Skip to content

D by Alfred Dunhill

Men 1996

Perfumer
Gerard Anthony

Description

D by Alfred Dunhill is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 1996, this composition was created by perfumer Gerard Anthony. The olfactory pyramid opens with top notes of Amalfi lemon, pepper, mint, mandarin, cypress, and sandalwood; the heart reveals a harmony of rose, lavender, geranium, jasmine, valley lily, and freesia; and the base settles on sandalwood, Virginia cedar,…

Show more

Quick summary

When to wear it (votes)

  • Winter 6.9%
  • Spring 35%
  • Summer 31%
  • Autumn 26%
  • Day 75%
  • Night 25%

Key notes

Community

154 votes

  • Positive 81%
  • Negative 7.8%
  • Neutral 12%
positive reviews 154 community votes
LongevityModerate SillageModerate Best momentDay CharacterMasculine

The olfactory pyramid

A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.

The community speaks

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

In the collection

Leading answer I own it

449 votes

Season

Choose several

Leading answer Spring

204 votes

Time of day

Choose several

Leading answer Day

110 votes

Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.

Fragrance profile

About D

Main accord woody Year 1996 Gender Men Perfumer Gerard Anthony

D by Alfred Dunhill is an aromatic fougère fragrance for men. Launched in 1996, this composition was created by perfumer Gerard Anthony. The olfactory pyramid opens with top notes of Amalfi lemon, pepper, mint, mandarin, cypress, and sandalwood; the heart reveals a harmony of rose, lavender, geranium, jasmine, valley lily, and freesia; and the base settles on sandalwood, Virginia cedar, musk, oakmoss, tonka bean, vanilla, and amber.

Spices Green, herbal and fougère Woods and mosses Flowers White flowers Musk, amber and animalic

How it wears

Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.

Longevity

Leading answer Moderate

91 votes

Sillage

Leading answer Moderate

104 votes

Character

Leading answer Traditionally masculine

61 votes

Value perception

Leading answer Good value

51 votes

Community reviews

5 reviews

Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.

Write a review
  1. naso_en_ciernes

    Dunhill in the low-cost segment always hits the mark, even though they also have mid and premium options. Like Lapidus or Bogart, the house sometimes pays tribute to vintage 90s scents, like this D (I already own the lovely Black Edition fougère). Well-blended notes, several of them intense (moss is my favorite), with that solid, aromatic masculine floral vibe. There’s no sugary youthfulness or gourmand here, just floral in the style of three decades ago, always leaning towards the ‘macho man’ side, though a bold lady could wear it without issues. It’s versatile, suitable for day and night, more autumnal, perfect for elegant informal wear, and priced right for the low-cost category here. An Eau de Toilette without huge projection, but it doesn’t stay skin-deep; with generous applications, I get about 5 or 6 hours. It’s not an old-school barber-shop scent for mature men, but ideal for anyone who grew up in the 90s. Thanks again to Dunhill (I can definitely tell it’s different from Tommy Hilfiger to my nose).

  2. naso_en_ciernes

    Dunhill in the low-cost segment is always worth it, even though they have mid and premium options. Like Lapidus or Bogart, they sometimes make vintage 90s references, like this D (I already own the beautiful Black Edition fougère). Well-combined notes, several intense ones (moss is one of my favorites), with a solid, aromatic masculine floral vibe. There’s no sugary youthfulness or gourmand here; it’s floral in the style of three decades ago, always leaning towards the ‘macho man’ side, though a bold lady could use it without problems. It’s versatile, good for day and night, more autumnal, perfect for elegant informal wear, and has an accessible price. It’s an Eau de Toilette without great projection, but it doesn’t fade to skin-level quickly; with generous applications, I get about 5 or 6 hours. It’s not an old-school barber-shop scent for mature men, but it will be great for anyone who was a kid in the 90s. Thanks to Dunhill for this scent, which I perceive as different from Tommy Hilfiger, to my nose and according to what’s indicated there.

  3. A very good surprise. Dunhill usually makes classics, but this one breaks the routine: it forgets its typical fougères for something more festive from the 2000s. It’s dry, mossy, powdery with that rigid citrus touch and smell of a dirty comb or old shirt, à la Eau Sauvage. With D, it modernized and got youthful; it smells freshly showered, young as it was styled then, but a mature, cheerful man wears it well too. It has that mid-90s aromatic-spicy edge. It mixes the woody, musky base of CK One or Penhaligon’s Quercus with the spiced glass-cleaner taste of Tommy. It’s not as unisex as Calvin Klein, nor as heavy and overbearing as Tommy’s mineral lettuce; it’s the perfect blend of both. A crystal-clear, floral-spicy water very much of its era, when fresh perfumes left Kenzo’s marine lavenders and Cool Water behind. This one, like Hugo and Tommy, felt youthful, with that slightly dizzying aromatic-spicy cleanliness, like a fridge full of sulfurous lettuce and apples, or a calcareous waterfall. Current young people might find it old-fashioned, but in its time it was fresh and novel. It’s the scent of a guy in sport jeans, a white tee, Nike sneakers, and Ray-Bans. The D is super easy to imagine: a beautiful bottle in a classic matte tone, smells like Tommy Hilfiger but more loaded, floral, and musky. There’s an addictive moment with a creamy, herbaceous clash of cedar, mandarin, and cypress; as it dries, it’s very musky but keeps that cold, spicy vibe. It even seems like a unisex water at some point. The only downside is it feels synthetic, but all EDTs from that 90s current were synthetic anyway.

  4. A very pleasant surprise. Dunhill usually makes classic scents; it’s rare not to find a fougère or semi-fougère, although in the 2000s they went a more festive route. Dry, mossy, powdery colognes with that cardboard-like hesperide touch and a hint of dirty comb or stale shirt, reminiscent of Eau Sauvage. With D, they became more modern and youthful, perfect for straight out of the shower. It feels young as it was styled back then, but a mature, cheerful man can wear it too, diving into the aromatic-spicy currents of the mid-90s. It blends the woody, musky base of CK One or Penhaligon’s Quercus with the spiced glass-cleaner vibe of Tommy. It’s not as unisex as Calvin Klein, nor as heavy and mineral-cucumber-like as Tommy; D is the perfect mix of both. A crystal-clear, floral-spicy water very much of its time, when fresh perfumes stopped looking at Kenzo’s marine lavenders or Cool Water. This one, like Hugo and Tommy, felt youthful, sharing that slightly dizzying aromatic-spicy cleanliness, like a fridge loaded with sulfurous lettuce and apples, or a cascade of fresh, calcareous water. Old styles today, but fresh and novel back then. Nothing more than the scent of a guy in sport jeans, a white tee, Nike sneakers, and Ray-Bans. Imagining D is easy: a beautiful bottle in a classic matte tone. Tommy Hilfiger but more loaded, floral, and musky. There’s an addictive moment with a creamy, herbaceous clash of cedar, mandarin, and cypress; the drydown is very musky but keeps that cold, spicy tone, even seeming like a unisex water at times. The only downside is it feels synthetic, but that’s redundant because all EDTs from that 90s current were synthetic.