Fahrenheit Cologne

9 reseñas

Mostrando las más recientes primero.

• georgequeue

  December 22, 2015

  

  Aqua Fahrenheit smells great (I love the scent), although the performance is poor, lasting at most 4-5 hours. I think Fahrenheit Cologne is almost the same, though even more discreet, so you shouldn’t have many expectations with this product.

• Dungvasil

  July 14, 2016

  

  Good scent; it’s a fragmented Fahrenheit that reminds me a lot of the classic, at least in the mid-notes. To clarify: they fragmented the classic by leaving the least attractive and interesting part of the EDT, removing the opening, longevity, sillage, and making it linear. Thus was born Fahrenheit Cologne, a disappointment. It’s not bad at all if you don’t compare it to the original. I don’t know why or who came up with this variant, which is a failure, at least from my point of view.

• Dungvasil

  May 16, 2017

  

  Honestly, I don’t recommend it due to its performance and poor value for money. Better to go for the classic or another perfume from a different house. For example, 100 ml of this costs the same as a Dior Homme and isn’t worth it at all. Hope I haven’t offended anyone.

• Tami Franco

  June 3, 2017

  

  Fahrenheit Cologne is perhaps the flanker most similar to the EDT (more so than Absolute, 32, or Parfum), but in one of those dubious reformulations. The scent lacks presence and the performance is mediocre, even with heavy application. At first, you feel the classic DNA, but it lasts only seconds; then the classic imprint disappears and it turns abrupt, extremely citrusy between tangerine, bergamot, and lemon. Rarely do the top notes settle (about 40 minutes). Afterward, it transforms into a dark phase that doesn’t know what identity to take, lasting an hour. It’s a perfume that evolves in blocks; it’s hard to distinguish the notes until the end. You notice the citrus at the beginning, then the characteristic violet, later nutmeg and caraway. Patchouli and vetiver are very discreet in the background. Cedar softens it among so many oriental notes. It gives the impression of a softened Fahrenheit EDT that doesn’t know what it wants. It’s not for summer: too dark for daytime and summer, and too short for winter and night. At first, I rejected it for that citrus vibe, but when the majesty of the EDT emerged, I had to give in, though with reservations about the lack of personality and mediocre performance. Optimistically, it’s a Fahrenheit to introduce yourself to the EDT and other flankers (except 32, which has nothing to do with it); it’s for beginners who fear the EDT. Passes barely. Scent: top and early-mid 4/10, late-mid and base 6/10. Sillage 5/10. Longevity 5.5/10. Versatility 4.5/10.

• Forzut

  December 27, 2017

  

  I think it’s a total scam: who pays 60 euros or more for a cologne that’s not worth a thing?

• Forzut

  January 15, 2018

  

  I think it’s a scam to charge 60 euros or more for an eau de cologne that’s not worth anything.

• daniiecrowley

  July 13, 2023

  

  What a fragrance! It’s citrusy and full of character. I find it very versatile: it has the essence of the original Fahrenheit but with more pronounced citrus notes. Ideal for spring and summer, it goes from casual to semi-formal. The only downside is the longevity: it projects well for two hours, then becomes a personal bubble and lasts a maximum of 5 hours on the skin, which I enjoy immensely. I wear it to work, for casual outings, and on vacation—it fits everywhere, and no one will smell you.

• Wilson Manolito

  June 22, 2024

  

  I only notice that Levantine citrus touch at first, but afterwards it smells just like the EDT: super masculine and lasts a good while (7-9 hours). Ideal for warm or mild days, a mature cologne that delivers.

• Wilson Manolito

  July 3, 2024

  

  I only notice that Levantine citrus opening; otherwise, it smells just like the EDT—super masculine and lasts 7-9 hours. Recommended for temperate or warm climates, it’s a mature cologne.