Men
Madame Rochas
Acordes principales
Descripción
Madame Rochas by Rochas is an aldehydic floral fragrance for women. Launched in 1960 under the olfactory direction of Guy Robert, this creation opens with aldehydes, hyacinth, green notes, neroli, honeysuckle, bergamot, orange blossom, and lemon (sour lime). The heart reveals iris, narcissus, lily root, ylang-ylang, Bulgarian rose, violet, valley lily, jasmine, and neroli. The base settles on oakmoss, sandalwood, vetiver, musk, cedar, amber, and tonka bean.
Resumen rápido
Pirámide olfativa
Estructura completa de la fragancia: de la salida al fondo.
Comunidad
Qué dicen los usuarios sobre propiedad, preferencia y mejor momento de uso.
Propiedad
¿La tienen, la tuvieron o la quieren?
Preferencia
Cómo valora la comunidad esta fragancia.
Uso recomendado
Estación y momento del día con más votos.
Dónde comprar
Compara tiendas verificadas para Madame Rochas y elige según envío, precio o disponibilidad.
Amazon
Envío rápidoEntrega rápida y política de devoluciones conocida.
Ideal si priorizas velocidad y disponibilidad.
Ver en Amazon
eBay
Más opcionesMás opciones de precio, formatos y vendedores.
Útil para comparar alternativas antes de decidir.
Ver en eBay
Características
Resumen de votos sobre longevidad, estela, género y percepción de precio.
Longevidad
Escasa
Débil
Moderada
Duradera
Muy duradera
Estela
Suave
Moderada
Pesada
Enorme
Género
Femenino
Unisex femenino
Unisex
Unisex masculino
Masculino
Precio
Extremadamente costoso
Ligeramente costoso
Precio moderado
Buen precio
Excelente precio
Reseñas
Experiencias reales de la comunidad sobre uso diario, rendimiento y estela.
Para dejar una reseña necesitas iniciar sesión.
22 reseñas
Mostrando las más recientes primero.
Category:
I had this when I was 15. I remember it as fresh and sophisticated, not too strong or long-lasting, with personality but subtlety. Nothing cloying, very enjoyable. I remember it on rainy days; the romantic side of the perfume really came through. Without a doubt, a great scent I’d buy again in 20 years. I recommend it!
I tried it at fifteen and still remember it as fresh and classy. It’s not loud or overpowering; it has character without going too far. Nothing overly sweet, just very pleasant. I picture it on rainy days, where the romantic touch really shines. Definitely a great scent I’d buy again today and recommend.
Definitely a gentleman’s perfume. My mom has been using it for a long time, even before I was born, just like my godmother. And honestly, it’s so classic, sophisticated, and elegant that it never looks wrong wherever you wear it. Not just because it smells good, but because almost no one else uses it. Since my mom ran out of the bottle, I only have the body lotion left, which smells just as good as the perfume. Even my dad and my brothers have given me compliments, though not everyone likes it. Plus, it leaves an excellent trail and lasts for hours, if not days. I recommend it; you’ll love it. It’s a Rochas classic and never clashes, no matter your taste.
This perfume was my mom’s and brings me childhood memories. In my mind, it’s similar to Chanel No. 5 (maybe because of the aldehydes?): elegant…
It’s the fragrance that reminds me of my mom…
My grandmother’s perfume, delicious and intense, elegant. Just pleasant memories every time I smell it again, fully feminine. Sandalwood and musk stand out, a classic for life.
I bought it because a friend from my teenage years used to steal it from her mom, haha, but when I finally got it, I didn’t prefer it as much as I did back then. I had to set it aside during my pregnancy because it was too sweet for my taste, and it’s still almost full in my collection—I haven’t used it since, but it brings back lovely memories of my teens.
Just bought it and it’s super elegant, very distinguished, pure beauty and sophistication. My mom loves it and now I’m using it too. It smells like talc and woody roses, with a spicy note that suits my skin perfectly; it has great presence but a subtle charm. Definitely smells like that sensual glory of the past, like perfumes from before; a classic that will never go out of style for me. It reminds me a lot of Chanel No. 5.
A work of art by Guy Robert. Madame, despite appearances, is not an aldehydic in the style of No. 5 that usually dries on a bed of floral talc. It’s almost a chypre disguised as an aldehydic, just like First by Van Cleef. Both appear to be maternal talc lotions but are something else: sulfurous hybrids with the exact mix of moss, flowers, and herbs. Too bold to sell as innocent perfumes, yet not rough enough to be ruthless chypres. Madame is a standout component of that family of herbal, gaseous woody scents I adore: Miss Dior, First by Van Cleef, and Calèche. They have a mischievous personality, like a truant elf. All four remind me of those teenage girls who prefer hanging out with boys running around rather than sleepovers with friends. Today, Madame Rochas is an absolutely unisex perfume. I agree with Rebeca’s previous review: it captures a masculine tone, like high-end shaving foam. That’s the air that unites Miss Dior, First, and Calèche: a sulfurous, herbaceous narcissus with memories of nature, streams, mosses, and animal life. They position them as ambiguous and unpretentious formulas. Madame smells like luxury and something well-made, but it doesn’t take you to the protocol salon of a Faubourg Saint Honoré apartment; instead, it leads you to a bustling street in motion or to nature itself. A sublimated and delicate vision, yet almost wild. An unclaimed classic, and for me, one of the best perfumes ever created. I, who have a passion for soapy scents, find everything I’m looking for here: a perfect perfume.
Today I’m debuting Madame Rochas. Starting with the fact that it’s an aldehydic floral that I like, I must say it’s developing tones on my skin that I didn’t expect. Good tones, just not the ones I imagined. Reading reviews, I pictured something much more feminine and refined, but at least on my skin, it’s not like that… The aldehydes at the start are accompanied by some oakmoss, so its drydown feels like a mix between aldehydic and chypre, which I like, though I expected less chypre and more aldehydic. As it moves into its heart, I notice luminous florals with citrus and green tones, giving it freshness within soapy nuances that I perceive as masculine, like rich shaving soap. I think the vetiver does this, and personally, I like it. In its later stages, sandalwood is clearly noticeable, but a very fluffy and volatile sandalwood. It doesn’t feel like a night-only perfume as suggested in its profile, nor specifically winter… In my opinion and for my taste, it can have a wider range of use.
Today I’m launching Madame Rochas. It’s an aldehydic floral that I like, but I must say it’s developing tones on my skin that I didn’t expect. Good tones, just not the ones I imagined. Reading reviews, I thought it would be much more feminine and soapy, but on my skin, it’s not… The aldehydes in the opening come accompanied by some oakmoss, so the start feels like a mix between aldehydic and chypre, which I like, although I expected less chypre and more aldehydic. As it moves into the heart, I notice luminous florals with citrus and green tones that give it freshness, within soapy nuances that I perceive as masculine, like rich shaving foam. I think this is due to the vetiver, and I personally enjoy it. In the later stages, sandalwood is clearly noticeable, but very fluffy and volatile. It doesn’t feel like a perfume specifically for night use as the card suggests, nor is it strictly winter. In my opinion, it can have a wider field of use.
A work of art by Guy Robert. Madame, despite appearances, isn’t aldehydic like No. 5 and similar scents, which tend to dry down to powdery florals. Madame is almost a chypre disguised as aldehydic, just like Van Cleef’s First. Both seem like soapy, talcum-motherly lotions but are something else: sulfurous hybrids with the perfect blend of moss, flowers, and herbs. Too bold to sell as innocent perfumes, yet not as harsh as a ruthless chypre. Madame is a standout component of that strange family of herbal, gaseous woody scents I’m devoted to: Miss Dior, Van Cleef’s First, and Caleche—perfumes with mischievous personalities like a daredevil sprite. All four remind me of those teenage girls who preferred hanging out with boys running around rather than sleepovers. Today, Madame Rochas is an absolutely unisex perfume; I like what the previous review by Rebeca said, it captures a masculine tone like fancy shaving foam, and that’s the air that unites the aforementioned scents: a sulfurous, herbaceous narcissus, with memories of nature, streams, mosses, and animal life, positioning them as ambiguous and slightly unrefined formulas. Madame smells luxurious, well-made, but doesn’t take you to the formal salon of a Faubourg Saint Honoré apartment; instead, it takes you to a bustling street in motion, or even nature itself—a sublimated and delicate vision, yet almost wild. A classic not fully reclaimed, in my opinion one of the best perfumes ever created. I, who have a passion for soapy chypres, find everything I’m looking for in this, a perfect perfume.
My experience with Madame Rochas began with the post-1990 reformulations: a heavy floral with strong, unbalanced notes that made me lose interest. Much later, when I started finding original vintage formulas by Guy Robert in other fragrances, I realized I had to give it another chance. That’s when I found a parfum de toilette and understood why it was one of the most used in dressing rooms of the era. Analysis: A flash of aldehydes with a soft, soapy sensation of green moss and valley lily. The citrus fades after the first few minutes but remains present. The rose and jasmine hide shyly behind the lily. Sandalwood and vetiver form an interesting duo in the heart. Tonka bean is prominent. The valley lily, aldehydes, green notes, and a subtle citrus touch shine in Madame Rochas. In the dry down, it becomes more talc-like and musky. Madame Rochas is that woman who dresses simply yet elegantly, with class, free, and delicate. She is simple and complex at the same time. She doesn’t need diamonds or sumptuous gowns; she dresses without exaggeration and remains equally refined. Guy Robert wanted to make it warmer and fresher without losing complexity. I think of the same delicacy and punch I used for Calèche. A very interesting proposal from Rochas.
There are conceptual parallels between haute couture and perfumery. Industrial packaging has freed up countless hands and democratized fashion, but how much poetry has been lost in the process? Words like ‘fine dress’ or ‘attire’ now only appear in old movies. How much cultural heritage has passed through those hands! The same is true for perfumes; much has been lost. For someone like me, who still listens to vinyl records, wandering the vintage world in search of treasures feels comforting. The timeless elegance of this perfume fascinates me more and more. What a splendid combination of flowers and woods from those years, elevated by aldehydes that grant a lightness and thickness with a paradoxical weight that is deeply satisfying. We call some things ‘vintage’ as a compliment and others ‘outdated’ with disdain; Madame Rochas is a true beauty. Do you have favorite floral aldehydes? Do you think they smell too old-fashioned? If you want to smell or be like a lady who transcends time, MR is the key to unlock that door.
It’s the scent of a refined, elegant woman; upon smelling it, I remember my mother’s vanity with all her magical, feminine things. It has many notes, but the balance is incredible. A timeless beauty only for luxury lovers—I can’t see myself wearing it with a t-shirt and sandals.
A scent for a refined and elegant lady. The moment I smell it, I’m transported to my mother’s dressing room, filled with magical, feminine, and elegant treasures. It has many notes, but the balance between them is admirable. A timeless beauty exclusively for lovers of luxury; I can’t imagine it worn with a t-shirt and sandals.
It’s a classic. I can distinguish green notes, bergamot, neroli, lily, rose, violet, sandalwood, and cedar, which make it feminine and elegant. It’s not invasive or short-lived; several times people have asked me what perfume I’m wearing because it’s different from the mass-market ones. It’s a jewel that adds class.
Complex. On my skin, the aldehydes are very noticeable from the beginning to the end. Very vintage.
I bought Madame Rochas in April 2023, and almost a year has passed to give a final verdict and train my novice nose. For me, Madame Rochas was like Dolores Umbridge: a cold lady with a piercing gaze and chin held high. I spent about $30, and so eager to try it that I walked into a cathedral, only to be traumatized when I sprayed it. It was a slap in the face! I thought I could have spent that money on something else. I got a bitter taste in my throat and mouth, as if Dolores Umbridge was punishing me with blood and ink. It smelled like insect repellent to me. I kept it in its lace box on a red platform. Months passed before I showed it to my sister-in-law. I thought about saying ‘don’t even think about it,’ but I didn’t. I let Dolores Umbridge introduce herself her way. I took it out of the box, and she smelled it (I was nervous) and said, ‘it smells like cream.’ My head exploded! What? Of course, it smelled like anti-aging cream, like Nivea, but more floral. Dolores had already massaged the perfume with her breath, and that bitter taste trauma became anecdotal. Now, while I write, I’m wearing it, and it smells like clean floral, very nice. We get along well with Dolores Umbridge. I love her; she taught me something valuable about perfumery.
Right from the start, you can tell the age and quality. It’s one of those scents they no longer make, and there are no two alike. However, for me right now, the smell is too heavy, intense, and vintage, and it’s not what I’m looking for, but that doesn’t stop it from being a classy perfume. I imagine a well-dressed, fashionable woman wearing it while shopping in a European city.
The quality and age are immediately noticeable. It’s one of those unique scents they no longer make. For me now, it feels a bit heavy, intense, and vintage—not quite what I’m looking for, but that doesn’t stop it from being a great perfume. I picture it on a stylish, poised woman shopping in a European city.
Aldehydes with a floral touch reminiscent of the foam from the finest bar of soap. A hydrating, soft sensation with a very subtle floral nuance. It belongs to that vintage family alongside Calèche, Arpège, or Joya; it was an attempt to modernize aldehydes in the 60s. It’s a more timid aldehydic floral than its sisters, speaking to us today in a retro language. It’s pure perfume history.