Men

Musc Ravageur

Maurice Roucel
Perfumista
Maurice Roucel
4.20 de 5
9,644 votos

Acordes principales

Descripción

Musc Ravageur by Frederic Malle is a spicy oriental fragrance for men and women. Launched in 2000, the nose behind this composition is Maurice Roucel. The top notes unfold lavender, tangerine orange, bergamot, coriander, and neroli; the heart reveals cinnamon, cloves, iris root, rose, and osmanthus; while the base notes land on musk, vanilla, tonka bean, amber, sandalwood, guaiac wood, cedar, animal notes, and patchouli.

Resumen rápido

Cuándo llevarla (votos)

  • Invierno 41%
  • Primavera 14%
  • Verano 6.6%
  • Otoño 39%
  • Día 36%
  • Noche 64%

Notas clave

Comunidad

9,644 votos

  • Positivo 81%
  • Negativo 12%
  • Neutral 7.8%

Pirámide olfativa

Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.

Comunidad

Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.

Propiedad

¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?

Uso recomendado

Estación y momento del día con más votos.

Dónde comprar

Compara tiendas verificadas para Musc Ravageur y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.

Amazon

Amazon

Envío rápido

Entrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.

Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.

Ver en Amazon
eBay

eBay

Más opciones

Más opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.

Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.

Ver en eBay

Características

Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.

Longevidad

Escasa

Débil

Moderada

Duradera

Muy duradera

Estela

Suave

Moderada

Pesada

Enorme

Género

Femenino

Unisex femenino

Unisex

Unisex masculino

Masculino

Precio

Extremadamente costoso

Ligeramente costoso

Precio moderado

Buen precio

Excelente precio

Reseñas

Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.

Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.

40 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

  • A modern and opulent reinterpretation of great animal classics. A very rich and addictive gourmand dry-down. A great perfume.

  • El poder del aroma

    I tested a sample a few weeks ago. To be honest: you can tell it’s high quality, very well balanced, and has good longevity… But it hasn’t convinced me enough to give it a ‘wow’ effect. I totally agree with blackened. For me, it also turns out to be a recreation of the heavy fragrances of the past, but with a more relaxed and modern touch. When I applied it, it seemed very similar to Muscs Koublai Khan due to that animalized musk side, but as it dried, it basically smelled sweet and playful. Yes, musky, maybe a hint of it. What stands out most is the amber and vanilla. I admit it’s undoubtedly high quality and pleasant, but it doesn’t offer anything new. And to pay €175 for a 100 ml bottle… I wouldn’t be able to do it for now.

  • Rachmaninov

    Musc Ravageur is a clear example of oriental perfumery. Although I prefer other orientals, I recognize it’s very well assembled. The musk is noticeable but not overwhelming. What stands out most is the dry-down: amber, sandalwood, and vanilla. In conclusion, it’s a rich and sensual fragrance with great longevity. Perfect for cold weather. Scent: 7, Originality: 6, Longevity: 8, Sillage: 7, Versatility: 6, Overall Rating: 6.8.

  • Emorandeira

    To me, it’s a very sweet perfume, quite wearable, though perhaps lacking in originality. It smells great; you can tell the ingredients are top-notch, it has good performance, and it follows current trends, but after trying it today, I’m left a bit indifferent. If it cost half the price, I might consider buying it, but I think there are similar options that are much more affordable. Scent: 8, Longevity: 7, Sillage: 6, Value for money: 4, Versatility: 8, Overall: 7.5.

  • Jorgepucela

    I’ve worn it… straight out of the bottle, it’s vanilla overload and powdery iris. I like it, the longevity is endless, and a bit more. Totally recommended, a 10.

  • Don Giovanni

    One of my favorite fragrances, a luxury for the nose and a masterpiece for the man of yesterday, today, and tomorrow. On my skin, it’s an insane amount of longevity and projection, the kind that makes you want to live. It suits every season, like most great perfumes.

  • FranSeatJones.

    A perfume my best friend would describe as ‘bookish.’ What a masterpiece this Musc Ravageur is. Yesterday I tested Lolita Lempicka’s L, and today I wanted to compare their performance; yes, they share some nuances. It’s an extremely powdery amber; at first, it feels like burying your nose in a jar of ground cinnamon and smoky woods. I catch a tiny bitter note, which I think is the orange. Over time, it turns into clean, elegant vanilla, gaining sweetness. It denotes maturity, though each has its own style. I don’t know why I see my father wearing it with joy, but if I bought it for him, it’s worth more than a shroud, and I think the price is justified.

  • It’s an absolutely brutal olfactory experience. Smells like custard with powdered cinnamon, but of the highest imaginable quality, backed by woods that provide a solid foundation. It’s mind-blowing, honestly. Although I’d never buy it given the price and the vibe, as an experience, it’s on another level.

  • Hey, it’s a clone of Ungaro pour L’Homme II, that collector’s classic by Jacques Polge. They share that resin, amber, and civet base that smells like depilatory wax, just like Aldo Ravin’s Pure Amber. The difference is the dry-down here is sweeter, almost vanilla-like, but in the end, they’re nearly identical.

  • Gervinmorales1

    Without sounding arrogant, I declare that this juice is definitely not for beginners or those playing it safe. It’s a bold, heavy, and complicated affair. It’s like abstract painting by Picasso or Soutine: the individual components make no sense, but the whole work acquires a beautiful fluid form. The fragrance should be appreciated as art. Musk dominates, with brief, well-orchestrated appearances of lavender, tonka, vanilla, and cedar. The balance creates a beautiful harmony. Best used outdoors on a very cold day, where it blooms and shows its true colors. Just handle it gently when spraying, as it has immense sillage and a lifespan of over 8 hours.

  • I expected something very different after reading the reviews. It didn’t disappoint, but as a fan of spiced vanillas, it didn’t particularly surprise me. What did surprise me is that, despite musk being a star note, it’s not overwhelming and is so well-blended, which is much appreciated. The opening is fresh and aromatic, but with the mask on and shopkeepers watching, I could only judge the dry-down, which I could smell in peace. It’s a delicious, suggestive, and very sensual base. A bit heavy and dense, more suitable for cold climates. Vanilla, tonka, sandalwood creaminess, amber… what could go wrong? It’s a good example of ambered vanilla with quality ingredients and composition, but it’s not original; it doesn’t tell any new story. However, as an olfactory journey, it’s a recommended stop.

  • The most delicious rice pudding I’ve ever had the chance to spray on myself… Deli deli… Definitely one of my great loves.

  • A house classic. What stands out most is the vanilla combined with musk, backed by tonka bean that tames the ‘dirtiness’ of the earlier notes. It conjures the scent of someone sweating during sex: that dirty but rich aroma that turns you on. I don’t detect any rice pudding scent, but every nose is a different world; no problem using it in any season (watching out for triggers) and climate. I see it as unisex leaning masculine. Lasts about 8 hours on skin and two more projecting, the latter within a meter. Without a doubt, an excellent perfume that must be in your collection.

  • Musc Ravageur is a unisex version leaning masculine of my beloved ‘cinnamon bombs’. I didn’t like the opening: the mix of musk, lavender, and clove was dissonant and too animalistic, like a botched aftershave. But a few hours later, it transforms into a delicious fragrance—citrusy, amber, woody, with cinnamon and vanilla. I like its tonka bean, which usually disagrees with me. When dry, it’s perfect for cold weather: cozy and enveloping without hogging the space. However, the opening is too much for me. It smells 90% like Mehareés by L’Erbolario; its opening is less unpleasant but its dry-down isn’t as well-blended. Given the 200€ price difference, I’d choose Mehareés. It also reminds me of Alambar by Laboratorio Olfattivo, though its dry-down is less refined and its price less competitive than Mehareés. Pleasant: 7/10, Interesting: 7/10, Versatile: 7/10, Original: 4/10.

  • It’s a mossy, spiced, and slightly sweet lavender. The opening is mossy and vintage, evoking old men’s perfumes. Then the stellar clove and cinnamon appear, accompanied by a warm vanilla that makes it cozy. As it dries, it takes on a woody, amber, sweet, and creamy character—very special. Although it’s unisex, I believe it shines brightest on a man’s skin. It’s rich and sexy, but not very modern; it’s vintage and aimed at mature men.

  • I was gifted a decant, and at first, when I applied it to my wrist, I found it extremely masculine. I pictured a mature, attractive man in a suit, with his life settled, respectable, and needing to prove nothing to anyone; it really smells like that. Masculinity and cleanliness, nothing more. I couldn’t imagine a woman wearing it; that was my first thought.

  • I don’t know what rice pudding you’ve tried, but if you haven’t tasted a good one, your nose is broken; this rice pudding has what I have as an astronaut. That said, the perfume has a sharp opening that surprised me for the better. As it dries, it keeps that aroma but moves to the background, becoming mossy, sweaty, and sweet; I liked it. Performance is quite good, though the price… that’s subjective.

  • JxtaPerfumes

    Welcome to another review from Jxtaperfumes: Musc Ravageur by Frederic Malle. Upon spraying, it floods the senses with a complex, realistic aroma featuring strong cinnamon, subtle lavender, and cloves, giving it an oriental and rigid touch. The opening is powdery and smoky, like tossing a layer of sweet, spicy dust into the air—a gourmet cinnamon dessert that leaves you craving another sniff. It lacks a middle note, consisting of two phases: a sparkling and cheerful one, followed by a mature, subdued, yet creamy dry-down. Excellent longevity on skin, though projection is weak. It’s pure niche: powdery, cinnamon dessert, vanilla, and citrus light, with the finesse and exclusivity worthy of the house.

  • Today I was at Mercadona looking for gazpacho, got distracted by the movie ‘The Unfaithful’, and it left me wondering: what kind of woman would cheat on that guy? That really shook my moral compass, especially combined with Madrid’s terrible game without a number 9, leaving me utterly fed up. Then, stuck in traffic thinking about Diane Lane’s tight squeeze, I realized that Frenchman should be wearing Musc Ravageur for those clandestine encounters. It’s the perfect scent for that: dirty musk, heavy cinnamon, vanilla, and a hint of clove that smells like sensual sweat. Enjoy it hard while Richard watches it being forged in fire.

  • jerry drake

    Maybe it’s me, but I don’t find it too vintage, nor as animalistic as they say. Perhaps the older versions, since Musc Ravageur is very docile on my skin, and any implication of something wild is misleading. What I clearly perceive is a delicious, sensual spiced Oriental with woody nuances; the opening reveals a soft citrus lavender with a very well-integrated clove accord. The cinnamon is designed to accentuate the clove, and together they form an almost perfect pair. The spice complements the wood satisfactorily, and the only flaw is that the cedar and sandalwood are too soft. As it develops on the skin, the vanilla and tonka take center stage, and the sweetness increases. It’s not cloying at all, but it pushes in that direction a bit, with the spicy edge keeping it grounded and preventing the base from losing interest. A more noticeable wood would have been excellent, but here there’s an abundance of a type of musk that attracts and seduces, subtle and infinitely deep. The musk can be a caress or sin itself—calm, soft, and tempting. It settles on the skin and merges with it. Musc Ravageur suggests desire, closeness, carnal union. What Maurice Roucel has created is difficult to express in words. He has captured a primal instinct in molecular form, almost brutally, in a perfume. I can’t even imagine what the first batches were like…

  • What a fragrance mismatch, in the best possible way. At first, I struggle to feel and distinguish the notes. What I definitely sense is the profile: sensual, sexual, animalistic. Cinnamon and lavender (to a lesser extent) are there. The vanilla note, from start to finish, opens up brighter and more luminous, settling into something powdery, mature, and classy. The woody tone helps give the composition that touch. It transports me to a bed. Sweat, carnal activity—call me weird, but that’s how I feel it. It’s a necessary fragrance in a collection for those specific days. It says too much for office use. Sincerely, when a scent has the capacity to evoke such a primal instinct in me, the creator has done something right. It performs and projects very well. A must-have in any collection. I have to acquire this. This is perfumery history. An 11.

  • Marcosvldzr1

    My friends say I smell old, haha, but I love this fragrance; it’s a work of art. On my skin, it feels very vanilla-forward, but it’s a natural, addictive vanilla with effeminate touches and tonka dancing among the ingredients. Note: this isn’t a blind buy.

  • Just in case anyone is interested, there’s an air freshener at Mercadona called Dèlice that smells quite similar to Musc Ravageur.

  • molletmod.73

    You’re mixing the legendary Guerlain Shalimar EDP—which feels unisex in today’s climate (and while it’s a timeless classic, it smells like my great-grandmother to me)—with typical ’70s and ’80s men’s fragrances, the ‘old school’ citrus, lavender, cinnamon, and clove kind. Here you get lots of vanilla, plenty of musk, heavy amber, and a woody base. Roucel isn’t lying; he’s a skilled perfumer, but he doesn’t innovate here; he’s just recycling the past. MR feels like a Westernized Oriental or a Western scent trying to look Oriental. To me, it’s not very original and surprised me for no reason. If you have an olfactory memory, you’ve smelled this before. The moment I smelled it, I thought: ‘I have a scent like this at home.’ Some critics or those who jumped on the luxury deodorant hype train sold this as the ultimate luxury body deodorant. It’s smoky. The price is exaggerated for what it is; they’re losing their minds, and there’s way too much hype, just like with many Frederic Malle niche products. It’s not very versatile, too heavy, and too mature (I doubt a 20-25-year-old wants to smell like this). There’s a lot of loudmouthed YouTube hype and people eager to make friends. Don’t pay attention to the easy ‘WOW’ and forced friendliness from those who just want to live off the hype.

  • samucel87

    Well, this perfume is in my collection by mistake. I don’t like it; I find it simply unpleasant. I can’t smell any lavender or citrus. I only detect musk and clove—that musk that smells like a gland, sour sweat, very unpleasant. Plus, it has a rancid, aged vibe, like walking into my grandfather’s bedroom that was closed for three years. I think it’s the clove’s fault; I’ve always hated it. Yes, it’s a very carnal and sexual scent, I suppose because of that sweaty note. It does give it a point, I won’t deny that. But if I want that feeling, I’d prefer any Francesca Bianchi perfume, like The Lover’s Tale, which achieves that aroma much better and more pleasantly. In summary: Age 100+, masculine, or better yet, a four-legged mammal. Cold, cold. Scent 5/10. Longevity 9/10. Duration +10h. Sillage 7/10, luckily because smelling like rancid sweat isn’t cool. Versatility 3/10. Price $$$ Final score 6.3/10, and that seems like the most I can give it.

  • Courtesy of Jerry Drake. A monumental fragrance that evolves vertiginously, leaving no time to recover from the olfactory shocks. You move between the sensual indolence of a Turkish palace and a sweaty den of the Parisian lumpenproletariat of the 1920s, passing through conifers, before reclaiming Turkish passions and lost paradises of opium dens in colonial Shanghai. The opening is explosive, turgid, like a Dance of the Seven Veils with a sweet chant preparing us for decapitation. A halo of perverse malice and sinful lust adorns the star amber, mixed with spices from the Silk Road: cinnamon, clove, vanilla, tonka bean, and Persian honey. Sweet, oriental, enveloping, dense yet sparkling and frenzied. This opening lasts only a few minutes before you’re suddenly in the Cabaret de l’Enfer on Boulevard Clichy, amidst fops, dandies, ladies of ill repute, thieves, traffickers, priests, and murderers. A pre-IFRA animal, sweaty, perianal, axillary, cocaine-addled, and psychedelic musk. A parasitic musk (Ravageur), as its name suggests, a louse that attracts and repels, offering a kiss then denying it. The game of sexual love made into perfume. Here it sheds its oriental pretensions to become a top-tier animal chypre. Obscene and lecherous. A devilish, vampiric brothel musk. It lasts longer than the first phase, acclimating you to the animal musk, the acrid galbanum, and the distant oud, undeclared notes since Roucel doesn’t have to list everything. Gradually, woody flashes appear—conifers, galbanum resins, and cedar—transforming it into a sturdy, torn resinous and woody chypre. The underbrush and coniferous forest unite in a procession of woods, resins, bark exudations, and impenetrable sun. But the oriental opening returns, alongside animal traits from the central stage and woody touches. Few fragrances possess such complexity and beauty, difficult for the general public to digest. Not for the inexperienced, but worth every euro, especially since it’s by Jerry Drake, the professor of perfumery.

  • First review on Fragantica. Short and unpretentious. This is the most faithful recreation of sex, carnal intimacy, secretions, and desire I’ve ever smelled. It’s brutal—not for everyone or every day—but it’s art.

  • maruphd@hotmail.com

    It’s an immense fragrance, more masculine than feminine. It’s not just a perfume; it’s a concept: a luxurious, expensive date at an ultra-sophisticated venue. People say it smells like sex, and while that sounds forward, it describes it well, probably due to the spicy and musky notes. To me, it smells like wood and spices, evoking a hug from a super-elegant Dubai gentleman. I don’t detect citrus or vanilla, maybe they don’t show up on my skin. It also smells like life, something alive, its very creation. It’s super hard to get because a world-famous Korean idol uses it, and fans buy it out instantly, plus it’s very pricey. It smells rich and just smells like rich.

  • It smells like an oriental cream or those herbal soaps with cinnamon and lavender, like walking into a Middle Eastern shop. It’s spicy and sweet, but not gourmand—it’s dirty. It doesn’t make me want sex or sensuality; instead, I just want to have some tea.

  • I feel like I’ll be alone with this, but the long-awaited sensory journey or the sexual impression I expected to capture… doesn’t exist. It’s a warm, fairly elemental oriental with a base I feel is softly fougere; I don’t know if because of all the clones or younger siblings that have appeared over these decades, I failed to understand, but let’s just say I didn’t perceive that nirvana moment of skin and passion that some mention around here. Honestly, I wish I had. Not monumental, not grandiose, not a masterpiece. It’s a perfectly constructed oriental, and if you like those notes, you’ll be thrilled, but I haven’t fallen for its supposed magic.

  • It’s a perfume with good nuances that develop slowly. The lavender at first gives that sense of cleanliness, though it’s very subtle. As it dries down, it improves and turns into a sweet, medium gourmand that even wakes up your appetite. However, it lacks originality; it seems inspired by amber-spiced perfumes from three decades ago. When I applied it, I thought of Kenzo’s Jungle Elephant. I think I had high expectations and thought this brand would have a different approach, but since this is the second one I’ve tried, I’m starting to think it’s not the case (at least in the lower price range). It’s not bad, better to try it and draw your own conclusions. Tested thanks to Mithrandir.

  • I’m convinced that this Musc Ravageur is an acquired taste: when I started my olfactory journey, I bought samples of F.Malle, including this one, French Lover, Bigarade Concentrée, and Vetiver Extraordinaire. The first two were repulsive at first sniff, while the latter two were just unpleasant. Over time, my opinion didn’t change with the others, but I grew to love this one until we reached 2024, and I can’t wait to have a bottle. It reminds me of many perfumes at once, mainly Shalimar and Ani, Lagerfeld Classic, Obsession Men, Eternal Oud, and BaV. Its opening is very spicy and aromatic, with lavender, clove, cinnamon, and mandarin standing out, the latter giving a bitterness reminiscent of Lagerfeld. As it dries down, the star is vanilla, very creamy and consistent thanks to the iris root and sandalwood. A true work of art. P.S.: I don’t know where they get the idea that it’s sexy; it smells elegant and formal, but not sexy at all.

  • On all fours. Against the verticalization of the body, MR brings you back to crawling, as a regression and fantasy of pure need. Bipedalism ends with a world mediated by smell, where the nose and instinct allow for the sustenance and reproduction of the species. The animalic nature of MR isn’t the promise of good sex, but the nostalgia of returning to the organic, to a wordless world where we can join together sniffing each other in search of genetic information, licking and mounting. There are no great triumphs, only the passionate certainty of something lost forever. A desire against desire. MR puts you on all fours, not to have sex, but to tell you: woof woof.

  • It’s a disaster for me: after a few seconds, it smells like a cat in heat. I admit it’s powerful and long-lasting, but since I don’t like it, that detracts instead of adding, even giving me a headache because it’s so heavy. On the other hand, a housewife loved it so much she asked for the rest of the bottle to use herself. That’s how my experience with this Musc from FM ends.

  • Scentleasar

    I’m going to buy the biggest bottle when I finish renovating and decorating my house. That’s how I really get my act together, hahaha.

  • It’s not for everyone, but it smells like what each person is looking for: a bunch of fermented herbs with a touch of lavender, as if an animal slept on you last night. Typical of Frederic Malle: it doesn’t seek consensus.

  • It could be the medicinal, adult version of Tobacco Vanille by Tom Ford, but while TF is like a summer song, this Musc Ravageur is an artist’s song; while TF is made for dancing and humming, this F. Malle creation is for listening to alone or with a very intimate partner. A magnificent composition where the sweet, soapy, and dirty notes blend in a sexually addictive way, just like in real life. The cinnamon, lavender, and animalic notes are of superb quality and noticeable. This isn’t about pleasing; it’s about urging you to be known in depth, so no matter the first impression, you can’t stop bringing your hand to your nose every few seconds. The balsamic touch gives it a medicinal feel, as if it were only bought with a prescription. No, it’s not a Tobacco Vanille at all, not in ingredients, maturity, or intention. But if it were, I’d have to compare it to a Greek mead that seduced the gods. It’s not gourmand or oriental despite the sweetness and density, but it has something that reconciles you with everything. Or maybe it’s like that secret love that only your own skin knows. Musc Ravageur.

  • They say what they say, but this perfume is pure gold: sexy to the point of being unstoppable, addictive, with incredible projection and longevity. It’s more of a masculine vibe but luxurious on a woman. A masterpiece of perfumery, 100% recommended.