Tag-Him by Armaf
Men
Description
Tag-Him by Armaf is a spicy woody fragrance for men. The top notes are grapefruit, lemon, bergamot, and pink pepper; the heart notes are ginger, mint, lavender, and nutmeg; the base notes are vetiver, sandalwood, patchouli, and cedar.
Show more ↓Quick summary
When to wear it (votes)
- Winter 10%
- Spring 33%
- Summer 34%
- Autumn 23%
- Day 64%
- Night 36%
Key notes
-
Top
grapefruit
-
Heart
ginger
-
Base
vetiver
Community
825 votes
- Positive 74%
- Negative 14%
- Neutral 13%
The olfactory pyramid
A guide to the opening, heart and lasting trail of the fragrance.
The community speaks
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
In the collection
Leading answer I own it
2,898 votes
What do you think?
Leading answer Like it
825 votes
Season
Choose severalLeading answer Summer
1,290 votes
Time of day
Choose severalLeading answer Day
721 votes
Each question has its own vote count. You can choose several seasons.
Fragrance profile
About Tag-Him
Tag-Him by Armaf is a spicy woody fragrance for men. The top notes are grapefruit, lemon, bergamot, and pink pepper; the heart notes are ginger, mint, lavender, and nutmeg; the base notes are vetiver, sandalwood, patchouli, and cedar.
Spices Green, herbal and fougère Flowers Woods and mosses
It may remind you of
Ranked by what the community voted.
More from Armaf
Related editions
How it wears
Compare the results and tap an answer to add your vote.
Longevity
Leading answer Moderate
660 votes
Sillage
Leading answer Moderate
737 votes
Character
Leading answer Traditionally masculine
424 votes
Value perception
Leading answer Excellent value
413 votes
You may also like
Community reviews
39 reviews
Share what you noticed: opening, drydown, sillage and the moments when it works for you.
Smells very synthetic at first, with a pleasant masculine touch that later turns cloying and cardboard-like, with a peppery sting. If you’re looking to smell like Bleu de Chanel without spending a fortune, Club de Nuit Iconic is the best option.
It’s a pretty good perfume, though I had an issue: I think overusing the sprayers made it smell like insecticide, especially with the citrus notes which became unpleasant. It’s fresh, very similar to Bleu de Chanel, lasts 6 to 8 hours, and projects for 1 to 2 hours. The price is ridiculous; I recommend it, but don’t go overboard with the sprays.
This beast has a quick alcohol opening, then explodes into citrus (bergamot, grapefruit, lemon) with ginger that gives it character. Within this citrus, spicy, and marine backdrop, fresh, spicy, and herbal mint emerges, along with earthy vetiver and patchouli. Then lavender blooms, competing with the mint. In the base, a salty touch, cedar, and sandalwood add refinement and creaminess, becoming more powdery. It’s fresh, clean, and beautiful—an DNA I absolutely love. Compliments come in, and its performance is surprising: lasts 11-12 hours on skin and projects moderately for the first 2-3 hours. It’s versatile, ideal for spring, fall, and summer. Economical, exquisite, and highly recommended; surely no man will dislike it.
Hard to recommend blindly; although it has an excellent price and smells very much like Blue de Chanel, there’s something I just don’t like about it.
In particular, I love this DNA to wear all the time. It doesn’t last or project as much as we’d like; if you’re a fan of the Bleu de Chanel EDT, you know what I mean (just and necessary). It’s citrusy, spicy, clean, and beautiful, with a youthful yet formal vibe. There are thousands of perfumes with this scent; you just have to find the one you like best. It brings compliments.
This perfume costs half as much as the Iconic and six times less than the Bleu de Chanel. If you keep that in mind, it’s a good economical, versatile option with decent performance. Is it synthetic? Yes, and what did you expect for the price? The Iconic is less synthetic, and Chanel is lightyears away in quality.
I bought this perfume not because it was a Bleu de Chanel inspiration, but looking for a good citrus. While it is, there’s a note I don’t like that gives it a plastic smell when it dries. If you experience the same, better use Lanvin L’homme.
It’s a replica of Blue de Chanel but very weak. If you want a better option, Armaf’s Iconic is infinitely superior and lasts longer with better projection.
Like the Bleu de Chanel but less intense. It’s super light, barely there.
I have both Armaf Tag-Him and Bleu de Chanel (EDT) in my limited collection. Yes, it has a great resemblance to BDC, I’d say 85-88%, but the opening is very synthetic, linear, sharp, and alcoholic. It doesn’t achieve the scent bomb power that BDC has from the first spray. The power and projection are good and it lasts at least 5 hours on skin. As it dries, it stops smelling so synthetic and rough (though it never disappears completely). It doesn’t compare in quality to BDC, but let’s be honest: I bought Tag Him for $24 and BDC costs around $150. Do you have BDC and want a cheap clone that smells very similar for daily wear? Then Tag-Him is yours.
Tag-Him aims to mimic Bleu de Chanel but at a bargain price. The first spray smells like that familiar citrus-woody blend, though here the balance is more intense and sharp, with a black pepper note giving it a more aggressive vibe. The opening is closest to the original: fresh, with lemon and grapefruit evoking cleanliness and modernity. As it dries, lavender and ginger add spices, but they’re a bit rougher than in the original. The patchouli and cedar base gives it body, though it feels less refined. Decent performance for 5-6 hours, moderate sillage, and versatile for daily wear. It lacks Chanel’s sophistication, but it works as an affordable alternative; retailers will notice the ingredients aren’t as rounded.
I’ve been wearing Bleu and Perry Ellis almost simultaneously for years, and they were eerily similar—good quality. Armaf Tag-Him tries to copy it, maybe at 60%, dominating that synthetic aromatic citrus part. To me, it’s indifferent—not bad, but it does have very good longevity.
To be honest, it smells like a sharper, more synthetic version of Bleu, but for the price, I think it’s quite competent. The opening is the most grating part for me, but once it dries, the scent is quite pleasant. It lasts and projects enough; you won’t flood a room, but it doesn’t stick to your skin either. As an affordable fragrance, it’s good; I got mine for about $22.
Wow, what a terrible perfume this is. 0% recommended, stay away from this fragrance.
Calling this a ‘copy’ of Bleu de Chanel is a total joke. The latter is elegant, fresh, refined—you can tell it’s high quality. A truly memorable fragrance. This Tag Him is memorable too, yes… but it smells awful. Synthetic, metallic, and it’ll remind you you’re doing laundry. Spray it on one arm, smell it, then go to the laundry room and grab that ‘Bolivar’ lemon-scented detergent. You won’t notice the difference.
A totally fresh fragrance for the price is quite good; just reapply because the longevity is low. Usually fresh scents are short-lived, but this on my skin doesn’t last more than 4 hours; you’d need to apply it on clothes to make it last. Otherwise, very good.
A very low-quality version of Bleu de Chanel Eau de Toilette, with grating and extremely synthetic citrus notes.
I bought it for my husband based on comments saying it smelled like Blue de Chanel and was so good… but what a disappointing surprise, neither he nor I liked it. It reminds us of a cheap catalog perfume like Avon. Honestly, I expected more; my husband owns the Blue, and there’s nothing alike. Maybe they share the citrus, but that’s it. We tested it in December-January… let’s see if it performs better in summer, otherwise, I doubt we’ll buy it again.
I’d define this as a fragrance that’s ‘just right’ for what you pay and what it’s trying to emulate. Definitely it resembles Bleu, though I notice it’s a bit sweeter and fruitier. The opening smells alcoholic, citrusy, and fruity; after 15 minutes, it settles into sweet, fruity woods. I feel it lacks the depth Chanel has, but it’s very pleasant. I wouldn’t recommend it for extreme heat due to the woody notes. The only thing I didn’t like is that I can’t smell it after about 3 hours (I suspect it’s my imagination, as it happens to me often). Overall, it’s the most accessible clone of Blue de Chanel; I haven’t tried the CDN Iconic, but I assume it’s better (though its price is inflated by hype). Longevity: 5-6 hours, no doubt it lasts longer on others. Projection: 2 hours, good, nothing impressive. Scent: 8/10 if it’s similar to Bleu, just a bit less dense and sweeter. Price: 9/10, very economical and fair (I wouldn’t pay more than $30).
If it smells like air freshener to you, tell me which one it is?? Haha, this perfume is a bomb in terms of sillage and longevity. You wash your clothes, and they stay soaked with the scent. It’s citrusy, metallic, woody; for the price, it’s definitely worth it. I think it’s for special occasions, a date, going out; it’s too dense and heavy for daily wear. It smells like a super-rich man, plus you won’t smell like everyone else.
I don’t get why people like this. It smells like cheap, synthetic lemon bathroom air freshener. It’s piercing and low quality, nothing more.
I wasn’t trusting this fragrance; I eyed it but didn’t dare try it. I bought it because it’s inspired by Blue de Chanel. I tried the gold version and didn’t like it, but its longevity pleasantly surprised me. In the dry-down, it emulates Blue 90%. The sillage is moderate—not overwhelming but constant; if you get close, they smell it. Armaf has me impressed, though like any house, it has flaws; Tag Him isn’t one of them. Maybe the first sprays don’t deliver its full potential.
It smells great and is super comfortable. Its longevity is scarce during the day, but it lasts longer at night. It’s very versatile and masculine; I wear it mostly at night. I recommend it for special dates.
I bought decants of Bleu de Chanel EDP and this one; sometimes I confuse them. The only difference is that Bleu has a sweet base that Tag Him lacks, making it mostly citrusy. But you can’t expect much for the price; it’s an absolute steal. If you like Bleu but don’t have the cash, go for this; it’s a good alternative.
I bought it as a gift; I hesitated due to the price, but it was a surprise. As time passes, it smells richer: at first citrus, then pink pepper, ginger, lavender, and that effeminate touch. It’s super masculine, versatile, and evolves. I think it projects really well; wherever you go, they’ll smell it. It’s not for daily wear, but for night or special events. I love it; it has all three B’s.
This is my fourth Armaf fragrance, and I like it quite a bit. I agree it smells synthetic and metallic with a lemon-mint vibe, but in my opinion, it’s fine—not something to go crazy over. I disagree that it’s strictly for night; I’d recommend it more for daytime. Maybe it works for warm or tropical nights. Where I live, nights are cold, so it really depends on the weather. I haven’t tried Bleu de Chanel, but people say this is a clone. The price is good, as is typical for Armaf. Longevity and projection are decent, though not standout.
I absolutely love this perfume, and so does my wife. The Eau de Toilette lasts 6–8 hours and projects well. It’s exquisite: the top notes are citrusy and mentholated, and once it dries down, it smells truly delicious. I didn’t detect the metallic scent others mention. It holds its own against Chanel Bleu. I recommend it for night outs, but it’s also versatile enough for daytime wear.
Armaf Tag Him: The comparison to Bleu de Chanel is undeniable, but there’s a big difference. Tag Him feels more powdery and plastic-like, yet once it dries down, it becomes very pleasant, revealing a modern, subtly masculine scent. The quality of its notes, though artificial, doesn’t clash; it delivers on scent, projection, and longevity. It’s a true all-rounder: office, school, gym, or date. It’s good, cost-effective, and reliable. It won’t turn heads, but you’ll smell great. Scent: 8.0. Projection: moderate but noticeable for 2 hours. Longevity: about 6 hours. Recommended.
Armaf’s Tag Him: Undeniably resembles the Bleu de Chanel, but there’s a big difference. Tag Him feels more powdery and plastic, though it becomes much more pleasant in the dry-down, revealing a modern, subtly masculine scent. Although the notes are artificial, they don’t clash; it delivers on scent, projection, and longevity. It’s an all-rounder: office, school, gym, or date, and you won’t be left behind. It’s good, high-performing, economical, and reliable. It’s not a head-turner, but you’ll smell good. Scent: 8.0. Projection: moderate but noticeable for 2 hours. Longevity: approx. 6 hours. Recommended.
I bought it after watching YouTube videos and have no regrets. It’s the only fragrance I’ve ever purchased at a mall. It smells incredibly synthetic at first, but dries down to a rich, youthful, clean, amber, dry, and non-invasive scent. You can be sweaty, and this perfume keeps you from smelling bad. I recommend it.