. Absolutely unisex, with excellent longevity and sillage; it makes many ‘niche’ perfumes from artistic houses with storied names look pale, which proliferate like mushrooms and sell at similar prices. Soir de Lune is expensive, but it’s worth it.
Beautiful. It smells like silk muslin or velvet, with all the edges of these fabrics. It’s rough yet velvety, dry yet with a sweet spot. Not even the word sweet defines it well; it would be more like a sweetness of macerated mimosa and honey, like a medicinal balm, an aged sweetness, almost stewed. Trying Sisley’s insignia is like remembering times when any designer launch smelled of luxury and excellence. The key note is a crisp, fresh rose boosted by the dry, ruthless tone of oakmoss; here it doesn’t shine alone as it does in Soir d’Orient, which is more ammoniacal; here it’s intuited and felt, complemented first as a slap of haughtiness by the moss and then by warmth from the honey. Coriander gives it an aromatic, raw, and spicy touch that I don’t like at all; I suppose it’s the note that makes me, while appreciating how beautiful Soir de Lune is, not want it for myself. Absolutely unisex, with excellent longevity and sillage; it makes many “niche” perfumes from artistic houses that proliferate like mushrooms at similar prices look pale. Soir de Lune is expensive, but it’s worth it.
It’s dry, fresh, floral, and earthy—a sweet scent that isn’t sweet, strange? Haha, yes, it is… Longevity and projection are excellent, very delicious.
I have a question; I was about to buy it but hesitated to see if it was reformulated. A few months ago I tested Eau du Soir and noticed the oakmoss wasn’t the same anymore, and some ingredient had become very sour and synthetic, like most mossy fragrances… I think I’ll go with another Soir de Lune unless I read that their oakmoss has changed.
I went back to the counter to test it on skin: it hasn’t changed at all. Maybe it seemed lighter due to the sales associate’s spray, but tomorrow it’s 40% off. Since it hasn’t changed, plus the huge discount, and because I’m tired of searching for a good chypre like the ones from before. I’ve been loyal to Montana for 15 years. Aromatics Elixirs suits me well towards the end of the day; it just starts sour until it dries down, soapy and powdery. Perles de Lalique has that effect for the first few hours, but then it turns oriental. While I search for my perfect chypre, I’ll stick with Soir de Lune, even if it’s not quite as dry or soapy…
Beautiful Cyprus, floral and dry with that earthy dry-down that is pure delight. It has a soapy air, reminiscent of old talcum powder. A masterpiece.
I had to try it, so off I went. If I had to describe it with one word, it would be LUXURY, it clearly shows there is class and many euros. To me, it smells like a royal palace. In my humble opinion, the “problem” with this perfume is that the target isn’t young women. To wear this perfume, you must have lived a lot, traveled a lot, experienced a lot, and above all, have a lot of wisdom to truly appreciate what it is. I don’t see myself wearing it, but if I see my mother with her elegance and savoir-vivre, I thought maybe I could buy it for her, that she uses half the bottle and leaves the other half for me in a couple of decades. EDIT: 11 hours have passed since application, up close I perceive a wonderful honeyed and fresh mist at the same time, crazy. No perfume lasts this long on my skin; definitely this jewel has to enter my family.
After doing an approximate calculation of what I’ve spent on cheap fragrances this year, I concluded that with that money I could have bought something of much higher quality, so I went for the fragrance that fell in love with me two years ago, Pluriel Féminin by Maison Francis Kurkdjian. Even knowing the fragrance, I decided to spray it all over my arm just in case and run out of the perfumery to avoid an impulse purchase. It still seems like a very beautiful fragrance, but it no longer makes my heart race like it did the first time I smelled it, when my sense of smell was much less trained than it is today. Yesterday I went back to the perfumery and wanted to try Soir de Lune, I’d never smelled it before, and although Eau de Campagne and Eau de Soir seem like two great perfumes to me, I don’t see them for me. Eau de Soir ends up overwhelming me, and I’ve smelled fragrances similar to Eau de Campagne that I liked more. Well, I sprayed Soir de Lune and look, I almost cried. So much beauty, what a treasure, so well-made and so “me.” I didn’t know what its olfactory notes were, I hadn’t read them beforehand, but I could distinguish the rose full of nuances, the honey, the peach, the moss… all complex, elegant, luxurious, of exquisite taste. Now, reading the notes, I understand: it has all the ones I like, but all, all, come on. If I had to ask someone to make a perfume from scratch for me, suitable to my tastes, it would be Soir de Lune. The last time I fell in love with a fragrance was with Panthère de Cartier, which I adore and which can’t be compared to Soir de Lune because they have nothing to do with each other, but the latter has stolen my heart in a way that I lack words for. (I’m very intense today, sorry). You’re coming with me home, beauty.
The few reviews this perfume has here must be symptomatic of the current lack of popularity of chypres and their appreciation by connoisseurs, like those who have described the spirit of SdL here very well. What else to add? It’s a fairly recent chypre with a classic spirit. For me, it was the gateway to this olfactory family. I was seduced by the distant sweetness and yet mossy quality. It’s very autumnal. It has something sad, deep, contained, and solemn. And at the same time, it’s a song to life that seems to wither with the arrival of the cold. In humid and warm climates, it sounds sweeter, less dry, you feel more patchouli, even cloying. I’d dare to characterize it as the younger sister of Knowing or Paloma Picasso, with more honey, rose, and jasmine. For me, autumn has started today, and this has been the best perfume to start (perhaps, excepting the old Samsara). The sun is getting lower, the air fresher. The lightness of summer is over, and it’s time to balance the year, a contemplative mood, a bittersweet happiness for the year ending and the wait for life to be reborn in a few months. Yes, SdL is solemn (and yet has the necessary ease) and isn’t for everyone. I don’t want to go into details about my personal life and struggles, but I think I’m at the point of wearing it. An image for this perfume could be a winter or autumn landscape by Brueghel, with its distant viewpoint on the prosaic vicissitudes of the world, without losing the love for them and for the little things.
After calculating how much I’ve spent on cheap fragrances this year, I realized I could have bought something of much higher quality with that money, so I went for the scent that made me fall in love two years ago: Pluriel Féminin by Maison Francis Kurkdjian. Even knowing what it smells like, I sprayed it on my arm just in case and ran out of the perfumery to avoid an impulse buy. It still seems like a beautiful fragrance, but it doesn’t make my heart race like it did the first time I smelled it, when my sense of smell wasn’t as trained as it is today. Yesterday, I went back to the perfumery and wanted to try Soir de Lune; I’d never smelled it before. While Eau de Campagne and Eau de Soir seem like amazing scents, they don’t feel right for me. Eau de Soir ends up overwhelming me, and I’ve smelled similar fragrances to Eau de Campagne that I liked more. Anyway, I sprayed Soir de Lune, and look, I almost cried. What absolute beauty, how exquisite, how well-crafted, and how ‘me.’ I didn’t know its notes beforehand, but I could distinguish the nuanced rose, the honey, the peach, the moss… all complex, elegant, luxurious, with exquisite taste. Now, after reading the notes, it makes sense: it has all the notes I love, but all of them, every single one. If I had to ask someone to create a fragrance from scratch for me, suited to my tastes, it would be Soir de Lune. The last time I fell in love with a fragrance was with Panthère by Cartier, which I adore and can’t compare to Soir de Lune because they’re completely different, but the latter has stolen my heart in a way that leaves me speechless. (I’m feeling extra today, sorry about that). Come home with me, beauty.
The few reviews this has here must be symptomatic of the current lack of popularity of chypres and their appreciation by connoisseurs, like those who have described the spirit of SdL very well. What more can I add! It’s a recent chypre with a classic spirit, my gateway into this olfactory family. I was seduced by the distant yet mossy sweetness. It’s very autumnal. It has something sad, deep, contained, and solemn, yet it’s also a song to life that seems to wither with the cold. In humid and warm climates, it sounds sweeter, less dry; you feel more patchouli, even cloying. I’d dare say it’s the little sister of Knowing or Paloma Picasso, with more honey, rose, and jasmine. For me, autumn has started today, and this has been the best perfume to begin (perhaps, excepting the old Samsara). The sun sets, the air cools. The lightness of summer is over, and it’s time to take stock, a contemplative mood, a bittersweet happiness for the year ending and the wait for life to be reborn. Yes, SdL is solemn (yet at the same time spirited) and not for everyone. I don’t want to get into my personal life, but I think I’m at the point of wearing it. An image for this perfume would be a winter or autumnal landscape by Brueghel, with a distant viewpoint on the prosaic vicissitudes of the world, without losing the love for them and for the small things.
A beauty, that’s this perfume. It’s hard for a Sisley perfume to be bad; usually, you think it’s good but it doesn’t work for me. This perfume I’ve liked a lot, it has many notes; the ones I perceive most are rose, mimosa, iris, lily, and jasmine, all with a hint of honey. It’s elegant, divine, you smell like a rich woman. Its price is somewhat exclusive, but if you see it on sale or promotion, don’t hesitate. In my country, there are no discounts in perfumeries, so I suffer with little hope; I haven’t seen 50ml or 30ml sizes either. Just one spray served me to perceive it for hours, it has good fixation and sillage. Scent 10/10, Sillage 10/10, Longevity 10/10 (5-8h).
If I had to explain to someone what a chypre perfume is, I’d do it through this scent. I’d include Panthère de Cartier, Eau du Soir, and maybe Aromatics Elixir, although the first two are pure intensity and the latter is more aromatic. Soir de Lune is a pure chypre, accessible and luminous for daily wear, with its moss, earth, patchouli, and a touch of honey that softens everything. It has something nostalgic for me, as if in the 90s I’d met someone with a similar perfume, I think a salesperson in a store I liked. It’s very possible that’s the case because women with taste, style, and class know how to appreciate this particular family.
First time writing here. I’ve been using this forum as my bible for over 10 years before buying any perfume. I started with the 90s classics: Perry Ellis, Clinique, Moschino… then I tried J’adore, which made me gag, until I discovered Chanel Chance, with which I got married the first time because it made me feel refined. Later I tried Gucci (which don’t last at all), Escada (which earn me lots of compliments), Hermès, and Cartier (which leave others wondering what I’m wearing). I also tried Angel, the original and Nova; I almost bought the refill system to keep it at home, but in the end, I got bored of everything. During the lockdown, I bought several things blind just for the pleasure of it: Miu Miu, La Belle by JPG, and Born in Roma by Valentino. Thank God they were 30ml to use and throw away. That’s when I started reading about Sisley and went to try it on my skin because the reviews intrigued me. I put Soir d’Orient on one wrist and Soir de Lune on the other. My first reaction was pure disgust, just like when I bought Chanel No. 5 or YSL’s Rive Gauche; that feeling of having put on a grandmother’s perfume. Thank goodness I didn’t spend 70 euros. I kept buying things in the store, went out to the city center, and came home convinced that Sisley, no. But more than an hour later, a scent began to arrive that intrigued me, something very refined, like a high-society lady I’d never dare ask what perfume she uses, a queen. It was like a bouquet of flowers that changed every time I brought my nose closer. I don’t remember exactly which one it was because I was in a rush and the caps seemed identical, but I knew the right side was Soir d’Orient because of the incense that came through. And here I am, testifying to a before and after. I struggled for almost two months convincing myself that it wasn’t for me, that I’d surely hate it, and that these aren’t modern scents. But my 41 years and my current life confirm that yes, Soir de Lune arrived at the right moment. I am that lady and that queen who deserves to smell this refined, without having to signal my husband to buy it for me, because I simply can’t wait. The only thing I regret is having drawers full of perfumes that say nothing to me and don’t make me feel this exclusive and ladylike. My next purchase will be Soir d’Orient.
This is my first review. The forum has been my reference manual for over 10 years, which I take this opportunity to thank… I’ve consulted all my perfumes before buying them. My foray into the world of perfumes began over 20 years ago; I remember my first purchases were Perry Ellis 360, Clinique Happy, Moschino Cheap and Chic… Then I tried J’adore and it repelled me… I discovered Chanel Chance… wearing that perfume I got married for the first time, it made me feel so refined… Then I went through Gucci (which don’t last), Escada (which earn many compliments), Hermès (which also don’t last as much as I’d like), Cartier (which leave others wondering what perfume you’re wearing), Angel (the original and the one from last year, the NOVA, for which I almost bought the refill machine to keep at home) and… I got bored. Of all of them. During the lockdown, I bought several blind, just to treat myself. Miu Miu, La Belle de JPG, Born in Roma by Valentino. Thank God they were all 30ml to use and throw away. And I started reading about Sisley. I went to try it on my skin because the reviews intrigued me. On one wrist Soir d’Orient and on the other Soir de Lune. My first reaction was disgust. I felt as disappointed as when I bought Chanel No. 5 or YSL Rive Gauche, that feeling of putting on a grandmother’s perfume. And I thanked myself for not spending 70 euros. I continued shopping in the perfumery, went to the mall, and arrived home with the firm conviction that Sisley, no… Until well past an hour, a scent started reaching me that intrigued me, something very fine, of a high-society lady I’d never dare ask what perfume she uses, of a queen. It was like a bouquet of flowers that changed every time I brought my nose closer to my wrist. I couldn’t remember if I’d put on Eau de Soir or Soir de Lune because I was in a rush and the caps seemed so similar I couldn’t recall clearly. I knew I’d put Soir d’Orient on the right side because the incense reaching me confirmed it. And here it is, testifying to a before and after in my life. I flirted with Sisley for almost two months, trying to convince myself it wasn’t for me, that I’d surely hate it if I bought it, that they aren’t modern scents. But my 41 years and my current life confirm that yes, Soir de Lune arrived at me at the right moment. Where I am for myself that lady and that queen who deserves to smell this fine, who won’t try to signal my husband to gift it to me, because I simply can’t wait. The only thing I regret is having drawers full of perfumes that say nothing to me, that don’t make me feel this exclusive, refined, and so ladylike. My next acquisition will be Soir d’Orient.
Sisley: good products but overpriced. In Argentina, the 100ml bottle is close to 300 euros. Is it worth it? In my case, no. The fragrance is fine and retro; it can be a bit monotonous, lacking that modern touch. The essences are pure and clear. Longevity is moderate. It evokes the tranquility of a solitary garden, where old roses settle. There are far more delicious fragrances at a reasonable price on the shelves. In Sisley’s case, the prices denote the quality of the product and also the importer’s caprice to keep them sky-high. Treatment prices are unheard of and far from La Prairie or even Dior.
What a marvel this is! They left me this vial this afternoon, and the moment I smelled it, I knew it was special. I need to write this while the scent is still on my wrist. What a smell! White, fleshy floral, citrus with evocative talc, intoxicating mimosa rose, a sublime composition. It’s at the pinnacle of good taste and refinement. It can be sweet without being cloying, clean and soapy, yet with a dirty, carnal, slightly acidic touch that softens with the flow of honey. It’s as if they bottled the sweat of the most beautiful woman in the world.
What a marvel this is! I sprayed this delight from a vial left to me this afternoon, and the moment I smelled it, I knew it was special. I need to write this while the scent is still on my wrist. What a scent! Meaty white floral, evocative talc-infused citrus, intoxicating mimosa rose, a sublime composition. It’s at the pinnacle of good taste and refinement. Without being sweet, it can be sweet, clean and soapy, yet with a slightly acidic, carnal dirty touch that softens with the flow of honey. It’s as if they bottled the sweat of the most beautiful woman in the world.
This perfume deserves its name: Moonlight Night, though it could just as well be called Moon Spell. It’s complex, elegant, nocturnal, enveloping, sensual, and mysterious. The longevity and sillage are extraordinary. In my opinion, it’s my favorite from Sisley. It can be worn any time of year, but only in the afternoon or evening.
Definitely not for me, though I admit it’s a great perfume with noble materials. To me, it smells very opulent and reminds me a lot of its sister, Eau de Soir, which I have the same issue with. I stick with Izia from the same house, which is much more sparkly.
90s wedding, this is what your aunt smells like, the one who was overdressed, who looked more like a parrot than anything else. Exactly. And compared to what I consider a horror of her family, Eau du Soir, this Lune is “a bit” more friendly, but it still doesn’t tempt me. I strained my brain to understand why this mythical perfume is so valued and has such prices, because it seems to me a flat, talcum-powdered average that I’ve smelled three hundred times from three hundred different angles. By its beautiful name and bottle, I imagined something else. At first, it tells me nothing. Now, in its mid-phase, it brings a slightly more interesting breeze, but not enough. Again, I feel confused by the well-meaning reviews that label it elegant, opulent, and luxurious. Honestly, I’d love to experience that same thing, but there’s no way to appreciate this Sisley. It feels boring and lordly with that invented rose and that hyper-polished San Francisco Farm honey that sometimes comes out of it, nothing carnal, more like cubalibre caramel. I feel its death will be more beautiful; something tells me it might be a scent appreciated over time and after a few hours, but for now, Soir de Lune and I are not colleagues.
90s wedding, this is what your aunt smells like, the one who was over-dressed, who looked more like a parrot than anything else. Exactly. And compared to Eau du Soir, which is a nightmare for me, this Lune is ‘a little’ friendlier, but it still doesn’t tempt me. I strained my brain to understand why this mythical perfume has such a price and value, because it seems like a flat, talc-covered surface I’ve smelled three hundred times from three hundred angles. By the name and bottle, I imagined something else. At first, it says nothing to me. Now in the dry-down, there’s some interesting breeze, but not enough. Again, I feel confused by reviews calling it elegant, opulent, and luxurious. Truly, I’d like to feel that, but there’s no way to appreciate this Sisley. It feels boring and aristocratic, with that invented rose and that ultra-polished San Francisco Farm honey, nothing carnal, more like cubalibre caramel. I feel its death will be more beautiful; perhaps it’s a scent appreciated over time, but for now, Soir de Lune and I are not colleagues.
What can you say about this marvel? A magical potion, an enchantment, a spell under the moonlight. On me, it smells of honey and opulence. Of old roses, of a 1940s movie diva, of luxury. And it lasts… Better in cold climates and formal occasions, though I must confess I often wear it just for myself. It’s so beautiful and so well-made. A true work of art.
One cannot deny the quality of Sisley, and that includes its fragrances. Soir de Lune screams refinement, with baroque flashes, a masterpiece by Dominique Ropion that’s quite underrated, but that doesn’t stop us who love it; diamonds are always diamonds, even if many don’t see them. One of the best chypres today with touches of the past, a vivid, vibrant opening, citrusy, peppery, coriander, and a juicy peach, which shifts to the heart notes to become darker, deeper, perhaps nostalgic: fragrant roses bathed in natural honey, earthy, slightly sweet-and-sour, driven by a green and earthy base, a very real patchouli. It’s sumptuous and artistic, and once you learn to appreciate it, it becomes an acquired taste. Lasts more than 10 hours on skin with strong projection.
I’ve worn Soir de Lune for 24 hours and I feel I don’t need any other perfume in my life. Fascinating. Incredible aroma with a wonderful powdery quality. It was a blind buy, but guided by a Spanish YouTuber. It reminds me of Animal and Dior Rose and Roses, though this surpasses them in beauty, sillage, and longevity. Happy.
A perfect perfume.
It smells like a 1930s jazz club. It’s dark and elegant. The sandalwood and earthy notes give it a mysterious air. I love it.
I wanted to review one of my favorites, but @LadyLazarus said it in few words, and that’s exactly right. I don’t know if it’s exactly a ‘jazz club,’ but it’s a cultured, elegant place without pretension, old (beautifully old, not musty), artistic, and with music, that’s the vibe. I’ll add the magical touch of someone with a cultivated inner life, wise and mysterious, very nocturnal, sometimes distant. I love it ^^
Soir de Lune is perfect, but not for everyone. I met it years ago at a perfumery and it impacted me so much that I asked what it was and requested a test spray, but hearing the price left me surprised. Shortly after, I bought it, and until today, the experience is unique. It’s different from everything, uncommon, special. I identify with it a lot. It never goes out of style. It leaves an incredible trail and draws attention. I love it.
Every time I wear it, I feel like selling the rest of my collection and keeping only this and Gozo by Jeroboam. I don’t know what Soir de Lune has that I love so much. When I wear it, I feel comfortable and elegant, as if the scent belongs to me. Definitely, I feel like it’s my go-to perfume.
It’s pure, elegant, and distant beauty… dry and slightly cool. The first thing that hits is coriander and pepper, with a touch of nutmeg. Then comes mimosa and a very proud iris, followed by the total darkness of moss and a resinous sandalwood, perhaps with honey, but nothing sweet. No jams here, only night roses, gloomy and of a shadowy green that’s almost scary. It smells of the past, of earth, of enigma; a fragrance that’s hard to imagine anymore. Complex, intense, unisex, and… worth every euro of its crazy price. Without a doubt, a prodigy of perfumery art.