Skip to content

Cool Water Wave by Davidoff

Men 2017

Brand
Davidoff
Perfumer
Antoine Lie
Perfumer
Jean Jacques

Description

Cool Water Wave by Davidoff is a woody aquatic fragrance for men. Launched in 2017, this composition was created by Francis Kurkdjian, Antoine Lie, and Jean Jacques. The top notes reveal a marine freshness accompanied by grapefruit and Sichuan pepper; the heart unfolds with juniper and birch leaves; while the base notes anchor the essence with sandalwood and patchouli.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 3.4%
  • Spring 37%
  • Summer 51%
  • Autumn 8.3%
  • Day 84%
  • Night 16%

Key notes

Community

759 votes

  • Positive 76%
  • Negative 10%
  • Neutral 13%
positive reviews 759 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentSummer CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

2,209 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Summer

935 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

518 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About Cool Water Wave

Main accord aromatic Year 2017 Gender Men Perfumer Antoine Lie · Francis Kurkdjian · Jean Jacques

Cool Water Wave by Davidoff is a woody aquatic fragrance for men. Launched in 2017, this composition was created by Francis Kurkdjian, Antoine Lie, and Jean Jacques. The top notes reveal a marine freshness accompanied by grapefruit and Sichuan pepper; the heart unfolds with juniper and birch leaves; while the base notes anchor the essence with sandalwood and patchouli.

Spices Woods and mosses

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

517 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

584 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

380 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

358 votes

Community reviews

37 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Raphael.lavande

    Second review of the Davidoff house and this time one of the Cool Water flankers, this is Davidoff Cool Water Wave Eau de Toilette. A fresh summer fragrance that opens with a citrus-herbal accord that lasts approximately no more than half an hour, slightly keeping that salty note from its great predecessor. Afterward, to my nose, the herbal notes prevail again leaving a clean feeling of well-being. Its performance is not outstanding, but very modest, lasting about four hours and then disappearing without a trace on both skin and clothes. The perfume is not bad, it’s just that both projection and longevity are quite weak. Typical spring and summer fragrance, preferably for morning and afternoon. I would not recommend it for nighttime use because of what I mentioned about its performance and longevity. Its use is preferably casual and for mornings and afternoons in the indicated seasons. In short, a fragrance for spring and summer use both in the morning and afternoon, for casual use, with medium to low projection and sillage that is not unpleasant and will leave you with a clean feeling. Greetings.

    Reply
  2. Very nice refreshing scent although I only use it at home because its performance is terrible.

    Reply
  3. Ruben.patchouli

    Davidoff Cool Water Wave. A scent that is overwhelming in the opening and causes nothing but rejection, it dries down and ends up disappearing in 1 hour or less, everything very flat. Honestly I would not buy it or gift it, it is not even good for the gym. In Argentina it is one of the cheapest among the expensive ones and even so it is not worth it. It is the same as Bross London Classic which costs 5 times less. The original Cool Water is 1000 times better than this.

    Reply
  4. I have a 5ml decant, I have tried it a couple of times already. As a fresh scent, it is one of the best I have smelled. Very fresh, very youthful, very easy. Impossible for anyone to say they do not like it. It is not a perfume that stands out but I think it is great if you just want to smell good and clean. I already have it on my list of upcoming purchases. At the same time, I have other decants: regular Cool Water, Versace Pour Homme, Citrus Cedro, Tonka Lima, Bad Boy Cobalt, and this one beats them all in my taste. If it is on sale, safe blind buy. As I said, you may find it is not novel, but it is impossible not to like it. EDIT 2025: I feel that if I had it I would use it a lot 5/10 good frag

    Reply
  5. Starting from the fact that my nose is definitely not a sommelier’s nose, for me this Wave sits right between Invictus and Legend Spirit. Youthful, fun, and crowd-pleasing…. Pretty much everyone who smells it likes it.

    Reply
  6. I haven’t smelled this flanker yet, but I don’t understand why they say the classic CW stands out so much for its aquatic and/or marine notes. For me, it’s an extremely green fragrance, lightly accompanied by some citrus, on an ultra-discreet woody base. Mind you, I’m not saying it smells bad. Not at all. I owned CHEZ BOND by Bond No. 9. And they’re very similar. And you can instantly perceive the greenness of grass, a bit brightened with citrus, on a woody and/or oakmoss base.

    Reply
  7. This Cool Water flanker is a version that has nothing to do with the original, perhaps more youthful and summery. Where one is the ocean, this one is the pool. If Cool Water for me evokes that sea breeze while you’re standing on a rock with only the sound of the sea in the background, in Wave you’re sitting at a beach bar, drinking a cocktail, with laughter and jokes around. My wife particularly loves it, although I’ll always prefer the classic.

    Reply
  8. ChiaraVanille

    Personally, I’ll stick with the original; this one removes the classic characteristic marine saltiness in favor of a more modern sweetness. Problem? There are a ton of fragrances just like it on the market. Bad? No. Good? More of the same.

    Reply
  9. If the original Cool Water seems dreadful to me in almost every way, this Wave version is much worse, I expected this fragrance to at least be somewhat better, more pleasant and superior but it ended up being quite the opposite, this vulgarity seems to me a perfume not as aquatic nor as fresh as the normal version and what makes this Wave version even worse is that it also turns sweetish and cloying, all in all it doesn’t surprise me because many fans of the original Cool Water hardly take the Wave version into account.

    Reply
  10. Bruno.santal

    The new “Wave” of the old and ultra-green aquatic Cool Water. A necessary evolution toward less sharp aromatic notes toward a modern pepper with woods on a marine aquatic base, the house specialty. The opening of this Wave is dominated by citrus and intense pepper, with that marine base so characteristic of the original Cool Water. The pepper seemed pleasant and realistic to me, like its middle notes of juniper and wood; the juniper very intense. A soft sandalwood and an almost imperceptible patchouli dry down at the end. Luckily, it only brings slight reminders of the original. A fragrance for refreshing and reapplying in the middle of a summer afternoon. Its cost is reasonable for what it offers.

    Reply
  11. Fresh, comforting fragrance, with a cold opening, of sweetish morning breeze and early summer wake-up. It starts with an aromatic citrus, accompanied by a light and fresh green juniper nuance. I perceive an aquatic aroma harmonized with a young patchouli. You could say it is an aquatic patchouli in the dry-down. Overall, it is a good fragrance, pleasant to wear from start to finish and although synthetic, it is neither sharp, heavy nor cloying, so it allows for reapplication. On my skin it has good performance. I applied it at El Corte Inglés 5 hours ago and I still feel the scent intensely. A good choice for those who like aquatic patchoulis. A very current trend for summer perfumes or hot climates. It also has good deals. Totally youthful and 100% recommendable.

    Reply
  12. I just received it, I bought it in an excellent deal in 125 ml. And I bought it to complement my summer perfumes, original Cool Water, Night Dive and Nautica Voyage. Obviously a very fresh summer perfume with the heart and spirit of classic Cool Water, not as aggressive and with added fruit, the grapefruit notes are perceived as well as mint (although these are not in the perfume pyramid). I perceive some juniper and patchouli, along with the most predominant marine notes. A very good alternative for summer days, it can work well on nights of great heat and humidity. Price Quality: 10/10. Recommendable!

    Reply
  13. I finished my bottle of Cool Water, and before buying another one, I was gifted this one. I don’t know what to say, I have mixed feelings about this… flanker? special edition? (it doesn’t seem to be the typical citrus summer special edition, since this year’s Cool Water is called “Pacific”) … Right away I was surprised by a sweet opening, like melon flavor, the opposite of the bitter opening of the original. I find it woody, without mint in the leading role and with that marine aroma more muted. Maybe the sandalwood or birch it claims to have are responsible for that woody feeling, but I’m no expert in notes. As for the other “trademark” of the original fragrance, the “detergenty” touch, it’s present but also softened. It’s not the aggressive, uncompromising freshness of the original. I don’t dislike it at all, but it doesn’t convince me either. And then I wonder how it is that, with woody scents being among my favorites, this one doesn’t do much for me. Maybe because I’m a big fan and loyal to the original and I find this like a “neutered,” “sweetened” version, like a reinterpretation in line with the current fashion for sweetish perfumes… like a betrayal. I recognize lower sillage and longevity than the original don’t help either, which isn’t a marvel in those aspects either but is still superior. Maybe young people and people who generally like sweeter scents will like it and be able to appreciate it.

    Reply
  14. silas_bergamote

    Fresh, comforting fragrance, with a cold opening, of sweet morning breeze and early summer wake-up. It starts with an aromatic citrus, accompanied by a light, fresh green juniper nuance. I recognize an aquatic aroma harmonized with a young patchouli. You could say it’s an aquatic patchouli in the dry-down. Overall, it’s a good fragrance, pleasant to wear from start to finish and although synthetic, it’s not sharp, heavy or cloying, so it allows for overspraying. On my skin it performs well. I sprayed it at Corte Inglés 5 hours ago and I still smell it intensely. A good choice for those who like aquatic patchoulis. A very current trend for summer perfumes or hot climates. It also has good deals. Totally youthful and 100% recommendable.

    Reply
  15. The new “Wave” of the old and ultra-green aquatic Cool Water. A necessary evolution away from less sharp aromatic notes toward a modern pepper with woods on a marine aquatic base, the house specialty. The opening of this Wave is centered around citrus and intense pepper, with that marine base so characteristic of the original Cool Water. I found the pepper pleasant and realistic, like its heart notes of juniper and wood; the juniper very intense. A soft sandalwood and an almost imperceptible patchouli dry down at the end. Luckily, it only brings faint reminders of the original. A fragrance for refreshing and for reapplying in the middle of a summer afternoon. Its cost is reasonable for what it offers.

    Reply
  16. ClaraLavande

    I have a 5ml decant, I’ve tried it a couple of times already. As a fresh scent, it’s one of the best I’ve smelled. Very fresh, very youthful, very easy. Impossible for anyone to say they don’t like it. It’s not a perfume that stands out but I think it’s great if you just want to smell good and clean. It’s already on my list of upcoming purchases, and this one beats them all as my favorite. At the same time, I have other decants: regular Cool Water, Versace Pour Homme, Citrus Cedro, Tonka Lima, Bad Boy Cobalt, and this one beats them all in my taste. If it’s on sale, safe blind buy. As I said, you may find it’s not novel, but it’s impossible not to like it. EDIT 2025: I feel that if I had it I would use it a lot 5/10 good perfume

    Reply
  17. Finished my bottle of Cool Water, before buying another one, I was gifted this one. I don’t know what to say, I have mixed feelings about this flanker? special edition? (it doesn’t seem to be the typical citrus summer special edition, since this year’s Cool Water is called “Pacific”) … Right away I was surprised by a sweet opening, like melon, the opposite of the bitter one of the original. I find it woody, without the leading role of mint and with the marine scent of the original more muted. Maybe the sandalwood or birch it claims to have are responsible for that woody feeling, but I’m no expert in notes. As for the other “trademark” of the original fragrance, the “detergenty” touch, it’s present but also softened. It’s not the aggressive, uncompromising freshness of the original. I don’t dislike it at all, but it doesn’t convince me either. And then I wonder how it is that, really liking woody fragrances, this one doesn’t do much for me. Maybe because I’m a big fan and loyal to the original and I find this like a “neutered,” “sweetened” version, like a reinterpretation in line with the current fashion for sweet perfumes… like a betrayal. Lower sillage and longevity than the original don’t help either, which isn’t a marvel in those aspects either but is still superior. Maybe young people and people who generally like sweeter scents will like it and be able to appreciate it.

    Reply
  18. I just received it, I bought it in an excellent deal in 125 ml. And I bought it to complement my summer perfumes, original Cool Water, Night Dive and Nautica Voyage. Obviously a very fresh summer perfume with the heart and spirit of Classic Cool Water, not so aggressive and with added fruit, you can perceive Grapefruit notes as well as mint notes (although these are not in the perfume pyramid). I perceive some juniper and patchouli, along with the most predominant ones which are the marine notes. A very good alternative for summer days, it can work well on very hot and humid nights. Price Quality: 10/10. Recommendable!

    Reply
  19. mateo_labdanum

    Davidoff cool water wave A scent that is overwhelming in the opening and provokes nothing but rejection, it dries down and ends up disappearing in 1hr or less, everything very flat. Honestly I wouldn’t buy it or gift it, it’s not even good for going to the gym. In Argentina it’s among the cheapest of the expensive ones and still not worth it. It’s the same as the bross london classic that costs 5 times less. The original cool water is 1000 times better than this.

    Reply
  20. Raphael.santal

    if the original cool water seems dreadful to me in almost every way, this wave version is much worse, I expected this fragrance to at least be somewhat better, more pleasant and superior but it ended up being quite the opposite, this vulgarity seems to me a perfume not as aquatic nor as fresh as the normal version and what makes this wave version even worse is that it also turns sweetish and cloying, in the end it doesn’t surprise me because many fans of the original cool water hardly even consider the wave version.

    Reply
  21. Second stop in the Davidoff line, and this is one of the Cool Water versions: Cool Water Wave EDT. It smells fresh and summery, starting with a citrus and herbal note that lasts about half an hour, leaving a very faint salty trail. Then, for my nose, the herbs take over, giving a clean and refreshing feeling. Its performance is modest; it lasts around four hours before fading away without leaving anything on skin or clothes. It’s not bad, but the projection and longevity are weak. Ideal for spring and summer, morning and afternoon. I wouldn’t wear it at night due to its short duration. It’s for casual use in those seasons. In short, a fragrance for spring and summer days with low-to-medium projection that doesn’t bother anyone and leaves a clean sensation. Cheers.

    Reply
  22. Very good refreshing scent, but I only use it at home because its performance is terrible.

    Reply
  23. Trancemantis

    Davidoff Cool Water Wave smells overwhelming at first and only causes rejection; it dries down and disappears in an hour or less, feeling very flat. Honestly, I wouldn’t buy it or give it as a gift, not even for the gym. In Argentina, it’s one of the cheapest of the expensive ones, and still, it’s not worth it. It’s identical to Bross London Classic, which costs five times less. The original Cool Water is a thousand times better than this.

    Reply
  24. Trancemantis

    Davidoff Cool Water Wave is a scent that overwhelms at the start and provokes nothing but rejection; it dries down and disappears in an hour or less, very flat. Honestly, I wouldn’t buy it or give it away; it’s not even good for the gym. In Argentina, it’s among the cheapest of the expensive ones and still isn’t worth it. It’s the same as Boss London Classic, which costs five times less. The Cool Water original is a thousand times better than this.

    Reply
  25. I have a 5ml decant and have tried it a couple of times. As a fresh scent, it’s one of the best I’ve ever smelled. Very fresh, very youthful, very simple. It’s impossible for anyone not to like it. It doesn’t stand out, but I think it’s great if you just want to smell good and clean. I already have it on my list of next purchases. At the same time, I have other decants: Cool Water normal, Versace Pour Homme, Citrus Cedro, Tonka Lima, Bad Boy Cobalt, and this one beats them all in my taste. If it’s on sale, buy it blind; I’m sure of it. As I said, it might not be novel, but it’s impossible not to like it. EDIT 2025: I feel like if I had it, I would use it a lot. 5/10 good perfume.

    Reply
  26. I have a 5 ml decant, already tried it a couple of times. As a fresh scent, it’s one of the best I’ve ever smelled. Very fresh, very youthful, very easy. Impossible for anyone to say they don’t like it. It’s not a fragrance that stands out, but I think it’s great if you just want to smell good and clean. I already have it on my list of next purchases. At the same time, I have other decants: Cool Water normal, Versace Pour Homme, Citrus Cedro, Tonka Lima, Bad Boy Cobalt, and this one beats them all in my taste. If it’s on sale, buy blind with confidence. As I said, it might not be groundbreaking, but it’s impossible not to like it. EDIT 2025: I feel like if I had it, I’d use it a lot. 5/10 good perfume.

    Reply
  27. Bartholomew

    Starting with the fact that my nose isn’t a sommelier’s, this Wave for me is right between Invictus and Legend Spirit. Youthful, fun, and friendly… practically everyone likes it when they smell it.

    Reply
  28. I haven’t tried this flanker yet, but I don’t understand why people say the classic CW highlights aquatic or marine notes so much. For me, it’s a supremely green fragrance with a slight citrus touch, over a very discreet woody base. Note, I’m not saying it smells bad. Not at all. I had Chez Bond by Bond No. 9, and they have a lot in common. If you perceive the greenness of the grass instantly, a bit illuminated with citrus, over a woody and/or oak moss base.

    Reply
  29. This Cool Water flanker is a version that has nothing to do with the original, being perhaps more youthful and summery. Where one is the sea, this is the pool. If Cool Water for me evokes that sea breeze while standing on a rock with only the sound of the sea in the background, in Wave you are sitting at a beach bar, having a cocktail, with laughter and jokes around. My wife particularly loves it, although I will always prefer the classic.

    Reply
  30. Personally, I stick with the original; from this one, the classic salty marine touch has been removed to make something sweeter and more modern. Is there a problem? Yes, there are many fragrances of the same style on the market. Is it bad? No. Is it good? More of the same.

    Reply