Skip to content

M/Mink by Byredo

Men Women 2010

Brand
Byredo

Description

M/Mink by Byredo is a fragrance from the olfactory family for men and women. Launched in 2010, this composition evokes the sensuality of skin and the mystery of mink, creating an intimate and timeless atmosphere that transcends gender distinctions.

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 31%
  • Spring 23%
  • Summer 11%
  • Autumn 35%
  • Day 46%
  • Night 54%

Key notes

Community

983 votes

  • Positive 58%
  • Negative 38%
  • Neutral 3.9%
positive reviews 983 community votes
LongevityLong-lasting SillageStrong Best momentAutumn CharacterUnisex

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I want it

2,165 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Autumn

500 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Night

274 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About M/Mink

Main accord amber Year 2010 Gender Men · Women

M/Mink by Byredo is a fragrance from the olfactory family for men and women. Launched in 2010, this composition evokes the sensuality of skin and the mystery of mink, creating an intimate and timeless atmosphere that transcends gender distinctions.

Woods and mosses Sweet and gourmand Musk, amber and animalic Flowers

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Long-lasting

320 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Strong

407 votes

Character

Leading answer Balanced

127 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Fair price

119 votes

Community reviews

11 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review

Add your review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with an asterisk.

Your rating optional
Your take, in one line optional
Your take, in one line

  1. Gentil vagabond

    A risky scent, but if you’re hooked on Kouros or Secretions Magnifiques, this is your spot.

    Reply
  2. Gentil vagabond

    Hard to risk, but if you’re hooked on Kouros or Secretions Magnifiques, this one is for you.

    Reply
  3. jerry drake

    Cooking helps you understand segregation timelines. While making pesto, I thought about what a friend’s daughter told me this afternoon: value not just what you say, but how you say it and how you stand. She likes this scent, minus one detail. To her, it’s a strange liquid; to me, a complete aroma. Having old-fashioned tastes forced me to realize others can love these proposals. Let’s talk, kid: your forward-thinking tastes open horizons. It’s an incredible generational olfactory exchange. For me, it’s still rare, an experiment more than a perfume, fascinating but repulsive. It manages to be different from what perfumeries sell. The prelude can be disturbing. Here, the ink works best: a prepotent chemical smell that later turns into a synthetic, dusty, greasy freshness. As Spartacus would say, it’s like working three days in a car workshop. Then, a synthetic shock: cyber incense worthy of The Matrix. The sillage is strong and penetrating. I don’t recommend buying blind.

    Reply
  4. My sense of smell is recovering, so I’m daring to try this. I can’t tolerate indifference; I need a fragrance to speak to me. And this one does. The lion isn’t as fierce as they paint; it’s not a perfume in the strict sense, it’s an experience. I don’t smell ink or fecal substances. We start well: an overwhelming opening but nothing extraordinary. What strikes me most is an explosion of resinous aldehydes of incense and labdanum. Then, a dirty, earthy patchouli that I love. An excessive, soapy animalic musk appears, fades in intensity, and doesn’t bother. What I like most is the dry down: balsamic, smoky, with turpentine and a touch of camphor. I can’t stop smelling my arm; it’s persistent and long-lasting. It’s masculine, not very versatile, for autumn and winter nights with grunge clothes. A solitary, nostalgic perfume. It transports me to three scenes: flowers, shrubbery, and straw on a ghost town road in the US, with scruffy guys in cornfields; an old lioness den full of dust, grain sacks, and a vintage Singer; or that train to the capital during my exams, with hope in my backpack. The city entrance: high-voltage towers, oxidized cars on dead tracks, shacks, and crowded people. A desolate, sad, yet human landscape. Illusion and desolation hand in hand. This fragrance evokes it, and well, because it makes us see how privileged we are and that we aren’t so far away. It fills me with humility and groundedness. Thanks to Bofifa for the sample full of mixed feelings.

    Reply
  5. Since my sense of smell has recovered, I’m attacking. I can’t stand indifference; a fragrance has to speak to me, whether good or bad. And this one does. The lion isn’t as fierce as they say, although for me it’s not a perfume, it’s an experience. It doesn’t smell like ink or shit. The opening is overwhelming but nothing extraordinary. What I love most is that explosion of resinous aldehydes of incense and labdanum, followed by a dirty, earthy patchouli. Then comes a raw, soapy animalic musk that I don’t like, but it fades in intensity and doesn’t bother. The best is the dry down: balsamic, smoky, with turpentine and a touch of camphor. I can’t stop smelling my arm; it’s persistent and long-lasting. It’s masculine, not very versatile, for remembering places and moments, ideal in autumn and winter with grunge wool clothes. A solitary, nostalgic perfume. It transports me to three places: a cornfield in a ghost town in the US with scruffy guys and scarecrows; an abandoned lioness den full of dust, grain sacks, and a Singer machine; or that train from my exams, with high-voltage towers, oxidized cars, and shacks of misery. It’s desolate but human, a mix of illusion and sadness that makes me feel privileged and humble. Thanks to Bofifa for the sample full of mixed feelings.

    Reply
  6. The start of M/Mink smells like human shit. Not goat, horse, pig, white flowers, civet, or castoreum. It’s the shit of an individual with a social security number going to the nearest Burger King. After shitting in a mall restroom, someone alerted cleaning to disinfect thoroughly. That’s what I perceive: a slap of fecal notes against disinfectant and industrial ones. The industrial tone comes from aldehydes, but I don’t understand how they recreate human excrement. There’s something that reminds me of Kouros, but where Kouros is civet/aldehydes, here it’s simple shit/aldehydes, without that nice algalia tone found in perfumes like Ysatis. Here there is no beauty; it’s stinky like a bus station toilet. Curiously, you can’t stop smelling it; the 3D image intrigues you. If it didn’t evolve, it would only be worth it as surrealism. But it turns and transforms into a dense, dirty, aquatic, masculine scent with earthy soap and incense, losing the fecal tone but leaving a trail. The essence is a cross between Aqua di Giò and Chanel Bleu: the water of the first, the incense and patchouli of the second. Diffuse, between aquatic and barbershop, masculine, neat, and for everyone. If you try it, it’s an experience. Longevity is excellent.

    Reply
  7. M/Mink is the most original and strange perfume I’ve ever tried. It’s rare, but within that rarity lies an exotic, almost hypnotic beauty. I compare it to Chihuahuas: the uglier they are, the more we like them because they seem funny; this perfume is the same, it’s not ugly, it has something I love and I don’t know what it is. The aroma is almost linear, it smells the same from the beginning: natural ink and fresh sap from a freshly cut plant, warm and sticky. It’s complex to explain. At the start it’s very intense, but then it wraps in a honeyed tone, warmer and cozier. Sometimes I see a mortar with crushed plants, that green and undefined smell flooding my nostrils. Other times I smell printer ink with a metallic touch, due to the aldehydes. Although it doesn’t sound cozy, it hooks you; it’s a subliminal beauty that whispers a spell. Performance is brutal: I put it on at 9:00 and at 18:45 I still notice it clearly. The trail is very diffusive. It’s for night and cold climates; winter and autumn are its allies, though on a cold morning like today it goes perfectly. It’s risky and not for everyone, but if you have the opportunity, don’t pass it up, you might find a lost treasure.

    Reply
  8. M/Mink is the most original and strange perfume I’ve ever tried. Rare, but within that rarity lies an exotic, almost hypnotic beauty, hard to explain. I equate it to Chihuahuas: the uglier they are, the more we like them because they seem funny. This perfume, despite its eccentricity, isn’t ugly; it has something I love and can’t explain. It has an almost linear aroma: from the start, it smells the same, a mix of natural ink and fresh sap from a freshly cut plant, warm and sticky, with a precious resinous tone. It’s complex to describe. This opening aroma lasts almost the whole life, except that at the end it becomes very intense and wraps in a honeyed tone, warmer and cozier. Sometimes I see a mortar with crushed plants and that green, fresh, undefined smell flooding my nostrils. Other times, I smell my printer ink, with that metallic touch, due to the aldehydes. Although the description isn’t cozy, the aroma hooks you; it’s a subliminal beauty that whispers a spell to make you surrender. Performance is very good: I put it on at 9:00, and now it’s 18:45, and I still perceive it clearly. The trail is good, very diffusive from the start. It’s for night and cold climates; winter and autumn are its allies, though on a cold morning like today it’s enjoyed perfectly. It depends on taste. It’s risky and not for everyone, but if you have the chance, don’t pass it up; you might find a lost treasure.

    Reply
  9. Damn, I just read Bofifa’s review and I have so many urges to try this M/Mink by Byredo. I’ve never smelled anything from the brand, it’s not sold in my city, and paying ten euros for a 1.5ml tube doesn’t seduce me. But I’ve always liked the house: the names and the bottle design, with that modernist cap that reminds me of some city in a comic. Investigating, I discovered it’s a commission by the studio M/M Paris, creators of the graphics for Balenciaga, Missoni, or Louis Vuitton. They are avant-garde, they love corrupting photos with colors and geometric shapes and finishing by hand in Chinese ink, style bohemian illustrations from the seventies. Could that ink smell mentioned by Bofifa come from there? It’s difficult; some call it a “novelty” item for the smell and because it seems inspired by Dada and Elsa Schiaparelli, a precursor to Moschino’s irony in the thirties. M/Mink wants to make nods to unpleasant concepts, but I’m intrigued that Bofifa likes it, although the perfume seems impractical on purpose. It carries incense, patchouli, honey, amber, and adoxal, a synthetic that mimics the valley lily. I love the name full of references: M/M is the studio, “ink” is ink, and “mink” is mink. Antagonistic concepts. Also, it has a metallic dry-down created on purpose; Ben Gorhman says they wanted it to smell like blood. Not sweet blood, but tons of blood. Isn’t that a similar idea to the first Comme des Garçons perfumes? I remember the Odeur 53 review: “smells like rivers of aluminum, hot blood, car engine…”. Could this be a conceptual perfume in their style? And above all, could it result in an interesting perfume to wear within Bofifa’s idiosyncrasy of aberration? I want to try it.

    Reply
  10. Damn, I just read Bofifa’s review and I’m itching to try this M/Mink by Byredo. I’ve never smelled anything from the brand, it’s not sold in my city, and paying nine or ten euros for a 1.5ml sample tube that I don’t know if I’ll like doesn’t seduce me. However, I’ve always been interested in this house; I like the names of their perfumes and especially the bottle design, with that almost modernist cap that reminds me of some city in a comic based on modernism. Digging a bit into M/Mink, I discovered it’s a commission by the graphic design studio M/M Paris, the creators of the graphics for brands like Balenciaga, Missoni, or currently Louis Vuitton. I know this studio’s work; they are very avant-garde, they love corrupting a photo using colors and geometric shapes to finish by hand in Chinese ink with drawings similar to bohemian illustrations from the seventies… could that ink smell mentioned by Bofifa come from there? Apparently, it’s a difficult perfume that some have categorized as a “novelty” item, first for its smell and especially because it seems inspired by Dada and creations like Elsa Schiaparelli’s shoe/hat, famous for her collaborations with Salvador Dalí and for being a kind of precursor to Moschino’s irony but in the thirties. M/Mink goes that way, wanting to make nods to multiple concepts that appear unpleasant in perfumery, yet I’m intrigued that Bofifa finds it quite interesting… although apparently the perfume’s nature is to be impractical on purpose. It carries incense, patchouli, honey, amber, and adoxal, a synthetic compound that mimics the valley lily. By the way, I love the name full of nods and references. M/M is the studio that birthed it, but “ink” means ink, and if you add the “m” in English, “mink” means mink… M/M, ink, and mink… such antagonistic concepts. Finally, it has a metallic dry-down created on purpose; Ben Gorhman says they wanted it to smell like blood. Not sweet blood, but tons of blood… don’t you find it a very similar idea to the first Comme des Garçons perfumes? When I was younger, I read a review of Odeur 53, and my youthful mind was very impacted by the way they sold it; it said, “smells like rivers of aluminum, hot blood, car engine, baby breath…” Could this M/Mink be a conceptual perfume in the style of Comme when they weren’t so massified yet? And especially, could it result in an interesting perfume to wear within Bofifa’s idiosyncrasy of aberration? I want to try it.

    Reply
  11. Well, what can I say about this perfume… First, it’s unique. Or rather, rare. It’s not generic or for everyone, certainly. Although defined as unisex, for me it occupies -invades- all the spectrum of masculine fragrances. I don’t see anything remotely feminine in it. Let’s talk about the opening. It can be extremely aggressive if you’re not used to perfumes like Kouros. In fact, with that last classic, it shares the same animal, musky, dirty accord, which some people remember as urine. This accord is accompanied by clean notes, but too “clean”. I don’t know if I’m explaining myself: detergent or disinfectant liquid notes. The combination causes a bathroom effect that someone has used after several weeks of constipation, and which was immediately cleaned and disinfected afterwards. Said that way, it scares, right? More examples of people I let smell M/Mink after applying it: “Smells like very dirty armpit. And also poop.” “Smells like an attic.” “Smells like car air freshener.” The curious thing is that this “dirty” core is accompanied by a sharp olfactory illusion of Chinese ink, but artisanal Chinese ink, made with natural products of very high quality. The combination of all these notes makes M/Mink a highly suggestive perfume, loaded with evocative images; some talk of stinky bathrooms, others of ink buckets, also of zoos or abandoned factories. I prefer to stick with the idea of a ruined industrial landscape, nocturnal, invaded by grass and wild plants, with shadows of vermin inhabiting it, beautiful but dangerous at the same time. Projection is quite high, and it lasts for centuries. For me, it’s a masterpiece and one of the niche perfumes worth paying its exaggerated price for. It seems of extremely high quality, and there’s nothing remotely similar. But it has a very reduced audience: to wear this, you have to be very individualistic, or bohemian, or used to eighties masculine fragrances (powerhouses). If you wear it, M/Mink will reward you with an aura of threat, of romanticism, of wild poetry that won’t leave anyone indifferent. Note: 10/10

    Reply