Men
Cacharel pour L’Homme
Acordes principales
Descripción
Cacharel pour L'homme by Cacharel is a woody-spicy fragrance for men. Launched in 1981, the nose behind this composition is Gérard Goupy. The top notes are nutmeg, bergamot, lavender, and helichrysum; the heart features carnation, geranium, ylang-ylang, valley lily, cyclamen, and jasmine; while the base notes consist of fir, vetiver, cedar, oakmoss, sandalwood, amber, and musk.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Cacharel pour L’Homme y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I never thought a raw croissant perfume could please me so much. Sorry for the joke, it’s that on my skin the nutmeg persists to infinity and beyond, even with more potency over time. I love it. Having no vintage references, I don’t get upset and accept reformulations. I only have old minis to compare; in the case of Cacharel, it seems like a 2D version of the original. Still, I enjoy the latest version immensely. It’s a sexy masculinity perfume, in a totally different sense from today: it’s not muscular or hormonal, but evokes an honest, gentle, and fun guy. What makes it addictive is the dry down, not the opening. Under the nutmeg, I sometimes catch fir or oak moss, and it reminds me a lot of Massimo Dutti, but with less nutmeg.
This fragrance was an icon of masculinity and sensuality in the 80s and 90s. A spicy blend with nutmeg, high-quality vegetable and woody notes that made it legendary. It was a top seller and one of Cacharel’s most important perfumes. Today, reformulated, it’s not even a shadow of what it was. They’ve ruined the citrus and that memory effect is gone. The performance is a joke. I’m sorry, Cacharel, today it’s a scam.
I tried the reformulated version for the second time. To me, it’s just nutmeg water, no sharp edges, no floral grease, no wood, and that arrogant youth of the original. Just a watery woody air. Before, one could synesthesia; now I only think of dyes and thyme. This makes the Massimo Dutti imitation ridiculous. The limited edition is proof that something very similar with good performance can be achieved, but it’s limited and sold out. Maybe only teenagers buy the current version. Many of us will keep buying until we can only aspire to wear dirty nutmeg water. EDITED 07/31/18: several chains have the limited edition back. Yay!
In 1960 Jean Bousquet founded Cacharel, taking the name from a duck in the Occitan dialect. After a lightning success with the pink ‘Le Cacharel’ blouse in 1963, he revalidated his success with youthful and romantic designs. He collaborated with L’Oreal since 1978. My bottle is the 2017 Limited Edition, which they say preserves the 1981 formula. To me, it’s a brilliant, sparkling Spicy Chypre. Compared to Massimo Dutti EDT, Cacharel is more rugged and raw; Massimo is sweeter and floral. Cacharel evolves, leaving flowers behind for a deep, woody dry down with fir, cedar, vetiver, and cloves. Massimo is soft, sweet, and more amber. Both have moderate longevity, though Cacharel is slightly higher. If you’re not too picky, Massimo can pass as Cacharel. But if you want, buy both or even mix them; I did and it went from Chypre to Fougère with better longevity. Heresy? Maybe, but I’m an iconoclast.
I like it. Starts citrusy-spicy with nutmeg standing out and a clean touch from lavender and fir. In the mid-stage, florals enter with supporting woods, highlighting the vetiver. It stands out from the everyday; I haven’t loved it, but I feel comfortable. Good for the office, versatile for spring, autumn, and winter. Moderate performance and sillage.
I first bought Halston 1-12 because the Cacharel was out of my budget and their note similarity is notable. Comparing both, I see they share a lot, but each has its own essence. In short: Cacharel Pour Homme and Halston 1-12 are beauties worth wearing.
Fresh and aromatic, Cacharel Pour Homme flirts with old-school citrus, like Dunhill for Men or Signor Ricci, but with a spicy twist. Juicy aldehydic notes and a perfect sweet-sour sensation. In the dry down, a soft pine enriches without being loud. Then emerges the famous well-crafted nutmeg, immortal among the classics of the 80s. Accompanied by vetiver reminiscent of Guerlain. As it evolves, florals like lavender, carnation, and geranium appear. The finish is a feast: relaxed, fresh, creamy, and amber-like. An interesting classic with impeccable longevity thanks to its vetiver and nutmeg.
I remember 1988 in Madrid, at 15, in my uncle’s car. In the glovebox was a glass bottle perfume that smelled like paradise: nutmeg, jasmine, geranium, moss, and noble woods, strong and long-lasting. A year ago I saw it in a perfumery and my head couldn’t believe it; they had ruined it. It was no longer Cacharel Pour Homme, but a rancid nutmeg mess, an insult. Now it’s a ‘very diluted nutmeg water’.
For lovers of the original formula: does it remind you of Loewe 7 Anonyme EDP? I find it quite similar.
I always buy blind, trusting my youth memories, but this time I checked the reviews and the reformulation shocked me. Upon arrival, the scent seemed diluted and altered; I almost regretted it. But after checking the batch, I saw it was from 5 years ago. Let it rest for 5 hours and… magic! It’s back to being the classic with its charm and projection. My advice: don’t judge by the first impression, let it breathe.
An unforgettable classic, but we don’t get along because that marked nutmeg note overwhelms me; it feels astringent and even gives me a headache. That said, if you’ve never heard of it, it’s a fragrance you should try. PS: A friend’s wife often wears that scent, but I imagine it’s a women’s perfume since it’s not her style to wear men’s fragrances. Does anyone know which women’s fragrance this might be? Thanks, au revoir.
I’ve read that it has moderate longevity, but I’ve worn it for over 12 hours and still feel its presence, I suppose it depends on skin pH. I’ve known it since the 90s, from my first job at a perfume shop thanks to a very posh and perfume-obsessed manager. Thanks to him, I entered this world I can’t leave. The scent is unique and is one of my favorites. It’s quite persistent with good fixation and trail. Every true fan should have it on their list.
It’s been my signature fragrance until 3 years ago when I started trying other options. It’s wonderful, smells fantastic, it’s sweet, has longevity, and a good trail. As some forum members say, it’s very similar to Loewe 7 but without the incense. Highly recommended.
My first fragrance away from Crossman or Sportman. I was 14 and went with my grandma to the neighborhood perfume shop. She said, ‘Pick one, I’ll gift it to you.’ Imagine what a nose a 14-year-old had choosing Cacharel Pour Homme. It might be the nutmeg or because my mom wore Lou Lou, but either way, it blew my mind and I fell in love. Today, 25 years later, I keep the empty bottle as one of my best memories of my grandma, whom I recently lost. I started loving perfumes that day. I don’t remember the trail or longevity from back then, but I know now it doesn’t last long, though the scent still reminds me of that 14-year-old kid.
I don’t understand the comments calling it fresh or sweet; to my nose, it feels rough and dry. The opening lasts a breath, then comes a strange middle, and at the end, it smells like croquette dough due to the nutmeg. Maybe it’s like tonic water, where you get used to it, but with other scents, there’s no second chance. It’s a classic men’s cologne, though for that, I’d stick with Loewe. EDIT: After using it for a couple of weeks, it’s become one of my regulars. I stand by my point that it’s neither fresh nor sweet, but yesterday I saw a limited edition box, and I’m keeping it.
The quintessential 90s gem. While everyone else smelled like Cool Water, I smelled like Cacharel. I was the cool kid, no need to say more. It’s a must-have for any fragrance lover’s collection.
My brother had a dead bottle, so I picked it up. At first, it didn’t convince me, but over time I’ve come to appreciate it. It’s very herbal and aromatic, with a touch of incense at the end. I don’t see it as unisex and wouldn’t recommend it blindly. The trail and longevity are decent. It’s similar to the classic Massimo Dutti one, but this is more intense. It’s good for shy people who need to stand out. My final rating is 7.5.
They gave it to me for my birthday, 25 years after I first owned it. The bottle and box are identical, and luckily, the scent is too. I don’t care about longevity or projection; this fragrance doesn’t matter to me. It has that characteristic nutmeg that sets it apart from Loewe. It transports me back to age 14; it’s incredible how perfumes can take us back in time.
Cacharel Pour Homme from the 80s is a pioneering gem in an era of excess. It smells like winter vacations thanks to that addictive fir and spice note. The dry musk adds a powdery, fresh touch that’s enchanting. The current version has reduced the musk and isn’t as deep, but if you can grab the limited edition with the bird logo, it remains an timeless, earthy masculine gem.
I think I tested a bottle that had been sitting on the shelf too long, which took away its brilliance. The opening is citrus with lavender, but the dry down is a bed of wood and jasmine that smells nice, nothing more. The longevity is extremely short, so it feels like the potential was left half-realized. If I try it again with a fresh bottle, I’ll let you know.
I fell in love with this authentic bottle, one of my favorite designs, both old and modern, and logically I had to get the contents, blind buy. A fragrance from ’81 with that story couldn’t disappoint me. But one day I couldn’t resist and tried it; I loved the scent but not the longevity, which seemed very short. What a letdown, pressing my nose to my arm trying to convince myself it had quality, but no way! The smell vanished in no time and I shelved the purchase. Will I buy it someday? Maybe, just for the bottle, ains what a pity. But what joy I brought myself today!! I tried it again, the limited edition they say is better, and wow it really is. Three sprays on the wrist and I can smell it all day; after 12 hours I still catch it close to the skin, how great. It’s a scent I love, very evocative, as if I had smelled it already in someone back in my childhood. This fragrance transports me to another time, other situations; it’s easier for me to imagine stories, for example, in ’80s Madrid, of those people who one day perfumed themselves with the real Cacharel Pour L’Homme. Stories of high and low neighborhoods, robberies, infidelities, elevators, discos, Christmases… Like a film director or writer, a small detail serves as inspiration to start their story. Something like that happens to me with this scent. In a review I read they associated it with Christmas, it has clearly taken the #1 spot again, and next month it will be my mandatory purchase. Cacharel will be my Christmas perfume this year, ho ho hou!!!
I agree that Cacharel Pour Homme is a timeless gem, earthy and woody. The nutmeg note is the most beautiful I’ve encountered, superbly harmonized with the woods and the top notes that drive it into a spicy, sensual opening. I share that this masterpiece must be a must-have in any perfumery lover’s collection.
I owned this in my youth; today I only vaguely remember its scent. I wore it only for special occasions. Once, a girl from my crew gave me a compliment: ‘you smell like a man.’ She meant a mature man… and I really felt that way wearing this fragrance.
Connect and keep connecting, a rendezvous with life in many of its aspects: sensuality, ego, generosity, passion, nature. Sounds pretentious, yes, but it is huge.
After putting this perfume off for years, it finally arrived today, blind buy. At first, it felt like a unique, masculine take. After 10 minutes, it started reminding me of Loewe 7, but softer and more wearable. I really liked it. Will keep testing it out.
Very masculine scent, a blend of woods, lavender, and nutmeg. Already a classic. I usually don’t categorize by age, but this isn’t for teenagers. Highly recommended for shoulder seasons. A fragrance that appeals to women, lasts 6-7 hours, and projects well for the first hour and a half. Rating: 8/10.
An absolute classic in men’s perfumery, made for the people. Back when perfumes were crafted with love and brains to last. And trust me, it’s good because it’s been around for 42 years, and the Cacharel house now only has two men’s fragrances left in their catalog. Get real, Pepeluís. The rest is for women. Excellent aroma, mature, not for those overly sweet, ambroxan-crazed kids. It’s versatile, fresh, energizing, and puts everyone in a good mood immediately. It’s an EDT that, without being a lemonade-style cologne like 4711, offers a touch of classic fresh cologne without going full barbershop. It has personality, is well-made, designed to be elegant when needed while staying practical for work, study, or a date. Best of all, it’s reasonably priced at 45-50 euros for 100ml. You can find it everywhere at generalist perfumeries, no snobbish exclusivity. Even women love it; in fact, many buy it for themselves and wear it with delight. Among the 80s classics, this is one of the most wearable today without looking like a stiff old politician. What about longevity? Logical, my friend. With IFRA banning ingredients and a saturated market, expecting it to smell exactly like it did 40 years ago is like asking for a blow job when they deny you a shot with a cobra. A 2022 batch lasts about 6 hours on me, then fades to skin scent. Projection is about 30 cm for the first hour. In short: Cacharel Pour L’Homme: Wonderful. P.S. There are two editions, the Limited one with a sticker and the regular. I don’t know if there’s a difference and don’t want to judge without testing them. If you can, give them a try.
It was my first perfume. The first time a friend wore it, I was blown away. Perfumery has changed a lot since then, but even though I don’t wear it often, it still has a special place in my collection.
Joaquín Sabina says you shouldn’t return to the place where you were happy, and that’s exactly what happened with this new Cacharel Pour Homme. I owned it fifteen years ago, enjoyed it, but didn’t repurchase when I finished it. A few days ago I found a ‘Limited Edition’ at a well-known chain, assuming it would be better. Fed up with trying it and finding not a hint of what it used to be, I bought the February 2021 batch (the regular ones are from 2023). Big mistake. It’s identical to the current version: a watery mess with no punch that doesn’t even last. I agree with everyone else: save your money and grab any Massimo Dutti dupe that’s still in production. Honestly, it’s not worth it unless you find an old gem from seven or eight years ago. I’m outraged by what they’ve done; it’s an insult and a crime.
This was my signature scent at 16, along with Massimo Dutti. That spiced DNA with nutmeg and the green clary sage note is still there, but IFRA restrictions have neutered it bit by bit. It’s not the same anymore: back then you could fill an entire nightclub and it lasted forever; now, lucky you, maybe three hours but at least it’s safer 😂. The important thing is the soul remains intact, loaded with memories of when you were happy and didn’t even know it.
Luckily, I enjoyed this fragrance in the 80s. It seemed to me the most spectacular aroma I’d ever tried: the most elegant touch of nutmeg I’ve ever experienced. Unfortunately, the reformulations (I know the topic is overdone, but it’s true) have ruined the perfume. It still smells just as good, but nothing like the power and projection of the past. If it lasts you more than 4 hours, you’ll be lucky. Despite everything, I recommend it for its pleasant and elegant scent, perhaps even with a touch of sexiness.
It’s true, I also enjoyed it many years ago, in the past. Now it’s a pain, a huge frustration. The aroma, though no longer as harsh or penetrating, still retains its extreme elegance, but the performance is not even a shadow of what it was. A huge pity.
They’ve destroyed this perfume in its reformulation. It still smells just as good, but after 10 minutes, it’s as if you never wore it. It literally disappears from the skin. And they keep it priced above €50. I don’t know how they have the audacity to release a formula with less longevity and trail than colognes from ALDI.
It’s been my favorite for many years. I find it balanced, round, masculine, timeless, and elegant, suitable for daily wear and all seasons. But recent reformulations have turned it into an ephemeral cologne with almost no fixation. I have a bottle from 17 years ago with barely 5 ml saved to remember; that one lasts hours. It happened to it the same as the original Kenzo EDT: what’s sold now is just a shadow of what it once was.
I didn’t try it until last year. Several skin tests confirm it’s repellent to my nose. What does it smell like? Like a puddle of urine cleaned with Zotal.
It’s my signature. It fills my senses, I feel comfortable and confident wearing it on any occasion, climate, or season. Regardless of the listed notes, three undeniable ones come to mind for me: pepper, nutmeg, and cardamom. I might be wrong; I’m just a humble enthusiast. I received my first bottle as a gift in 1996 at age 19 and loved it immediately. I’ve used it in different periods, and when it runs out, I leave it aside to smell something different and miss it. It disappeared for two years, and when I found it in 2015, I bought two 100 ml bottles; the second one finished mid-last year. It’s surely reformulated, because sometimes my olfactory memory misses something. However, it seems fairly faithful to the first time I smelled it. It’s less persistent and lasts much shorter, but what can we do? At least it’s still available, and I hope to enjoy it until I die, hopefully buried with it.
It’s a cologne that disappears the moment you put it on the shelf. To be noticeable as a perfumed person in the afternoon, you have to reapply about 8 ml. The performance is desperate, including projection. I’m practically bathing in it to finish the bottle, goodbye Cacharel. Better to go for an Alvarez Gómez based on bergamot for the price. I don’t know what the original smelled like; here it’s a kids’ water. Save your money and for slightly more, buy an Aqua di Giò; an Obsession for Man by Calvin Klein is much cheaper and beats it a thousand times. Nothing like Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme, which reminds me of it a bit. That one is truly a great perfume.
What a crime they’ve done with this perfume! It was my signature from 1998 to 2002, and I hadn’t smelled it in ages. Yesterday I sprayed it, and it smells like a completely different fragrance, plus the performance is non-existent. What a shame to ruin a classic like this.
Excellent nutmeg scent, very different from what’s being done these days. Pity the longevity is so short.
A vintage gem that doesn’t follow fleeting trends; today and in 20 years, it will still sound incredible. It starts fresh and herbal, reminiscent of freshly cut parsley with a hint of anise. Then it evolves into something mossy, with tobacco and floral notes—very old-school and masculine, like what dads in the 80s wore with suits and full beards. Nutmeg and flowers blend together; I can’t distinguish much beyond geranium and clean lavender. They achieve a harmony without the harshness of modern perfumery. In Spain during the 80s, this was the status upgrade in an emerging men’s perfumery, leaving behind mass-market hits like Agua Brava or Varón Dandy. My mom gifted it to my dad on an anniversary, which made me try it in-store; I loved it so much I bought it. The bottle and box maintain the original design, perhaps with minimal changes. It deserves a spot on every serious collector’s shelf. In fresh springs or mild autumns, it fits like a glove, perfect for daytime use because it’s subtle, like a second skin. In current batches, the trail and longevity are moderate (6 sprays/6 hours). Reasonable price between €35 and €45 for 100ml given what it offers.