Men
Ungaro pour L’Homme III
Acordes principales
Descripción
Ungaro pour L'Homme III by Emanuel Ungaro is a green aromatic fragrance for men. Launched in 1993, this composition features vodka, lavender, cilantro, sage, cedar, orange, and lemon (sour lime) in the top notes; rose, geranium, jasmine, and lily of the valley (muguet) in the heart; and sandalwood, patchouli, vetiver, oakmoss, cedar, and musk in the base.
Resumen rápido
Cuándo llevarla (votos)
Notas clave
-
Salida
Vodka
-
Corazón
rose
-
Base
sandalwood
Comunidad
1,531 votos
- Positivo 86%
- Negativo 9.2%
- Neutral 4.9%
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Ungaro pour L’Homme III y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
40 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
Elegant, just for connoisseurs. Its aroma is delicate, very masculine, just for a gentleman.
FINALLY!!! Finally, I have the bottle of the original formula made in France in 1993 (red box, red cap) in my hands. The first time I bought this fragrance was in the mid-2000s based on reviews from this site (the English version I’ve been following for years). I bought it knowing it was a reformulation and liked it quite a bit. I finished the bottle and didn’t buy another; it was a good fragrance but that was it. However, I couldn’t get the idea out of my head that I needed to try the original formula. A few weeks ago, an enthusiastic friend living in France told me: ‘I have an original Ungaro III from 1993, do you want it?’. I think the answer is obvious… With shipping to Mexico, it was over $150, but well, there was the opportunity. As soon as the box arrived, I applied two sprays to my wrist; I must say I was very disappointed at first. It smelled almost identical to Polo Green, completely woody with none of the roses or vodka people talk about. 30 minutes later, OH MY GOD! The scent of roses, lavender, and cilantro opened up in a super powerful way, not negatively, on the contrary, a delicious scent I never perceived in the reformulated formula. 4-5 hours later it changed to a citrus-musk scent and lasted on my skin for over 14 hours. Projection was over 8 hours. Definitely this original 1993 formula is the best. You will hardly find a fragrance more masculine and sexy than Ungaro III. It drives women crazy simply. A MASTERPIECE.
I love it, it makes me feel sober, elegant, a gentleman… and it seems somewhat similar to Chanel Allure Sport, with Allure being stronger. Cheers.
It was my first perfume, but it stayed in the past because they didn’t advance with new fragrances. Today, it’s only worn by men over 40; I’m not saying it’s bad, it was the trendy perfume in the 90s, but today it’s not, there are many better ones like the 2015 Dunhill Icon which has a similar (not identical) aroma with better longevity. It’s a bit pricey but worth it; you won’t regret using it.
This fragrance is superlative in every way! Masculine, mysterious, sexual, it has something ‘gothic,’ I don’t know how to explain it, but it’s the perfume I’d wear if Dracula were in his castle. You have to dress in black when wearing it; with other colors, I think it would clash. That rose tone is always tempered by vodka and mahogany, forming a flawless balance. I never thought a fragrance with a rose base would smell so masculine. I don’t consider it office-appropriate… I think it works better exclusively at night, but that’s just my opinion. 10/10.
A great discovery for me. Truly a hidden gem and a masterpiece of perfumery. It starts with a fleeting citrus-green freshness, but quickly deep nuances emerge like rose, lavender, and to a lesser extent patchouli and vetiver; together they create a unique and extremely pleasant harmony. It’s classic but original, conservative yet avant-garde; it sounds contradictory but that’s exactly it: it looks like a classic fragrance, but if you take a moment to reflect, there’s much more going on. What great handling of rose in a men’s perfume; a dark rose dominates the heart, giving it unique and sophisticated originality, purely masculine. It’s reliable in almost all settings and has the ability to captivate. Indispensable.
A hidden gem, it was a total discovery for me. At first, there’s a fleeting citrus-green freshness, but quickly the rose, lavender, and to a lesser extent patchouli and vetiver come through, giving it depth. It’s a classic but original and avant-garde scent; the rose is the protagonist, dark and masculine, dominating the heart and giving it a distinctive touch. At first glance it seems classic, but the peculiarity of its aroma makes it stand out and gives it unique and addictive originality. It has the potential to captivate; the rose is exquisitely crafted and absolutely doesn’t smell feminine. It’s a classy, reliable, masculine, and original perfume that doesn’t disappoint. Indispensable.
I don’t know what’s happening with my sense of smell lately. I tried this perfume and the experience didn’t match the glowing reviews describing an enveloping, boozy scent with a sophisticated rose at a niche level. I expected more from a 1996 bottle, when most perfumes offered great versatility. It smells very different and better in the atomizer and box than on the skin. The smell on the cardboard and the initial blast promise a magnificent dry rose with smoky wood, and the matte black bottle with gold details sells elegance. But on the skin, it’s something else: a fresh, citrusy, floral opening with a soapy lavender that smells like a light cologne, almost like a soda. Projection is very timid and fades in under 30 minutes, leaving a pleasant woody and spicy dry down, but that’s it. After 12 hours, barely a trace is noticeable. It reminds me of Herrera For Men, which shares lavender, lemon, geranium, and sandalwood, but without that dense accord of tobacco and sandalwood that smells like pencil shavings; this Ungaro has very decaffeinated woods. I see it as versatile, for daily use, without climatic issues or anything making it special; it’s not for special occasions. Honestly, I’m disappointed. Maybe I’ll use it daily. Perhaps I rushed the first impression. Scent: 6.5/10, Longevity: 4/10, Projection: 5/10, Versatility: 9/10.
Ungaro Pour L’Homme is woody and floral with fresh spices. It smells beautiful and very masculine, evoking the late 80s and early 90s when florals dominated slightly over woods, refreshed with cilantro and herbs. Rose and lavender are the star notes. It reminds me of YSL Jazz, Cartier Pasha, or Herrera for Men. It’s fresh, better for daytime, but also works for fresh evenings or nights. Projection is low, lasting only about 45 minutes off the skin, but on the skin it lasts over 12 hours. Given the scent and price, it’s worth it, especially if you like those classic perfumes.
I’ve been wearing Ungaro III since 1994 and it’s a delight. It’s a shame they discontinued I and II, but these are true gems. Perfect for fresh or cold days.
A slap with a white glove – Chapter III (Ungaro). Over 30 years in the world of scents haven’t taken away my trust in first impressions; I keep stumbling on the same rock. Fortunately, there are fragrances so special that they patiently win us over until we value them. I said in my first review that it wasn’t anything special and that I would empty my 1996 vintage bottle to move on to something new. How wrong I was! What a foolish thing I was about to do. It’s a liquid concoction with surprising exquisiteness, reaching peaks of delight. It fluctuates between sophisticated freshness and a pleasant floral frame. With sandalwood, patchouli, and sage weaving a gallant canvas, it brings to light an intoxicating rose bathed in vodka, plus a clean, coquettish, and opulent lavender. Finally, a woody musky base with a soapy touch. Performance: intermediate projection and excellent longevity. I consider it nocturnal, very versatile, with presence at family gatherings, formal events, or romantic dates. It integrates elegance with nonchalance. A serious ace up the sleeve. It conveys a man with an unforgettable smile and high personal worth. Rating: 10.
With the reformulation, I’d wear it on warm nights (spring-summer), something more nocturnal like Declaration Un Soir or Ultime de Galérie Lafayette, for something casual, a party, or drinks with friends. I loved it at first sniff.
I was lucky to try the 90s formula thanks to a collector friend who sold me a 5 mL sample. It differs in two things: 1. The opening. In the vintage, the lemon is pristine, noticeable, and strong; the transitions are slower and more defined. In the current version, from the start it’s a conglomerate that doesn’t let the lemon and lavender breathe. 2. The organic feel. The 90s version has a niche-like creaminess in the heart. Then they are almost identical, with the same longevity and projection. In summary, the reformulation went well; they didn’t mess it up like they did with so many others. It remains a rich perfume. Very masculine, elegant, and comforting.
I don’t know since when it was reformulated and I don’t know the original version. I tried it a few years ago and tried it again recently. It seems like a disaster. An unpleasant blend that, fortunately, has little body and presence, so we’re relieved of its existence. No rose, no lavender, no vodka (haha), or anything else. It’s spicy and nonsensical. In terms of quality, it’s among the worst. Lamentable performance in trail and longevity, which is good. The only positive: the price. I’m sorry.
Despite the rose, which is usually associated with opulent perfumes, this one is very calm, nothing exaggerated, and even seems muted sometimes. I’ve enjoyed it quite a bit; it’s fresh but nocturnal. It has major performance issues… I don’t know what happened in another era… it feels watery on the skin. A pity because based on the scent and price, it would be well recommended. I’m sure it was a great fragrance in its time.
An incredible and cheap perfume, ideal for going into a romantic battle. They say it was reformulated, but the sillage is good. I’m sure any girl who smells it thinks it’s very sexy… although I’ve used very expensive perfumes with no effect, this one scores higher. So, price doesn’t always indicate quality or guarantee success.
I love it for its versatility; at first it seems simple but hides sophisticated and well-thought-out work. It starts fresh and aromatic, then subtle floral notes enter to give it depth, ending with woods and sandalwood (I don’t detect vetiver). I use it daily, on weekends, for romantic dinners, and even in summer. It smells delicious, isn’t intrusive, and women find it sexy. All of this at an excellent price. A winning formula. I love it! Au revoir.
Not bad, but on my skin it smells stale :S The price is ridiculous and the longevity is just as poor. For the same money, there are better options.
One of my all-time favorite fragrances. It brings back the best memories from the 90s. The recent reformulation hasn’t hurt it as much as other scents. Highly recommended at 200%. I love it and I think I’ll always wear it.
A timeless classic that never goes out of style. While it reminds me a bit of Ralph Lauren Safari, it takes a different path: it’s darker, more intriguing, and elegant, with a vintage yet modern vibe. Perfect for architects, doctors, or lawyers who want to project success without being pretentious. It’s the understated elegance of a accomplished man, not for the young. Best used at night for formal events. Scent: 9.0, Projection: 7.0, Longevity: 8 hours (after the fourth hour, it stays closer to the skin). Recommended.
A woody fragrance that smells like a successful man in a suit. The price is a steal; it has such a rich, potent aroma that it seems worth much more.
Terrible. Smells like a drugstore perfume. Old-fashioned, like an English cologne or something similar. I’m shocked it has a 4 out of 5 rating.
Ungaro Pour L’Homme III. I’ve wanted this perfume for a while but never pulled the trigger until Victor, a fellow fragrance enthusiast, recommended it to me, and I couldn’t wait any longer. I just had to own it. As soon as it arrived and I tested it, it completely flipped my world upside down; I never expected this scent at all. It starts fresh, very aromatic and floral. The lavender is incredible—floral, talc-like, with that distinct soapy note really present. I assume the vodka is what gives it that fresh quality; I wouldn’t call it aquatic, but it conveys a similar sensation. After a few minutes, it turns spicy, the fresh notes remain, and it picks up a metallic nuance typical of geranium. This is where the rose appears, joining the current aroma and adding its floral character to the composition. Combining the rose with that fresh, slightly metallic, and spicy vibe reminded me of Moschino Toy Boy; they aren’t the same, but they share a similar approach to the rose, like rose water. Finally, I must highlight the patchouli, which, while not as perceptible as I’d like, is still noticeable. It’s earthy and green, carried by a classic facet without any hint of sweetness or chocolate. The longevity is average, around 6 hours, with a projection of one to two hours and a moderate sillage. I suppose in the past it would have been a beast, or at least much more potent than it is now. It’s a very versatile perfume, ideal for use all year round, both day and night. As for occasions… It’s an elegant scent that won’t look out of place in casual settings (except for sports). A very solid choice as a signature fragrance. It doesn’t seem unisex to me; despite the heavy floral load, it feels very masculine. That said, as I always say, ladies, try it and judge for yourselves. If you want to see more related content, check out my YouTube channel to see if you like it: Perfúmate Con JL.
I really wish they’d release an EDP version of this fragrance. The batch I have is terribly short-lived and it’s a real shame—even on clothes, it’s barely there. I have to reapply constantly; even when I’m generous, it lasts about 3 hours with only an hour of projection, which is extremely weak. It is affordable, sure, but it’s not worth reapplying that frequently. The scent itself is a very special, spicy, boozy rose that’s in no way intrusive. It’s quite intimate, if not too intimate.
The Gentleman of the Rose smells like a million roses bathed in Rock and Roll. It’s a proper classic fougère, similar to JFK, L. Del Rey, Jazz, Pasha, Safari, etc. The opening is astringent with mosses, crushed herbs, and an expectorant, mentholated lavender. Then the citrus notes and geranium emerge, smelling like masculine herbal soap. In the heart, it leans floral, with a meadow hay coumarin and a hint of alcohol, dusted with cedar and mahogany. Finally, it fades into a dark rose submerged in patchouli and wood, which reminded me of some ‘feminine’ fragrances. It’s nice, classic, and elegant. It’s definitely old-school, but as it dries down, it softens, becoming a bit more relaxed and even casual. My issue with fougères or ‘green aromatics’ is that most of them feel very similar; only subtle nuances manage to distinguish one from the other. For example, Pasha leans more spicy, while Safari is greener and soapy. Ungaro III is more floral: a dark rose and lavender dancing together in the full moon of the forest.
Over time, my opinion on this fragrance has changed; now it’s one of my favorites. The scent seems like the perfect blend of elegance and sexiness, to be clear, it smells like a ‘good guy.’ It’s super versatile, especially for afternoons and nights, and it smells absolutely delicious.
A classic and formal scent that, after an hour, reminds me of YSL Jazz.
I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite fragrance due to its short longevity, but without a doubt, it’s my favorite scent. It’s super versatile, sexy, somewhat fresh, but always making it clear that the wearer is a true gentleman. It’s timeless and addictive.
Oh my god, it doesn’t resemble Safari, Aromatic Touch by Rochas, or Lyric Man by Amouage… We’re lightyears away from any of them. Sometimes I wonder if the people voting for similarities even realize or know anything about perfumes. That said, I have to admit it’s really good. It reminds me of the shaving gels I use: it smells clean and, for heaven’s sake, very masculine. Please forgive my aversion to unisex scents, but that’s just not my thing. At first, it’s a bit boozy, probably due to the vodka, with lavender and citrus taking the lead; at times I can detect geranium and rose, and it ends with the same lavender, vetiver, and cedar. All of this, we have to admit, does lean a bit synthetic… but for the price, you can’t ask for more, right? In my opinion, the first version of Ungaro Pour L’Homme was the best of all. But honestly, it’s a pleasant, masculine fragrance, and from time to time, it even earns you a compliment or two.
What an amazing scent! I’ve been using it for over a decade since my twenties, and it smells nothing like anything else I’ve tried. It might share some similarities with other barbershop fragrances like Ungaro III, but it doesn’t resemble any classic closely. I buy it, finish it, and repurchase it a year or two later; every time I wear it, I remember why I’ve owned at least five bottles. It’s not a beast in projection, but the longevity is impressive. Luckily, I just managed to find the Bold and Gold version, which is no longer bottled but still available, and I recommend it even more because it’s denser and projects better. The notes are spot on: Estelar rose, a scent I absolutely love and which I believe is the vodka note, some sandalwood, and lavender. To me, it’s timeless and elegant.
A wonderful scent that reminds me of my father, who used to wear it before passing away at 54. A masculine, elegant, complex, warm, and woody aroma.
I think anyone looking for a fragrance wants that small moment of happiness when spraying it. Ungaro III from the 90s manages to draw a smile from ear to ear on me. It’s not just timeless; it’s refined in every aspect, smelling like a hyper-luxury barbershop. It projects enough to leave a memory on the wearer. I won’t get into reformulation debates because I simply don’t like them, and I believe profiting or claiming one batch is better is just a way to raise prices and deceive consumers. The story of Ungaro III isn’t erased by thousands of reformulations. How many fragrances would want to transcend the way this beauty has, does, and will continue to do so.
For the price, it’s an excellent fragrance very easy to wear daily. Too fresh and it suits me well as a teenager; I’ve received many compliments. After the first two hours, it radiates a lot, leaving a trail. It’s also a very uncommon scent. Excellent perfume.
Wow! What a scent. I once smelled something similar on my father; it evokes memories and feelings. It’s an excellent fragrance for the price paid. If you like citrus and woods, this is a safe blind buy.
Poor longevity and a soft sillage. It’s a classic fragrance meant for personal enjoyment. A wonderful old-school masculine scent dominated by lavender and those familiar retro notes. Avoid it if you prefer trendy sweet aromas; you’ll love it if you want something subtle, classy, and unconventional for today. I’m reviewing the current version, so don’t confuse it with the original formulas from decades ago that are no longer available. You won’t be bothered because it settles on the skin instantly, leaving a so pleasant aroma that you’ll want to replicate it all the time, despite its abysmal performance.
Very masculine opening, a bit strong for my taste, but it softens as the hours pass. I think lavender dominates, and I find a resemblance to Carolina Herrera for Men, just more intense. I wouldn’t buy it again.
Old-school vibe from the 80s-90s, classic, green, and 100% fougère. Very mature and masculine, smelling of citrus, geranium, rose, and herbal and woody notes; very much in the line of big 80s perfumes like YSL Jazz, Ralph Lauren Safari, and the recent Cartier Pasha, but fresher and less heavy. Lasts 6-7 hours without problems. You need some character to wear it daily if you’re under 40. If you like the classics, go for it. Plus, it’s affordable. Nowadays, like with Maison Emanuel Ungaro, it’s hard to find. Look for it, it’s worth it. Kids, fashionistas, or fans of sweet bubblegum scents, stay away.
It has a green note, but it’s not vintage; I see it as current, even though I’ve been wearing it for a few years. It’s not like Quorum or Paco Rabanne Pour Homme. It has a modern green vibe and dries down into a barbershop-style fragrance. It reminds me a lot of Tous Man Intense, though it doesn’t have the same longevity, but its opening is richer. It’s good for work, nothing too loud, lasts 6 hours without issues, and has a very reasonable price. There are many in that league, but this one stands out.
To me, it’s an old-school scent. The opening is a slightly bitter explosion of citrus and vodka, and as it dries down, it leaves that woody accord with a very striking and elegant rose. Special for a night out.
I’ve had this bottle of Ungaro III since 2019, and to be honest, I didn’t give it a second thought until the year 2025 ended. Now that I truly know it, it’s a great perfume: smells good, with rose and geranium notes over wood and a green touch. It smells like the 90s, but it doesn’t feel outdated; it’s different from what people wear today. Perfect for the office and transitional seasons. The trail is very masculine and pleasant. For the price, it gives way more than it costs, and nobody will smell exactly like you. JGS