Men
Santal du Pacifique
Acordes principales
Descripción
Santal du Pacifique by Perris Monte Carlo is an olfactory fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2016, the nose behind this composition is Mathieu Nardin. The top notes are carrot; the heart notes include violet, Gurjum balsam, lip gloss, and orchid; while the base notes consist of sandalwood and musk.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Carrot
-
Corazón
violet
-
Base
sandalwood
Comunidad
571 votos
- Positivo 74%
- Neutral 15%
- Negativo 11%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Santal du Pacifique y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
21 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Beautiful perfume and packaging. It’s woody and balsamic from the very first moment. Masculine, with moderate longevity and average projection. Highly recommended for lovers of woody fragrances.
Beautiful perfume and packaging. Smells of wood and balm from the very first moment. It’s masculine, with moderate longevity and projection. Highly recommended for lovers of woody fragrances.
A very woody perfume with an outstanding sandalwood base. It feels sweet and powdery. I’m currently testing four Perris Monte Carlo fragrances (Esence de Patchouli, Patchouli Nosy Be, Oud Imperial, and this one), and this might be the one I like the least. It reminds me of Loewe’s 001 but softened, less spicy, and more understated. It smells great, and maybe the issue is that my nose is saturated by the other three, which are more potent. While they win in power and sillage, this scent feels very natural. Perfect for elegant occasions without drawing too much attention. Scent: 9, Longevity: 7, Sillage: 6, Value: 5, Versatility: 9, Overall: 7.
A very woody perfume with standout sandalwood. It has a sweet, powdery base. I’m testing four from Perris Montecarlo, and this might be the one I like the least. It reminds me of Loewe’s 001 but softened, less spicy, and more discreet. It smells great, and maybe the issue is that my nose is saturated by the other three, which are more potent. Although they win in power and trail, this one smells very natural. Ideal for elegant occasions where you don’t want to draw attention. Scent: 9, Longevity: 7, Sillage: 6, Value: 5, Versatility: 9, Overall: 7
Santal du Pacifique by Perris Monte Carlo is a creamy, sweet, almost tropical sandalwood (at times it reminds me of a fleshy coconut), of exceptional quality and long-lasting. Very natural, nothing synthetic. It’s unisex, perhaps with a slight masculine lean due to its strength and dryness, balanced by a just-right sweetness that isn’t annoying. If you like sandalwoods, this is a must-buy. Nothing like the classic Acqua di Parma types that smell like a barbershop; this evokes a tropical, woody, and sweet beach with a slight dry touch. Well done, Perris Monte Carlo!
Santal du Pacifique by Perris Monte Carlo is a creamy, sweet sandalwood with almost tropical vibes (sometimes reminiscent of fleshy coconut), featuring top-notch quality and brutal longevity. It feels incredibly natural, with no harsh notes or synthetic edge. It’s unisex, perhaps leaning slightly masculine due to its strength and dryness, but balanced by a just-right sweetness that never becomes annoying. If you love sandalwood, this is a must-have. It has nothing to do with the classic Acqua di Parma Sandalo, which smells like a barbershop; this evokes a tropical, woody, and sweet beach with a dry touch. Kudos to Perris Monte Carlo!
It feels very refined, nothing heavy. It’s masculine but without that ‘alpha male’ vibe that sometimes even they can’t handle. It’s enjoyable. In its purest simplicity, it smells of woods with a herbal touch.
Looking for the perfect sandalwood, I was pleasantly surprised by Santal du Pacifique. It starts fresh and aquatic, which is unusual for a creamy scent, but soon settles into a straightforward line. The sandalwood is clear, with a milky touch reminiscent of light body lotion rather than a heavy cream. It’s a sandy wood that enhances the natural feel, accented by a musk that adds cleanliness. As it evolves, it softens everything and adds an unexpected hint of barrel-aged liquor. It transports me to southern summers, the sea, a beach at sunset in total relaxation. It’s an interesting olfactory aura with medium projection and longevity if applied well. Unisex, elegant in its discretion, perfect for smelling light and put-together on summer nights. High price, so test on skin before buying. (Courtesy of Rafasant)
As a first impression, the opening was a quite recognizable aroma for me: those mixes of sandalwoods, fig leaves, coconut, massoia, peppercorns… that you smell in Santal 33 and its clones, Stash SJP, Ferrari Silver… Perhaps finer and more polished, but heading that way. As it dries down, the sandalwood seems to me quite similar to Santal Majuscule. Good longevity with seemingly discreet projection. Not bad, I should try it more and without interference from other perfumes, but a priori I wouldn’t pay what it costs given there are similar aromas already.
One of the best sandalwoods I’ve ever smelled in my life: woody, balsamic, and creamy. The note feels of enormous quality.
I thought my search for the perfect sandalwood would end here… but it didn’t. Disappointed? Absolutely not. It’s a good sandalwood perfume, but the sandalwood I’m looking for isn’t recognized here. This one doesn’t have the typical nuances of Indian sandalwood (‘warm’ wood, white, spiritual…); it acquires a scent that jumps from a woody level to an ‘aromatic’ wood level. It reminded me a bit of Zara’s Energetically New York, saving the distance: Zara’s is synthetic and this feels very natural and high quality. It’s a discreet scent with great class, good longevity on skin but little projection and sillage. Personally, I stick with Diptyque’s Santal Eau de Toilette and especially Miller & Bertaux’s Indian Study / Santal +++ (despite its complicated launch that gives the impression of smelling wet cardboard).
I thought my search for the perfect sandalwood was over here… but it wasn’t. Disappointed? No. It’s a good sandalwood, just not the one I was looking for. This lacks the nuances of Indian sandalwood (warm, white, spiritual wood), jumping instead from a woody level to an aromatic resinous one. It reminds me a bit of Zara’s Energetically New York, though Zara’s is synthetic while this feels very natural and high-quality. It’s understated, classy, with great longevity on the skin but minimal sillage. I’ll stick with Diptyque’s Tam Dao and Miller & Bertaux’s Indian Study (though the latter smells like wet cardboard at first).
Ultra-refined perfume that just doesn’t work for me. At first, that dusty sandalwood overwhelms me, mixed with balsamic or resinous notes. Then, there’s little versatility; I only see myself wearing it at 70, sipping tea with a British monarch in a room full of ornaments and tapestries. Nothing, it just doesn’t fit. And look, I know it smells high-quality, but meh.
An incredibly refined fragrance that is nothing for me. At first, the prominent dusty sandalwood saturates me a lot, along with a balsamic or resinous note. Then, little versatility. I only see myself wearing it when I’m 70, having tea with a British monarch in a room full of ornaments and tapestries. Nothing. It just doesn’t fit me. And look, I perceive it as high quality, but meh.
I bought this fragrance blind… I’ve had it for nearly a month, here’s my take: It feels like pure quality, it’s almost entirely woody, I can’t doubt the ingredients. The wood scent dominates, as if you were smelling aged wood directly from the bottle; the carrot note is slightly perceptible. After an hour, that aged wood scent stops being so pronounced and becomes a bit softer, with a floral touch, although its dry-down doesn’t stray much from the initial scent. I consider it not for everyone: you must like woody scents because that accord dominates everything. After about 4 hours, it stops being perceptible to the wearer, but others can still smell it. It has a special charm, but you need an open mind. It works much better in temperate or cold climates than in hot ones. I only recommend buying it if you’re a fragrance lover; if you just want to smell nice, there are better options at this price, which in my opinion is a bit high.
This perfume is a delight. As a wood lover, I always use at least ten sprays and adore the aura it creates. The interesting thing is that it’s subtle yet confusing because it lasts forever and lingers on clothes for weeks. I’ve sprayed it on jackets for short outings, and days later, when I walk into a room, it’s still there. It’s an elegant scent, smells like a boss, with spectacular quality. It has me hooked.
This perfume is a delight. As a lover of woody scents, whenever I use it I put on at least 10 sprays and I love the aura it generates. It has the particularity of being subtle yet confusing because it lasts forever and sticks to clothes for weeks. I’ve sprayed it on jackets to go out for a bit, and days later, when I enter the room, the scent reaches me. It’s an elegant perfume, it smells like a boss, of spectacular quality. It has me fascinated.
A sandalwood fragrance, essentially soft, with a touch of sweetness, totally masculine, and moderate in sillage and projection. Elegant and discreet, very pleasant, as class and luxury should be. As always, try it for a few hours before buying.
This perfume features natural Australian sandalwood as its star, which I absolutely love. It makes me think of dry wood in a desert environment, like getting close to smell sandalwood dust, that commercial sawdust. To my nose, alongside that sandalwood, there are nuances of fig and coconut, even lactonic ones; paradoxically, although I perceive that creaminess and a certain sweetness, I feel it as a dry woody perfume. It’s as if the wood no longer has sap, parched by the sun of the Australian deserts. Several people perceive it as more masculine, but to my nose, it’s totally unisex. It lasts about 10 hours with notable projection. Like other woody scents, it conveys sobriety and calm. Scent 8.5/10, Longevity 10/10, Sillage 8/10, Value/Quality 6.5/10, Versatility 7/10, Packaging 9/10. I’d consider buying the full bottle when my travel size runs out.
Trying this perfume makes Santal 33 look vulgar and cheap. In my opinion, Santal du Pacifique is the best expression of sandalwood I’ve ever tried: high class, sophisticated, natural, with a totally balanced aroma, almost with a silky texture that caresses the olfactory senses. Everyone around you loves it. I see it as suitable for semi-formal occasions, unisex. If you like sandalwood and haven’t tried this, forget the rest and go for it: it’s spectacular.
Wow, this perfume caught me off guard. At first, I thought, ‘pfft, smells like cheap wood shavings,’ but then I’d bury my nose in my arm every three minutes. I love it: it starts with realistic wood notes and is followed by very pleasant floral touches. I put it on at 9 AM, and by 3 PM people were saying they could smell me from two meters away; even though I couldn’t detect it myself, the longevity and sillage are incredible. Plus, it smells different on my partner: no realistic wood, just a creamy iris. It’s a hit for me, though I feel it’s mature and formal, so I wouldn’t say everyone will like it. That said, it cost a third of what Santal 33 does, and in terms of quality, it gives that chemical junk a run for its money.